scholarly journals Regulation of the human protein C inhibitor gene expression in HepG2 cells: role of Sp1 and AP2

1998 ◽  
Vol 332 (2) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya HAYASHI ◽  
Masanobu USUI ◽  
Junji NISHIOKA ◽  
Zu Xun ZHANG ◽  
Koji SUZUKI

Protein C inhibitor (PCI) is the plasma inhibitor of activated protein C, which is the main protease of the anticoagulant protein C pathway. In this study the transcriptional regulation of human PCI gene in the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2, was characterized by evaluating the transient expression of a luciferase reporter gene. The 5´ flanking region (residues -1587 to +2) of the PCI gene showed an adequate transcriptional activity, the maximum transcriptional activity being in a region between residues -452 and -94, which contains an Sp1-binding site, two AP2-binding sites and an inverted AP2-binding site. Transient expression assays with various deletion mutants and site-directed mutants showed that the Sp1-binding site (residues -302 to -294) has a potent promoter activity and that the upstream AP2-binding site (residues -350 to -343) has a potent enhancer activity; no activity was detected in the inverted (residues -413 to -404) and downstream (residues -136 to -127) AP2-binding sites. In addition, a region of the PCI gene (residues -452 to -414) containing the STATx-binding site, the A-activator (AA)-binding site, and the interferon α (IFN-α) response element, and another region of the PCI gene (residues -176 to -147) containing the GATA-1 and the IFN-γ response element showed potent silencer activities. Gel mobility-shift assays with various DNA fragments indicated that the Sp1-binding site, the upstream AP2-binding site, the AA-binding site and the IFN-γ response element interact with nuclear protein(s) of HepG2 cells. These findings suggest that the Sp1-binding site is the promoter, the AP2-binding site (residues -350 to -343) the enhancer, and both the AA-binding site and the IFN-γ response element are the silencers of human PCI gene expression in HepG2 cells.

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 4393-4401 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Rance ◽  
George A. Follows ◽  
Peter N. Cockerill ◽  
Constanze Bonifer ◽  
David A. Lane ◽  
...  

Abstract The human endothelial cell protein C receptor (hEPCR) is normally expressed by the endothelium of large blood vessels, but the molecular basis for its in vivo specificity is uncertain. In this study, DNaseI hypersensitive site mapping demonstrated the presence of a hypersensitive site in the 5′ flanking region of the hEPCR gene in endothelial cells and certain transformed cells (HeLa and U937) known to express hEPCR in vitro. Conversely, this site was only weakly hypersensitive in HepG2 cells, cells which do not express hEPCR mRNA. Functional analysis of this 5′ flanking region by in vivo dimethylsulfate footprinting in cultured endothelial cells identified multiple regions, containing high and low homology consensus Sp1 binding sequences, that were protected from methylation in endothelial cells. These sequences were not protected in HepG2 cells. Reporter gene analysis of this region in endothelial cells demonstrated the presence of promoter activity conferred by the proximal 572 bp but failed to identify a functional TATA-box. This promoter was inactive in HepG2 cells. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays using endothelial cell nuclear extracts identified Sp1 family proteins binding to sites that were protected during footprinting. Sp1 sites were identified in regions at –368, –232, –226, –201, –146, and –102 bp relative to the translation start site. With the exception of the site at –102 bp, each identified Sp1 binding site made a positive contribution to reporter gene expression, although no individual site was critically important. We conclude that transcription factor binding to Sp1 binding sites in the 5′ flanking region is critical for normal hEPCR gene expression in endothelial cells.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (26) ◽  
pp. 15096-15103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel H. Keller ◽  
Siddhartha G. Jena ◽  
Yuji Yamazaki ◽  
Bomyi Lim

The regulatory specificity of a gene is determined by the structure of its enhancers, which contain multiple transcription factor binding sites. A unique combination of transcription factor binding sites in an enhancer determines the boundary of target gene expression, and their disruption often leads to developmental defects. Despite extensive characterization of binding motifs in an enhancer, it is still unclear how each binding site contributes to overall transcriptional activity. Using live imaging, quantitative analysis, and mathematical modeling, we measured the contribution of individual binding sites in transcriptional regulation. We show that binding site arrangement within the Rho-GTPase componentt48enhancer mediates the expression boundary by mainly regulating the timing of transcriptional activation along the dorsoventral axis ofDrosophilaembryos. By tuning the binding affinity of the Dorsal (Dl) and Zelda (Zld) sites, we show that single site modulations are sufficient to induce significant changes in transcription. Yet, no one site seems to have a dominant role; rather, multiple sites synergistically drive increases in transcriptional activity. Interestingly, Dl and Zld demonstrate distinct roles in transcriptional regulation. Dl site modulations change spatial boundaries oft48, mostly by affecting the timing of activation and bursting frequency rather than transcriptional amplitude or bursting duration. However, modulating the binding site for the pioneer factor Zld affects both the timing of activation and amplitude, suggesting that Zld may potentiate higher Dl recruitment to target DNAs. We propose that such fine-tuning of dynamic gene control via enhancer structure may play an important role in ensuring normal development.


