scholarly journals The loss of rapidly labelled ribonucleic acid from isolated HeLa cell nuclei

1969 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Watts
Keyword(s):  
Hela Cell ◽  
Incubation Medium ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Bivalent Cations ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
And Diffusion

1. The loss of nucleic acids and protein from isolated HeLa-cell nuclei was studied. During 4hr. incubation at 37° DNA was conserved, but appreciable amounts of RNA and protein were lost. 2. Two classes of nuclear RNA were distinguished: at least 75% of the RNA was lost from the nuclei relatively slowly through degradation to acid-soluble fragments; the rest of the RNA was lost much more rapidly, not only through degradation to acid-soluble fragments but also through diffusion of RNA out of the nuclei into the incubation medium. 3. The RNA that was preferentially lost was the fraction of nuclear RNA that was rapidly labelled when intact HeLa cells were grown in a medium containing radioactive precursors of RNA. 4. The RNA appearing in the incubation medium was apparently partially degraded and had a sedimentation coefficient of about that of transfer RNA. 5. Both the degradation of RNA and the loss of RNA from the nuclei were sensitive to bivalent cations. Low concentrations of Mg2+ and Mn2+ greatly increased the rate of degradation of the rapidly labelled RNA to acid-soluble fragments, and produced a corresponding decrease in the amount of RNA diffusing into the medium. At higher concentrations they suppressed both degradation and diffusion of RNA. The cations Ca2+, Cu2+, Zn2+ and Ni2+ all progressively inhibited both forms of loss of RNA. 6. Salts of univalent cations produced appreciable effects only at ionic strengths of about 0·2, when degradation to acid-soluble fragments was preferentially inhibited. 7. Both ADP and ATP inhibited loss of RNA at about 30mm. 8. It was concluded that the diffusion of rapidly labelled RNA out of the isolated nuclei was not related to the movement of RNA from nucleus to cytoplasm in vivo, but reflected the ease with which the rapidly labelled RNA detached from the chromatin and the permeability of the membranes of isolated nuclei.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation in vivo of Proteins Associated with Heterogenous Nuclear RNA in HeLa Cell Nuclei

1978 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Marie BLANCHARD ◽  
Claude BRUNEL ◽  
Philippe JEANTEUR
Keyword(s):  
Hela Cell ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Nuclear Rna

Transcription boundaries of U1 small nuclear RNA

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2332-2340
Author(s):  
G R Kunkel ◽  
T Pederson
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Rna Biosynthesis ◽  
Labeled Rna ◽  
Alpha Amanitin

Transcription-proximal stages of U1 small nuclear RNA biosynthesis were studied by 32P labeling of nascent chains in isolated HeLa cell nuclei. Labeled RNA was hybridized to nitrocellulose-immobilized, single-stranded M13 DNA clones corresponding to regions within or flanking a human U1 RNA gene. Transcription of U1 RNA was inhibited by greater than 95% by alpha-amanitin at 1 microgram/ml, consistent with previous evidence that it is synthesized by RNA polymerase II. No hybridization to DNA immediately adjacent to the 5' end of mature U1 RNA (-6 to -105 nucleotides) was detected, indicating that, like all studied polymerase II initiation, transcription of U1 RNA starts at or very near the cap site. However, in contrast to previously described transcription units for mRNA, in which equimolar transcription occurs for hundreds or thousands of nucleotides beyond the mature 3' end of the mRNA, labeled U1 RNA hybridization dropped off sharply within a very short region (approximately 60 nucleotides) immediately downstream from the 3' end of mature U1 RNA. Also in contrast to pre-mRNA, which is assembled into ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles while still nascent RNA chains, the U1 RNA transcribed in isolated nuclei did not form RNP complexes by the criterion of reaction with a monoclonal antibody for the small nuclear RNP Sm proteins. This suggests that, unlike pre-mRNA-RNP particle formation, U1 small nuclear RNP assembly does not occur until after the completion of transcription. These results show that, despite their common synthesis by RNA polymerase II, mRNA and U1 small nuclear RNA differ markedly both in their extents of 3' processing and their temporal patterns of RNP assembly.

scholarly journals A Cytochemical Study on the Pancreas of the Guinea Pig

1960 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Siekevitz ◽  
George E. Palade
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Structure ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Incubation Medium ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Analytical Ultracentrifuge ◽  
Cytochemical Study ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Proteolytic Activities ◽  
High Concentrations

