scholarly journals SnoRNA microarray analysis reveals changes in H/ACA and C/D RNA levels caused by dyskerin ablation in mouse liver

2010 ◽  
Vol 429 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingping Ge ◽  
Seth D. Crosby ◽  
Michael E. Heinz ◽  
Monica Bessler ◽  
Philip J. Mason

snoRNAs (small nucleolar RNAs) are key components of snoRNP (small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein) particles involved in modifying specific residues of ribosomal and other RNAs by pseudouridylation (H/ACA snoRNAs) or methylation (C/D snoRNAs). They are encoded within the introns of host genes, which tend to be genes whose products are involved in ribosome biogenesis or function. Although snoRNPs are abundant, ubiquitous and their components highly conserved, information concerning their expression during development or how their expression is altered in diseased states is sparse. To facilitate these studies we have developed a snoRNA microarray platform for the analysis of the abundance of snoRNAs in different RNA samples. In the present study we show that the microarray is sensitive and specific for the detection of snoRNAs. A mouse snoRNA microarray was used to monitor changes in abundance of snoRNAs after ablation of dyskerin, an H/ACA snoRNA protein component, from mouse liver, which causes a decrease in ribosome production. H/ACA snoRNAs were decreased in abundance in these livers while, unexpectedly, C/D snoRNAs were increased. The increase in C/D snoRNAs corresponded with an increase in the abundance of the mRNAs transcribed from snoRNA host genes, suggesting the increase may be part of a cellular response to defective ribosome synthesis.

2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Jones ◽  
J. Petty ◽  
D. C. Hoyle ◽  
A. Hayes ◽  
E. Ragni ◽  
...  

Often changes in gene expression levels have been considered significant only when above/below some arbitrarily chosen threshold. We investigated the effect of applying a purely statistical approach to microarray analysis and demonstrated that small changes in gene expression have biological significance. Whole genome microarray analysis of a pde2Δ mutant, constructed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference strain FY23, revealed altered expression of ∼11% of protein encoding genes. The mutant, characterized by constitutive activation of the Ras/cAMP pathway, has increased sensitivity to stress, reduced ability to assimilate nonfermentable carbon sources, and some cell wall integrity defects. Applying the Munich Information Centre for Protein Sequences (MIPS) functional categories revealed increased expression of genes related to ribosome biogenesis and downregulation of genes in the cell rescue, defense, cell death and aging category, suggesting a decreased response to stress conditions. A reduced level of gene expression in the unfolded protein response pathway (UPR) was observed. Cell wall genes whose expression was affected by this mutation were also identified. Several of the cAMP-responsive orphan genes, upon further investigation, revealed cell wall functions; others had previously unidentified phenotypes assigned to them. This investigation provides a statistical global transcriptome analysis of the cellular response to constitutive activation of the Ras/cAMP pathway.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 3686-3699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Qiu ◽  
Julia Eifert ◽  
Ludivine Wacheul ◽  
Marc Thiry ◽  
Adam C. Berger ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) orchestrate the modification and cleavage of pre-rRNA and are essential for ribosome biogenesis. Recent data suggest that after nucleoplasmic synthesis, snoRNAs transiently localize to the Cajal body (in plant and animal cells) or the homologous nucleolar body (in budding yeast) for maturation and assembly into snoRNPs prior to accumulation in their primary functional site, the nucleolus. However, little is known about the trans-acting factors important for the intranuclear trafficking and nucleolar localization of snoRNAs. Here, we describe a large-scale genetic screen to identify proteins important for snoRNA transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We performed fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis to visualize U3 snoRNA localization in a collection of temperature-sensitive yeast mutants. We have identified Nop4, Prp21, Tao3, Sec14, and Htl1 as proteins important for the proper localization of U3 snoRNA. Mutations in genes encoding these proteins lead to specific defects in the targeting or retention of the snoRNA to either the nucleolar body or the nucleolus. Additional characterization of the mutants revealed impairment in specific steps of U3 snoRNA processing, demonstrating that snoRNA maturation and trafficking are linked processes.


1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 845-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Gerbi

A growing list of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) has been characterized in eukaryotes. They are transcribed by RNA polymerase II or III; some snoRNAs are encoded in the introns of other genes. The nonintronic polymerase II transcribed snoRNAs receive a trimethylguanosine cap, probably in the nucleus, and move to the nucleolus. snoRNAs are complexed with proteins, sometimes including fibrillarin. Localization and maintenance in the nucleolus of some snoRNAs requires the presence of initial precursor rRNA (pre-rRNA). Many snoRNAs have conserved sequence boxes C and D and a 3′ terminal stem; the roles of these features are discussed. Functional assays done for a few snoRNAs indicate their roles in rRNA processing for cleavage of the external and internal transcribed spacers (ETS and ITS). U3 is the most abundant snoRNA and is needed for cleavage of ETS1 and ITS1; experimental results on U3 binding sites in pre-rRNA are reviewed. 18S rRNA production also needs U14, U22, and snR30 snoRNAs, whereas U8 snoRNA is needed for 5.8S and 28S rRNA production. Other snoRNAs that are complementary to 18S or 28S rRNA might act as chaperones to mediate RNA folding. Whether snoRNAs join together in a large rRNA processing complex (the "processome") is not yet clear. It has been hypothesized that such complexes could anchor the ends of loops in pre-rRNA containing 18S or 28S rRNA, thereby replacing base-paired stems found in pre-rRNA of prokaryotes.Key words: RNA processing, small nucleolar RNAs, nucleolus, ribosome biogenesis, rRNA processing complex.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Streit ◽  
Enrico Schleiff

