Human papillomavirus regulation of SR proteins

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1116-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie McFarlane ◽  
Sheila V. Graham

Splicing is a cellular process essential for mRNA biogenesis. There are two types of splicing: constitutive and alternative splicing. During constitutive splicing, non-coding intron sequences are removed and exonic coding sequences are spliced together to form mature mRNAs. Alternative splicing can maximize the coding capacity of the genome by specific alternative selection of exons from multi-exon metazoan pre-mRNAs. Splicing is a tightly regulated process, so when control is lost disease may occur. SR proteins (serine/arginine-rich proteins) are a family of highly conserved splicing regulators that are also involved in other steps in RNA biogenesis and expression. Many viruses have evolved to utilize the cellular splicing machinery to enhance their proteome from a limited number of genes. HPV (human papillomavirus) is an example of one such virus. The HPV transcription/replication factor E2 (early 2) specifically up-regulates expression of the SR proteins SF2/ASF (splicing factor 2/alternative splicing factor), SRp20 and SC35 in infected epithelial cells. These SR proteins are essential for viral RNA processing. SF2/ASF is a proto-oncogene that is also up-regulated in a number of cancers. For example, SF2/ASF, together with SRp20 and SC35 is selectively up-regulated in cervical tumours caused by persistent oncogenic HPV infection. However, the mode of SR protein up-regulation in tumours is different to the E2-directed transcriptional regulation in normal transient HPV infection. SR proteins could provide excellent targets for HPV antiviral therapy as well as anticancer therapy.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 5400-5408 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Zhang ◽  
J Y Wu

The p54 protein was previously identified by its reactivity with an autoantiserum. We report here that p54 is a new member of the SR family of splicing factors, as judged from its structural, antigenic, and functional characteristics. Consistent with its identification as an SR protein, p54 can function as a constitutive splicing factor in complementing splicing-deficient HeLa cell S100 extract. However, p54 also shows properties distinct from those of other SR family members, p54 can directly interact with the 65-kDa subunit of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF65), a protein associated with the 3' splice site. In addition, p54 interacts with other SR proteins but does not interact with the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein U1-70K or the 35-kDa subunit of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF35). This protein-protein interaction profile is different from those of prototypical SR proteins SC35 and ASF/SF2, both of which interact with U1-70K and U2AF35 but not with U2AF65. p54 promotes the use of the distal 5' splice site in E1A pre-mRNA alternative splicing, while the same site is suppressed by ASF/SF2 and SC35. These findings and the differential tissue distribution of p54 suggest that this novel SR protein may participate in regulation of alternative splicing in a tissue- and substrate-dependent manner.


2002 ◽  
Vol 368 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaohua TANG ◽  
Norbert F. KÄUFER ◽  
Ren-Jang LIN

The unexpected low number of genes in the human genome has triggered increasing attention to alternative pre-mRNA splicing, and serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins have been correlated with the complex alternative splicing that is a characteristic of metazoans. SR proteins interact with RNA and splicing protein factors, and they also undergo reversible phosphorylation, thereby regulating constitutive and alternative splicing in mammals and Drosophila. However, it is not clear whether the features of SR proteins and alternative splicing are present in simple and genetically tractable organisms, such as yeasts. In the present study, we show that the SR-like proteins Srp1 and Srp2, found in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interact with each other and the interaction is modulated by protein phosphorylation. By using Srp1 as bait in a yeast two-hybrid analysis, we specifically isolated Srp2 from a random screen. This Srp interaction was confirmed by a glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assay. We also found that the Srp1—Srp2 complex was phosphorylated at a reduced efficiency by a fission yeast SR-specific kinase, Dis1-suppression kinase (Dsk1). Conversely, Dsk1-mediated phosphorylation inhibited the formation of the Srp complex. These findings offer the first example in fission yeast for interactions between SR-related proteins and the modulation of the interactions by specific protein phosphorylation, suggesting that a mammalian-like SR protein function may exist in fission yeast.


