scholarly journals HNF1alpha is involved in tissue-specific regulation of CFTR gene expression

2004 ◽  
Vol 378 (3) ◽  
pp. 909-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie MOUCHEL ◽  
Sytse A. HENSTRA ◽  
Victoria A. McCARTHY ◽  
Sarah H. WILLIAMS ◽  
Marios PHYLACTIDES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

The CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) gene shows a complex pattern of expression with tissue-specific and temporal regulation. However, the genetic elements and transcription factors that control CFTR expression are largely unidentified. The CFTR promoter does not confer tissue specificity on gene expression, suggesting that there are regulatory elements outside the upstream region. Analysis of potential regulatory elements defined as DNase 1-hypersensitive sites within introns of the gene revealed multiple predicted binding sites for the HNF1α (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α) transcription factor. HNF1α, which is expressed in many of the same epithelial cell types as CFTR and shows similar differentiation-dependent changes in gene expression, bound to these sites in vitro. Overexpression of heterologous HNF1α augmented CFTR transcription in vivo. In contrast, antisense inhibition of HNF1α transcription decreased the CFTR mRNA levels. Hnf1α knockout mice showed lower levels of CFTR mRNA in their small intestine in comparison with wild-type mice. This is the first report of a transcription factor, which confers tissue specificity on the expression of this important disease-associated gene.

Maturation Stage-Specific Regulation of Megakaryocytic Genes by Pointed-Domain Ets Proteins.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1737-1737
Author(s):  
Liyan Pang ◽  
Xun Wang ◽  
Yuhuan Wang ◽  
Gerd Blobel ◽  
Mortimer Poncz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Fetal Liver ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Maturation Stage ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Specific Regulation

Abstract The pointed-domain Ets transcription factor Fli-1 has a critical role during megakaryocyte-specific gene expression. Previously, we demonstrated that Fli-1 occupies the early megakaryocyte-specific gene αIIb in vivo. Moreover, our work suggested a mechanism for Fli-1 function by showing that Fli-1 facilitates GATA-1/FOG-1 dependent expression of the αIIb gene. However, studies by others with a targeted disruption of the Fli-1 gene in mice showed that while Fli-1 is essential for normal megakaryocyte maturation, αIIb mRNA levels were not significantly reduced in the resulting megakaryocytes, suggesting that a related Ets factor(s) might compensate for the loss of Fli-1. Here we show that the widely expressed pointed domain Ets protein GABPα specifically binds in vitro to Ets elements from two early megakaryocyte-specific genes, αIIb and c-mpl. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments using primary murine fetal liver-derived megakaryocytes reveal that GABPα associates with αIIb and c-mpl in vivo. Moreover, GABPα is capable of mediating GATA-1/FOG-1 synergy in the context of αIIb promoter constructs. These results suggest that GABPα contributes to megakaryocyte-restricted gene expression and is capable of at least partially compensating for the loss of Fli-1. However, loss of Fli-1 leads to a pronounced decrease in the expression of the late megakaryocyte-specific gene GPIX, indicating that compensation by GABPα is incomplete. Consistent with this observation, ChIP experiments fail to detect significant levels of GABPα at the regulatory region of GPIX while Fli-1 is readily detected there. Together, these results point to a model in which Fli-1 and GABPα serve overlapping, but distinct roles, during the development of megakaryocytes. GABPα may be important during early megakaryopoiesis, but Fli-1 exerting an essential role during late stages of maturation.

Tissue-specific gene expression of prolactin receptor in the acute-phase response induced by lipopolysaccharides

2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (4) ◽  
pp. E750-E757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana M. Corbacho ◽  
Giuseppe Valacchi ◽  
Lukas Kubala ◽  
Estibaliz Olano-Martín ◽  
Bettina C. Schock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Phase ◽  
Acute Phase Response ◽  
Prolactin Receptor ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