Eukaryotic ribosome assembly starts in the nucleolus, where the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is transcribed into the 35S pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA). More than two-hundred ribosome biogenesis factors (RBFs) and more than two-hundred small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNA) catalyze the processing, folding and modification of the rRNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. The initial pre-ribosomal 90S complex is formed already during transcription by association of ribosomal proteins (RPs) and RBFs. In addition, small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs) composed of snoRNAs and RBFs catalyze the two major rRNA modification types, 2′-O-ribose-methylation and pseudouridylation. Besides these two modifications, rRNAs can also undergo base methylations and acetylation. However, the latter two modifications have not yet been systematically explored in plants. The snoRNAs of these snoRNPs serve as targeting factors to direct modifications to specific rRNA regions by antisense elements. Today, hundreds of different sites of modifications in the rRNA have been described for eukaryotic ribosomes in general. While our understanding of the general process of ribosome biogenesis has advanced rapidly, the diversities appearing during plant ribosome biogenesis is beginning to emerge. Today, more than two-hundred RBFs were identified by bioinformatics or biochemical approaches, including several plant specific factors. Similarly, more than two hundred snoRNA were predicted based on RNA sequencing experiments. Here, we discuss the predicted and verified rRNA modification sites and the corresponding identified snoRNAs on the example of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our summary uncovers the plant modification sites in comparison to the human and yeast modification sites.


2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salini Konikkat ◽  
John L. Woolford,

Ribosome biogenesis requires the intertwined processes of folding, modification, and processing of ribosomal RNA, together with binding of ribosomal proteins. In eukaryotic cells, ribosome assembly begins in the nucleolus, continues in the nucleoplasm, and is not completed until after nascent particles are exported to the cytoplasm. The efficiency and fidelity of ribosome biogenesis are facilitated by >200 assembly factors and ∼76 different small nucleolar RNAs. The pathway is driven forward by numerous remodeling events to rearrange the ribonucleoprotein architecture of pre-ribosomes. Here, we describe principles of ribosome assembly that have emerged from recent studies of biogenesis of the large ribosomal subunit in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We describe tools that have empowered investigations of ribosome biogenesis, and then summarize recent discoveries about each of the consecutive steps of subunit assembly.


2020 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-359
Author(s):  
Rituparno Sen ◽  
Jörg Fallmann ◽  
Maria Emília M. T. Walter ◽  
Peter F. Stadler

AbstractMany small nucleolar RNAs and many of the hairpin precursors of miRNAs are processed from long non-protein-coding host genes. In contrast to their highly conserved and heavily structured payload, the host genes feature poorly conserved sequences. Nevertheless, there is mounting evidence that the host genes have biological functions beyond their primary task of carrying a ncRNA as payload. So far, no connections between the function of the host genes and the function of their payloads have been reported. Here we investigate whether there is evidence for an association of host gene function or mechanisms with the type of payload. To assess this hypothesis we test whether the miRNA host genes (MIRHGs), snoRNA host genes (SNHGs), and other lncRNA host genes can be distinguished based on sequence and/or structure features unrelated to their payload. A positive answer would imply a functional and mechanistic correlation between host genes and their payload, provided the classification does not depend on the presence and type of the payload. A negative answer would indicate that to the extent that secondary functions are acquired, they are not strongly constrained by the prior, primary function of the payload. We find that the three classes can be distinguished reliably when the classifier is allowed to extract features from the payloads. They become virtually indistinguishable, however, as soon as only sequence and structure of parts of the host gene distal from the snoRNAs or miRNA payload is used for classification. This indicates that the functions of MIRHGs and SNHGs are largely independent of the functions of their payloads. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the MIRHGs and SNHGs form coherent classes of long non-coding RNAs distinguished by features other than their payloads.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Bousquet ◽  
Claire Hemon ◽  
Paul Malburet ◽  
François Bucchini ◽  
Klaas Vandepoele ◽  
...  

