scholarly journals Phosphoinositides differentially regulate alpha-actinin flexibility and function

2004 ◽  
Vol 378 (3) ◽  
pp. 1067-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie CORGAN ◽  
CoreyAyne SINGLETON ◽  
Cynthia B. SANTOSO ◽  
Jeffrey A. GREENWOOD
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Cleavage Sites ◽  
Inhibit Activity ◽  
Integrin Receptors ◽  
Linker Region ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
A Cell ◽  
And Function ◽  
Spectrin Repeats

α-Actinin is a cell-adhesion and cytoskeletal protein that bundles actin microfilaments and links these filaments directly to integrin-adhesion receptors. Phosphoinositides bind to and regulate the interaction of α-actinin with actin filaments and integrin receptors. In the present study, we demonstrate that PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 inhibits and disrupts α-actinin-bundling activity, whereas PtdIns(4,5)P2 can only inhibit activity. In addition, a protease-sensitivity assay was developed to examine the flexibility of the linker region between the actin-binding domain and the spectrin repeats of α-actinin. Both phosphoinositides influenced the extent of proteolysis and the cleavage sites. PtdIns(4,5)P2 binding decreased the proteolysis of α-actinin, suggesting a role in stabilizing the structure of the protein. In contrast, PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 binding enhanced α-actinin proteolysis, indicating an increase in the flexibility of the protein. Furthermore, phosphoinositide binding influenced the proteolysis of the N- and C-terminal domains of α-actinin, indicating regulation of structure within both domains. These results support the hypothesis that PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 differentially regulate α-actinin function by modulating the structure and flexibility of the protein.

scholarly journals Characterisation ofSchizosaccharomyces pombe α-actinin

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Addario ◽  
Linda Sandblad ◽  
Karina Persson ◽  
Lars Backman
Keyword(s):  
Salt Bridge ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Structural Domain ◽  
Structural Domains ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
Ef Hand ◽  
And Function ◽  
Spectrin Repeats

The actin cytoskeleton plays a fundamental role in eukaryotic cells. Its reorganization is regulated by a plethora of actin-modulating proteins, such as a-actinin. In higher organisms,α-actinin is characterized by the presence of three distinct structural domains: an N-terminal actin-binding domain and a C-terminal region with EF-hand motif separated by a central rod domain with four spectrin repeats. Sequence analysis has revealed that the central rod domain ofα-actinin from the fission yeastSchizosaccharomyces pombeconsists of only two spectrin repeats. To obtain a firmer understanding of the structure and function of this unconventionalα-actinin, we have cloned and characterized each structural domain. Our results show that this a-actinin isoform is capable of forming dimers and that the rod domain is required for this. However, its actin-binding and cross-linking activity appears less efficient compared to conventionalα-actinins. The solved crystal structure of the actin-binding domain indicates that the closed state is stabilised by hydrogen bonds and a salt bridge not present in otherα-actinins, which may reduce the affinity for actin.

scholarly journals Determination of the alpha-actinin-binding site on actin filaments by cryoelectron microscopy and image analysis.

1994 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
A McGough ◽  
M Way ◽  
D DeRosier
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Outer Face ◽  
Actin Binding Domain

The three-dimensional structure of actin filaments decorated with the actin-binding domain of chick smooth muscle alpha-actinin (alpha A1-2) has been determined to 21-A resolution. The shape and location of alpha A1-2 was determined by subtracting maps of F-actin from the reconstruction of decorated filaments. alpha A1-2 resembles a bell that measures approximately 38 A at its base and extends 42 A from its base to its tip. In decorated filaments, the base of alpha A1-2 is centered about the outer face of subdomain 2 of actin and contacts subdomain 1 of two neighboring monomers along the long-pitch (two-start) helical strands. Using the atomic model of F-actin (Lorenz, M., D. Popp, and K. C. Holmes. 1993. J. Mol. Biol. 234:826-836.), we have been able to test directly the likelihood that specific actin residues, which have been previously identified by others, interact with alpha A1-2. Our results indicate that residues 86-117 and 350-375 comprise distinct binding sites for alpha-actinin on adjacent actin monomers.

scholarly journals αE-catenin actin-binding domain alters actin filament conformation and regulates binding of nucleation and disassembly factors

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 3710-3720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Hansen ◽  
Adam V. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Chung-Yueh Ouyang ◽  
HongJun Liu ◽  
Sabine Pokutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
Filament Structure ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
Filament Bundles ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Cell Cell

The actin-binding protein αE-catenin may contribute to transitions between cell migration and cell–cell adhesion that depend on remodeling the actin cytoskeleton, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We show that the αE-catenin actin-binding domain (ABD) binds cooperatively to individual actin filaments and that binding is accompanied by a conformational change in the actin protomer that affects filament structure. αE-catenin ABD binding limits barbed-end growth, especially in actin filament bundles. αE-catenin ABD inhibits actin filament branching by the Arp2/3 complex and severing by cofilin, both of which contact regions of the actin protomer that are structurally altered by αE-catenin ABD binding. In epithelial cells, there is little correlation between the distribution of αE-catenin and the Arp2/3 complex at developing cell–cell contacts. Our results indicate that αE-catenin binding to filamentous actin favors assembly of unbranched filament bundles that are protected from severing over more dynamic, branched filament arrays.

scholarly journals Tissue Expression and Actin Binding of a Novel N-Terminal Utrophin Isoform

