scholarly journals Non-histone chromosomal proteins. Evidence for their role in mediating the binding of histones to deoxyribonucleic acid during the cell cycle

1974 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary S. Stein ◽  
Gale Hunter ◽  
Lena Lavie
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Sodium Deoxycholate ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Template Activity ◽  
Chromosomal Proteins ◽  
Ionic Detergent ◽  
Selective Dissociation ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
Mitotic Cells

By selective dissociation of histones with the ionic detergent sodium deoxycholate, we have demonstrated that these basic chromosomal polypeptides, which are effective inhibitors of transcription, are more tenaciously bound to DNA in mitotic than in S-phase chromatin. Evidence is presented which suggests that cell-cycle-stage-specific non-histone chromosomal proteins can account for such variations in the association of histones with DNA. When chromatin is reconstituted with DNA and histones are pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins, a preferential extraction of histones with sodium deoxycholate from chromatin reconstituted with S-phase rather than mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins is observed. In contrast, the extractability of histones with sodium deoxycholate from nucleohistone complexes reconstituted with DNA pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic histones is identical. Since non-histone chromosomal proteins rather than histones are responsible for the differences in chromatin template activity during S-phase and mitosis, we propose that non-histone chromosomal proteins may modify gene expression during the cell cycle by mediating the binding of histones to DNA.

Yeast L double-stranded ribonucleic acid is synthesized during the G1 phase but not the S phase of the cell cycle

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-679
Author(s):  
V A Zakian ◽  
D W Wagner ◽  
W L Fangman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Permissive Temperature ◽  
Phase Synthesis ◽  
Ribonucleic Acids ◽  
Alpha Factor

The cytoplasm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two major classes of protein-encapsulated double-stranded ribonucleic acids (dsRNA's), L and M. Replication of L and M dsRNA's was examined in cells arrested in the G1 phase by either alpha-factor, a yeast mating pheromone, or the restrictive temperature for a cell cycle mutant (cdc7). [3H]uracil was added during the arrest periods to cells prelabeled with [14C]uracil, and replication was monitored by determining the ratio of 3H/14C for purified dsRNA's. Like mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, both L and M dsRNA's were synthesized in the G1 arrested cells. The replication of L dsRNA was also examined during the S phase, using cells synchronized in two different ways. Cells containing the cdc7 mutation, treated sequentially with alpha-factor and then the restrictive temperature, enter a synchronous S phase when transferred to permissive temperature. When cells entered the S phase, synthesis of L dsRNA ceased, and little or no synthesis was detected throughout the S phase. Synthesis of L dsRNA was also observed in G1 phase cells isolated from asynchronous cultures by velocity centrifugation. Again, synthesis ceased when cells entered the S phase. These results indicate that L dsRNA replication is under cell cycle control. The control differs from that of mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, which replicates in all phases of the cell cycle, and from that of 2-micron DNA, a multiple-copy plasmid whose replication is confined to the S phase.

scholarly journals THE SYNTHESIS OF ACIDIC CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS DURING THE CELL CYCLE OF HELA S-3 CELLS

1972 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Borun ◽  
G. S. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Fraction ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel ◽  
Nuclear Fraction ◽  
Chromosomal Protein ◽  
Chromosomal Proteins ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Mitotic Cells

The kinetics of acidic residual chromosomal protein synthesis and transport were studied throughout the cell cycle in HeLa S-3 cells synchronized by 2 mM thymidine block and selective detachment of mitotic cells. Pulse labeling the cells with leucine-3H for 2 min and then "chasing" the radioactive proteins for up to 3 hr showed that the amount of protein synthesized, transported, and retained in the acidic residual chromosomal protein fraction is greater immediately after mitosis and later in G1 than in the S or G2 phases of the cell cycle. During S, only 20–25% of the proteins synthesized and transported to the acidic residual chromosomal protein fraction are chased during the first 2 hr after pulse labeling, whereas up to 40% of the material entering the residual nuclear fraction in mitosis, G1, and G2 leaves during a 2 hr chase. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic profiles of these proteins, at various times after pulse labeling, reveal that the turnover of individual polypeptides within this fraction has kinetics of synthesis and turnover which are markedly different from one another and undergo stage-specific changes.

scholarly journals Mammalian Orc1 Protein Is Selectively Released from Chromatin and Ubiquitinated during the S-to-M Transition in the Cell Division Cycle

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong-Jun Li ◽  
Melvin L. DePamphilis
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Half Life ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Division Cycle ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Selective Dissociation

ABSTRACT Previous studies have shown that changes in the affinity of the hamster Orc1 protein for chromatin during the M-to-G1 transition correlate with the activity of hamster origin recognition complexes (ORCs) and the appearance of prereplication complexes at specific sites. Here we show that Orc1 is selectively released from chromatin as cells enter S phase, converted into a mono- or diubiquitinated form, and then deubiquitinated and re-bound to chromatin during the M-to-G1 transition. Orc1 is degraded by the 26S proteasome only when released into the cytosol, and peptide additions to Orc1 make it hypersensitive to polyubiquitination. In contrast, Orc2 remains tightly bound to chromatin throughout the cell cycle and is not a substrate for ubiquitination. Since the concentration of Orc1 remains constant throughout the cell cycle, and its half-life in vivo is the same as that of Orc2, ubiquitination of non-chromatin-bound Orc1 presumably facilitates the inactivation of ORCs by sequestering Orc1 during S phase. Thus, in contrast to yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe), mammalian ORC activity appears to be regulated during each cell cycle through selective dissociation and reassociation of Orc1 from chromatin-bound ORCs.

