scholarly journals RGS14 is a novel Rap effector that preferentially regulates the GTPase activity of Gαo

2000 ◽  
Vol 350 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine TRAVER ◽  
Carole BIDOT ◽  
Nathalie SPASSKY ◽  
Tania BALTAUSS ◽  
Marie-France DE TAND ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Gtpase Activity ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Adult Mice ◽  
G Protein Signalling ◽  
Marked Preference

In an attempt to elucidate the physiological function(s) of the Ras-related Rap proteins, we used the yeast two-hybrid system and isolated a cDNA encoding a protein that interacts with both Rap1 and Rap2, but not with Ras; the use of Rap2 mutants showed that this interaction is characteristic of a potential Rap effector. This protein was identified as RGS14, a member of the recently discovered family of RGS (‘regulators of G-protein signalling’) proteins that stimulate the GTPase activity of the GTP-binding α subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins (Gα). Deletion analysis, as well as in vitro binding experiments, revealed that RGS14 binds Rap proteins through a domain distinct from that carrying the RGS identity, and that this domain shares sequence identity with the Ras/Rap binding domain of B-Raf and Raf-1 kinases. RGS14 is distinguished from other RGS proteins by its marked preference for Gαo over other Gα subunits: RGS14 binds preferentially to Gαo in isolated brain membranes, and also interacts preferentially with Gαo (as compared with Gαi1) to stimulate its GTPase activity. In adult mice, RGS14 expression is restricted to spleen and brain. In situ hybridization studies showed that it is highly expressed only in certain areas of mouse brain (such as the CA1 and CA2 regions of the hippocampus), and that this pattern closely resembles that of Rap2, but not Rap1, expression. Double in situ hybridization experiments revealed that certain cells in the hippocampus express both RGS14 and Gαo, as well as both RGS14 and Rap2, showing that the interaction of RGS14 with Gαo and Rap2 is physiologically possible. Taken together, these results suggest that RGS14 could constitute a bridging molecule that allows cross-regulation of signalling pathways downstream from G-protein-coupled receptors involving heterotrimeric proteins of the Gi/o family and those involving the Ras-related GTPase Rap2.

Processing of mRNA and proteins at the neuromuscular synapse

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
S. Bursztajn ◽  
S. A. Berman
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Motor Neuron ◽  
Neuromuscular Synapse ◽  
Muscle Cells ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Grain Distribution

Muscle cells are multinucleated and each nucleus has the capacity of expressing many genes. Both in vivo and in vitro the AChR clusters appear to be associated with clusters of nuclei. To answer the question whether each nucleus in a multinucleated myotube is equally active in expressing the AChR message and how this may be regulated by motor neuron we have carried out in situ hybridization with radiolabeled probes to the AChR α subunit RNA. We have found that muscle cells do not express the mRNA at equal levels. The response we have observed is not due to the death, or the metabolic inactivity of some nuclei. Cells hybridized with a probe for U1 small nuclear RNA, show grains in every nucleus with approximately the same grain distribution. To better understand how the motor neuron may regulate the AChR gene expression we have combined in situ hybridization with immunocytochemistry. We radiolabeled the AChR intron/exon probes with two (35S) thiodeoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNYPs).

Knockdown of regulator of G-protein signalling 2 (Rgs2) leads to abnormal early mouse embryo development in vitro

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Zhu ◽  
Ya-Hong Jiang ◽  
Ya-Ping He ◽  
Xuan Zhang ◽  
Zhao-Gui Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryonic Development ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Embryo Development ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
G Protein Signalling ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Development In Vitro

