The contribution of the budding yeast histone H2A C-terminal tail to DNA-damage responses

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1519-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. Chambers ◽  
J.A. Downs

The cellular response to DNA damage involves extensive interaction with and manipulation of chromatin. This includes the detection and repair of the DNA lesion, but there are also transcriptional responses to DNA damage, involving the up- or down-regulation of numerous genes. Therefore changes to chromatin structure, including covalent modification of histone proteins, are known to occur during DNA-damage responses. One of the most well characterized DNA-damage-responsive chromatin modification events is the phosphorylation of the SQ motif found in the C-terminal tail of histone H2A or the H2AX variant in higher eukaryotes. In the budding yeast, a number of additional residues in this region of histone H2A that contribute to the cellular response to DNA damage have been identified, providing an insight into the nature and complexity of the DNA-damage histone code.

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
Manjinder S. Cheema ◽  
Katrina V. Good ◽  
Bohyun Kim ◽  
Heddy Soufari ◽  
Connor O’Sullivan ◽  
...  

The replication independent (RI) histone H2A.Z is one of the more extensively studied variant members of the core histone H2A family, which consists of many replication dependent (RD) members. The protein has been shown to be indispensable for survival, and involved in multiple roles from DNA damage to chromosome segregation, replication, and transcription. However, its functional involvement in gene expression is controversial. Moreover, the variant in several groups of metazoan organisms consists of two main isoforms (H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2) that differ in a few (3–6) amino acids. They comprise the main topic of this review, starting from the events that led to their identification, what is currently known about them, followed by further experimental, structural, and functional insight into their roles. Despite their structural differences, a direct correlation to their functional variability remains enigmatic. As all of this is being elucidated, it appears that a strong functional involvement of isoform variability may be connected to development.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramhari Kumbhar ◽  
Jullian Perren ◽  
Fade Gong ◽  
David Corujo ◽  
Frank Medina ◽  
...  

AbstractThe histone demethylase KDM5A removes histone H3 lysine 4 methylation, which is involved in transcription and DNA damage responses (DDR). While DDR functions of KDM5A have been identified, how KDM5A recognizes DNA lesion sites within chromatin is unknown. Here, we identify two factors that act upstream of KDM5A to promote its association with DNA damage sites. We have identified a non-canonical poly(ADP-ribose), (PAR), binding region unique to KDM5A. Loss of the PAR-binding region or treatment with PAR polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) blocks KDM5A-PAR interactions and DNA repair functions of KDM5A. The histone variant macroH2A1.2 is also specifically required for KDM5A recruitment and functions at DNA damage sites, including homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks and repression of transcription at DNA breaks. Overall, this work reveals the importance of PAR-binding and macroH2A1.2 in KDM5A recognition of damage sites that drive transcriptional and repair activities at DNA breaks within chromatin that are essential for maintaining genome integrity.SummaryThe histone demethylase KDM5A demethylates H3K4 to promote repair and transcriptional responses at DNA breaks. We identified poly(ADP-ribose)-binding and macroH2A1.2 as modulators of KDM5A association with DNA damage sites, revealing how KDM5A engages DNA breaks within chromatin.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 705-705
Author(s):  
Eliot Marston ◽  
Victoria Weston ◽  
Belinda Austen ◽  
Michael Wakelam ◽  
Sarah Lawson ◽  
...  

