scholarly journals Effect of inhibitors of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase on the contents of ornithine decarboxylase and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase in L1210 cells

1988 ◽  
Vol 254 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Madhubala ◽  
J A Secrist ◽  
A E Pegg
Keyword(s):  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase ◽  
Enzyme Content ◽  
L1210 Cells ◽  
Mrna Content ◽  
Important Regulator ◽  
Substantial Decline ◽  
Effect Of Inhibitors

Treatment of L1210 cells with either of two inhibitors of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC), namely 5′-deoxy-5′-[N-methyl-N-[2-(amino-oxy)ethyl])aminoadenosine or 5′-deoxy-5′-[N-methyl-N-(3-hydrazinopropyl)]aminoadenosine, produced a large increase in the amount of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) protein. The increased enzyme content was due to a decreased rate of degradation of the protein and to an increased rate of synthesis, but there was no change in its mRNA content. The inhibitors led to a substantial decline in the amounts of intracellular spermidine and spermine, but to a big increase in the amount of putrescine. These results indicate that the content of ODC is negatively regulated by spermidine and spermine at the levels of protein translation and turnover, but that putrescine is much less effective in bringing about this repression. Addition of either spermidine or spermine to the cells treated with the AdoMetDC inhibitors led to a decrease in ODC activity, indicating that either polyamine can bring about this effect, but spermidine produced effects at concentrations similar to those found in the control cells and appears to be the physiologically important regulator. The content of AdoMetDC protein (measured by radioimmunoassay) was also increased by these inhibitors, and a small increase in its mRNA content was observed, but this was insufficient to account for the increase in protein. A substantial stabilization of AdoMetDC occurred in these cells, contributing to the increased enzyme content, but an increase in the rate of translation cannot be ruled out.

scholarly journals Glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) as an inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis in tumour cells

1984 ◽  
Vol 221 (2) ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Seppänen ◽  
R Fagerström ◽  
L Alhonen-Hongisto ◽  
H Elo ◽  
P Lumme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Parent Compound ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase ◽  
L1210 Cells ◽  
In Cells

Glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), the parent compound of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), was synthesized and tested for its ability to inhibit the biosynthesis of polyamines. It was found to be a powerful competitive inhibitor of adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.50), yet the lack of the methyl group at the glyoxal portion increased the apparent Ki value for the enzyme by about 30-fold in comparison with methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone). Glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) inhibited diamine oxidase (EC 1.4.3.6) activity as effectively as did methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone). The cellular accumulation curves of glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) in L1210 cells were practically superimposable with those of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), and the uptake of both compounds was distinctly stimulated by a prior treatment with 2-difluoromethylornithine. The drug decreased the concentration of spermidine in a dose-dependent manner and, in contrast with methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), without a concomitant accumulation of putrescine. The fact that putrescine concentrations were decreased in cells exposed to glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) was, at least in part, attributable to an inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.17) activity in cells treated with the compound. Under these experimental conditions equivalent concentrations of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) [1,1′-[(methylethanediylidine)dinitrilo]diguanidine] elicited large increases in the enzyme activity. When combined with difluoromethylornithine, glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) potentiated the growth-inhibitory effect of that drug. Taking into consideration the proven anti-leukaemic activity of glyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone), its effectiveness to inhibit spermidine biosynthesis (without raising the concentration of putrescine) as well as its suitability for combined use with inhibitors of ornithine decarboxylase, this drug is apparently worthy of further testing in tumour-bearing animals, especially in combination with difluoromethylornithine or related inhibitors of ornithine decarboxylase.

scholarly journals Investigations of the mechanism by which mammalian cell growth is inhibited by N1N12-bis(ethyl)spermine

1993 ◽  
Vol 291 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Albanese ◽  
R J Bergeron ◽  
A E Pegg
Keyword(s):  
Mitochondrial Dna ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Polyamine Analogues ◽  
Proliferative Effect ◽  
L1210 Cells ◽  
Inhibition Of Growth ◽  
Variant Cell ◽  
Mammalian Cell Growth

N1N12-Bis(ethyl)spermine (BESM) and related compounds are powerful inhibitors of cell growth that may have potential as anti-neoplastic agents [Bergeron, Neims, McManis, Hawthorne, Vinson, Bortell and Ingeno (1988) J. Med. Chem. 31, 1183-1190]. The mechanism by which these compounds bring about their effects was investigated by using variant cell lines in which processes thought to be altered by these agents are perturbed. Comparisons between the response of these cells and of their parental equivalents to BESM, N1N11-bis(ethyl)norspermine, N1N14-bis(ethyl)homospermine and N1N8-bis(ethyl)spermidine were then made. It was found that D-R cells, an L1210-derived line that over-expresses ornithine decarboxylase, were not resistant to these compounds. This indicates that the decrease in ornithine decarboxylase is not critical for the action of the compounds on cell growth. Furthermore, although polyamine levels were decreased in the D-R cells, the content was not totally depleted, indicating that such depletion is also not essential for the anti-proliferative effect. Two cell lines lacking mitochondrial DNA (human 143B206 cells and chicken DU3 cells) did not differ in sensitivity to BESM from their parental 143BTK- and DU24 cells. Furthermore, the inhibition of respiration in L1210 cells in response to BESM developed more slowly than the inhibition of growth. Thus it appears that the inhibitions of mitochondrial DNA synthesis and of mitochondrial respiration are also not primary factors in the anti-proliferative effects of these polyamine analogues. The inhibition of growth did, however, correlate with the intracellular accumulation of the analogues. It appears that the bis(ethyl)polyamine derivatives act by binding to intracellular target molecules and preventing macromolecular synthesis. The decline in normal polyamines may facilitate such binding, but is not essential for growth arrest.