Regulator of G-protein signalling 2 (Rgs2) is involved in G-protein-mediated signalling by negatively regulating the activity of the G-protein α-subunit. In the present study, the expression patterns of Rgs2 in mouse ovarian tissues and early embryos were determined by semiquantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescent analyses. Rgs2 expression was observed in the ovarian tissues of adult female mice, with an almost equal expression levels during different stages of the oestrous cycle. Rgs2 was abundant in the cytoplasm, membrane, nuclei and spindles of intact polar bodies in mouse early embryos at different developmental stages from the zygote to blastocyst. The effect of Rgs2 knockdown on early embryonic development in vitro was examined by microinjecting Rgs2-specific short interfering (si) RNAs into mouse zygotes. Knockdown of endogenous Rgs2 expression led to abnormal embryonic development in vitro, with a considerable number of early embryos arrested at the 2- or 4-cell stage. Moreover, mRNA expression of three zygotic gene activation-related genes (i.e. Zscan4, Tcstv1 and MuERV-L) was decreased significantly in 2-cell arrested embryos. These results suggest that Rgs2 plays a critical role in early embryo development.

RGS18 is a myeloerythroid lineage-specific regulator of G-protein-signalling molecule highly expressed in megakaryocytes

2001 ◽  
Vol 359 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
David YOWE ◽  
Nadine WEICH ◽  
Mercy PRABHUDAS ◽  
Louis POISSON ◽  
Patrick ERRADA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
K562 Cells ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Hek 293 ◽  
Lymphoid Lineage ◽  
Cytokines And Chemokines ◽  
G Protein Signalling

Myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis are controlled by haematopoietic growth factors, including cytokines, and chemokines that bind to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Regulators of G-protein signalling (RGSs) are a protein family that can act as GTPase-activating proteins for Gαi- and Gαq-class proteins. We have identified a new member of the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins, RGS18. RGS18 contains clusters of hydrophobic and basic residues, which are characteristic of an amphipathic helix within its first 33 amino acids. RGS18 mRNA was most highly abundant in megakaryocytes, and was also detected specifically in haematopoietic progenitor and myeloerythroid lineage cells. RGS18 mRNA was not detected in cells of the lymphoid lineage. RGS18 was also highly expressed in mouse embryonic 15-day livers, livers being the principal organ for haematopoiesis at this stage of fetal development. RGS1, RGS2 and RGS16, other members of the R4 subfamily, were expressed in distinct progenitor and mature myeloerythroid and lymphoid lineage blood cells. RGS18 was shown to interact specifically with the Gαi-3 subunit in membranes from K562 cells. Furthermore, overexpression of RGS18 inhibited mitogen-activated-protein kinase activation in HEK-293/chemokine receptor 2 cells treated with monocyte chemotactic protein-1. In yeast cells, RGS18 overexpression complemented a pheromone-sensitive phenotype caused by mutations in the endogeneous yeast RGS gene, SST2. These data demonstrated that RGS18 was expressed most highly in megakaryocytes, and can modulate GPCR pathways in both mammalian and yeast cells in vitro. Hence RGS18 might have an important role in the regulation of megakaryocyte differentiation and chemotaxis.

scholarly journals RGS3 interacts with 14-3-3 via the N-terminal region distinct from the RGS (regulator of G-protein signalling) domain

2002 ◽  
Vol 365 (3) ◽  
pp. 677-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxin NIU ◽  
Astrid SCHESCHONKA ◽  
Kirk M. DRUEY ◽  
Amanda DAVIS ◽  
Eleanor REED ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Rgs Proteins ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
G Protein Signalling ◽  
Vitro Binding ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
Hybrid Screening

RGS3 belongs to a family of the regulators of G-protein signalling (RGS), which bind and inhibit the Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins via a homologous RGS domain. Increasing evidence suggests that RGS proteins can also interact with targets other than G-proteins. Employing yeast two-hybrid screening of a cDNA library, we identified an interaction between RGS3 and the phosphoserine-binding protein 14-3-3. This interaction was confirmed by in vitro binding and co-immunoprecipitation experiments. RGS3-deletion analysis revealed the presence of a single 14-3-3-binding site located outside of the RGS domain. Ser264 was then identified as the 14-3-3-binding site of RGS3. The S264A mutation resulted in the loss of RGS3 binding to 14-3-3, without affecting its ability to bind Gαq. Signalling studies showed that the S264A mutant was more potent than the wild-type RGS3 in inhibition of G-protein-mediated signalling. Binding experiments revealed that RGS3 exists in two separate pools, either 14-3-3-bound or G-protein-bound, and that the 14-3-3-bound RGS3 is unable to interact with G-proteins. These data are consistent with the model wherein 14-3-3 serves as a scavenger of RGS3, regulating the amounts of RGS3 available for binding G-proteins. This study describes a new level in the regulation of G-protein signalling, in which the inhibitors of G-proteins, RGS proteins, can themselves be regulated by phosphorylation and binding 14-3-3.

