scholarly journals Biochemical characterization of RGS14: RGS14 activity towards G-protein α subunits is independent of its binding to Rap2A

2006 ◽  
Vol 394 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Mittal ◽  
Maurine E. Linder
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Subunit Dissociation ◽  
Α Subunits

RGS (regulators of G-protein signalling) modulate signalling by acting as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins) for α subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. RGS14 accelerates GTP hydrolysis by Giα family members through its RGS domain and suppresses guanine nucleotide dissociation from Giα1 and Giα3 subunits through its C-terminal GoLoco domain. Additionally, RGS14 binds the activated forms of the small GTPases Rap1 and Rap2 by virtue of tandem RBDs (Raf-like Ras/Rap binding domains). RGS14 was identified in a screen for Rap2 effectors [Traver, Splingard, Gaudriault and De Gunzburg (2004) Biochem. J. 379, 627–632]. In the present study, we tested whether Rap binding regulates RGS14's biochemical activities. We found that RGS14 activity towards heterotrimeric G-proteins, as either a GAP or a GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor), was unaffected by Rap binding. Extending our biochemical characterization of RGS14, we also examined whether RGS14 can suppress guanine nucleotide exchange on Giα1 in the context of the heterotrimer. We found that a heterotrimer composed of N-myristoylated Giα1 and prenylated Gβγ is resistant to the GDI activity of the GoLoco domain of RGS14. This is consistent with models of GoLoco domain action on free Gα and suggests that RGS14 alone cannot induce subunit dissociation to promote receptor-independent activation of Gβγ-mediated signalling pathways.

Characterization of heterotrimeric G-proteins in adult Acanthocheilonema viteae

1996 ◽  
Vol 320 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
GRANT Karen R. ◽  
Margaret M. HARNETT ◽  
Graeme MILLIGAN ◽  
William HARNETT
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Pertussis Toxin ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Protein Subunits ◽  
Acanthocheilonema Viteae ◽  
Affinity Labelling ◽  
Α Subunits

Heterotrimeric G-proteins have been found in eukaryotic cells, from yeast to humans, but have received little attention, to date, with respect to parasitic organisms. We now present the first report of the characterization of heterotrimeric G-proteins expressed in a filarial nematode, Acanthocheilonema viteae. Using a combination of (i) affinity labelling with [α-32P]GTP; (ii) ADP-ribosylation with cholera toxin and pertussis toxin; (iii) Western blotting with a panel of anti-G-protein antibodies; and (iv) reverse transcriptase-PCR with degenerate G-protein oligonucleotide primers followed by hybridization analysis using oligonucleotides specific for individual G-protein subunits, we demonstrate that adult A. viteae expresses homologues of the β1-and/or β2-like subunits and α-subunits of the Gs, Gi, Gq and G12 subfamilies found in mammals. The role which these G-proteins may play in the biology of the organism is discussed.

Small GTP-binding protein-coupled receptors

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1040-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bhattacharya ◽  
A.V. Babwah ◽  
S.S.G. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Rho Gtpases ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Effector Pathways ◽  
Small G Proteins

Heterotrimeric GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) form the largest group of integral membrane receptor proteins and mediate diverse physiological processes. In addition to signalling via heterotrimeric G-proteins, GPCRs can also signal by interacting with various small G-proteins to regulate downstream effector pathways. The small G-protein superfamily is structurally classified into at least five families: the Ras, Rho/Rac/cdc42, Rab, Sar1/Arf and Ran families. They are monomeric G-proteins with molecular masses over the range 20–30 kDa, which function as molecular switches to control many eukaryotic cell functions. Several studies have provided evidence of crosstalk between GPCRs and small G-proteins. It is well documented that GPCR signalling through heterotrimeric G-proteins can lead to the activation of Ras and Rho GTPases. In addition, RhoA, Rabs, ARFs and ARF GEFs (guanine nucleotide-exchange factors) can associate directly with GPCRs, and GPCRs may also function as GEFs for small GTPases. In this review, we summarize the recent progress made in understanding the interaction between GPCRs and small GTPases, focusing on understanding how the association of small G-proteins with GPCRs and GPCR-regulatory proteins may influence GPCR signalling and intracellular trafficking.

scholarly journals Activation of G proteins by guanine nucleotide exchange factors relies on GTPase activity

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob J Stanley ◽  
Geraint MH Thomas
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide ◽  
Gtpase Activity ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Signalling Molecules ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange Factors ◽  
Experimental Strategies

