scholarly journals Physical interaction between the histone acetyl transferase Tip60 and the DNA double-strand breaks sensor MRN complex

2010 ◽  
Vol 426 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Chailleux ◽  
Sandrine Tyteca ◽  
Christophe Papin ◽  
François Boudsocq ◽  
Nadine Puget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Histone Acetyl Transferase ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs

Chromatin modifications and chromatin-modifying enzymes are believed to play a major role in the process of DNA repair. The histone acetyl transferase Tip60 is physically recruited to DNA DSBs (double-strand breaks) where it mediates histone acetylation. In the present study, we show, using a reporter system in mammalian cells, that Tip60 expression is required for homology-driven repair, strongly suggesting that Tip60 participates in DNA DSB repair through homologous recombination. Moreover, Tip60 depletion inhibits the formation of Rad50 foci following ionizing radiation, indicating that Tip60 expression is necessary for the recruitment of the DNA damage sensor MRN (Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1) complex to DNA DSBs. Moreover, we found that endogenous Tip60 physically interacts with endogenous MRN proteins in a complex which is distinct from the classical Tip60 complex. Taken together, our results describe a physical link between a DNA damage sensor and a histone-modifying enzyme, and provide important new insights into the role and mechanism of action of Tip60 in the process of DNA DSB repair.

Detecting, signalling and repairing DNA double-strand breaks

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Recombination Processes

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be generated by a variety of genotoxic agents, including ionizing radiation and radiomimetic chemicals. They can also occur when DNA replication complexes encounter other forms of DNA damage, and are produced as intermediates during certain site-specific recombination processes. It is crucial that cells recognize DSBs and bring about their efficient repair, because a single unrepaired cellular DSB can induce cell death, and defective DSB repair can lead to mutations or the loss of significant segments of chromosomal material. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a variety of systems to detect DNA DSBs, repair them, and signal their presence to the transcription, cell cycle and apoptotic machineries. In this review, I describe how work on mammalian cells and also on model organisms such as yeasts has revelaed that such systems are highly conserved throughout evolution, and has provided insights into the molecular mechanisms by which DNA DSBs are recognized, signalled and repaired. I also explain how defects in the proteins that function in these pathways are associated with a variety of human pathological states.

scholarly journals The chromatin remodeler p400 ATPase facilitates Rad51-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 199 (7) ◽  
pp. 1067-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Courilleau ◽  
Catherine Chailleux ◽  
Alain Jauneau ◽  
Fanny Grimal ◽  
Sébastien Briois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Dependent Processes

DNA damage signaling and repair take place in a chromatin context. Consequently, chromatin-modifying enzymes, including adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes, play an important role in the management of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we show that the p400 ATPase is required for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). Indeed, although p400 is not required for DNA damage signaling, DNA DSB repair is defective in the absence of p400. We demonstrate that p400 is important for HR-dependent processes, such as recruitment of Rad51 to DSB (a key component of HR), homology-directed repair, and survival after DNA damage. Strikingly, p400 and Rad51 are present in the same complex and both favor chromatin remodeling around DSBs. Altogether, our data provide a direct molecular link between Rad51 and a chromatin remodeling enzyme involved in chromatin decompaction around DNA DSBs.

scholarly journals Histone chaperone Anp32e removes H2A.Z from DNA double-strand breaks and promotes nucleosome reorganization and DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7507-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu ◽  
Marina K. Ayrapetov ◽  
Brendan D. Price
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Dynamics ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
End Resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires open, flexible chromatin domains. The NuA4–Tip60 complex creates these flexible chromatin structures by exchanging histone H2A.Z onto nucleosomes and promoting acetylation of histone H4. Here, we demonstrate that the accumulation of H2A.Z on nucleosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair. Anp32e, an H2A.Z chaperone that interacts with the C-terminal docking domain of H2A.Z, is rapidly recruited to DSBs. Anp32e functions to remove H2A.Z from nucleosomes, so that H2A.Z levels return to basal within 10 min of DNA damage. Further, H2A.Z removal by Anp32e disrupts inhibitory interactions between the histone H4 tail and the nucleosome surface, facilitating increased acetylation of histone H4 following DNA damage. When H2A.Z removal by Anp32e is blocked, nucleosomes at DSBs retain elevated levels of H2A.Z, and assume a more stable, hypoacetylated conformation. Further, loss of Anp32e leads to increased CtIP-dependent end resection, accumulation of single-stranded DNA, and an increase in repair by the alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. Exchange of H2A.Z onto the chromatin and subsequent rapid removal by Anp32e are therefore critical for creating open, acetylated nucleosome structures and for controlling end resection by CtIP. Dynamic modulation of H2A.Z exchange and removal by Anp32e reveals the importance of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome dynamics in processing the damaged chromatin template during DSB repair.

Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Johnson ◽  
M. Jasin
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks

In mammalian cells, the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs by both homologous and non-homologous mechanisms. Indirect evidence, including that from gene targeting and random integration experiments, had suggested that non-homologous mechanisms were significantly more frequent than homologous ones. However, more recent experiments indicate that homologous recombination is also a prominent DSB repair pathway. These experiments show that mammalian cells use homologous sequences located at multiple positions throughout the genome to repair a DSB. However, template preference appears to be biased, with the sister chromatid being preferred by 2–3 orders of magnitude over a homologous or heterologous chromosome. The outcome of homologous recombination in mammalian cells is predominantly gene conversion that is not associated with crossing-over. The preference for the sister chromatid and the bias against crossing-over seen in mitotic mammalian cells may have developed in order to reduce the potential for genome alterations that could occur when other homologous repair templates are utilized. In attempts to understand further the mechanism of homologous recombination, the proteins that promote this process are beginning to be identified. To date, four mammalian proteins have been demonstrated conclusively to be involved in DSB repair by homologous recombination: Rad54, XRCC2, XRCC3 and BRCAI. This paper summarizes results from a number of recent studies.

scholarly journals The Determinant of DNA Repair Pathway Choices in Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Chengyu Bao ◽  
Yuxuan Shang ◽  
Xinye He ◽  
Chiyuan Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ionising Radiation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Pathways

Ionising radiation- (IR-) induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the deleterious DNA lesions that pose a serious threat to genomic stability. The major DNA repair pathways, including classical nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing, and alternative end joining, play critical roles in countering and eliciting IR-induced DSBs to ensure genome integrity. If the IR-induced DNA DSBs are not repaired correctly, the residual or incorrectly repaired DSBs can result in genomic instability that is associated with certain human diseases. Although many efforts have been made in investigating the major mechanisms of IR-induced DNA DSB repair, it is still unclear what determines the choices of IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanisms of IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices can operate in irradiated cells. We first briefly describe the main mechanisms of the major DNA DSB repair pathways and the related key repair proteins. Based on our understanding of the characteristics of IR-induced DNA DSBs and the regulatory mechanisms of DSB repair pathways in irradiated cells and recent advances in this field, We then highlight the main factors and associated challenges to determine the IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices. We conclude that the type and distribution of IR-induced DSBs, chromatin state, DNA-end structure, and DNA-end resection are the main determinants of the choice of the IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathway.

scholarly journals Screen identifies DYRK1B network as mediator of transcription repression on damaged chromatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17019-17030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Dong ◽  
Kirk L. West ◽  
Xin Yi Tan ◽  
Junshi Li ◽  
Toyotaka Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Active Chromatin ◽  
Chemical Library ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger transient pausing of nearby transcription, an emerging ATM-dependent response that suppresses chromosomal instability. We screened a chemical library designed to target the human kinome for new activities that mediate gene silencing on DSB-flanking chromatin, and have uncovered the DYRK1B kinase as an early respondent to DNA damage. We showed that DYRK1B is swiftly and transiently recruited to laser-microirradiated sites, and that genetic inactivation of DYRK1B or its kinase activity attenuated DSB-induced gene silencing and led to compromised DNA repair. Notably, global transcription shutdown alleviated DNA repair defects associated with DYRK1B loss, suggesting that DYRK1B is strictly required for DSB repair on active chromatin. We also found that DYRK1B mediates transcription silencing in part via phosphorylating and enforcing DSB accumulation of the histone methyltransferase EHMT2. Together, our findings unveil the DYRK1B signaling network as a key branch of mammalian DNA damage response circuitries, and establish the DYRK1B–EHMT2 axis as an effector that coordinates DSB repair on transcribed chromatin.

