scholarly journals A mutation and an antibody that affect chemical cross-linking of low-density lipoprotein receptors on human fibroblasts

1993 ◽  
Vol 289 (2) ◽  
pp. 569-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
D D Patel ◽  
A K Soutar ◽  
B L Knight
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Surface Membrane ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Ldl Receptors ◽  
Surface Receptors

Treatment of normal fibroblasts with the bifunctional cross-linking reagent DTSSP [3,3′-dithiobis(sulphosuccinimidylpropionate)] at 4 degrees C converted approximately 40% of the cell-surface low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors into a high-M(r) form, thought to represent receptor dimers. Preincubation of the cells with anti-(LDL receptor) monoclonal antibody 10A2 increased the proportion of surface receptors in the high-M(r) form after treatment with DTSSP at 4 degrees C to over 70%. Preincubation with LDL did not affect the proportion cross-linked, but prevented the increase produced by antibody 10A2. Cross-linking at 37 degrees C was less efficient than at 4 degrees C and was not affected by preincubation with antibody 10A2. Surface LDL receptors on fibroblasts from the homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemic subject MM were not cross-linked by DTSSP, confirming that the mutation had produced a change in the conformation of the receptor molecule. Taken together, the results suggest that normal LDL receptors on at least one region of the surface membrane may be loosely associated in some form of multimeric array which alters its alignment differently in response to antibody 10A2 and to cooling. Mutations that alter the tertiary structure of the receptors could affect LDL binding by disturbing the arrangement of the array.

scholarly journals Effect of cell density on binding and uptake of low density lipoprotein by human fibroblasts.

1979 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Kruth ◽  
J Avigan ◽  
W Gamble ◽  
M Vaughan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Density ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Cellular Lipid ◽  
Cholesterol Accumulation ◽  
Ldl Receptors ◽  
Ldl Binding ◽  
In Cells

The effect of cell density on low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding by cultured human skin fibroblasts was investigated. Bound LDL was visualized by indirect immunofluorescence. Cellular lipid and cholesterol were monitored by fluorescence in cells stained with phosphine 3R and filipin, respectively. LDL binding and lipid accumulation were compared in cells in stationary and exponentially growing cultures, in sparsely and densely plated cultures, in wounded and non-wounded areas of stationary cultures, and in stationary cultures with and without the addition of lipoprotein-deficient serum. We conclude that LDL binding and cholesterol accumulation induced by LDL are influenced by cell density. It appears that, compared to rapidly growing cells, quiescent (noncycling) human fibroblasts exhibit fewer functional LDL receptors.

Characterization of a family of gamma-ray-induced CHO mutants demonstrates that the ldlA locus is diploid and encodes the low-density lipoprotein receptor

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3268-3277
Author(s):  
R D Sege ◽  
K F Kozarsky ◽  
M Krieger
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Cho Cells ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Ldl Receptors

The ldlA locus is one of four Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell loci which are known to be required for the synthesis of functional low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors. Previous studies have suggested that the ldlA locus is diploid and encodes the LDL receptor. To confirm this assignment, we have isolated a partial genomic clone of the Chinese hamster LDL receptor gene and used this and other nucleic acid and antibody probes to study a family of ldlA mutants isolated after gamma-irradiation. Our analysis suggests that there are two LDL receptor alleles in wild-type CHO cells. Each of the three mutants isolated after gamma-irradiation had detectable deletions affecting one of the two LDL receptor alleles. One of the mutants also had a disruption of the remaining allele, resulting in the synthesis of an abnormal receptor precursor which was not subject to Golgi-associated posttranslational glycoprotein processing. The correlation of changes in the expression, structure, and function of LDL receptors with deletions in the LDL receptor genes in these mutants directly demonstrated that the ldlA locus in CHO cells is diploid and encodes the LDL receptor. In addition, our analysis suggests that CHO cells in culture may contain a partial LDL receptor pseudogene.

scholarly journals Unusual forms of low density lipoprotein receptors in hamster cell mutants with defects in the receptor structural gene.

