An in silico analysis of trypanosomatid RNA polymerases: insights into their unusual transcription

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1435-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kelly ◽  
B. Wickstead ◽  
K. Gull

African trypanosomes employ both Pol I (RNA polymerase I) and Pol II to transcribe protein-coding genes in large polycistronic units of up to 50 genes. Subsequent processing produces mature capped mRNAs. Evidence suggests that regulation of gene expression is primarily exerted post-transcriptionally. Here, we use the recently completed genome sequences of three trypanosomatids, Trypanosoma brucei, Trypanosoma cruzi and Leishmania major, in an in silico analysis of their fundamental RNA polymerase complexes. The core complement of Pol II subunits, including those that are shared with Pol I and Pol III are present. However, both Pol I and Pol III complexes are missing members of the rpoE-rpoF subunit groups. Out of the five shared subunits, both RPB5 and RPB6 have two isoforms in the three trypanosomes. One represents the canonical polymerase subunit and the other differs by insertion or deletion of stretches of charged residues. We propose that these alternative isoforms function in distinct polymerase complexes, and may influence recruitment of the trypanosome RPB4–RPB7 heterodimer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (15) ◽  
pp. 4782-4795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp E. Merkl ◽  
Michael Pilsl ◽  
Tobias Fremter ◽  
Katrin Schwank ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
...  

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I–associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I–specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity.


Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Keighobadi ◽  
Saeed Emami ◽  
Milad Lagzian ◽  
Mahdi Fakhar ◽  
Alireza Rafiei ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Md Emran ◽  
Md. Mofijur Rahman ◽  
Afroza Khanam Anika ◽  
Sultana Hossain Nasrin ◽  
Abu Tayab Moin

Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious disease, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) that has infected and killed a lot of people in the past. At present treatments against TB are available at a very low cost. Since these chemical drugs have many adverse effects on health, more attention is now given on the plant-derived phytochemicals as potential agents to fight against TB. In this study, 5 phytochemicals, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, benzoic acid, bergapten, psoralen, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid, are selected to test their potentiality, safety, and efficacy against two potential targets, the MTB RNA polymerase and enoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) reductase, the InhA protein, using various tools of in silico biology. The molecular docking experiment, drug-likeness property test, ADME/T-test, P450 SOM prediction, pharmacophore mapping, and modeling, solubility testing, DFT calculations, and PASS prediction study had confirmed that all the molecules had the good potentiality to inhibit the two targets. However, two agents, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and bergapten were considered as the best agents among the five selected agents and they also showed far better results than the two currently used drugs, that function in these pathways, rifampicin (MTB RNA polymerase) and isoniazid (InhA protein). These two agents can be used effectively to treat tuberculosis.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2644-2652 ◽  
Author(s):  
S D Brown ◽  
J Huang ◽  
L H Van der Ploeg

All eukaryotic protein-coding genes are believed to be transcribed by RNA polymerase (Pol) II. An exception may exist in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei, in which the genes encoding the variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) and procyclic acidic repetitive protein (PARP) are transcribed by an RNA polymerase that is resistant to the Pol II inhibitor alpha-amanitin. The PARP and VSG genes were proposed to be transcribed by Pol I (C. Shea, M. G.-S. Lee, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, Cell 50:603-612, 1987; G. Rudenko, M. G.-S. Lee, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, Nucleic Acids Res. 20:303-306, 1992), a suggestion that has been substantiated by the finding that trypanosomes can transcribe protein-coding genes by Pol I (G. Rudenko, H.-M. Chung, V. P. Pham, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, EMBO J. 10:3387-3397, 1991). We analyzed the sequence elements of the PARP promoter by linker scanning mutagenesis and compared the PARP promoter with Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III promoters. The PARP promoter appeared to be of limited complexity and contained at least two critical regions. The first was located adjacent to the transcription initiation site (nucleotides [nt] -69 to +12) and contained three discrete domains in which linker scanning mutants affected the transcriptional efficiency: at nt -69 to -56, -37 to -11, and -11 to +12. The second region was located between nt -140 and -131, and a third region may be located between nt -228 and -205. The nucleotide sequences of these elements, and their relative positioning with respect to the transcription initiation site did not resemble those of either Pol II or Pol III promoter elements, but rather reflected the organization of Pol I promoters in (i) similarity in the positioning of essential domains in the PARP promoter and Pol I promoter, (ii) strong sequence homology between the PARP core promoter element (nt -37 to -11) and identically positioned nucleotide sequences in the trypanosome rRNA and VSG gene promoters, and (iii) moderate effects on promoter activity of mutations around the transcription initiation site.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratibha Bhalla ◽  
Dipti Vernekar ◽  
Ashutosh Shukla ◽  
Benoit Gilquin ◽  
Yohann Couté ◽  
...  