scholarly journals ATM-dependent formation of a novel chromatin compartment regulates the Response to DNA Double Strand Breaks and the biogenesis of translocations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coline Arnould ◽  
Vincent Rocher ◽  
Aldo S Bader ◽  
Emma Lesage ◽  
Nadine Puget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Cancer Genomes ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Induced Changes

DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs) repair is essential to safeguard genome integrity but the contribution of chromosome folding into this process remains elusive. Here we unveiled basic principles of chromosome dynamics upon DSBs in mammalian cells, controlled by key kinases from the DNA Damage Response. We report that ATM is responsible for the reinforcement of topologically associating domains (TAD) that experience a DSB. ATM further drives the formation of a new chromatin sub-compartment (″D″ compartment) upon clustering of damaged TADs decorated with γH2AX and 53BP1. ″D″ compartment formation mostly occurs in G1, is independent of cohesin and is enhanced upon DNA-PK pharmacological inhibition. Importantly, a subset of DNA damage responsive genes that are upregulated following DSBs also physically localize in the D sub-compartment and this ensures their optimal activation, providing a function for DSB clustering in activating the DNA Damage Response. However, these DSB-induced changes in genome organization also come at the expense of an increased translocations rate, which we could also detect on cancer genomes. Overall, our work provides a function for DSB-induced compartmentalization in orchestrating the DNA Damage Response and highlights the critical impact of chromosome architecture in genomic instability.

scholarly journals Kinesin Kif2C in regulation of DNA double strand break dynamics and repair

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songli Zhu ◽  
Mohammadjavad Paydar ◽  
Feifei Wang ◽  
Yanqiu Li ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) have detrimental effects on cell survival and genomic stability, and are related to cancer and other human diseases. In this study, we identified microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin Kif2C as a protein associated with DSB-mimicking DNA templates and known DSB repair proteins in Xenopus egg extracts and mammalian cells. The recruitment of Kif2C to DNA damage sites was dependent on both PARP and ATM activities. Kif2C knockdown or knockout led to accumulation of endogenous DNA damage, DNA damage hypersensitivity, and reduced DSB repair via both NHEJ and HR. Interestingly, Kif2C depletion, or inhibition of its microtubule depolymerase activity, reduced the mobility of DSBs, impaired the formation of DNA damage foci, and decreased the occurrence of foci fusion and resolution. Taken together, our study established Kif2C as a new player of the DNA damage response, and presented a new mechanism that governs DSB dynamics and repair.

scholarly journals Multiple classes of bactericidal antibiotics cause DNA double strand breaks in Staphylococcus aureus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Clarke ◽  
Kam Pou Ha ◽  
Andrew M. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Bacterial Survival ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Anaerobic Conditions ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Endogenous Production ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Dose Dependent

AbstractAntibiotics inhibit essential bacterial processes, resulting in arrest of growth and in some cases cell death. Many antibiotics are also reported to trigger endogenous production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage DNA and other macromolecules. However, the type of DNA damage that arises and the mechanisms used by bacteria to repair it are largely unclear. We found that several different classes of antibiotic triggered dose-dependent DNA damage in Staphylococcus aureus, including some bacteriostatic drugs. Damage was heterogenous and varied in magnitude between strains. However, antibiotic-triggered DNA damage led to double strand breaks, the processing of which by the RexAB helicase/nuclease complex triggered the SOS response and reduced staphylococcal susceptibility to most of the antibacterials tested. In most cases, DNA DSBs occurred under aerobic but not anaerobic conditions, suggesting a role for ROS. We conclude that DNA double strand breaks are a common occurrence during bacterial exposure to several different antibiotic classes and that repair of this damage by the RexAB complex promotes bacterial survival.

scholarly journals Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Waterman ◽  
James E. Haber ◽  
Marcus B. Smolka
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Model System ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Cell Lethality

Cells confront DNA damage in every cell cycle. Among the most deleterious types of DNA damage are DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which can cause cell lethality if unrepaired or cancers if improperly repaired. In response to DNA DSBs, cells activate a complex DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) response that arrests the cell cycle, reprograms gene expression, and mobilizes DNA repair factors to prevent the inheritance of unrepaired and broken chromosomes. Here we examine the DDC, induced by DNA DSBs, in the budding yeast model system and in mammals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document