scholarly journals The RGS (regulator of G-protein signalling) and GoLoco domains of RGS14 co-operate to regulate Gi-mediated signalling

2004 ◽  
Vol 379 (3) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine TRAVER ◽  
Anne SPLINGARD ◽  
Georges GAUDRIAULT ◽  
Jean de GUNZBURG
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor ◽  
Maximal Activity ◽  
Stable Cell Line ◽  
Gtpase Activity ◽  
G Protein Signalling ◽  
Rgs Domain ◽  
Gdp Dissociation Inhibitor ◽  
G Protein Coupled

RGS (regulator of G-protein signalling) proteins stimulate the intrinsic GTPase activity of the α subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins, and thereby negatively regulate G-protein-coupled receptor signalling. RGS14 has been shown previously to stimulate the GTPase activities of Gαo and Gαi subunits through its N-terminal RGS domain, and to down-modulate signalling from receptors coupled to Gi. It also contains a central domain that binds active Rap proteins, as well as a C-terminal GoLoco/G-protein regulatory motif that has been shown to act in vitro as a GDP-dissociation inhibitor for Gαi. In order to elucidate the respective contributions of the three functional domains of RGS14 to its ability to regulate Gi signalling, we generated RGS14 mutants invalidated in each of its domains, as well as truncated molecules, and assessed their effects on Gi signalling via the βγ pathway in a stable cell line ectopically expressing the Gi-coupled M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (HEK-m2). We show that the RGS and GoLoco domains of RGS14 are independently able to inhibit signalling downstream of Gi. Targeting of the isolated GoLoco domain to membranes, by myristoylation/palmitoylation or Rap binding, enhances its inhibitory activity on Gi signalling. Finally, in the context of the full RGS14 molecule, the RGS and GoLoco domains co-operate to confer maximal activity on RGS14. We therefore propose that RGS14 combines the inhibition of Gi activation or coupling to receptors via its GoLoco domain with stimulation of the GTPase activity of Gαi–GTP via its RGS domain to negatively regulate signalling downstream of Gi.

Characterization of an Intermediate Filament Protein from the Platyhelminth, Dugesia japonica

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-446
Author(s):  
Akiko Yamamoto ◽  
Ken-ichiro Matsunaga ◽  
Toyoaki Anai ◽  
Hitoshi Kawano ◽  
Toshihisa Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Protein Characterization ◽  
Intermediate Filament Protein ◽  
Tail Domain ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Dugesia Japonica ◽  
Function Relationship

Background: Intermediate Filaments (IFs) are major constituents of the cytoskeletal systems in animal cells. Objective: To gain insights into the structure-function relationship of invertebrate cytoplasmic IF proteins, we characterized an IF protein from the platyhelminth, Dugesia japonica, termed Dif-1. Method: cDNA cloning, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemical analysis, and IF assembly experiments in vitro using recombinant Dif-1, were performed for protein characterization. Results: The structure deduced from the cDNA sequence showed that Djf-1 comprises 568 amino acids and has a tripartite domain structure (N-terminal head, central rod, and C-terminal tail) that is characteristic of IF proteins. Similar to nuclear IF lamins, Djf-1 contains an extra 42 residues in the coil 1b subdomain of the rod domain that is absent from vertebrate cytoplasmic IF proteins and a nuclear lamin-homology segment of approximately 105 residues in the tail domain; however, it contains no nuclear localization signal. In situ hybridization analysis showed that Djf-1 mRNA is specifically expressed in cells located within the marginal region encircling the worm body. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that Djf-1 protein forms cytoplasmic IFs located close to the microvilli of the cells. In vitro IF assembly experiments using recombinant proteins showed that Djf-1 alone polymerizes into IFs. Deletion of the extra 42 residues in the coil 1b subdomain resulted in the failure of IF formation. Conclusions: Together with data from other histological studies, our results suggest that Djf- 1 is expressed specifically in anchor cells within the glandular adhesive organs of the worm and that Djf-1 IFs may play a role in protecting the cells from mechanical stress.