Acute inflammation can elicit a defense reaction known as the acute-phase response (APR) that is crucial for reestablishing homeostasis in the host. The role for prolactin (PRL) as an immunomodulatory factor maintaining homeostasis under conditions of stress has been proposed; however, its function during the APR remains unclear. Previously, it was shown that proinflammatory cytokines characteristic of the APR (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFNγ) induced the expression of the PRL receptor (PRLR) by pulmonary fibroblasts in vitro. Here, we investigated the in vivo expression of PRLR during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced APR in various tissues of the mouse. We show that PRLR mRNA and protein levels were downregulated in hepatic tissues after intraperitoneal LPS injection. Downregulation of PRLR in the liver was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. A suppressive effect on mRNA expression was also observed in prostate, seminal vesicle, kidney, heart, and lung tissues. However, PRLR mRNA levels were increased in the thymus, and no changes were observed in the spleen. The proportion of transcripts for the different receptor isoforms (long, S1, S2, and S3) in liver and thymus was not altered by LPS injection. These findings suggest a complex tissue-specific regulation of PRLR expression in the context of the APR.

scholarly journals Identification of a 5-Methylcytosine Site that may Regulate C/EBPβ Binding and Determine Tissue-Specific Expression of the BPI Gene in Piglets

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Sun ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Xuemei Yin ◽  
Shouyong Sun ◽  
Chen Zi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Tissue Specificity ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
Immune Defense ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Tissue Specific Expression ◽  
Promoter Dna

Abstract Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) plays an important role in innate immune defense in mammals. A previous study showed that BPI gene expression correlates to gram-negative bacteria resistance. However, this gene showed tissue-specific expression in piglets and strongly expressed only in the digestive tract. To investigate the mechanisms governing the tissue-specificity, bisulfite sequencing PCR and next generation sequencing were used for high accuracy methylation quantitation of CpG islands of BPI gene upstream in 11 different tissues from weaned Yorkshire piglets. Additionally, qPCR was used to examine mRNA levels of BPI gene as well as transcription factor. We additionally analyzed transcriptional regulation by studying key 5-methylcytosine sites and transcription factors. Results showed that BPI mRNA levels significantly correlated with the overall methylation as well as methylation at mC-15 which was non-CpG site, no significant correlation could be found between the BPI and transcription factor mRNA levels, EMSA test showed that C/EBPβ could interact with BPI wild-type promoter DNA, but not methylated DNA. So we confirmed that methylation of mC-15 residue could inhibit the ability of C/EBPβ binding to the BPI promoter and affect the expression, and this mechanism probably plays a role in the tissue specificity of BPI gene expression in weaned piglets.

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

Delimiting regulatory sequences of the Drosophila melanogaster Ddc gene

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4548-4557
Author(s):  
J Hirsh ◽  
B A Morgan ◽  
S B Scholnick
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
P Element ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Flanking Sequences

We delimited sequences necessary for in vivo expression of the Drosophila melanogaster dopa decarboxylase gene Ddc. The expression of in vitro-altered genes was assayed following germ line integration via P-element vectors. Sequences between -209 and -24 were necessary for normally regulated expression, although genes lacking these sequences could be expressed at 10 to 50% of wild-type levels at specific developmental times. These genes showed components of normal developmental expression, which suggests that they retain some regulatory elements. All Ddc genes lacking the normal immediate 5'-flanking sequences were grossly deficient in larval central nervous system expression. Thus, this upstream region must contain at least one element necessary for this expression. A mutated Ddc gene without a normal TATA boxlike sequence used the normal RNA start points, indicating that this sequences is not required for start point specificity.

scholarly journals Synthetic gene regulatory networks in the opportunistic human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin A. Sorg ◽  
Clement Gallay ◽  
Jan-Willem Veening
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Combinatorial Libraries ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Expression Control ◽  
Gene Expression Control

AbstractStreptococcus pneumoniae can cause disease in various human tissues and organs, including the ear, the brain, the blood and the lung, and thus in highly diverse and dynamic environments. It is challenging to study how pneumococci control virulence factor expression, because cues of natural environments and the presence of an immune system are difficult to simulate in vitro. Here, we apply synthetic biology methods to reverse-engineer gene expression control in S. pneumoniae. A selection platform is described that allows for straightforward identification of transcriptional regulatory elements out of combinatorial libraries. We present TetR- and LacI-regulated promoters that show expression ranges of four orders of magnitude. Based on these promoters, regulatory networks of higher complexity are assembled, such as logic AND and IMPLY gates. Finally, we demonstrate single-copy genome-integrated toggle switches that give rise to bimodal population distributions. The tools described here can be used to mimic complex expression patterns, such as the ones found for pneumococcal virulence factors, paving the way for in vivo investigations of the importance of gene expression control on the pathogenicity of S. pneumoniae.