1997 ◽  
Vol 326 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver NAYLER ◽  
Stefan STAMM ◽  
Axel ULLRICH

Phosphorylated serine- and arginine-rich (SR) proteins are components of the spliceosomal complex, and have been implicated in the control of alternative splicing. Kinases that regulate the phosphorylation and possibly the intranuclear distribution of SR proteins may therefore contribute to changes in choice of splice site. We have cloned three mouse cDNAs with high sequence identity to the family of LAMMER kinases (i.e. kinases carrying the conserved signature EHLAMMERILG in the catalytic domain). A comparison of their amino acid sequences revealed two related subfamilies with high evolutionary conservation. We have compared the expression patterns of these proteins in mouse tissues and transformed cell lines with that of a previously cloned family member (mCLK1/STY), and detected various transcripts for each gene. This underlines previous findings of alternative splicing of mclk1/STY. Our results suggest that the proportions of products for each gene are regulated independently. We further demonstrate that all variants encode autophosphorylating proteins that can phosphorylate several biochemically purified SR proteins in vitro, leading to hyperphosphorylation of at least one SR protein in vivo. The observed tissue distributions and substrate specificities suggest that these kinases may all be constituents of a network of regulatory mechanisms that enable SR proteins to control RNA splicing.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1874-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanette Rooke ◽  
Vadim Markovtsov ◽  
Esra Cagavi ◽  
Douglas L. Black

ABSTRACT The splicing of the c-src exon N1 is controlled by an intricate combination of positive and negative RNA elements. Most previous work on these sequences focused on intronic elements found upstream and downstream of exon N1. However, it was demonstrated that the 5′ half of the N1 exon itself acts as a splicing enhancer in vivo. Here we examine the function of this regulatory element in vitro. We show that a mutation in this sequence decreases splicing of the N1 exon in vitro. Proteins binding to this element were identified as hnRNP A1, hnRNP H, hnRNP F, and SF2/ASF by site-specific cross-linking and immunoprecipitation. The binding of these proteins to the RNA was eliminated by a mutation in the exonic element. The activities of hnRNP A1 and SF2/ASF on N1 splicing were examined by adding purified protein to in vitro splicing reactions. SF2/ASF and another SR protein, SC35, are both able to stimulate splicing of c-src pre-mRNA. However, splicing activation by SF2/ASF is dependent on the N1 exon enhancer element whereas activation by SC35 is not. In contrast to SF2/ASF and in agreement with other systems, hnRNP A1 repressed c-src splicing in vitro. The negative activity of hnRNP A1 on splicing was compared with that of PTB, a protein previously demonstrated to repress splicing in this system. Both proteins repress exon N1 splicing, and both counteract the enhancing activity of the SR proteins. Removal of the PTB binding sites upstream of N1 prevents PTB-mediated repression but does not affect A1-mediated repression. Thus, hnRNP A1 and PTB use different mechanisms to repress c-src splicing. Our results link the activity of these well-known exonic splicing regulators, SF2/ASF and hnRNP A1, to the splicing of an exon primarily controlled by intronic factors.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1478-1478
Author(s):  
Young Rock Chung ◽  
Hana Cho ◽  
Young Joon Kim ◽  
Eunhee Kim ◽  