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Richard A. Zuellig ◽  
Beat C. Bornhauser ◽  
Ralf Amstutz ◽  
Bruno Constantin ◽  
Marcus C. Schaub
Keyword(s):  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Tissue Expression ◽  
Protein Product ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Rat Tissues ◽  
Cortical Actin ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
Spectrin Repeats

Utrophin and dystrophin present two large proteins that link the intracellular actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix via the C-terminal-associated protein complex. Here we describe a novel short N-terminal isoform of utrophin and its protein product in various rat tissues (N-utro, 62 kDa, amino acids 1–539, comprising the actin-binding domain plus the first two spectrin repeats). Using different N-terminal recombinant utrophin fragments, we show that actin binding exhibits pronounced negative cooperativity (affinity constantsK1=∼5×106andK2=∼1×105 M-1) and is Ca2+-insensitive. Expression of the different fragments in COS7 cells and in myotubes indicates that the actin-binding domain alone binds exlusively to actin filaments. The recombinant N-utro analogue binds in vitro to actin and in the cells associates to the membranes. The results indicate that N-utro may be responsible for the anchoring of the cortical actin cytoskeleton to the membranes in muscle and other tissues.

scholarly journals Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis ACTN4 mutants binding to actin: regulation by phosphomimetic mutations

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanshuang Shao ◽  
Bentley Wingert ◽  
Astrid Weins ◽  
Martin R. Pollak ◽  
Carlos Camacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Dominant Form ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Segmental Glomerulosclerosis ◽  
Actin Binding Domain

Abstract Natural mutations such as lysine 255 to glutamic acid (K to E), threonine 259 to isoleucine (T to I) and serine 262 to proline (S to P) that occur within the actin binding domain of alpha-actinin-4 (ACTN4) cause an autosomal dominant form of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in affected humans. This appears due to elevated actin binding propensity in podocytes resulting in a ‘frozen’ cytoskeleton. What is challenging is how this cellular behavior would be compatible with other cell functions that rely on cytoskeleton plasticity. Our previous finding revealed that wild type ACTN4 can be phosphorylated at tyrosine 4 and 31 upon stimulation by epidermal growth factor (EGF) to reduce the binding to actin cytoskeleton. We queried whether the elevated actin binding activity of FSGS mutants can be downregulated by EGF-mediated phosphorylation, to discern a mechanism by which the actin-cytoskeleton can be released in FSGS. In this manuscript, we first constructed variants with Y4/31E to mimic the phosphorylation at tyrosines 4 and 31 based on earlier modeling simulations that predicted that this would bury the actin binding domains and lead to a decrease in actin binding activity. We found that Y4/31E significantly reduced the actin binding activity of K255E, T259I and S262P, dramatically preventing them from aggregating in, and inhibiting motility of, podocytes, fibroblasts and melanoma cells. A putative kinase target site at Y265 in the actin binding domain was also generated as a phosphomimetic ACTN4 Y265E that demonstrated even greater binding to actin filaments than K255E and the other FSGS mutants. That the tyrosine kinase regulation of FSGS mutation binding to actin filaments can occur in cells was shown by phosphorylation on Y4 and Y31 of the K225E after extended exposure of cells to EGF, with a decrease in ACTN4 aggregates in fibroblasts. These findings will provide evidence for targeting the N-termini of FSGS ACTN4 mutants to downregulate their actin binding activities for ameliorating the glomerulosclerotic phenotype of patients.

scholarly journals Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorit Hanein ◽  
Paul Matsudaira ◽  
David J. DeRosier
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Binding Surface ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Structure ◽  
Signal Transduction Proteins

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH2-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.

Actin Binding Proteins: Regulation of Cytoskeletal Microfilaments

2003 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 433-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Dos Remedios ◽  
D. Chhabra ◽  
M. Kekic ◽  
I. V. Dedova ◽  
M. Tsubakihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Actin Binding Proteins ◽  
Ancestral Gene ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Human Disorders ◽  
And Function

The actin cytoskeleton is a complex structure that performs a wide range of cellular functions. In 2001, significant advances were made to our understanding of the structure and function of actin monomers. Many of these are likely to help us understand and distinguish between the structural models of actin microfilaments. In particular, 1) the structure of actin was resolved from crystals in the absence of cocrystallized actin binding proteins (ABPs), 2) the prokaryotic ancestral gene of actin was crystallized and its function as a bacterial cytoskeleton was revealed, and 3) the structure of the Arp2/3 complex was described for the first time. In this review we selected several ABPs (ADF/cofilin, profilin, gelsolin, thymosin β4, DNase I, CapZ, tropomodulin, and Arp2/3) that regulate actin-driven assembly, i.e., movement that is independent of motor proteins. They were chosen because 1) they represent a family of related proteins, 2) they are widely distributed in nature, 3) an atomic structure (or at least a plausible model) is available for each of them, and 4) each is expressed in significant quantities in cells. These ABPs perform the following cellular functions: 1) they maintain the population of unassembled but assembly-ready actin monomers (profilin), 2) they regulate the state of polymerization of filaments (ADF/cofilin, profilin), 3) they bind to and block the growing ends of actin filaments (gelsolin), 4) they nucleate actin assembly (gelsolin, Arp2/3, cofilin), 5) they sever actin filaments (gelsolin, ADF/cofilin), 6) they bind to the sides of actin filaments (gelsolin, Arp2/3), and 7) they cross-link actin filaments (Arp2/3). Some of these ABPs are essential, whereas others may form regulatory ternary complexes. Some play crucial roles in human disorders, and for all of them, there are good reasons why investigations into their structures and functions should continue.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document