Biomolecular coevolution and its applications: Going from structure prediction toward signaling, epistasis, and function

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1253-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehari B. Zerihun ◽  
Alexander Schug
Keyword(s):  
Rna Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Spatial Proximity ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Resolution Limit ◽  
Rna Structure Prediction ◽  
Experimental Resolution ◽  
And Function ◽  
Signaling Interactions ◽  
Evolutionary Fitness

Evolution leads to considerable changes in the sequence of biomolecules, while their overall structure and function remain quite conserved. The wealth of genomic sequences, the ‘Biological Big Data’, modern sequencing techniques provide allows us to investigate biomolecular evolution with unprecedented detail. Sophisticated statistical models can infer residue pair mutations resulting from spatial proximity. The introduction of predicted spatial adjacencies as constraints in biomolecular structure prediction workflows has transformed the field of protein and RNA structure prediction toward accuracies approaching the experimental resolution limit. Going beyond structure prediction, the same mathematical framework allows mimicking evolutionary fitness landscapes to infer signaling interactions, epistasis, or mutational landscapes.

scholarly journals A Method for RNA Structure Prediction Shows Evidence for Structure in lncRNAs

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Delli Ponti ◽  
Alexandros Armaos ◽  
Stefanie Marti ◽  
Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
Keyword(s):  
Rna Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Structure Prediction

scholarly journals A method for RNA structure prediction shows evidence for structure in lncRNAs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Delli ponti ◽  
Alexandros Armaos ◽  
Stefanie Marti ◽  
Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Rna Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Time Warping ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Rna Structure Prediction ◽  
Dynamic Time ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution

AbstractTo compare the secondary structures of RNA molecules we developed the CROSSalign method. CROSSalign is based on the combination of the Computational Recognition Of Secondary Structure (CROSS) algorithm to predict the RNA secondary structure at single-nucleotide resolution using sequence information, and the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) method to align profiles of different lengths. We applied CROSSalign to investigate the structural conservation of long non-coding RNAs such as XIST and HOTAIR as well as ssRNA viruses including HIV. In a pool of sequences with the same secondary structure CROSSalign accurately recognizes repeat A of XIST and domain D2 of HOTAIR and outperforms other methods based on covariance modelling. CROSSalign can be applied to perform pair-wise comparisons and is able to find homologues between thousands of matches identifying the exact regions of similarity between profiles of different lengths. The algorithm is freely available at the webpage http://service.tartaglialab.com//new_submission/CROSSalign.

Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Using a Improved BPSO Based on Stem Combination

2013 ◽  
Vol 325-326 ◽  
pp. 1551-1554
Author(s):  
Yi Qi
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Rna Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure ◽  
Experimental Results ◽  
New Method ◽  
Rna Structure Prediction ◽  
New Strategies

In this paper, we present an improved BPSO to predict RNA secondary structure to improve the performance with two new strategies. First one is to reduce the searching space of PSO through super stem set construction. Second is to modify the general BPSO updating process to settle stem permutation and combination problems. The experimental results show that the new method is effective for RNA structure prediction in terms of sensitivity and specificity by different sequence datasets including simple pseudoknot.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document