G proteins are an important family of signalling molecules controlled by guanine nucleotide exchange and GTPase activity in what is commonly called an 'activation/inactivation cycle'. The molecular mechanism by which guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) catalyse the activation of monomeric G proteins is well-established, however the complete reversibility of this mechanism is often overlooked. Here, we use a theoretical approach to prove that GEFs are unable to positively control G protein systems at steady-state in the absence of GTPase activity. Instead, positive regulation of G proteins must be seen as a product of the competition between guanine nucleotide exchange and GTPase activity -- emphasising a central role for GTPase activity beyond merely signal termination. We conclude that a more accurate description of the regulation of G proteins via these processes is as a 'balance/imbalance' mechanism. This result has implications for the understanding of many intracellular signalling processes, and for experimental strategies that rely on modulating G protein systems.

Anesthetics Inhibit Acetylcholine-promoted Guanine Nucleotide Exchange of Heterotrimeric G Proteins of Airway Smooth Muscle

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chie Sakihara ◽  
William J. Perkins ◽  
David O. Warner ◽  
Keith A. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Muscle Contraction ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Muscarinic Receptor ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Airway Smooth Muscle ◽  
Smooth Muscle Contraction ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Protein

Background Anesthetics inhibit airway smooth muscle contraction in part by a direct effect on the smooth muscle cell. This study tested the hypothesis that the anesthetics halothane and hexanol, which both relax airway smooth muscle in vitro, inhibit acetylcholine-promoted nucleotide exchange at the alpha subunit of the Gq/11 heterotrimeric G protein (Galphaq/11; i.e., they inhibit muscarinic receptor-Galphaq/11 coupling). Methods The effect of halothane (0.38 +/- 0.02 mm) and hexanol (10 mm) on basal and acetylcholine-stimulated Galphaq/11 guanosine nucleotide exchange was determined in membranes prepared from porcine tracheal smooth muscle. The nonhydrolyzable, radioactive form of guanosine-5'-triphosphate, [S]GTPgammaS, was used as the reporter for Galphaq/11 subunit dissociation from the membrane to soluble fraction, which was immunoprecipitated with rabbit polyclonal anti-Galphaq/11 antiserum. Results Acetylcholine caused a significant time- and concentration-dependent increase in the magnitude of Galphaq/11 nucleotide exchange compared with basal values (i.e., without acetylcholine), reaching a maximal difference at 100 microm (35.9 +/-2.9 vs. 9.8 +/-1.2 fmol/mg protein, respectively). Whereas neither anesthetic had an effect on basal Galphaq/11 nucleotide exchange, both halothane and hexanol significantly inhibited the increase in Galphaq/11 nucleotide exchange produced by 30 microm acetylcholine (by 59% and 68%, respectively). Conclusions Halothane and hexanol interact with the receptor-heterotrimeric G-protein complex in a manner that prevents acetylcholine-promoted exchange of guanosine-5(')-triphosphate for guanosine-5'-diphosphate at Galphaq/11. These data are consistent with the ability of anesthetics to interfere with cellular processes mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins in many cells, including effects on muscarinic receptor-G-protein regulation of airway smooth muscle contraction.

scholarly journals Complementary biosensors reveal different G-protein signaling modes triggered by GPCRs and non-receptor activators

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikel Garcia-Marcos
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Cytoplasmic Proteins ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange Factor ◽  
In Cells

It has become evident that activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins by cytoplasmic proteins that are not G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays a role in physiology and disease. Despite sharing the same biochemical guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity as GPCRs in vitro, the mechanisms by which these cytoplasmic proteins trigger G-protein-dependent signaling in cells have not been elucidated. Heterotrimeric G-proteins can give rise to two active signaling species, Gα-GTP and dissociated Gβγ, with different downstream effectors, but how non-receptor GEFs affect the levels of these two species in cells is not known. Here, a systematic comparison of GPCRs and three unrelated non-receptor proteins with GEF activity in vitro (GIV/Girdin, AGS1/Dexras1, and Ric-8A) revealed high divergence in their contribution to generating Gα-GTP and free Gβγ in cells directly measured with live-cell biosensors. These findings demonstrate fundamental differences in how receptor and non-receptor G-protein activators promote signaling in cells despite sharing similar biochemical activities in vitro.

scholarly journals Signalling functions and biochemical properties of pertussis toxin-resistant G-proteins

1997 ◽  
Vol 321 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. FIELDS ◽  
Patrick J. CASEY
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Pertussis Toxin ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Signalling Pathways ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Regulate Cell Growth ◽  
Dependent Processes ◽  
Α Subunits