Diabetes ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Matsuda ◽  
E. Araki ◽  
R. Yoshimura ◽  
K. Tsuruzoe ◽  
N. Furukawa ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 2084-2093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Schaley ◽  
Robert J. O'Connor ◽  
Laura J. Taylor ◽  
Dafna Bar-Sagi ◽  
Patrick Hearing

ABSTRACT The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4-6/7 protein interacts directly with different members of the E2F family and mediates the cooperative and stable binding of E2F to a unique pair of binding sites in the Ad5 E2a promoter region. This induction of E2F DNA binding activity strongly correlates with increased E2a transcription when analyzed using virus infection and transient expression assays. Here we show that while different adenovirus isolates express an E4-6/7 protein that is capable of induction of E2F dimerization and stable DNA binding to the Ad5 E2a promoter region, not all of these viruses carry the inverted E2F binding site targets in their E2a promoter regions. The Ad12 and Ad40 E2a promoter regions bind E2F via a single binding site. However, these promoters bind adenovirus-induced (dimerized) E2F very weakly. The Ad3 E2a promoter region binds E2F very poorly, even via a single binding site. A possible explanation of these results is that the Ad E4-6/7 protein evolved to induce cellular gene expression. Consistent with this notion, we show that infection with different adenovirus isolates induces the binding of E2F to an inverted configuration of binding sites present in the cellular E2F-1 promoter. Transient expression of the E4-6/7 protein alone in uninfected cells is sufficient to induce transactivation of the E2F-1 promoter linked to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase or green fluorescent protein reporter genes. Further, expression of the E4-6/7 protein in the context of adenovirus infection induces E2F-1 protein accumulation. Thus, the induction of E2F binding to the E2F-1 promoter by the E4-6/7 protein observed in vitro correlates with transactivation of E2F-1 promoter activity in vivo. These results suggest that adenovirus has evolved two distinct mechanisms to induce the expression of the E2F-1 gene. The E1A proteins displace repressors of E2F activity (the Rb family members) and thus relieve E2F-1 promoter repression; the E4-6/7 protein complements this function by stably recruiting active E2F to the E2F-1 promoter to transactivate expression.


1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4759-4766
Author(s):  
F Tronche ◽  
A Rollier ◽  
I Bach ◽  
M C Weiss ◽  
M Yaniv

We have characterized in the accompanying paper (P. Herbomel, A. Rollier, F. Tronche, M.-O. Ott, M. Yaniv, and M. C. Weiss, Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:4750-4758, 1989) six different elements in the albumin promoter. One of them, the proximal element (PE), is the binding site for a strictly liver specific factor, APF/HNF1. This binding site contains a bacterial DAM DNA methylase methylation target sequence which, when methylated, decreases the affinity of the protein for this element. When the different albumin promoter constructions were prepared in an Escherichia coli deoxyadenosine methylase-negative strain, the respective contributions of the elements to the overall promoter activity were strikingly different. An intact proximal element plus the TATA box gave almost full transcriptional activity in transient transfection experiments and only in differentiated hepatoma cells of line H4II, whereas the distal elements (distal element III [DEIII], the NF1-binding site DEII, and the E/CBP-binding site DEI) had become essentially dispensable. Mutations affecting the CCAAT box showed only a two- to threefold decrease. When PE was methylated, mutated, or replaced by the homologous element from the alpha-fetoprotein gene, activity in the context of the short promoter (PE plus the TATA box) was abolished. However, activity was restored in the presence of the upstream elements, showing that cooperation with factors binding to the CCAAT box and distal elements favors the functional interaction of the liver-specific APF/HNF1 factor with lower-affinity binding sites.


