scholarly journals Role of RNF20 in cancer development and progression – a comprehensive review

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam Sethi ◽  
Muthu K. Shanmugam ◽  
Frank Arfuso ◽  
Alan Prem Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Transcriptional Elongation ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Suppressor Activity

Evolving strategies to counter cancer initiation and progression rely on the identification of novel therapeutic targets that exploit the aberrant genetic changes driving oncogenesis. Several chromatin associated enzymes have been shown to influence post-translational modification (PTM) in DNA, histones, and non-histone proteins. Any deregulation of this core group of enzymes often leads to cancer development. Ubiquitylation of histone H2B in mammalian cells was identified over three decades ago. An exciting really interesting new gene (RING) family of E3 ubiquitin ligases, known as RNF20 and RNF40, monoubiquitinates histone H2A at K119 or H2B at K120, is known to function in transcriptional elongation, DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair processes, maintenance of chromatin differentiation, and exerting tumor suppressor activity. RNF20 is somatically altered in breast, lung, prostate cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and mixed lineage leukemia, and its reduced expression is a key factor in initiating genome instability; and it also functions as one of the significant driving factors of oncogenesis. Loss of RNF20/40 and H2B monoubiquitination (H2Bub1) is found in several cancers and is linked to an aggressive phenotype, and is also an indicator of poor prognosis. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge of RNF20 in chronic inflammation-driven cancers, DNA DSBs, and apoptosis, and its impact on chromatin structure beyond the single nucleosome level.

scholarly journals SUMO, a small, but powerful, regulator of double-strand break repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Garvin ◽  
Joanna R. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Sumo Conjugation ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Sumo Proteases

The response to a DNA double-stranded break in mammalian cells is a process of sensing and signalling the lesion. It results in halting the cell cycle and local transcription and in the mediation of the DNA repair process itself. The response is launched through a series of post-translational modification signalling events coordinated by phosphorylation and ubiquitination. More recently modifications of proteins by S mall U biquitin-like MO difier (SUMO) isoforms have also been found to be key to coordination of the response (Morris et al. 2009 Nature 462 , 886–890 ( doi:10.1038/nature08593 ); Galanty et al. 2009 Nature 462 , 935–939 ( doi:10.1038/nature08657 )). However our understanding of the role of SUMOylation is slight compared with our growing knowledge of how ubiquitin drives signal amplification and key chromatin interactions. In this review we consider our current knowledge of how SUMO isoforms, SUMO conjugation machinery, SUMO proteases and SUMO-interacting proteins contribute to directing altered chromatin states and to repair-protein kinetics at a double-stranded DNA lesion in mammalian cells. We also consider the gaps in our understanding. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

H2S signaling in redox regulation of cellular functions

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngjun Ju ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Yanxi Pei ◽  
Guangdong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Redox Regulation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Redox Homeostasis ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Cellular Effects

Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is traditionally recognized as a toxic gas with a rotten-egg smell. In just the last few decades, H2S has been found to be one of a family of gasotransmitters, together with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, and various physiologic effects of H2S have been reported. Among the most acknowledged molecular mechanisms for the cellular effects of H2S is the regulation of intracellular redox homeostasis and post-translational modification of proteins through S-sulfhydration. On the one side, H2S can promote an antioxidant effect and is cytoprotective; on the other side, H2S stimulates oxidative stress and is cytotoxic. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the antioxidant versus pro-oxidant effects of H2S in mammalian cells and describes the Janus-faced properties of this novel gasotransmitter. The redox regulation for the cellular effects of H2S through S-sulfhydration and the role of H2S in glutathione generation is also recapitulated. A better understanding of H2S-regualted redox homeostasis will pave the way for future design of novel pharmacological and therapeutic interventions for various diseases.

scholarly journals PP2A-B55 Holoenzyme Regulation and Cancer

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1586
Author(s):  
Perrine Goguet-Rubio ◽  
Priya Amin ◽  
Sushil Awal ◽  
Suzanne Vigneron ◽  
Sophie Charrasse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Protein Phosphorylation ◽  
Protein Modification ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Specific Role ◽  
Signaling Cascades ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
The Family

Protein phosphorylation is a post-translational modification essential for the control of the activity of most enzymes in the cell. This protein modification results from a fine-tuned balance between kinases and phosphatases. PP2A is one of the major serine/threonine phosphatases that is involved in the control of a myriad of different signaling cascades. This enzyme, often misregulated in cancer, is considered a tumor suppressor. In this review, we will focus on PP2A-B55, a particular holoenzyme of the family of the PP2A phosphatases whose specific role in cancer development and progression has only recently been highlighted. The discovery of the Greatwall (Gwl)/Arpp19-ENSA cascade, a new pathway specifically controlling PP2A-B55 activity, has been shown to be frequently altered in cancer. Herein, we will review the current knowledge about the mechanisms controlling the formation and the regulation of the activity of this phosphatase and its misregulation in cancer.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 423 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea J. Hartlerode ◽  
Ralph Scully
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Information ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

