Biochemical characterization of human DNA polymerase i provides clues to its biological function

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tissier ◽  
E. G. Frank ◽  
J. P. McDonald ◽  
A. Vaisman ◽  
A. R. Fernàndez deHenestrosa Henestrosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Polymerase I

The human RAD30B gene has recently been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase i (poli). The role of poli within the cell is presently unknown, and the only clues to its cellular function come from its biochemical characterization in vitro. The aim of this short review is, therefore, to summarize the known enzymic activities of poli and to speculate as to how these biochemical properties might relate to its in vivo function.

DNA polymerase I proofreading exonuclease activity is required for endonuclease V repair pathway both in vitro and in vivo

DNA Repair ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang-Yi Su ◽  
Liang-In Lin ◽  
Steven D. Goodman ◽  
Rong-Syuan Yen ◽  
Cho-Yuan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Exonuclease Activity ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Endonuclease V ◽  
Polymerase I

scholarly journals Characterization of the mitochondrial DNA polymerase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1994 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sen ◽  
S Mukhopadhyay ◽  
J Wetzel ◽  
T K Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Mitochondrial Dna ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Protease Deficient ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Mitochondrial Dna Polymerase

The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymerase was isolated from a protease-deficient yeast strain (PY2), and purified about 3000 fold by a column chromatography on phosphocellulose, heparin-agarose, and single-stranded DNA cellulose. The purified polymerase was characterized with respect to optimal nucleotide concentrations, template-primer specificity and sensitivity to some inhibitors. These results were compared with the nuclear DNA polymerase I activity. Both polymerases showed similar requirement of deoxynucleotide concentrations (Km < 1 microM), and highest activity with poly(dA-dT) template. However, the mtDNA polymerase was more sensitive to ddTTP, EtBr and Mn2+ inhibition in comparison to the nuclear DNA polymerase I. The mtDNA polymerase did not need ATP as an energy source for in vitro DNA synthesis. This mtDNA polymerase preparation also showed 3'-->5' exonuclease activity.

Viroid RNA is accepted as a template for in vitro transcription by DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 929-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Rohde ◽  
Hans-Richard Rackwitz ◽  
Frank Boege ◽  
Heinz L. Sänger
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
In Vitro Synthesis ◽  
Polymerase I

The RNA genome of potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTV) is transcribed in vitro into complementary DNA and RNA by DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase, respectively, from Escherichia coli. In vitro synthesis of complementary RNA produces distinct transcripts larger than unit length thus reflecting the in vivo mechanism of viroid replication. The influence of varying experimental conditions on the transcription process is studied; actinomycin D is found to drastically reduce complementary RNA synthesis from the PSTV RNA template by RNA polymerase.

scholarly journals The Glutathione/Glutaredoxin System Is Essential for Arsenate Reduction in Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803

2009 ◽  
Vol 191 (11) ◽  
pp. 3534-3543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis López-Maury ◽  
Ana María Sánchez-Riego ◽  
José Carlos Reyes ◽  
Francisco J. Florencio
Keyword(s):  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Arsenate Reductase ◽  
Arsenic Resistance ◽  
Arsenate Resistance ◽  
Mutant Strains ◽  
Pcc 6803

ABSTRACT Arsenic resistance in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 is mediated by an operon of three genes in which arsC codes for an arsenate reductase with unique characteristics. Here we describe the identification of two additional and nearly identical genes coding for arsenate reductases in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803, which we have designed arsI1 and arsI2, and the biochemical characterization of both ArsC (arsenate reductase) and ArsI. Functional analysis of single, double, and triple mutants shows that both ArsI enzymes are active arsenate reductases but that their roles in arsenate resistance are essential only in the absence of ArsC. Based on its biochemical properties, ArsC belongs to a family that, though related to thioredoxin-dependent arsenate reductases, uses the glutathione/glutaredoxin system for reduction, whereas ArsI belongs to the previously known glutaredoxin-dependent family. We have also analyzed the role in arsenate resistance of the three glutaredoxins present in Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 both in vitro and in vivo. Only the dithiolic glutaredoxins, GrxA (glutaredoxin A) and GrxB (glutaredoxin B), are able to donate electrons to both types of reductases in vitro, while GrxC (glutaredoxin C), a monothiolic glutaredoxin, is unable to donate electrons to either type. Analysis of glutaredoxin mutant strains revealed that only those lacking the grxA gene have impaired arsenic resistance.