1986 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1567-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
K F Kozarsky ◽  
H A Brush ◽  
M Krieger
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Hamster Ovary ◽  
Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Ovary Cells ◽  
Ldl Receptors

The structure and processing of low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors in wild-type and LDL receptor-deficient mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells was examined using polyclonal anti-receptor antibodies. As previously reported for human LDL receptors, the LDL receptors in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells were synthesized as precursors which were extensively processed by glycosylation to a mature form. In the course of normal receptor turnover, an apparently unglycosylated portion of the cysteine-rich N-terminal LDL binding domain of the receptor is proteolytically removed. The LDL receptor-deficient mutants fall into four complementation groups, ldlA, ldlB, ldlC, and ldlD; results of the analysis of ldlB, ldlC, and ldlD mutants are described in the accompanying paper (Kingsley, D. M., K. F. Kozarsky, M. Segal, and M. Krieger, 1986, J. Cell. Biol, 102:1576-1585). Analysis of ldlA cells has identified three classes of mutant alleles at the ldlA locus: null alleles, alleles that code for normally processed receptors that cannot bind LDL, and alleles that code for abnormally processed receptors. The abnormally processed receptors were continually converted to novel unstable intracellular intermediates. We also identified a compound-heterozygous mutant and a heterozygous revertant which indicate that the ldlA locus is diploid. In conjunction with other genetic and biochemical data, the finding of multiple mutant forms of the LDL receptor in ldlA mutants, some of which appeared together in the same cell, confirm that the ldlA locus is the structural gene for the LDL receptor.

scholarly journals Measurement of the absolute number of functioning low-density lipoprotein receptors in vivo using a monoclonal antibody

1995 ◽  
Vol 305 (3) ◽  
pp. 897-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Fitzsimmons ◽  
R Bush ◽  
D Hele ◽  
C Godliman ◽  
E Gherardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Ldl Receptors ◽  
The Absolute

MAC188 S/S is a monoclonal antibody which can be used in vivo to measure the absolute number of functioning low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors in a rabbit. The antibody binds to the extra-cellular domain of the LDL receptor and binding is not blocked by the presence of LDL. When the antibody-receptor complex is internalized, receptor recycling is inhibited for several hours. Thus when saturating doses of MAC188 S/S are administered intravenously, the amount of antibody removed from the blood (minus non-specific removal) is determined solely by the total number of LDL receptors in an animal. In this study MAC188 S/S was used to measure the number of LDL receptors in control rabbits and in animals treated with 17 alpha-ethinyl oestradiol. After treatment (which caused a 47% decrease in plasma cholesterol), receptor-mediated removal of MAC188 S/S from the blood was saturated in both groups following injection of 3.0 mg of antibody per kg body weight. Based on the amount of antibody removed via the LDL receptor at this dose, the total number of accessible LDL receptors was calculated as (2.0 +/- 0.3) x 10(15) receptors per kg body weight in control rabbits and (4.0 +/- 0.4) x 10(15) receptors per kg body weight in oestrogen-treated animals. The number of receptors in various organs was also determined. The monoclonal antibody approach therefore, allows accurate determination of LDL receptor numbers in animals with markedly different concentrations of circulating LDL, conditions in which the use of endogenous ligand would be subject to significant errors.

scholarly journals Fluorescent low density lipoprotein for observation of dynamics of individual receptor complexes on cultured human fibroblasts.

1981 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
L S Barak ◽  
W W Webb
Keyword(s):  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Receptor Complexes ◽  
Heparin Sulfate ◽  
Cultured Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Coa Reductase

The visible wavelength excited fluorophore 3,3'-dioctadecylindocarbocyanine iodide (Dil[3]) was incorporated into human low density lipoprotein (LDL) to form the highly fluorescent LDL derivative dil(3)-LDL. Dil(3)-LDL binds to normal human fibroblasts and to human fibroblasts defective in LDL receptor internalization but does not bind to LDL receptor-negative human fibroblasts at 4 degrees C or 37 degrees C. It is internalized rapidly at 37 degrees C by normal fibroblasts and depresses the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) in a manner similar to that of LDL. It is prevented from binding to the LDL receptor by an excess of unlabeled LDL or by heparin sulfate. Identical distributions of dil(3)-LDL are observed on cells by either indirect immunofluorescence with fluorescein-labeled antibody or directly by dil(3) fluorescence. Upwards of 45 molecules of dil(3) are incorporated per molecule of LDL without affecting binding to the receptor. This labeling renders individual molecules visible by their fluorescence and enables the derivative to be used in dynamic studies of LDL-receptor motion on living fibroblasts by standard fluorescence techniques at low LDL receptor density. Observations with this derivative indicate that the LDL-receptor complex is immobilized on the surface of human fibroblasts but, when free of this linkage, undergoes a Brownian motion consistent with theory.