scholarly journals INDEPENDENCE OF CENTRIOLE FORMATION AND DNA SYNTHESIS

1973 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Rattner ◽  
Stephanie G. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Temporal Relationship ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Cellular Dna ◽  
Arabinosyl Cytosine ◽  
Mitotic Cells

The temporal relationship between cell cycle events and centriole duplication was investigated electron microscopically in L cells synchronized by mechanically selecting mitotic cells. The two mature centrioles which each cell received at telophase migrated together from the side of the telophase nucleus distal to the stem body around to a region of the cytoplasm near the stem body and then into a groovelike indention in the early G1 nucleus, where they were found throughout interphase. Procentrioles appeared in association with each mature centriole at times varying from 4 to 12 h after mitosis. Since S phase was found to begin on the average about 9 h after mitotic selection, it appeared that cells generated procentrioles late in G1 or early in S. During prophase, the two centriolar duplexes migrated to opposite sides of the nucleus and the daughter centrioles elongated to the mature length. To ascertain whether any aspect of centriolar duplication was contingent upon nuclear DNA synthesis, arabinosyl cytosine was added to mitotic cells at a concentration which inhibited cellular DNA synthesis by more than 99%. Though cells were thus prevented from entering S phase, the course of procentriole formation was not detectibly affected. However, cells were inhibited from proceeding to the next mitosis, and the centriolar elongation and migration normally associated with prophase did not occur.

Supercoiling of DNA and nuclear conformation during the cell-cycle

1978 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-226
Author(s):  
A.C. Warren ◽  
P.R. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sedimentation Rate ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Conformation ◽  
Nuclear Morphology ◽  
Ionic Detergent ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
The Individual

When cells are lysed in solutions containing high concentrations of salt and a non-ionic detergent, structures are released which retain many of the morphological features of nuclei. These nucleoids contain superhelical DNA but are depleted of nuclear protein. We have analysed DNA conformation in nucleoids derived from HeLa cells synchronized at different stages in the cell cycle. The gross differences in nuclear morphology seen during the cell cycle are reflected in the morphology of the nucleoids; for example, the individual chromosomes of mitotic cells remain identifiable and aggregated within the mitotic nucleoid. The sedimentation rate of nucleoids in sucrose gradients reflects the gross nuclear morphology; the small S-phase nucleoids sediment 9 times faster than the large mitotic nucleoids. Despite these large differences at the gross level of organization, both the degree of supercoiling and the size of the units in which supercoiling is maintained are roughly similar in the nucleoids derived from cells in the different phases. The protein content of the various nucleoids is also very similar. Like the nucleoids made from randomly growing cultures of cells, mitotic nucleoids are excellent templates for the RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli.

scholarly journals Yeast L double-stranded ribonucleic acid is synthesized during the G1 phase but not the S phase of the cell cycle.

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
V A Zakian ◽  
D W Wagner ◽  
W L Fangman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Permissive Temperature ◽  
Phase Synthesis ◽  
Ribonucleic Acids ◽  
Alpha Factor

The cytoplasm of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two major classes of protein-encapsulated double-stranded ribonucleic acids (dsRNA's), L and M. Replication of L and M dsRNA's was examined in cells arrested in the G1 phase by either alpha-factor, a yeast mating pheromone, or the restrictive temperature for a cell cycle mutant (cdc7). [3H]uracil was added during the arrest periods to cells prelabeled with [14C]uracil, and replication was monitored by determining the ratio of 3H/14C for purified dsRNA's. Like mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, both L and M dsRNA's were synthesized in the G1 arrested cells. The replication of L dsRNA was also examined during the S phase, using cells synchronized in two different ways. Cells containing the cdc7 mutation, treated sequentially with alpha-factor and then the restrictive temperature, enter a synchronous S phase when transferred to permissive temperature. When cells entered the S phase, synthesis of L dsRNA ceased, and little or no synthesis was detected throughout the S phase. Synthesis of L dsRNA was also observed in G1 phase cells isolated from asynchronous cultures by velocity centrifugation. Again, synthesis ceased when cells entered the S phase. These results indicate that L dsRNA replication is under cell cycle control. The control differs from that of mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, which replicates in all phases of the cell cycle, and from that of 2-micron DNA, a multiple-copy plasmid whose replication is confined to the S phase.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5195
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

Involvement of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in S-phase cell-cycle arrest induced by Furazolidone in human hepatoma G2 cells

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1500-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Sun ◽  
Shusheng Tang ◽  
Xi Jin ◽  
Chaoming Zhang ◽  
Wenxia Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
P38 Mapk ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mapk Signaling Pathway ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Human Hepatoma ◽  
Cycle Arrest
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document