Stanley Chun-Wei Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract The discovery that mRNA splicing factors are frequently mutated in clonal blood disorders represented one of the most unexpected findings from cancer genome sequencing projects. While initial functional studies of these mutations have suggested that alterations in constitutive and alternative splicing may directly contribute to malignant hematopoiesis, they also highlighted limitations in our knowledge of how splicing factors regulate differential splicing and usage of mRNA isoforms in normal hematopoietic development. Interestingly, the splicing factor SRSF2, a member of the serine/arginine-rich (SR) protein family that regulates alternative splicing in a tissue-specific manner, is recurrently mutated only in myeloid leukemias, whereas other splicing factors are also often mutated in lymphoid leukemias and epithelial cancers. These data suggest a specific role for SRSF2 in hematopoiesis and/or myelopoiesis and previous studies have shown that Srsf2 is required for T-lymphopoiesis and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) function. At the same time, SRSF2s functions in regulating splicing have been suggested to be at least partially overlapping with those of SRSF1, the founding member of the SR protein family. We therefore set out to understand the role and function of SRSF1 in normal fetal and adult hematopoiesis and to directly compare SRSF1s role in normal hematopoiesis to that of SRSF2. To understand the role of Srsf1 in adult hematopoiesis, we utilized mice for conditional deletion of 1 or 2 copies of Srsf1 or Srsf2 and performed non-competitive and competitive bone marrow transplantation (BMT) assays. BM from adult Mx1-Cre/Srsf1+/+, Mx1-Cre/Srsf1fl/+, Mx1-Cre/Srsf1fl/fl and Mx1-Cre/Srsf2fl/fl mice (together with the same number of wildtype CD45.1 marrow in competitive BMT) were transplanted into lethally irradiated CD45.1 recipients, followed by polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (pIpC) administration 4 weeks after reconstitution to induce Srsf1 deletion. In both competitive and non-competitive BMT, peripheral blood (PB) chimerism showed that while heterozygous deletion of Srsf1 did not affect PB chimerism, homozygous deletion of Srsf1 resulted in compromised multi-lineage reconstitution similar to homozygous Srsf2 deletion (Figure 1A). Analysis of hematopoietic organs 20 weeks post BMT revealed no contribution to hematopoiesis by Srsf1 or Srsf2 homozygous knockout cells. More specifically, the contribution of HSPC-enriched Lineage- Sca-1+ c-Kit+ (LSK) and myeloid progenitor-enriched Lineage- Sca-1- c-Kit+ (LK) fractions were significantly reduced in mice transplanted with Srsf1- and Srsf2-deficient BM (Figure 1B). These observations identify an absolute requirement for both splicing factors in HSPC function in adult mice. To determine if Srsf1 or Srsf2 are required for fetal hematopoiesis, we crossed Vav-CreTg/Srsf1fl/+ to Srsf1fl/fl mice and Vav-CreTg/Srsf2fl/+ to Srsf2fl/fl mice followed by HSPC analysis at embryonic day 13~14. At this time point, both Vav-CreTg/Srsf1fl/fl and Vav-CreTg/Srsf2fl/fl embryos were found at the approximate expected Mendelian ratio (p=0.77 for Srsf1 crosses and p=0.22 for Srsf2 crosses; Fishers exact test). Interestingly, the numbers of HSPCs and erythroid progenitors (determined by flow cytometry using Ter119 and CD71 antibodies) were similar in Vav-CreTg/Srsf1fl/fl fetal livers compared to control embryos, while Vav-CreTg/Srsf2fl/fl fetal livers had drastically reduced fetal liver cellularity, HSPC, and erythroid progenitors relative to control embryos. However, both Vav-CreTg/Srsf1fl/fl and Vav-CreTg/Srsf2fl/fl HSPCs had reduced colony-forming capacities in vitro relative to control, suggesting severe functional defects in homozygous mutants that are otherwise not observed in heterozygous mice. The above data identify that both Srsf1 and Srsf2 are essential for normal hematopoietic function in both embryonic and adult life. Although SRSF1 and SRSF2 have been suggested to regulate splicing by binding to similar sequences of pre-mRNA to promote splicing, here we find that both are absolutely required for hematopoiesis in a haplosufficient, non-overlapping manner. We are now performing transcriptomic analyses to delineate the common as well as distinct molecular targets of how SR proteins regulate HSPC function. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Roméria da Silva ◽  
Gabriela Alves Moreira ◽  
Ronni Anderson Gonçalves da Silva ◽  
Éverton de Almeida Alves Barbosa ◽  
Raoni Pais Siqueira ◽  
...  

