scholarly journals Two distinct transcriptional activities of pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplasts share immunochemically related functional polypeptides

1992 ◽  
Vol 286 (3) ◽  
pp. 833-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Lakhani ◽  
N C Khanna ◽  
K K Tewari
Keyword(s):  
Pisum Sativum ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rrna Genes ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Molecular Masses ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Functional Components ◽  
16 S Rrna

An RNA polymerase activity has been purified from pea (Pisum sativum) chloroplast extracts with a distinct transcriptional specificity for a chloroplast messenger gene. This activity (ms-RNA pol) differs from the pea RNA polymerase preparation reported by Sun, Shapiro, Wu & Tewari [(1986) Plant Mol. Biol. 6, 429-439], which specifically transcribes only the rRNA gene (rb-RNA pol). The specificity of transcription has been assessed by the synthesis in vitro of discrete transcripts of predicted sizes using cloned promoter regions of the chloroplast psbA and 16 S rRNA genes. The ms-RNA pol preparation, with polypeptides ranging in apparent molecular mass from 22 to 180 kDa, correctly initiates transcription from recombinant plasmids containing the psbA promoter and does not support 16 S rRNA promoter-directed transcription. The two activities differ also in their response to Mn2+ ions. To investigate whether the two transcriptional activities share common functional polypeptides, monoclonal antibodies were developed against the rb-RNA pol preparation. Three clones were selected on the basis of their ability to inhibit transcription in vitro of the 16 S rRNA gene by rb-RNA pol. The antibodies from these clones independently recognized three polypeptides with molecular masses of 27, 90 and 95 kDa on immunoblots. Antibodies cross-reacting with the 90 kDa polypeptide completely eliminated the specific retardation of an end-labelled 16 S rRNA promoter fragment in a mobility-shift assay, whereas the antibodies against the 95 kDa polypeptide resulted in the formation of a ternary complex (enzyme-DNA-antibody). The antibodies cross-reacting with the 27 kDa polypeptide, however, did not alter the mobility of the retarded DNA-enzyme complex on the gel. These antibodies also inhibited transcription in vitro of the psbA gene by ms-RNA pol and recognized polypeptides of identical molecular masses in the ms-RNA pol. These results show that the three polypeptides are functional components of the chloroplast transcriptional complex and appear to be involved in the transcription of both rRNA and mRNA genes. Transcriptional specificity is probably conferred by ancillary transcription factor(s) which remain to be identified.

The general transcription factor RAP30 binds to RNA polymerase II and prevents it from binding nonspecifically to DNA

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
M T Killeen ◽  
J F Greenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Glutathione S Transferase ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Indirect Consequence ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Sigma 70

RAP30/74 is a human general transcription factor that binds to RNA polymerase II and is required for initiation of transcription in vitro regardless of whether the promoter has a recognizable TATA box (Z. F. Burton, M. Killeen, M. Sopta, L. G. Ortolan, and J. F. Greenblatt, Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1602-1613, 1988). Part of the amino acid sequence of RAP30, the small subunit of RAP30/74, has limited homology with part of Escherichia coli sigma 70 (M. Sopta, Z. F. Burton, and J. Greenblatt, Nature (London) 341:410-414, 1989). To determine which sigmalike activities of RAP30/74 could be attributed to RAP30, we purified human RAP30 and a RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein that had been produced in E. coli. Bacterially produced RAP30 bound to RNA polymerase II in the absence of RAP74. Both partially purified natural RAP30/74 and recombinant RAP30 prevented RNA polymerase II from binding nonspecifically to DNA. In addition, nonspecific transcription by RNA polymerase II was greatly inhibited by RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase. DNA-bound RNA polymerase II could be removed from DNA by partially purified RAP30/74 but not by bacterially expressed RAP30. Thus, the ability of RAP30/74 to recruit RNA polymerase II to a promoter-bound preinitiation complex may be an indirect consequence of its ability to suppress nonspecific binding of RNA polymerase II to DNA.

scholarly journals Mitotic repression of transcription in vitro.

1993 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Hartl ◽  
J Gottesfeld ◽  
D J Forbes
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Protein Kinase Activity ◽  
Cdc2 Kinase ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

A normal consequence of mitosis in eukaryotes is the repression of transcription. Using Xenopus egg extracts shifted to a mitotic state by the addition of purified cyclin, we have for the first time been able to reproduce a mitotic repression of transcription in vitro. Active RNA polymerase III transcription is observed in interphase extracts, but strongly repressed in extracts converted to mitosis. With the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26, we demonstrate that this mitotic repression of RNA polymerase III transcription does not require normal chromatin condensation. Similarly; in vitro mitotic repression of transcription does not require the presence of nucleosome structure or involve a general repressive chromatin-binding protein, as inhibition of chromatin formation with saturating amounts of non-specific DNA has no effect on repression. Instead, the mitotic repression of transcription appears to be due to phosphorylation of a component of the transcription machinery by a mitotic protein kinase, either cdc2 kinase and/or a kinase activated by it. Mitotic repression of RNA polymerase III transcription is observed both in complete mitotic cytosol and when a kinase-enriched mitotic fraction is added to a highly simplified 5S RNA transcription reaction. We present evidence that, upon depletion of cdc2 kinase, a secondary protein kinase activity remains and can mediate this in vitro mitotic repression of transcription.