scholarly journals Modulation of Ins(2,4,5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization by Ins(1,3,4,5)P4: enhancement by activated G-proteins, and evidence for the involvement of a GAP1 protein, a putative Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 receptor

1998 ◽  
Vol 331 (3) ◽  
pp. 947-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson W. LOOMIS-HUSSELBEE ◽  
Christopher D. WALKER ◽  
Joanna R. BOTTOMLEY ◽  
Peter J. CULLEN ◽  
Robin F. IRVINE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Related Protein ◽  
L1210 Cells ◽  
Putative Receptor ◽  
Specific Enhancement ◽  
Insp3 Receptor

We have previously shown that addition of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 to permeabilized L1210 cells increases the amount of Ca2+ mobilized by a submaximal concentration of Ins(2,4,5)P3, and we suggested that, in doing this, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 is not working via an InsP3 receptor but indirectly via an InsP4 receptor [Loomis-Husselbee, Cullen, Dreikhausen, Irvine and Dawson (1996) Biochem. J. 314, 811–816]. Here we have investigated whether this effect might be mediated by GAP1IP4BP, recently identified as a putative receptor for Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. GAP1IP4BP is a protein that interacts with one or more monomeric G-proteins, so we sought evidence for involvement of monomeric G-proteins in the effects of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 in permeabilized L1210 cells. Guanosine 5´-[γ-thio]triphosphate (GTP[S]) enhanced the effect of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 on Ins(2,4,5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization, but had no effect on the action of Ins(2,4,5)P3 alone. A specific enhancement of only the action of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 was also seen with GTP[S]-loaded R-Ras or Rap1a (two G-proteins known to interact with GAP1IP4BP), whereas H-Ras was inactive at similar concentrations. Guanosine 5´-[β-thio]diphosphate (GDP[S]) did not alter the action of either Ins(2,4,5)P3 or Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. Finally, the addition of exogenous GAP1IP4BP, purified from platelets, markedly enhanced the effect of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, and again, the amount of Ca2+ mobilized by Ins(2,4,5)P3 alone was unaltered. We conclude that the increase in Ins(2,4,5)P3-stimulated Ca2+ mobilization by Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 may be mediated by GAP1IP4BP or a closely related protein (such as GAP1m), and if so, the action of the GAP1 is not solely to regulate GTP loading of a G-protein, but rather it acts with a G-protein to cause its effect.

scholarly journals Inhibition of the expression of ornithine decarboxylase by some Κ-opioidergic receptor ligands in difluoromethylornithine-resistant L1210 cells

1996 ◽  
Vol 1311 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavio Flamigni ◽  
Claudio Stefanelli ◽  
Ivana Stanic ◽  
Claudio Muscari ◽  
Antonella Giaccari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Receptor Ligands ◽  
L1210 Cells

scholarly journals Role of pyridoxal phosphate in mammalian polyamine biosynthesis. Lack of requirement for mammalian S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity

1977 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Pegg
Keyword(s):  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Pyridoxal Phosphate ◽  
Vitamin B ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Deficient Diet ◽  
Polyamine Biosynthesis ◽  
Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase ◽  
Ornithine Decarboxylase Activity

1. Polyamine concentrations were decreased in rats fed on a diet deficient in vitamin B-6. 2. Ornithine decarboxylase activity was decreased by vitamin B-6 deficiency when assayed in tissue extracts without addition of pyridoxal phosphate, but was greater than in control extracts when pyridoxal phosphate was present in saturating amounts. 3. In contrast, the activity of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase was not enhanced by pyridoxal phosphate addition even when dialysed extracts were prepared from tissues of young rats suckled by mothers fed on the vitamin B-6-deficient diet. 4. S-Adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activities were increased by administration of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) (1,1′-[(methylethanediylidine)dinitrilo]diguanidine) to similar extents in both control and vitamin B-6-deficient animals. 5. The spectrum of highly purified liver S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase did not indicate the presence of pyridoxal phosphate. After inactivation of the enzyme by reaction with NaB3H4, radioactivity was incorporated into the enzyme, but was not present as a reduced derivative of pyridoxal phosphate. 6. It is concluded that the decreased concentrations of polyamines in rats fed on a diet containing vitamin B-6 may be due to decreased activity or ornithine decarboxylase or may be caused by an unknown mechanism responding to growth retardation produced by the vitamin deficiency. In either case, measurements of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase activity under optimum conditions in vitro do not correlate with the polyamine concentrations in vivo.

Ornithine decarboxylase in rat small intestine: stimulation with food or insulin

1976 ◽  
Vol 231 (5) ◽  
pp. 1557-1561 ◽  
Author(s):  
DV Maudsley ◽  
J Leif ◽  
Y Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
Enzyme Activity ◽  
Small Intestine ◽  
Ornithine Decarboxylase ◽  
Diamine Oxidase ◽  
Actinomycin D ◽  
Histidine Decarboxylase ◽  
Decarboxylase Activity ◽  
Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase ◽  
Diamine Oxidase Activity ◽  
Similarities And Differences

Ornithine decarboxylase in the small intestine of starved rats was stimulated 3- to 10-fold by refeeding or administration of insulin. A peak is observed 3-5 h following treatment after which the enzyme activity rapidly declines. The rise in ornithine decarboxylase is reduced by actinomycin D or cycloheximide. The increase in enzyme activity occurs mainly in the duodenum and jejunum with less than a twofold change being observed in the ileum. A small (twofold) increase in S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity in the small intestine was observed after food, but there was no change in diamine oxidase activity. Whereas pentagastrin and metiamide administration markedly stimulated histidine decarbosylase in the gastric mucosa, no consistent effect of these agents on ornithine decarboxylase in the small intestine was observed. The similarities and differences between histidine decarboxylase and ornithine decarboxylase are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document