Pertussis toxin (PTX) has been widely used as a reagent to characterize the involvement of heterotrimeric G-proteins in signalling. This toxin catalyses the ADP-ribosylation of specific G-protein α subunits of the Gi family, and this modification prevents the occurrence of the receptorŐG-protein interaction. This review focuses on the biochemical properties and signalling of those G-proteins historically classified as ‘PTX-resistant’ due to the inability of the toxin to influence signalling through them. These G-proteins include members of the Gq and G12 families and one Gi family member, i.e. Gz. Signalling pathways controlled by these G-proteins are well characterized only for Gq family members, which activate specific isoforms of phospholipase C, resulting in increases in intracellular calcium and activation of protein kinase C (PKC), among other responses. While members of the G12 family have been implicated in processes that regulate cell growth, and Gz has been shown to inhibit adenylate cyclase, the specific downstream targets to these G-proteins in vivohave not been clearly established. Since two of these proteins, G12α and Gzα, are excellent substrates for PKC, there is the potential for cross-talk between their signalling and Gq-dependent processes leading to activation of PKC. In tissues that express these G-proteins, a number of guanine-nucleotide-dependent, PTX-resistant, signalling pathways have been defined for which the G-protein involved has not been identified. This review summarizes these pathways and discusses the evidence both for the participation of specific PTX-resistant G-proteins in them and for the regulation of these processes by PKC.

scholarly journals GIV/Girdin activates Gαi and inhibits Gαs via the same motif

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (39) ◽  
pp. E5721-E5730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijay Gupta ◽  
Deepali Bhandari ◽  
Anthony Leyme ◽  
Nicolas Aznar ◽  
Krishna K. Midde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Camp Response Element Binding ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide ◽  
Protein Signaling ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Subsequent Work ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Early Endosomes

We previously showed that guanine nucleotide-binding (G) protein α subunit (Gα)-interacting vesicle-associated protein (GIV), a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), transactivates Gα activity-inhibiting polypeptide 1 (Gαi) proteins in response to growth factors, such as EGF, using a short C-terminal motif. Subsequent work demonstrated that GIV also binds Gαs and that inactive Gαs promotes maturation of endosomes and shuts down mitogenic MAPK–ERK1/2 signals from endosomes. However, the mechanism and consequences of dual coupling of GIV to two G proteins, Gαi and Gαs, remained unknown. Here we report that GIV is a bifunctional modulator of G proteins; it serves as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) for Gαs using the same motif that allows it to serve as a GEF for Gαi. Upon EGF stimulation, GIV modulates Gαi and Gαs sequentially: first, a key phosphomodification favors the assembly of GIV–Gαi complexes and activates GIV’s GEF function; then a second phosphomodification terminates GIV’s GEF function, triggers the assembly of GIV–Gαs complexes, and activates GIV’s GDI function. By comparing WT and GIV mutants, we demonstrate that GIV inhibits Gαs activity in cells responding to EGF. Consequently, the cAMP→PKA→cAMP response element-binding protein signaling axis is inhibited, the transit time of EGF receptor through early endosomes are accelerated, mitogenic MAPK–ERK1/2 signals are rapidly terminated, and proliferation is suppressed. These insights define a paradigm in G-protein signaling in which a pleiotropically acting modulator uses the same motif both to activate and to inhibit G proteins. Our findings also illuminate how such modulation of two opposing Gα proteins integrates downstream signals and cellular responses.

Clues to the mechanism of action of eIF2B, the guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor for translation initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah S. Mohammad-Qureshi ◽  
Martin D. Jennings ◽  
Graham D. Pavitt
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Structural Similarity ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide ◽  
Nucleotide Exchange ◽  
Eukaryotic Translation ◽  
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange

A variety of cellular processes rely on G-proteins, which cycle through active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound forms. The switch between these states is commonly regulated by GEFs (guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors) and GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins). Although G-proteins have structural similarity, GEFs are very diverse proteins. A complex example of this system is seen in eukaryotic translation initiation between eIF (eukaryotic initiation factor) 2, a G-protein, its five-subunit GEF, eIF2B, and its GAP, eIF5. eIF2 delivers Met-tRNAi (initiator methionyl-tRNA) to the 40S ribosomal subunit before mRNA binding. Upon AUG recognition, eIF2 hydrolyses GTP, aided by eIF5. eIF2B then re-activates eIF2 by removing GDP, thereby promoting association of GTP. In the present article, we review data from studies of representative G-protein–GEF pairs and compare these with observations from our research on eIF2 and eIF2B to propose a model for how interactions between eIF2B and eIF2 promote guanine nucleotide exchange.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document