scholarly journals Correction: Learning from each other: ABC transporter regulation by protein phosphorylation in plant and mammalian systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 663-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibek Aryal ◽  
Christophe Laurent ◽  
Markus Geisler
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphorylation ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Abc Transporters ◽  
Higher Plants ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Transporter Family ◽  
Fk506 Binding Proteins ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
High Degree

The ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter family in higher plants is highly expanded compared with those of mammalians. Moreover, some members of the plant ABCB subfamily display very high substrate specificity compared with their mammalian counterparts that are often associated with multidrug resistance (MDR) phenomena. In this review we highlight prominent functions of plant and mammalian ABC transporters and summarize our knowledge on their post-transcriptional regulation with a focus on protein phosphorylation. A deeper comparison of regulatory events of human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and ABCB1 from the model plant Arabidopsis reveals a surprisingly high degree of similarity. Both physically interact with orthologues of the FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) that chaperon both transporters to the plasma membrane in an action that seems to involve Hsp90. Further both transporters are phosphorylated at regulatory domains that connect both nucleotide-binding folds. Taken together it appears that ABC transporters exhibit an evolutionary conserved but complex regulation by protein phosphorylation, which apparently is, at least in some cases, tightly connected with protein–protein interactions (PPI).

scholarly journals Learning from each other: ABC transporter regulation by protein phosphorylation in plant and mammalian systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 966-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibek Aryal ◽  
Christophe Laurent ◽  
Markus Geisler
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphorylation ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Abc Transporters ◽  
Higher Plants ◽  
Multi Drug Resistance ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Transporter Family ◽  
Hsp 90 ◽  
Post Transcriptional Regulation

The ABC (ATP-binding cassette) transporter family in higher plants is highly expanded compared with those of mammalians. Moreover, some members of the plant ABC subfamily B (ABCB) display very high substrate specificity compared with their mammalian counterparts that are often associated with multi-drug resistance phenomena. In this review, we highlight prominent functions of plant and mammalian ABC transporters and summarize our knowledge on their post-transcriptional regulation with a focus on protein phosphorylation. A deeper comparison of regulatory events of human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and ABCB1 from the model plant Arabidopsis reveals a surprisingly high degree of similarity. Both physically interact with orthologues of the FK506-binding proteins that chaperon both transporters to the plasma membrane in an action that seems to involve heat shock protein (Hsp)90. Further, both transporters are phosphorylated at regulatory domains that connect both nt-binding folds. Taken together, it appears that ABC transporters exhibit an evolutionary conserved but complex regulation by protein phosphorylation, which apparently is, at least in some cases, tightly connected with protein–protein interactions (PPI).

scholarly journals ArabidopsisImmunophilin-like TWD1 Functionally Interacts with Vacuolar ABC Transporters

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3393-3405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Geisler ◽  
Marjolaine Girin ◽  
Sabine Brandt ◽  
Vincent Vincenzetti ◽  
Sonia Plaza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Abc Transporters ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Calmodulin Binding ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Domain Mapping ◽  
Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain

Previously, the immunophilin-like protein TWD1 from Arabidopsis has been demonstrated to interact with the ABC transporters AtPGP1 and its closest homologue, AtPGP19. Physiological and biochemical investigation of pgp1/pgp19 and of twd1 plants suggested a regulatory role of TWD1 on AtPGP1/AtPGP19 transport activities. To further understand the dramatic pleiotropic phenotype that is caused by loss-of-function mutation of the TWD1 gene, we were interested in other TWD1 interacting proteins. AtMRP1, a multidrug resistance-associated (MRP/ABCC)-like ABC transporter, has been isolated in a yeast two-hybrid screen. We demonstrate molecular interaction between TWD1 and ABC transporters AtMRP1 and its closest homologue, AtMRP2. Unlike AtPGP1, AtMRP1 binds to the C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat domain of TWD1, which is well known to mediate protein-protein interactions. Domain mapping proved that TWD1 binds to a motif of AtMRP1 that resembles calmodulin-binding motifs; and calmodulin binding to the C-terminus of MRP1 was verified. By membrane fractionation and GFP-tagging, we localized AtMRP1 to the central vacuolar membrane and the TWD1-AtMRP1 complex was verified in vivo by coimmunoprecipitation. We were able to demonstrate that TWD1 binds to isolated vacuoles and has a significant impact on the uptake of metolachlor-GS and estradiol-β-glucuronide, well-known substrates of vacuolar transporters AtMRP1 and AtMRP2.