2002 ◽  
Vol 364 (2) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline CHAUVET ◽  
Brigitte BOIS-JOYEUX ◽  
Jean-Louis DANAN

The retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor α (RORα) is critically involved in many physiological functions in several organs. We find that the main RORα isoform in the mouse liver is the RORα4 isoform, in terms of both mRNA and protein levels, while the RORα1 isoform is less abundant. Because hypoxia is a major feature of liver physiology and pathology, we examined the effect of this stress on Rora gene expression and RORα transcriptional activity. HepG2 human hepatoma cells were cultured for 24h under normoxia (20% O2) or hypoxia (10, 2, and 0.1% O2) and the abundance of the Rora transcripts measured by Northern blot and semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Hypoxic HepG2 cells contained more Rora mRNA than controls. This was also observed in rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Cobalt chloride and desferrioxamine also increased the amount of Rora mRNA in HepG2 cells. It is likely that these treatments increase the amount of the RORα4 protein in HepG2 cells as evidenced by Western blotting in the case of desferrioxamine. Transient transfection experiments indicated that hypoxia, cobalt chloride, and desferrioxamine all stimulate RORα transcriptional activity in HepG2 cells. Hence, we believe that RORα participates in the control of gene transcription in hepatic cells and modulates gene expression in response to hypoxic stress.


Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 94 (9) ◽  
pp. 3151-3160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Catt ◽  
Shannon Hawkins ◽  
Ann Roman ◽  
Wen Luo ◽  
David G. Skalnik

CCAAT displacement protein (CDP) is a transcriptional repressor that restricts expression of the gp91phox gene to mature myeloid cells. CDP interacts with multiple sites within the −450 to +12 bp human gp91phox promoter, and down-regulation of CDP DNA-binding activity is required for induction of gp91phox transcription in mature phagocytes. Truncation of the gp91phox promoter to −102 to +12 bp removes 4 CDP-binding sites and reveals a promiscuous promoter activity that is active in some nonphagocytic cells. A cis-element at −90 bp is required for derepressed transcription and serves as a binding site for multiple transcriptional activators. We now report that this element also serves as a binding site for CDP. The affinity of CDP for this element is relatively weak compared with upstream CDP-binding sites within the promoter, consistent with the promiscuous transcriptional activity exhibited by the −102 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter fragment. Further analysis of the proximal promoter reveals an additional weak-affinity CDP-binding site centered at approximately −20 bp. Overexpression of cloned CDP represses the −102 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter, indicating that these proximal CDP-binding sites are functionally significant. The constellation of transcriptional activators and a repressor that interacts with the −90 bp cis-element is identical to that observed for a promoter element at −220 bp, reflecting the highly modular organization of the gp91phoxpromoter. These studies illustrate the complex interplay between transcriptional activators and a repressor that contribute to the myeloid-restricted expression of the gp91phox gene.


mBio ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia C. van Kessel ◽  
Luke E. Ulrich ◽  
Igor B. Zhulin ◽  
Bonnie L. Bassler

ABSTRACT LuxR-type transcription factors are the master regulators of quorum sensing in vibrios. LuxR proteins are unique members of the TetR superfamily of transcription factors because they activate and repress large regulons of genes. Here, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation and nucleotide sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify LuxR binding sites in the Vibrio harveyi genome. Bioinformatics analyses showed that the LuxR consensus binding site at repressed promoters is a symmetric palindrome, whereas at activated promoters it is asymmetric and contains only half of the palindrome. Using a genetic screen, we isolated LuxR mutants that separated activation and repression functions at representative promoters. These LuxR mutants exhibit sequence-specific DNA binding defects that restrict activation or repression activity to subsets of target promoters. Altering the LuxR DNA binding site sequence to one more closely resembling the ideal LuxR consensus motif can restore in vivo function to a LuxR mutant. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how a single protein can recognize a variety of binding sites to differentially regulate gene expression. IMPORTANCE Bacteria use the cell-cell communication process called quorum sensing to regulate collective behaviors. In vibrios, LuxR-type transcription factors control the quorum-sensing gene expression cascade. LuxR-type proteins are structural homologs of TetR-type transcription factors. LuxR proteins were assumed to function analogously to TetR proteins, which typically bind to a single conserved binding site to repress transcription of one or two genes. We find here that unlike TetR proteins, LuxR acts a global regulator, directly binding upstream of and controlling more than 100 genes. Again unlike TetR, LuxR functions as both an activator and a repressor, and these two activities can be separated by mutagenesis. Finally, the consensus binding motifs driving LuxR-activated and -repressed genes are distinct. This work shows that LuxR, although structurally similar to TetR, has evolved unique features enabling it to differentially control a large regulon of genes in response to quorum-sensing cues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document