DNA chromosomal DSBs (double-strand breaks) are potentially hazardous DNA lesions, and their accurate repair is essential for the successful maintenance and propagation of genetic information. Two major pathways have evolved to repair DSBs: HR (homologous recombination) and NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining). Depending on the context in which the break is encountered, HR and NHEJ may either compete or co-operate to fix DSBs in eukaryotic cells. Defects in either pathway are strongly associated with human disease, including immunodeficiency and cancer predisposition. Here we review the current knowledge of how NHEJ and HR are controlled in somatic mammalian cells, and discuss the role of the chromatin context in regulating each pathway. We also review evidence for both co-operation and competition between the two pathways.

Shelterin-Mediated Telomere Protection

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titia de Lange
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Telomere Protection ◽  
Repair Pathways

For more than a decade, it has been known that mammalian cells use shelterin to protect chromosome ends. Much progress has been made on the mechanism by which shelterin prevents telomeres from inadvertently activating DNA damage signaling and double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. Shelterin averts activation of three DNA damage response enzymes [the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinases and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)], blocks three DSB repair pathways [classical nonhomologous end joining (c-NHEJ), alternative (alt)-NHEJ, and homology-directed repair (HDR)], and prevents hyper-resection at telomeres. For several of these functions, mechanistic insights have emerged. In addition, much has been learned about how shelterin maintains the telomeric 3′ overhang, forms and protects the t-loop structure, and promotes replication through telomeres. These studies revealed that shelterin is compartmentalized, with individual subunits dedicated to distinct aspects of the end-protection problem. This review focuses on the current knowledge of shelterin-mediated telomere protection, highlights differences between human and mouse shelterin, and discusses some of the questions that remain.

scholarly journals Malonyl-proteome profiles of Staphylococcus aureus reveal lysine malonylation modification in enzymes involved in energy metabolism

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanan Shi ◽  
Jingjing Zhu ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Xiaozhao Tang ◽  
Zushun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Energy Metabolism ◽  
Active Sites ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Pentose Phosphate ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Bacterial Physiology ◽  
Dihydrolipoyl Dehydrogenase

Abstract Background Protein lysine malonylation, a novel post-translational modification (PTM), has been recently linked with energy metabolism in bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus is the third most important foodborne pathogen worldwide. Nonetheless, substrates and biological roles of malonylation are still poorly understood in this pathogen. Results Using anti-malonyl-lysine antibody enrichment and high-resolution LC-MS/MS analysis, 440 lysine-malonylated sites were identified in 281 proteins of S. aureus strain. The frequency of valine in position − 1 and alanine at + 2 and + 4 positions was high. KEGG pathway analysis showed that six categories were highly enriched, including ribosome, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), valine, leucine, isoleucine degradation, and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis. In total, 31 malonylated sites in S. aureus shared homology with lysine-malonylated sites previously identified in E. coli, indicating malonylated proteins are highly conserved among bacteria. Key rate-limiting enzymes in central carbon metabolic pathways were also found to be malonylated in S. aureus, namely pyruvate kinase (PYK), 6-phosphofructokinase, phosphoglycerate kinase, dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, and F1F0-ATP synthase. Notably, malonylation sites were found at or near protein active sites, including KH domain protein, thioredoxin, alanine dehydrogenase (ALD), dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (LpdA), pyruvate oxidase CidC, and catabolite control protein A (CcpA), thus suggesting that lysine malonylation may affect the activity of such enzymes. Conclusions Data presented herein expand the current knowledge on lysine malonylation in prokaryotes and indicate the potential roles of protein malonylation in bacterial physiology and metabolism.

