scholarly journals Cellular communication inside the liver. Binding, conversion and metabolic effect of prostaglandin D2 on parenchymal liver cells

1989 ◽  
Vol 262 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Kuiper ◽  
F J Zijlstra ◽  
J A A M Kamps ◽  
T J C Van Berkel
Keyword(s):  
Parenchymal Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Liver Cells ◽  
Metabolic Effect ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Prostaglandin D2 ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Parenchymal Liver

The major eicosanoid produced within the rat liver, prostaglandin (PG) D2, wa studied for its ability to interact with the various liver cell types. It appeared that PGD2 bound specifically to parenchymal liver cells, whereas the binding of PGD2 to Kupffer and endothelial liver cells was quantitatively unimportant. Maximally 700 pg of PGD2/mg of parenchymal-cell protein could be bound by a high-affinity site (1 x 10(6) PGD2-binding sites/cell). The recognition site for PGD2 is probably a protein because trypsin treatment of the cells virtually abolished the high-affinity binding. High-affinity binding of PGD2 was a prerequisite for the induction of a metabolic effect in isolated parenchymal liver cells, i.e. the induction of glycogenolysis. High-affinity binding of PGD2 by parenchymal cells was coupled to the conversion of PGD2 into three metabolites, whereas no conversion of PGD2 by Kupffer and endothelial liver cells was noticed. The temperature-sensitivity of the conversion of PGD2 was consistent with a conversion of PGD2 on or in the vicinity of the cell membrane. One of the PGD2 metabolites could be identified as 9 alpha, 11 beta-PGF2. It can be calculated that the conversion rate of PGD2 by parenchymal liver cells exceeds the production rate of PGD2 by Kupffer plus endothelial liver cells, indicating that PGD2 is meant to exert its activity within the liver. The present finding that PGD2 formed by the non-parenchymal liver cells is recognized by a specific receptor on parenchymal liver cells and that binding, conversion and metabolic effect of PGD2 are interlinked by this receptor provides further support for the specific role of PGD2 in the intercellular communication in the liver.

scholarly journals Transient high-affinity binding of agonists to α1 -adrenergic receptors of intact liver cells

FEBS Letters ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt R. Schwarz ◽  
Stephen M. Lanier ◽  
Edward A. Carter ◽  
Robert M. Graham ◽  
Charles J. Homey
Keyword(s):  
Adrenergic Receptors ◽  
Liver Cells ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity

scholarly journals Species differences in nucleoside transport. A study of uridine transport and nitrobenzylthioinosine binding by mammalian erythrocytes

1982 ◽  
Vol 208 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M Jarvis ◽  
J R Hammond ◽  
A R P Paterson ◽  
A S Clanachan
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Species Differences ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Nucleoside Transport ◽  
Kinetic Properties ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Transport Capacity ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity

A kinetic study of the inward transport of uridine in erythrocytes of rabbit, human, mouse, rat and guinea-pig demonstrated that the apparent Km of this process was similar (about 0.2mM) in these cell types, but Vmax. values differed markedly. In this array of cell types, Vmax. values were proportional to the number of transport-inhibitory, high-affinity binding sites present per cell of each type. Transport of uridine or adenosine was not detected in dog erythrocytes, nor was saturable, high-affinity binding of nitrobenzylthioinosine demonstrable. These findings demonstrate that species differences in nucleoside transport capacity are attributable to differences in the cell-surface content of functional nucleoside transport sites, rather than to differences in the kinetic properties of these sites.

scholarly journals Prostaglandin D2 mediates the stimulation of glycogenolysis in the liver by phorbol ester

1988 ◽  
Vol 250 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Casteleijn ◽  
J Kuiper ◽  
H C J Van Rooij ◽  
J A A M Kamps ◽  
J F Koster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phorbol Ester ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Liver Cells ◽  
Prostaglandin D2 ◽  
Perfused Liver ◽  
Glucose Homoeostasis ◽  
Parenchymal Liver Cell ◽  
Parenchymal Liver ◽  
Complex Regulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

The tumour-promoting phorbol ester, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), when added to the perfused liver, stimulates glycogenolysis 2-fold. This stimulation is not seen when aspirin is present in the perfusion medium. In isolated parenchymal liver cells. PMA is not able to stimulate glycogenolysis, suggesting that its effect on glycogenolysis might be indirect and depends on the presence of the non-parenchymal liver cell types. To test the possible operation of an indirect mechanism, we measured the amount of prostaglandin (PG) D2 in liver perfusates. After addition of PMA, the amount of PGD2 is doubled, in parallel with the increase in glycogenolysis. Glycogenolysis in both isolated parenchymal liver cells and perfused liver could be stimulated by the addition of PGD2. Our data indicate that stimulation of glycogenolysis in the liver by PMA may be mediated by non-parenchymal liver cells, which produce PGD2 in response to PMA. Subsequently PGD2 activates glycogenolysis in the parenchymal liver cells. The intercellular communication inside the liver in response to PMA adds a new mechanism to the complex regulation of glucose homoeostasis by the liver.