scholarly journals Combination of Direct Viable Count and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (DVC-FISH) as a Potential Method for Identifying Viable Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Oysters and Mussels

Foods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1502
Author(s):  
Jorge García-Hernández ◽  
Manuel Hernández ◽  
Yolanda Moreno
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Vibrio Parahaemolyticus ◽  
Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Potential Method ◽  
Viable Count ◽  
Hybridization Technique ◽  
Fish Technique ◽  
Viable Cells

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a human food-borne pathogen with the ability to enter the food chain. It is able to acquire a viable, non-cultivable state (VBNC), which is not detected by traditional methods. The combination of the direct viable count method and a fluorescent in situ hybridization technique (DVC-FISH) makes it possible to detect microorganisms that can present VBNC forms in complex samples The optimization of the in vitro DVC-FISH technique for V. parahaemolyticus was carried out. The selected antibiotic was ciprofloxacin at a concentration of 0.75 μg/mL with an incubation time in DVC broth of 5 h. The DVC-FISH technique and the traditional plate culture were applied to detect and quantify the viable cells of the affected pathogen in artificially contaminated food matrices at different temperatures. The results obtained showed that low temperatures produced an important logarithmic decrease of V. parahaemolyticus, while at 22 °C, it proliferated rapidly. The DVC-FISH technique proved to be a useful tool for the detection and quantification of V. parahaemolyticus in the two seafood matrices of oysters and mussels. This is the first study in which this technique has been developed to detect viable cells for this microorganism.

scholarly journals Development, Sex Steroid Regulation, and Phenotypic Characterization of RFamide-Related Peptide (Rfrp) Gene Expression and RFamide Receptors in the Mouse Hypothalamus

Endocrinology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1827-1840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Poling ◽  
Joshua Kim ◽  
Sangeeta Dhamija ◽  
Alexander S. Kauffman
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Phenotypic Characterization ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Adult Mice ◽  
Gnrh Neurons ◽  
Double Label ◽  
Hormonal Milieu

Arginine-phenylalanine-amide (RFamide)-related peptide 3 (RFRP-3, encoded by the Rfrp gene) is the mammalian ortholog of gonadotropin-inhibiting hormone and can inhibit GnRH neuronal activity and LH release. However, the development and regulation of the RFRP-3 system in both sexes is poorly understood. Using in situ hybridization, we examined changes in Rfrp-expressing neurons in mice of both sexes during development and under different adulthood hormonal milieus. We found no sex differences in Rfrp expression or cell number in adult mice. Interestingly, we identified two interspersed subpopulations of Rfrp cells (high Rfrp-expressing, HE; low Rfrp-expressing, LE), which have unique developmental and steroidal regulation characteristics. The number of LE cells robustly decreases during postnatal development, whereas HE cell number increases significantly before puberty. Using Bax knockout mice, we determined that the dramatic developmental decrease in LE Rfrp cells is not due primarily to BAX-dependent apoptosis. In adults, we found that estradiol and testosterone moderately repress Rfrp expression in both HE and LE cells, whereas the nonaromatizable androgen dihydrotestosterone has no effect. Using double-label in situ hybridization, we determined that approximately 25% of Rfrp neurons coexpress estrogen receptor-α in each sex, whereas Rfrp cells do not readily express androgen receptor in either sex, regardless of hormonal milieu. Lastly, when we looked at RFRP-3 receptors, we detected some coexpression of Gpr147 but no coexpression of Gpr74 in GnRH neurons of both intact and gonadectomized males and females. Thus, RFRP-3 may exert its effects on reproduction either directly, via Gpr147 in a subset of GnRH neurons, and/or indirectly, via upstream regulators of GnRH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document