Abstract Although there have been dramatic improvements in the treatment of paediatric ALL in recent years, a significant proportion of these patients still experience relapse. Early treatment responses, indicated by the rate and degree of blast clearance, are good markers for the likelihood of ALL relapse. However, despite their clinical predictive value, the molecular basis underlying these observations remains unknown. We aimed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind treatment resistance in paediatric ALL by analysing cellular responses to IR-induced damage. Using western blotting, we classified 82 paediatric diagnostic ALL samples into two categories on the basis of their activation of apoptosis following DNA damage. We found that 31 ALL tumours had an apoptotic resistant phenotype, failing to cleave PARP1 and caspases 3, 7 and 9 by 24h after ionising radiation (IR), in contrast to 51 tumours classified as apoptotic responsive. Strikingly, we observed that our DNA damage apoptotic response stratification of ALL tumours closely correlated with blast clearance following treatment in ALL patients. Among apoptotic resistant patients, 69% still had more than 25% blasts by morphological assessment on day 8 or 15, and 64% had a blast population that could be detected by molecular minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 28, indicating high risk of relapse. In contrast, in the apoptotic responsive group only 8% had more than 25% blasts at day 8 or 15, and just 6% were positive by MRD at day 28. Differential baseline expression of specific genes has been previously linked with drug resistance in paediatric ALL. To provide further insight into the biology of resistance to DNA damaging agents we analysed changes in transcriptional profiles following exposure of blast cells to IR in 22 representative tumours, 11 apoptotic responsive and 11 apoptotic resistant. We identified over 300 IR-induced genes that could discriminate between the two categories, including genes involved in cellular proliferation and the regulation of apoptosis. When we considered only the subset with TEL/AML1 fusion, we found that the expression of phospholipase C epsilon (PLCe), which is implicated in the Ras cellular survival pathway, provided powerful discrimination between the apoptotic resistant and responsive ALL tumours. We have subsequently confirmed that PLCe is also differentially expressed at the protein level at 24h after IR between apoptotic resistant and responsive ALLs, regardless of TEL/AML1 status. Finally, we have identified model pre-B ALL cell lines for each of the two response categories, and in these we have shown that Ras is activated in response to DNA damage and associates with PLCe only in the apoptotic resistant cells. In conclusion, we have shown that differences in cellular apoptotic response to DNA damage closely correlate with the rate of blast clearance in paediatric ALL. Furthermore, we believe that alteration in the Ras survival pathway is one mechanism to account for differential apoptotic responses to DNA damage in both primary ALL tumour cells and ALL cell lines. These findings provide new insight into the factors influencing clinical outcome in ALL patients and are likely to have important implications for the development of future targeted treatments in paediatric ALL.


2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 4122-4133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa T. Lis ◽  
Floyd E. Romesberg

ABSTRACT The cellular response to DNA damage requires not only direct repair of the damage but also changes in the DNA replication machinery, chromatin, and transcription that facilitate survival. Here, we describe Saccharomyces cerevisiae Doa1, which helps to control the damage response by channeling ubiquitin from the proteosomal degradation pathway into pathways that mediate altered DNA replication and chromatin modification. DOA1 interacts with genes involved in PCNA ubiquitination, including RAD6, RAD18, RAD5, UBC13, and MMS2, as well as genes involved in histone H2B ubiquitination or deubiquitination, including RAD6, BRE1, LGE1, CDC73, UBP8, UBP10, and HTB2. In the absence of DOA1, damage-induced ubiquitination of PCNA does not occur. In addition, the level of ubiquitinated H2B is decreased under normal conditions and completely absent in the presence of DNA damage. In the case of PCNA, the defect associated with the doa1Δ mutant is alleviated by overexpression of ubiquitin, but in the case of H2B, it is not. The data suggest that Doa1 is the major source of ubiquitin for the DNA damage response and that Doa1 also plays an additional essential and more specific role in the monoubiquitination of histone H2B.


2014 ◽  
Vol 289 (47) ◽  
pp. 32883-32894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Zhang ◽  
Huirong Yang ◽  
Hengbin Wang

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1011-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Botchkarev ◽  
Mikael V. Garabedian ◽  
Brenda Lemos ◽  
Eric Paulissen ◽  
James E. Haber

The budding yeast Polo-like kinase Cdc5 is a key regulator of many mitotic events. Cdc5 coordinates its functions spatially and temporally by changing its localization during the cell cycle: Cdc5 is imported into the nucleus in G2 phase and released to the cytoplasm in anaphase, where it accumulates at the bud neck. Cdc5 also localizes to the spindle pole bodies (SPBs) from S phase until the end of mitosis. Whether Cdc5 changes its SPB population during the cell cycle is not known. We find that Cdc5 localizes to distinct SPB subpopulations, depending on the mitotic stage. Cdc5 localizes to the nuclear side of the SPBs during metaphase and early anaphase and to the cytoplasmic surface of the SPBs during late anaphase. Cdc14 is necessary to relocalize Cdc5 from the nuclear SPB plaque. Accumulation of Cdc5 at the daughter SPB in late anaphase is controlled by Bfa1. We also show that Cdc5 and Bfa1 are found in spatially distinct locations at the SPBs during G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Collectively our data reveal that Cdc5 is a dynamic component of the SPBs during mitosis and provide new insight into its regulation during both late mitotic events and DNA damage–induced G2/M arrest.


DNA Repair ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 1471-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bilsland ◽  
Malin Hult ◽  
Stephen D. Bell ◽  
Per Sunnerhagen ◽  
Jessica A. Downs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document