AbstractMany regulatory proteins and complexes influence transcription by RNA polymerase (pol) II. In comparison, only a few regulatory proteins are known for pol III, which transcribes mostly house-keeping and non-coding genes. Yet, pol III transcription is precisely regulated under various stress conditions like starvation. We used pol III transcription complex components TFIIIC (Tfc6), pol III (Rpc128) and TFIIIB (Brf1) as baits to identify potential interactors through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. A large interactome constituting known chromatin modifiers, factors and regulators of transcription by pol I and pol II revealed the possibility of a large number of signaling cues for pol III transcription against adverse conditions. We found one of the pol II-associated factors, Paf1 complex (PAF1C) interacts with the three baits. Its occupancy on the pol III-transcribed genes is low and not correlated with pol III occupancy. Paf1 deletion leads to higher occupancy of pol III, γ-H2A and DNA pol2 but no change in nucleosome positions. Genotoxins exposure causes pol III but not Paf1 loss from the genes. PAF1C promotes the pol III pausing and restricts its accumulation on the genes, which reduces the replication stress caused by the pol III barrier and transcription-replication conflict on these highly transcribed genes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma E. Padilla-Mejía ◽  
Luis E. Florencio-Martínez ◽  
Rodrigo Moreno-Campos ◽  
Juan C. Vizuet-de-Rueda ◽  
Ana M. Cevallos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic tRNAs, transcribed by RNA polymerase III (Pol III), contain boxes A and B as internal promoter elements. One exception is the selenocysteine (Sec) tRNA (tRNA-Sec), whose transcription is directed by an internal box B and three extragenic sequences in vertebrates. Here we report on the transcriptional analysis of the tRNA-Sec gene in the protozoan parasite Leishmania major . This organism has unusual mechanisms of gene expression, including Pol II polycistronic transcription and maturation of mRNAs by trans splicing, a process that attaches a 39-nucleotide miniexon to the 5′ end of all the mRNAs. In L. major , tRNA-Sec is encoded by a single gene inserted into a Pol II polycistronic unit, in contrast to most tRNAs, which are clustered at the boundaries of polycistronic units. 5′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends and reverse transcription-PCR experiments showed that some tRNA-Sec transcripts contain the miniexon at the 5′ end and a poly(A) tail at the 3′ end, indicating that the tRNA-Sec gene is polycistronically transcribed by Pol II and processed by trans splicing and polyadenylation, as was recently reported for the tRNA-Sec genes in the related parasite Trypanosoma brucei . However, nuclear run-on assays with RNA polymerase inhibitors and with cells that were previously UV irradiated showed that the tRNA-Sec gene in L. major is also transcribed by Pol III. Thus, our results indicate that RNA polymerase specificity in Leishmania is not absolute in vivo , as has recently been found in other eukaryotes.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp E. Merkl ◽  
Michael Pilsl ◽  
Tobias Fremter ◽  
Katrin Schwank ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
...  

AbstractRNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized to synthesize most of the ribosomal RNA. After nucleosome deposition at each round of replication the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It was suggested that Pol I-associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is not known whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified Pol I of the yeast S. cerevisiae and Pol I mutants in comparison to Pol II and Pol III to pass a nucleosome. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, were able to transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. The contribution of Pol I specific subunit domains to efficient passage through nucleosomes in context with transcription rate and processivity is discussed.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2644-2652
Author(s):  
S D Brown ◽  
J Huang ◽  
L H Van der Ploeg

All eukaryotic protein-coding genes are believed to be transcribed by RNA polymerase (Pol) II. An exception may exist in the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei, in which the genes encoding the variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) and procyclic acidic repetitive protein (PARP) are transcribed by an RNA polymerase that is resistant to the Pol II inhibitor alpha-amanitin. The PARP and VSG genes were proposed to be transcribed by Pol I (C. Shea, M. G.-S. Lee, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, Cell 50:603-612, 1987; G. Rudenko, M. G.-S. Lee, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, Nucleic Acids Res. 20:303-306, 1992), a suggestion that has been substantiated by the finding that trypanosomes can transcribe protein-coding genes by Pol I (G. Rudenko, H.-M. Chung, V. P. Pham, and L. H. T. Van der Ploeg, EMBO J. 10:3387-3397, 1991). We analyzed the sequence elements of the PARP promoter by linker scanning mutagenesis and compared the PARP promoter with Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III promoters. The PARP promoter appeared to be of limited complexity and contained at least two critical regions. The first was located adjacent to the transcription initiation site (nucleotides [nt] -69 to +12) and contained three discrete domains in which linker scanning mutants affected the transcriptional efficiency: at nt -69 to -56, -37 to -11, and -11 to +12. The second region was located between nt -140 and -131, and a third region may be located between nt -228 and -205. The nucleotide sequences of these elements, and their relative positioning with respect to the transcription initiation site did not resemble those of either Pol II or Pol III promoter elements, but rather reflected the organization of Pol I promoters in (i) similarity in the positioning of essential domains in the PARP promoter and Pol I promoter, (ii) strong sequence homology between the PARP core promoter element (nt -37 to -11) and identically positioned nucleotide sequences in the trypanosome rRNA and VSG gene promoters, and (iii) moderate effects on promoter activity of mutations around the transcription initiation site.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document