scholarly journals Ligand size is a major determinant of high-affinity binding of fucose- and galactose-exposing (lipo)proteins by the hepatic fucose receptor

1994 ◽  
Vol 299 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Biessen ◽  
H F Bakkeren ◽  
D M Beuting ◽  
J Kuiper ◽  
T J Van Berkel
Keyword(s):  
Kupffer Cell ◽  
Kupffer Cells ◽  
Asialoglycoprotein Receptor ◽  
Major Determinant ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Parenchymal Liver

Previous in vivo studies have demonstrated that small galactose-exposing particles are preferentially internalized by the asialoglycoprotein receptor on the parenchymal liver cell and large particles by the galactose-particle receptor on the Kupffer cell. In this study, we have investigated using in vitro binding studies whether the affinity for either receptor is affected by the ligand size. The asialoglycoprotein receptor appeared to bind and process lactosylated proteins irrespective of their size. In contrast, recognition of galactose-exposing proteins by the galactose-particle receptor on the Kupffer cell was strongly dependent on size. The affinity increased 3000-fold with protein sizes increasing from 5 to 15 nm, reaching its maximum at approx. 1 nM for ligands larger than 15 nm. Apparently, the preferential in vivo uptake of large galactose-exposing ligands by Kupffer cells does not result from an inability of the parenchymal liver cells to internalize these ligands, but from the high affinity of large ligands for the galactose-particle receptor and the strategic anatomical localization of the Kupffer cells in the liver. In the preceding paper [Kuiper, Bakkeren, Biessen and Van Berkel (1994) Biochem. J. 299, 285-290] the galactose-particle receptor on the Kupffer cell was suggested to be identical with the fucose receptor. 125I-Lac-LDL-binding studies clearly showed that the galactose-particle receptor exhibited high-affinity binding of fucose-exposing proteins also. The affinity of fucosylated proteins for the galactose-particle receptor was greatly affected by ligand size. The above data strongly support the hypothesis that the galactose-particle receptor is identical with the fucose receptor. The size of neoglycoproteins can be appreciated as a new major determinant of affinity for the fucose receptor.

scholarly journals Uptake and degradation of human low-density lipoprotein by human liver parenchymal and Kupffer cells in culture

1991 ◽  
Vol 276 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A A M Kamps ◽  
J K Kruijt ◽  
J Kuiper ◽  
T J C Van Berkel
Keyword(s):  
Kupffer Cells ◽  
Human Liver ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Ldl Receptor ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Liver Cells ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Parenchymal Liver ◽  
Parenchymal Cells

The association with and degradation by cultured human parenchymal liver cells and human Kupffer cells of human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was investigated in order to define, for the human situation, the relative abilities of the various liver cell types to interact with LDL. With both human parenchymal liver cells and Kupffer cells the association of LDL with the cells followed saturation kinetics which were coupled to LDL degradation. The association of LDL (per mg of cell protein) to both cell types was comparable, but the association with human Kupffer cells was much more efficiently coupled to degradation than was the case in parenchymal cells. The capacity of human Kupffer cells to degrade LDL was consequently 18-fold higher (per mg of cell protein) than that of the human parenchymal liver cells. Competition studies showed that unlabelled LDL competed efficiently with the cell association and degradation of 125I-labelled LDL with both parenchymal and Kupffer cells, while unlabelled acetyl-LDL was ineffective. The degradation of LDL by parenchymal and Kupffer cells was blocked by chloroquine and NH4Cl, indicating that it occurs in the lysosomes. Binding and degradation of LDL by human liver parenchymal cells and human Kupffer cells appeared to be completely calcium-dependent. It is concluded that the association and degradation of LDL by human Kupffer and parenchymal liver cells proceeds through the specific LDL receptor, whereas the association of LDL to Kupffer cells is more efficiently coupled to degradation. The presence of the highly active LDL receptor on human Kupffer cells might contribute significantly to LDL catabolism by human liver, especially under conditions whereby the LDL receptor on parenchymal cells is down-regulated.