scholarly journals Bcl-2 and FKBP12 bind to IP3 and ryanodine receptors at overlapping sites: the complexity of protein–protein interactions for channel regulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Vervliet ◽  
Jan B. Parys ◽  
Geert Bultynck
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ryanodine Receptors ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Fk506 Binding Protein ◽  
Fk506 Binding Proteins

The 12- and 12.6-kDa FK506-binding proteins, FKBP12 (12-kDa FK506-binding protein) and FKBP12.6 (12.6-kDa FK506-binding protein), have been implicated in the binding to and the regulation of ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs), both tetrameric intracellular Ca2+-release channels. Whereas the amino acid sequences responsible for FKBP12 binding to RyRs are conserved in IP3Rs, FKBP12 binding to IP3Rs has been questioned and could not be observed in various experimental models. Nevertheless, conservation of these residues in the different IP3R isoforms and during evolution suggested that they could harbour an important regulatory site critical for IP3R-channel function. Recently, it has become clear that in IP3Rs, this site was targeted by B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) via its Bcl-2 homology (BH)4 domain, thereby dampening IP3R-mediated Ca2+ flux and preventing pro-apoptotic Ca2+ signalling. Furthermore, vice versa, the presence of the corresponding site in RyRs implied that Bcl-2 proteins could associate with and regulate RyR channels. Recently, the existence of endogenous RyR–Bcl-2 complexes has been identified in primary hippocampal neurons. Like for IP3Rs, binding of Bcl-2 to RyRs also involved its BH4 domain and suppressed RyR-mediated Ca2+ release. We therefore propose that the originally identified FKBP12-binding site in IP3Rs is a region critical for controlling IP3R-mediated Ca2+ flux by recruiting Bcl-2 rather than FKBP12. Although we hypothesize that anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins, but not FKBP12, are the main physiological inhibitors of IP3Rs, we cannot exclude that Bcl-2 could help engaging FKBP12 (or other FKBP isoforms) to the IP3R, potentially via calcineurin.

scholarly journals Molecular Functions and Pathways of Plastidial Starch Phosphorylase (PHO1) in Starch Metabolism: Current and Future Perspectives

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10450
Author(s):  
Noman Shoaib ◽  
Lun Liu ◽  
Asif Ali ◽  
Nishbah Mughal ◽  
Guowu Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Higher Plants ◽  
Crop Improvement ◽  
Starch Biosynthesis ◽  
Starch Metabolism ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Starch Phosphorylase ◽  
Integral Role

Starch phosphorylase is a member of the GT35-glycogen-phosphorylase superfamily. Glycogen phosphorylases have been researched in animals thoroughly when compared to plants. Genetic evidence signifies the integral role of plastidial starch phosphorylase (PHO1) in starch biosynthesis in model plants. The counterpart of PHO1 is PHO2, which specifically resides in cytosol and is reported to lack L80 peptide in the middle region of proteins as seen in animal and maltodextrin forms of phosphorylases. The function of this extra peptide varies among species and ranges from the substrate of proteasomes to modulate the degradation of PHO1 in Solanum tuberosum to a non-significant effect on biochemical activity in Oryza sativa and Hordeum vulgare. Various regulatory functions, e.g., phosphorylation, protein–protein interactions, and redox modulation, have been reported to affect the starch phosphorylase functions in higher plants. This review outlines the current findings on the regulation of starch phosphorylase genes and proteins with their possible role in the starch biosynthesis pathway. We highlight the gaps in present studies and elaborate on the molecular mechanisms of phosphorylase in starch metabolism. Moreover, we explore the possible role of PHO1 in crop improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document