Comparison of the LDL-receptor binding of VLDL and LDL from apoE4 and apoE3 homozygotes

1999 ◽  
Vol 276 (3) ◽  
pp. E553-E557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril D. S. Mamotte ◽  
Marian Sturm ◽  
Jock I. Foo ◽  
Frank M. van Bockxmeer ◽  
Roger R. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Lipids ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Hep G2 ◽  
Hep G2 Cells ◽  
Cultured Fibroblasts ◽  
Ldl Receptors ◽  
G2 Cells

Compared with apolipoprotein E3 (apoE3), apoE2 is less effective in mediating the binding of lipoproteins to the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor. The influence of the E4 isoform, which is associated with adverse effects on plasma lipids and coronary heart disease, is less clear. We compared the ability of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL from paired E4/4 and E3/3 subjects to compete against125I-labeled LDL for binding with the LDL receptor on cultured fibroblasts and Hep G2 cells. The concentrations of VLDL or LDL required to inhibit binding of125I-LDL by 50% (IC50, μg apoB/ml) were determined, and results were assessed in terms of an IC50 ratio, E4/4 IC50 relative to E3/3 IC50, to reduce the influence of interassay variability. In Hep G2 cells, E4/4 VLDL was more effective than E3/3 VLDL in competing for the LDL receptor, the IC50 ratio being lower than unity (0.73 ± 0.31, P < 0.05, two-tailed t-test). IC50 values themselves were marginally lower in E4/4 than E3/3 subjects (3.7 ± 1.3 vs. 6.1 ± 3.7, P < 0.08). However, there was no difference between E4/4 and E3/3 VLDL in competing for the LDL receptor on fibroblasts or between E4/4 and E3/3 LDL in competing for the LDL receptor on either cell type. These results suggest that inheritance of apoE4 is associated with an increased affinity of VLDL particles for LDL receptors on hepatocytes and may partly explain the influence of the E4 isoform on lipid metabolism.

scholarly journals Tissue-specific sorting of the human LDL receptor in polarized epithelia of transgenic mice.

1990 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
R K Pathak ◽  
M Yokode ◽  
R E Hammer ◽  
S L Hofmann ◽  
M S Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Transgenic Mice ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial Cells ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Intestinal Epithelial ◽  
Coated Pits ◽  
Ldl Receptors

The distribution of human low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors was studied by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy in epithelial cells of transgenic mice that express high levels of receptors under control of the metallothionein-I promoter. In hepatocytes and intestinal epithelial cells, the receptors were confined to the basal and basolateral surfaces, respectively. Very few LDL receptors were present in coated pits or intracellular vesicles. In striking contrast, in the epithelium of the renal tubule the receptors were present on the apical (lumenal) surface where they appeared to be concentrated at the base of microvilli and were abundant in vesicles of the endocytic recycling pathway. Intravenously administered LDL colloidal gold conjugates bound to the receptors on hepatocyte microvilli and were slowly internalized, apparently through slow migration into coated pits. We conclude that (a) sorting of LDL receptors to the surface of different epithelial cells varies with each tissue; and (b) in addition to a signal for clustering in coated pits, the LDL receptor may contain a signal for retention in noncoated membrane that is manifest in hepatocytes and intestinal epithelial cells, but not in renal epithelial cells or cultured human fibroblasts.

Low-density lipoprotein receptors in rat adipocytes: regulation with fasting

1994 ◽  
Vol 266 (1) ◽  
pp. E26-E32 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. B. Kraemer ◽  
C. Laane ◽  
B. Park ◽  
C. Sztalryd
Keyword(s):  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Fat Cell ◽  
Ldl Receptors ◽  
Rat Adipocytes ◽  
Epididymal Fat

Adipose tissue metabolism is exquisitely sensitive to caloric intake. With increasing adiposity more triglyceride and cholesterol are stored within increasingly large adipocytes, whereas less triglyceride and cholesterol are stored as the size of the fat cell decreases. A portion of the uptake of cholesterol by adipocytes is mediated by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors. The present studies addressed whether LDL receptors are differentially regulated in adipose tissue and the liver during fasting in the rat. Two days of fasting caused a reduction in body weight with an approximately 40% decrease in the epididymal fat depot and fat cell size. No changes in serum cholesterol were noted, but serum triglycerides fell approximately 55% with fasting. LDL receptors detected by immunoblotting decreased progressively with fasting to levels that were 95% below controls in adipocytes isolated from epididymal fat pads by 2-3 days. In contrast, hepatic LDL receptor expression was unaltered by fasting. After 2 days of fasting, the rate of synthesis of LDL receptors in isolated adipose cells was decreased approximately 35%, whereas levels of LDL receptor mRNA were diminished approximately 55%. It is concluded that the expression of LDL receptors in rat adipocytes is markedly downregulated during fasting through transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. Furthermore, LDL receptor expression is differentially regulated in adipose tissue and liver during fasting in the rat.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document