Synthetic octapeptide pyroGLU-ASP-ASP-SER-ASP-GLU-GLU-ASN controls DNA transcription in vitro by RNA polymerase II

1993 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Angiolillo ◽  
A. Desgro ◽  
V. Marsili ◽  
F. Panara ◽  
G. L. Gianfranceschi
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dna Transcription ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

Distinguishing the sites of pre-rRNA synthesis and accumulation in Ehrlich tumor cell nucleoli

1991 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-767
Author(s):  
M. Thiry ◽  
G. Goessens
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Condensed Chromatin ◽  
Rrna Genes ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Dense Fibrillar Component ◽  
Ehrlich Tumor ◽  
Granular Component ◽  
Fibrillar Component

The precise location of transcribing rRNA genes within Ehrlich tumor cell nucleoli has been investigated using two approaches: high-resolution autoradiography of cells pulse-labelled with tritiated uridine, varying the exposure time, and in situ-in vitro transcription coupled with an immunogold labelling procedure. When autoradiographic preparations are exposed for a short time, silver grains are found associated almost exclusively with interphasic cell nucleoli. Labelling of extranucleolar areas requires longer exposure. Within the nucleolus, the first sites to be revealed are in the dense fibrillar component. Prolonging exposure increases labelling over the dense fibrillar component, with label becoming more and more apparent over the fibrillar centers. Under these conditions, however, labelling does not extend into the granular component, and no background is observed. Initiation of transcription on ultrathin cell sections occurs preferentially at the borders of condensed chromatin blocks and in their close vicinity. The condensed chromatin areas themselves remain unlabelled. Inside most nucleoli, gold-particle clusters are mainly detected in the fibrillar centers, especially at their periphery, whereas the dense fibrillar component and the granular component remain devoid of label. These results, together with previous observations made on the same cell type, clearly indicate that the fibrillar centers are the sites of rRNA gene transcription in Ehrlich tumor cell nucleoli, while the dense fibrillar component is the site of pre-rRNA accumulation.

scholarly journals Revisiting T7 RNA polymerase transcription in vitro with the Broccoli RNA aptamer as a simplified real-time fluorescent reporter

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.014553
Author(s):  
Zachary J Kartje ◽  
Helen I Janis ◽  
Shaoni Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Keith T Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Real Time ◽  
High Throughput Screening ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
T7 Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Aptamer ◽  
Reaction Conditions ◽  
Fluorescent Reporter ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

Methods for rapid and high-throughput screening of transcription in vitro to examine reaction conditions, enzyme mutants, promoter variants, and small molecule modulators can be extremely valuable tools. However, these techniques may be difficult to establish or inaccessible to many researchers. To develop a straightforward and cost-effective platform for assessing transcription in vitro, we used the “Broccoli” RNA aptamer as a direct, real-time fluorescent transcript readout. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we screened the effect of common reaction conditions and components on bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) activity using a common quantitative PCR instrument for fluorescence detection. Several essential conditions for in vitro transcription by T7 RNAP were confirmed with this assay, including the importance of enzyme and substrate concentrations, co-variation of magnesium and nucleoside triphosphates, and the effects of several typical additives. When we used this method to assess all possible point mutants of a canonical T7 RNAP promoter, our results coincided well with previous reports. This approach should translate well to a broad variety of bacteriophage in vitro transcription systems and provides a platform for developing fluorescence-based readouts of more complex transcription systems in vitro.

scholarly journals Novel Small-Molecule Inhibitors of RNA Polymerase III

2003 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Wu ◽  
Jing Pan ◽  
Vala Thoroddsen ◽  
Deborah R. Wysong ◽  
Ronald K. Blackman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Small Molecule Inhibitors ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Biochemical Assays ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Pol Iii

ABSTRACT A genetic approach utilizing the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used to identify the target of antifungal compounds. This analysis led to the identification of small molecule inhibitors of RNA polymerase (Pol) III from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Three lines of evidence show that UK-118005 inhibits cell growth by targeting RNA Pol III in yeast. First, a dominant mutation in the g domain of Rpo31p, the largest subunit of RNA Pol III, confers resistance to the compound. Second, UK-118005 rapidly inhibits tRNA synthesis in wild-type cells but not in UK-118005 resistant mutants. Third, in biochemical assays, UK-118005 inhibits tRNA gene transcription in vitro by the wild-type but not the mutant Pol III enzyme. By testing analogs of UK-118005 in a template-specific RNA Pol III transcription assay, an inhibitor with significantly higher potency, ML-60218, was identified. Further examination showed that both compounds are broad-spectrum inhibitors, displaying activity against RNA Pol III transcription systems derived from Candida albicans and human cells. The identification of these inhibitors demonstrates that RNA Pol III can be targeted by small synthetic molecules.

[38] RNA polymerase II transcription in vitro

1991 ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal F. Lue ◽  
Peter M. Flanagan ◽  
Raymond J. Kelleher ◽  
Aled M. Edwards ◽  
Roger D. Kornberg
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Transcription
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document