Abstract The small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), essential for ribosome biogenesis, constitute a major family of medium-size noncoding RNAs (mncRNAs) in all eukaryotes. We present here, for the first time in a marine unicellular alga, the characterization of the snoRNAs family in Ostreococcus tauri, the smallest photosynthetic eukaryote. Using a transcriptomic approach, we identified 131 O. tauri snoRNAs (Ot–snoRNA) distributed in three classes: the C/D snoRNAs, the H/ACA snoRNAs and the MRP RNA. Their genomic organization revealed a unique combination of both the intronic organization of animals and the polycistronic organization of plants. Remarkably, clustered genes produced Ot–snoRNAs with unusual structures never previously described in plants. Their abundances, based on quantification of reads and northern blots, showed extreme differences in Ot–snoRNA accumulation, mainly determined by their differential stability. Most of these Ot–snoRNAs were predicted to target rRNAs or snRNAs. Seventeen others were orphan Ot–snoRNAs that would not target rRNA. These were specific to O. tauri or Mamiellophyceae and could have functions unrelated to ribosome biogenesis. Overall, these data reveal an ‘evolutionary response’ adapted to the extreme compactness of the O. tauri genome that accommodates the essential Ot–snoRNAs, developing multiple strategies to optimize their coordinated expression with a minimal cost on regulatory circuits.


Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Penzo ◽  
Rosanna Clima ◽  
Davide Trerè ◽  
Lorenzo Montanaro

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are non-coding RNAs involved in RNA modification and processing. Approximately half of the so far identified snoRNA genes map within the intronic regions of host genes, and their expression, as well as the expression of their host genes, is dependent on transcript splicing and maturation. Growing evidence indicates that mutations and/or deregulations that affect snoRNAs, as well as host genes, play a significant role in oncogenesis. Among the possible factors underlying snoRNA/host gene expression deregulation is copy number alteration (CNA). We analyzed the data available in The Cancer Genome Atlas database, relative to CNA and expression of 295 snoRNA/host gene couples in 10 cancer types, to understand whether the genetic or expression alteration of snoRNAs and their matched host genes would have overlapping trends. Our results show that, counterintuitively, copy number and expression alterations of snoRNAs and matched host genes are not necessarily coupled. In addition, some snoRNA/host genes are mutated and overexpressed recurrently in multiple cancer types. Our findings suggest that the differential contribution to cancer development of both snoRNAs and host genes should always be considered, and that snoRNAs and their host genes may contribute to cancer development in conjunction or independently.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4500
Author(s):  
Martina Godel ◽  
Deborah Morena ◽  
Preeta Ananthanarayanan ◽  
Ilaria Buondonno ◽  
Giulio Ferrero ◽  
...  

Doxorubicin (Dox) is one of the most important first-line drugs used in osteosarcoma therapy. Multiple and not fully clarified mechanisms, however, determine resistance to Dox. With the aim of identifying new markers associated with Dox-resistance, we found a global up-regulation of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in human Dox-resistant osteosarcoma cells. We investigated if and how snoRNAs are linked to resistance. After RT-PCR validation of snoRNAs up-regulated in osteosarcoma cells with different degrees of resistance to Dox, we overexpressed them in Dox-sensitive cells. We then evaluated Dox cytotoxicity and changes in genes relevant for osteosarcoma pathogenesis by PCR arrays. SNORD3A, SNORA13 and SNORA28 reduced Dox-cytotoxicity when over-expressed in Dox-sensitive cells. In these cells, GADD45A and MYC were up-regulated, TOP2A was down-regulated. The same profile was detected in cells with acquired resistance to Dox. GADD45A/MYC-silencing and TOP2A-over-expression counteracted the resistance to Dox induced by snoRNAs. We reported for the first time that snoRNAs induce resistance to Dox in human osteosarcoma, by modulating the expression of genes involved in DNA damaging sensing, DNA repair, ribosome biogenesis, and proliferation. Targeting snoRNAs or down-stream genes may open new treatment perspectives in chemoresistant osteosarcomas.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1499-1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Carneiro ◽  
Célia Carvalho ◽  
José Braga ◽  
José Rino ◽  
Laura Milligan ◽  
...  

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) associate with specific proteins forming small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) particles, which are essential for ribosome biogenesis. The snoRNAs are transcribed, processed, and assembled in snoRNPs in the nucleoplasm. Mature particles are then transported to the nucleolus. In yeast, 3′-end maturation of snoRNAs involves the activity of Rnt1p endonuclease and cleavage factor IA (CFIA). We report that after inhibition of CFIA components Rna14p and Rna15p, the snoRNP proteins Nop1p, Nop58p, and Gar1p delocalize from the nucleolus and accumulate in discrete nucleoplasmic foci. The U14 snoRNA, but not U3 snoRNA, similarly redistributes from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasmic foci. Simultaneous depletion of either Rna14p or Rna15p and the nuclear exosome component Rrp6p induces accumulation of poly(A)+ RNA at the snoRNP-containing foci. We propose that the foci detected after CFIA inactivation correspond to quality control centers in the nucleoplasm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document