Transcription factor GATA4 regulates cardiac BCL2 gene expression in vitro and in vivo

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Kobayashi ◽  
Troy Lackey ◽  
Yuan Huang ◽  
Egbert Bisping ◽  
William T. Pu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Bcl2 Gene

scholarly journals GDF-9 and BMP-15 mRNA Levels in Canine Cumulus Cells Related to Cumulus Expansion and the Maturation Process

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 462 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Ramirez ◽  
Jaime Palomino ◽  
Karla Aspee ◽  
Monica De los Reyes
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Estrous Cycle ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cumulus Cells ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Cumulus Expansion ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Reproductive Phases

The competence to undergo expansion is a characteristic of cumulus cells (CCs). The aim was to investigate the expression of GDF-9 and BMP-15 mRNA in canine cumulus cells in relation to cumulus expansion and meiotic development over the estrous cycle. CCs were recovered from nonmatured and in vitro-matured (IVM) dog cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs), which were obtained from antral follicles at different phases of the estrous cycle. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was used to evaluate the relative abundance of GDF-9 and BMP-15 transcripts from the CCs with or without signs of expansion. The results were evaluated by ANOVA and logistic regression. The maturity of the oocyte and the expansion process affected the mRNA levels in CCs. There were differences (p < 0.05) in GDF-9 and BMP-15 gene expression in CCs isolated from nonmatured COCs when comparing the reproductive phases. Lower mRNA levels (p < 0.05) were observed in anestrus and proestrus in comparison to those in estrus and diestrus. In contrast, when comparing GDF-9 mRNA levels in IVM COCs, no differences were found among the phases of the estrous cycle in expanded and nonexpanded CCs (p < 0.05). However, the highest (p < 0.05) BMP-15 gene expression in CCs that did not undergo expansion was exhibited in anestrus and the lowest (p < 0.05) expression was observed in estrus in expanded CCs. Although the stage of the estrous cycle did not affect the second metaphase (MII )rates, the expanded CCs obtained at estrus coexisted with higher percentages of MII (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the differential expression patterns of GDF-9 and BMP-15 mRNA transcripts might be related to cumulus expansion and maturation processes, suggesting specific regulation and temporal changes in their expression.

scholarly journals The Pu.1 Locus Is Differentially Regulated at the Level of Chromatin Structure and Noncoding Transcription by Alternate Mechanisms at Distinct Developmental Stages of Hematopoiesis

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 7425-7438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Hoogenkamp ◽  
Hanna Krysinska ◽  
Richard Ingram ◽  
Gang Huang ◽  
Rachael Barlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Specific Regulation

ABSTRACT The Ets family transcription factor PU.1 is crucial for the regulation of hematopoietic development. Pu.1 is activated in hematopoietic stem cells and is expressed in mast cells, B cells, granulocytes, and macrophages but is switched off in T cells. Many of the transcription factors regulating Pu.1 have been identified, but little is known about how they organize Pu.1 chromatin in development. We analyzed the Pu.1 promoter and the upstream regulatory element (URE) using in vivo footprinting and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. In B cells, Pu.1 was bound by a set of transcription factors different from that in myeloid cells and adopted alternative chromatin architectures. In T cells, Pu.1 chromatin at the URE was open and the same transcription factor binding sites were occupied as in B cells. The transcription factor RUNX1 was bound to the URE in precursor cells, but binding was down-regulated in maturing cells. In PU.1 knockout precursor cells, the Ets factor Fli-1 compensated for the lack of PU.1, and both proteins could occupy a subset of Pu.1 cis elements in PU.1-expressing cells. In addition, we identified novel URE-derived noncoding transcripts subject to tissue-specific regulation. Our results provide important insights into how overlapping, but different, sets of transcription factors program tissue-specific chromatin structures in the hematopoietic system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document