Characterization of a Mode of Specific Binding of Fibrin Monomer through its Amino-Terminal Domain by Macrophages and Macrophage Cell-Lines

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (02) ◽  
pp. 193-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R Shainoff ◽  
Deborah J Stearns ◽  
Patricia M DiBello ◽  
Youko Hishikawa-Itoh
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Macrophages ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Macrophage Cell ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Weak Binding ◽  
Amino Terminal Domain

SummaryThe studies reported here probe the existence of a receptor-mediated mode of fibrin-binding by macrophages that is associated with the chemical change underlying the fibrinogen-fibrin conversion (the release of fibrinopeptides from the amino-terminal domain) without depending on fibrin-aggregation. The question is pursued by 1) characterization of binding in relation to fibrinopeptide content of both the intact protein and the CNBr-fragment comprising the amino-terminal domain known as the NDSK of the protein, 2) tests of competition for binding sites, and 3) photo-affinity labeling of macrophage surface proteins. The binding of intact monomers of types lacking either fibrinopeptide A alone (α-fibrin) or both fibrinopeptides A and B (αβ-fibrin) by peritoneal macrophages is characterized as proceeding through both a fibrin-specific low density/high affinity (BMAX ≃ 200–800 molecules/cell, KD ≃ 10−12 M) interaction that is not duplicated with fibrinogen, and a non-specific high density/low affinity (BMAX ≥ 105 molecules/cell, KD ≥ 10−6 M) interaction equivalent to the weak binding of fibrinogen. Similar binding characteristics are displayed by monocyte/macrophage cell lines (J774A.1 and U937) as well as peritoneal macrophages towards the NDSK preparations of these proteins, except for a slightly weaker (KD ≃ 10−10 M) high-affinity binding. The high affinity binding of intact monomer is inhibitable by fibrin-NDSK, but not fibrinogen-NDSK. This binding appears principally dependent on release of fibrinopeptide-A, because a species of fibrin (β-fibrin) lacking fibrinopeptide-B alone undergoes only weak binding similar to that of fibrinogen. Synthetic Gly-Pro-Arg and Gly-His-Arg-Pro corresponding to the N-termini of to the α- and the β-chains of fibrin both inhibit the high affinity binding of the fibrin-NDSKs, and the cell-adhesion peptide Arg-Gly-Asp does not. Photoaffinity-labeling experiments indicate that polypeptides with elec-trophoretically estimated masses of 124 and 187 kDa are the principal membrane components associated with specifically bound fibrin-NDSK. The binding could not be up-regulated with either phorbol myristyl acetate, interferon gamma or ADP, but was abolished by EDTA and by lipopolysaccharide. Because of the low BMAX, it is suggested that the high-affinity mode of binding characterized here would be too limited to function by itself in scavenging much fibrin, but may act cooperatively with other, less limited modes of fibrin binding.

High Affinity Binding Sites for Activated Protein C and Protein C on Cultured Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (03) ◽  
pp. 465-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neelesh Bangalore ◽  
William N Drohan ◽  
Carolyn L Orthner
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Umbilical Vein ◽  
Activated Protein C ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Cell Binding ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity ◽  
Gla Domain ◽  
Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

SummaryActivated protein C (APC) is an antithrombotic serine proteinase having anticoagulant, profibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory activities. Despite its potential clinical utility, relatively little is known about its clearance mechanisms. In the present study we have characterized the interaction of APC and its active site blocked forms with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). At 4° C 125I-APC bound to HUVEC in a specific, time dependent, saturable and reversible manner. Scatchard analysis of the binding isotherm demonstrated a Kd value of 6.8 nM and total number of binding sites per cell of 359,000. Similar binding isotherms were obtained using radiolabeled protein C (PC) zymogen as well as D-phe-pro-arg-chloromethylketone (PPACK) inhibited APC indicating that a functional active site was not required. Competition studies showed that the binding of APC, PPACK-APC and PC were mutually exclusive suggesting that they bound to the same site(s). Proteolytic removal of the N-terminal γ-carboxyglutamic acid (gla) domain of PC abolished its ability to compete indicating that the gla-domain was essential for cell binding. Surprisingly, APC binding to these cells appeared to be independent of protein S, a cofactor of APC generally thought to be required for its high affinity binding to cell surfaces. The identity of the cell binding site(s), for the most part, appeared to be distinct from other known APC ligands which are associated with cell membranes or extracellular matrix including phospholipid, thrombomodulin, factor V, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and heparin. Pretreatment of HUVEC with antifactor VIII antibody caused partial inhibition of 125I-APC binding indicating that factor VIII or a homolog accounted for ∼30% of APC binding. Studies of the properties of surface bound 125I-APC or 125I-PC and their fate at 4°C compared to 37 °C were consistent with association of ∼25% of the initially bound radioligand with an endocytic receptor. However, most of the radioligand appeared not to be bound to an endocytic receptor and dissociated rapidly at 37° C in an intact and functional state. These data indicate the presence of specific, high affinity binding sites for APC and PC on the surface of HUVEC. While a minor proportion of binding sites may be involved in endocytosis, the identity and function of the major proportion is presently unknown. It is speculated that this putative receptor may be a further mechanisms of localizing the PC antithrombotic system to the vascular endothelium.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document