scholarly journals Structural basis for proficient oxidized ribonucleotide insertion in double strand break repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonas A. Jamsen ◽  
Akira Sassa ◽  
Lalith Perera ◽  
David D. Shock ◽  
William A. Beard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleotide Pools ◽  
Nucleotide Insertion ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractReactive oxygen species (ROS) oxidize cellular nucleotide pools and cause double strand breaks (DSBs). Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) attaches broken chromosomal ends together in mammalian cells. Ribonucleotide insertion by DNA polymerase (pol) μ prepares breaks for end-joining and this is required for successful NHEJ in vivo. We previously showed that pol μ lacks discrimination against oxidized dGTP (8-oxo-dGTP), that can lead to mutagenesis, cancer, aging and human disease. Here we reveal the structural basis for proficient oxidized ribonucleotide (8-oxo-rGTP) incorporation during DSB repair by pol μ. Time-lapse crystallography snapshots of structural intermediates during nucleotide insertion along with computational simulations reveal substrate, metal and side chain dynamics, that allow oxidized ribonucleotides to escape polymerase discrimination checkpoints. Abundant nucleotide pools, combined with inefficient sanitization and repair, implicate pol μ mediated oxidized ribonucleotide insertion as an emerging source of widespread persistent mutagenesis and genomic instability.

scholarly journals Use of a Small Palindrome Genetic Marker to Investigate Mechanisms of Double-Strand-Break Repair in Mammalian Cells

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julang Li ◽  
Mark D Baker
Keyword(s):  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Chromosomal Markers ◽  
Vector Borne ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
The One

Abstract We examined mechanisms of mammalian homologous recombination using a gene targeting assay in which the vector-borne region of homology to the chromosome bore small palindrome insertions that frequently escape mismatch repair when encompassed within heteroduplex DNA (hDNA). Our assay permitted the product(s) of each independent recombination event to be recovered for molecular analysis. The results revealed the following: (i) vector-borne double-strand break (DSB) processing usually did not yield a large double-strand gap (DSG); (ii) in 43% of the recombinants, the results were consistent with crossover at or near the DSB; and (iii) in the remaining recombinants, hDNA was an intermediate. The sectored (mixed) genotypes observed in 38% of the recombinants provided direct evidence for involvement of hDNA, while indirect evidence was obtained from the patterns of mismatch repair (MMR). Individual hDNA tracts were either long or short and asymmetric or symmetric on the one side of the DSB examined. Clonal analysis of the sectored recombinants revealed how vector-borne and chromosomal markers were linked in each strand of individual hDNA intermediates. As expected, vector-borne and chromosomal markers usually resided on opposite strands. However, in one recombinant, they were linked on the same strand. The results are discussed with particular reference to the double-strand-break repair (DSBR) model of recombination.

scholarly journals G-quadruplexes: a promising target for cancer therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Kosiol ◽  
Stefan Juranek ◽  
Peter Brossart ◽  
Annkristin Heine ◽  
Katrin Paeschke
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Structure Formation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Personalized Treatment ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Intratumor Heterogeneity ◽  
Dna And Rna ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
The Stability

AbstractDNA and RNA can fold into a variety of alternative conformations. In recent years, a particular nucleic acid structure was discussed to play a role in malignant transformation and cancer development. This structure is called a G-quadruplex (G4). G4 structure formation can drive genome instability by creating mutations, deletions and stimulating recombination events. The importance of G4 structures in the characterization of malignant cells was currently demonstrated in breast cancer samples. In this analysis a correlation between G4 structure formation and an increased intratumor heterogeneity was identified. This suggests that G4 structures might allow breast cancer stratification and supports the identification of new personalized treatment options. Because of the stability of G4 structures and their presence within most human oncogenic promoters and at telomeres, G4 structures are currently tested as a therapeutic target to downregulate transcription or to block telomere elongation in cancer cells. To date, different chemical molecules (G4 ligands) have been developed that aim to target G4 structures. In this review we discuss and compare G4 function and relevance for therapeutic approaches and their impact on cancer development for three cancer entities, which differ significantly in their amount and type of mutations: pancreatic cancer, leukemia and malignant melanoma. G4 structures might present a promising new strategy to individually target tumor cells and could support personalized treatment approaches in the future.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation: The Molecular Switch of Double-Strand Break Repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Summers ◽  
F. Shen ◽  
E. A. Sierra Potchanant ◽  
E. A. Phipps ◽  
R. J. Hickey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Molecular Switches ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Pathways

Repair of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is vital to maintaining genomic stability. In mammalian cells, DSBs are resolved in one of the following complex repair pathways: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), or the inclusive DNA damage response (DDR). These repair pathways rely on factors that utilize reversible phosphorylation of proteins as molecular switches to regulate DNA repair. Many of these molecular switches overlap and play key roles in multiple pathways. For example, the NHEJ pathway and the DDR both utilize DNA-PK phosphorylation, whereas the HR pathway mediates repair with phosphorylation of RPA2, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Also, the DDR pathway utilizes the kinases ATM and ATR, as well as the phosphorylation of H2AX and MDC1. Together, these molecular switches regulate repair of DSBs by aiding in DSB recognition, pathway initiation, recruitment of repair factors, and the maintenance of repair mechanisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document