Alternative splicing allows cells to expand the encoding potential of their genomes. In this elegant mechanism, a single gene can yield protein isoforms with even antagonistic functions depending on the cellular physiological context. Alterations in splicing regulatory factors activity in cancer cells, however, can generate an abnormal protein expression pattern that promotes growth, survival, and other processes, which are relevant to tumor biology. In this review, we discuss dysregulated alternative splicing events and regulatory factors that impact pathways related to cancer. The SR proteins and their regulatory kinases SRPKs and CLKs have been frequently found altered in tumors and are examined in more detail. Finally, perspectives that support splicing machinery as target for the development of novel anticancer therapies are discussed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 405 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaohua Tang ◽  
Amy Tsurumi ◽  
Sarah Alaei ◽  
Christopher Wilson ◽  
Cathleen Chiu ◽  
...  

Evolutionarily conserved SR proteins (serine/arginine-rich proteins) are important factors for alternative splicing and their activity is modulated by SRPKs (SR protein-specific kinases). We previously identified Dsk1p (dis1-suppressing protein kinase) as the orthologue of human SRPK1 in fission yeast. In addition to its similarity of gene structure to higher eukaryotes, fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a unicellular eukaryotic organism in which alternative splicing takes place. In the present study, we have revealed for the first time that SR proteins, Srp1p and Srp2p, are the in vivo substrates of Dsk1p in S. pombe. Moreover, the cellular localization of the SR proteins and Prp2p splicing factor is dependent on dsk1+: Dsk1p is required for the efficient nuclear localization of Srp2p and Prp2p, while it promotes the cytoplasmic distribution of Srp1p, thereby differentially influencing the destinations of these proteins in the cell. The present study offers the first biochemical and genetic evidence for the in vivo targets of the SRPK1 orthologue, Dsk1p, in S. pombe and the significant correlation between Dsk1p-mediated phosphorylation and the cellular localization of the SR proteins, providing information about the physiological functions of Dsk1p. Furthermore, the results demonstrate that the regulatory function of SRPKs in the nuclear targeting of SR proteins is conserved from fission yeast to human, indicating a general mechanism of reversible phosphorylation to control the activities of SR proteins in RNA metabolism through cellular partitioning.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 7437-7447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Ian C. Hawkins ◽  
Christopher D. Harvey ◽  
Jennifer L. Jennings ◽  
Andrew J. Link ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT SRrp86 is a unique member of the SR protein superfamily containing one RNA recognition motif and two serine-arginine (SR)-rich domains separated by an unusual glutamic acid-lysine (EK)-rich region. Previously, we showed that SRrp86 could regulate alternative splicing by both positively and negatively modulating the activity of other SR proteins and that the unique EK domain could inhibit both constitutive and alternative splicing. These functions were most consistent with the model in which SRrp86 functions by interacting with and thereby modulating the activity of target proteins. To identify the specific proteins that interact with SRrp86, we used a yeast two-hybrid library screen and immunoprecipitation coupled to mass spectrometry. We show that SRrp86 interacts with all of the core SR proteins, as well as a subset of other splicing regulatory proteins, including SAF-B, hnRNP G, YB-1, and p72. In contrast to previous results that showed activation of SRp20 by SRrp86, we now show that SAF-B, hnRNP G, and 9G8 all antagonize the activity of SRrp86. Overall, we conclude that not only does SRrp86 regulate SR protein activity but that it is, in turn, regulated by other splicing factors to control alternative splice site selection.


2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2436-2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Allemand ◽  
Svetlana Dokudovskaya ◽  
Rémy Bordonné ◽  
Jamal Tazi

Members of the highly conserved serine/arginine-rich (SR) protein family are nuclear factors involved in splicing of metazoan mRNA precursors. In mammals, two nuclear import receptors, transportin (TRN)-SR1 and TRN-SR2, are responsible for targeting SR proteins to the nucleus. Distinctive features in the nuclear localization signal between Drosophila and mammalian SR proteins prompted us to examine the mechanism by whichDrosophila SR proteins and their antagonist repressor splicing factor 1 (RSF1) are imported into nucleus. Herein, we report the identification and characterization of a Drosophilaimportin β-family protein (dTRN-SR), homologous to TRN-SR2, that specifically interacts with both SR proteins and RSF1. dTRN-SR has a broad localization in the cytoplasm and the nucleus, whereas an N-terminal deletion mutant colocalizes with SR proteins in nuclear speckles. Far Western experiments established that the RS domain of SR proteins and the GRS domain of RSF1 are required for the direct interaction with dTRN-SR, an interaction that can be modulated by phosphorylation. Using the yeast model system in which nuclear import of Drosophila SR proteins and RSF1 is impaired, we demonstrate that complementation with dTRN-SR is sufficient to target these proteins to the nucleus. Together, the results imply that the mechanism by which SR proteins are imported to the nucleus is conserved between Drosophila and humans.


1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1853-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akila Mayeda ◽  
Gavin R. Screaton ◽  
Sharon D. Chandler ◽  
Xiang-Dong Fu ◽  
Adrian R. Krainer

ABSTRACT We report striking differences in the substrate specificities of two human SR proteins, SF2/ASF and SC35, in constitutive splicing. β-Globin pre-mRNA (exons 1 and 2) is spliced indiscriminately with either SR protein. Human immunodeficiency virus tatpre-mRNA (exons 2 and 3) and immunoglobulin μ-chain (IgM) pre-mRNA (exons C3 and C4) are preferentially spliced with SF2/ASF and SC35, respectively. Using in vitro splicing with mutated or chimeric derivatives of the tat and IgM pre-mRNAs, we defined specific combinations of segments in the downstream exons, which mediate either positive or negative effects to confer SR protein specificity. A series of recombinant chimeric proteins consisting of domains of SF2/ASF and SC35 in various combinations was used to localize trans-acting domains responsible for substrate specificity. The RS domains of SF2/ASF and SC35 can be exchanged without effect on substrate specificity. The RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) of SF2/ASF are active only in the context of a two-RRM structure, and RRM2 has a dominant role in substrate specificity. In contrast, the single RRM of SC35 can function alone, but its substrate specificity can be influenced by the presence of an additional RRM. The RRMs behave as modules that, when present in different combinations, can have positive, neutral, or negative effects on splicing, depending upon the specific substrate. We conclude that SR protein-specific recognition of specific positive and negative pre-mRNA exonic elements via one or more RRMs is a crucial determinant of the substrate specificity of SR proteins in constitutive splicing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document