scholarly journals Exonuclease III (XthA) EnforcesIn VivoDNA Cloning ofEscherichia coliTo Create Cohesive Ends

2018 ◽  
Vol 201 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Fragments ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Cloning ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Cloning Technology

ABSTRACTEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15 to 40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinases but is dependent on XthA, a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease. Here,in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to asin vivoE. colicloning (iVEC). We also show that iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.IMPORTANCECloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently, anin vitrorecombination system for DNA cloning was shown to enable the joining of multiple DNA fragments at once. Interestingly,E. colipotentially assembles multiple linear DNA fragments that are introduced into the cell. Improved protocols for thisin vivocloning have realized a high level of usability, comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reactions. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here, we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning and also constructed a strain that was optimized forin vivocloning. Additionally, we streamlined the procedure ofin vivocloning by using a single microcentrifuge tube.

scholarly journals RNase HIII Is Important for Okazaki Fragment Processing inBacillus subtilis

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin R. Randall ◽  
Taylor M. Nye ◽  
Katherine J. Wozniak ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Okazaki Fragment ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Processing ◽  
Rnase Hi ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Maturation ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACTRNA-DNA hybrids are common in chromosomal DNA. Persistent RNA-DNA hybrids result in replication fork stress, DNA breaks, and neurological disorders in humans. During replication, Okazaki fragment synthesis relies on frequent RNA primer placement, providing one of the most prominent forms of covalent RNA-DNA strandsin vivo. The mechanism of Okazaki fragment maturation, which involves RNA removal and subsequent DNA replacement, in bacteria lacking RNase HI remains unclear. In this work, we reconstituted repair of a linear model Okazaki fragmentin vitrousing purified recombinant enzymes fromBacillus subtilis. We showed that RNase HII and HIII are capable of incision on Okazaki fragmentsin vitroand that both enzymes show mild stimulation by single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). We also showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturationin vitro. Furthermore, we found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ nuclease that can act on a wide variety of RNA- and DNA-containing substrates and exhibits preference for degrading RNA in model Okazaki fragments. Together, our data showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturation, whereas YpcP also contributes to the removal of RNA from an Okazaki fragmentin vitro.IMPORTANCEAll cells are required to resolve the different types of RNA-DNA hybrids that formin vivo. When RNA-DNA hybrids persist, cells experience an increase in mutation rate and problems with DNA replication. Okazaki fragment synthesis on the lagging strand requires an RNA primer to begin synthesis of each fragment. The mechanism of RNA removal from Okazaki fragments remains unknown in bacteria that lack RNase HI. We examined Okazaki fragment processingin vitroand found that RNase HIII in conjunction with DNA polymerase I represent the most efficient repair pathway. We also assessed the contribution of YpcP and found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease that prefers RNA substrates with activity on Okazaki and flap substratesin vitro.

scholarly journals Exonuclease III (XthA) enforcesin vivoDNA cloning ofEscherichia colito create cohesive ends

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Recombination Reaction ◽  
Dna Fragments ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Cloning ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Cloning Technology

AbstractEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15-40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA-cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinase, but is dependent on XthA, a 3’ to 5’ exonuclease. Here, in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to as iVEC (in vivo E. colicloning). Next, we show that the iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA-cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.ImportanceCloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently,in vitrorecombination of DNA fragments effectively joins multiple DNA fragments in place of the canonical method. Interestingly,E. colican take up linear double-stranded vectors, insert DNA fragments and assemble themin vivo.Thein vivocloning have realized a high level of usability comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reaction, since now it is only necessary to introduce PCR products intoE. colifor thein vivocloning. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning of E. coli and also constructed anE. colistrain that was optimized forin vivocloning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document