Ribonucleoprotein (RNP)1 particles isolated by DOC treatment from pancreatic microsomes have a RNA content of 35 to 45 per cent of their dry weight. In the analytical ultracentrifuge about 85 per cent of the material has a sedimentation coefficient of ∼85 S. These particles contain amylase, RNase, and trypsin-activatable proteolytic activities which cannot be washed off or detached by incubation in 0.44 M sucrose. The enzymes are released, however, by incubation in the presence of low concentrations of ATP, PP, or EDTA, and high concentrations of IP and AMP. At the same time, and at the same concentrations, ∼80 per cent of the RNA and ∼25 per cent of the protein of the particles becomes also non-sedimentable. The simultaneous addition of Mg++ to the incubation medium prevents these losses. This finding, together with the observation that all the Mg++ of the particles is released by the same agents, makes it likely that Mg++ holds the particles together, and that its removal by the chelators used causes the particles to disintegrate. These findings are discussed in relation to the molecular structure of the RNP particles.

scholarly journals Inhibition of hepatic deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent ribonucleic acid polymerases by the exotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in comparison with the effects of α-amanitin and cordycepin

1972 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Smuckler ◽  
Asen A. Hadjiolov
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Competitive Inhibition ◽  
Polymerase Activity ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Similar Action ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Rna Polymerase Activity

The action of Bacillus thuringiensis exotoxin, a structural analogue of ATP, on mouse liver DNA-dependent RNA polymerases was studied and its effects were compared with those of α-amanitin and cordycepin. (1) Administration of exotoxin in vivo caused a marked decrease in RNA polymerase activity of isolated nuclei at various concentrations of Mg2+, Mn2+and (NH4)2SO4. A similar action was recorded after addition of exotoxin to isolated nuclei from control or exotoxin-treated mice. (2) Chromatographic separation of nuclear RNA polymerases from mice treated in vivo with exotoxin showed a drastic decrease of the peak of nucleoplasmic RNA polymerase, whereas the peak of nucleolar RNA polymerase remained unaltered. The same effect was observed after administration of α-amanitin in vivo, but cordycepin did not alter the relative amounts of the two main RNA polymerase peaks. (3) Administration of exotoxin in vivo did not alter the template activity of isolated DNA or chromatin tested with different fractions of RNA polymerase from control or exotoxin-treated mice. (4) Addition of exotoxin to isolated liver RNA polymerases inhibited both enzyme fractions. However, the α-amanitin-sensitive RNA polymerase was also 50–100-fold more sensitive to exotoxin inhibition than was the α-amanitin-insensitive RNA polymerase. Kinetic analysis indicated the exotoxin produces a competitive inhibition with ATP on the nucleolar enzyme, but a mixed type of inhibition with nucleoplasmic enzyme. The results obtained indicate that the B. thuringiensis exotoxin inhibits liver RNA synthesis by affecting nuclear RNA polymerases, showing a preferential inhibition of the nucleoplasmic α-amanitin-sensitive RNA polymerase.

scholarly journals An assessment of some methodological criticisms of studies of RNA efflux from isolated nuclei

1983 ◽  
Vol 214 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
P S Agutter
Keyword(s):  
Proteinase Inhibitors ◽  
Serine Proteinase ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nuclear Surface ◽  
Efflux Rate ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Cytoplasmic Rna ◽  
Nuclear Rna

RNA efflux from isolated nuclei can be studied either as a means of elucidating the general mechanism of nucleo-cytoplasmic RNA transport, or as part of an investigation of the processing and utilization of particular gene transcripts. The present paper describes an assessment of three methodological criticisms of RNA-efflux measurements that are made for the former reason: for such measurements, it is sufficient to show that the post-incubation supernatant RNA is similar overall to homologous cytoplasmic mRNA, rather than to nuclear RNA, that is nevertheless of intranuclear origin, and that alterations to the medium during experiments do not markedly perturb this general nuclear restriction. The results seem to justify the following conclusions. (1) Although degradation of the nuclear RNA occurs during incubation in vitro, this process does not account for the appearance of RNA in the postnuclear supernatant. The degradation can be largely prevented by the addition of serine-proteinase inhibitors without altering the RNA efflux rate. (2) Some adsorption of labelled cytoplasmic RNA to the nuclear surface occurs during both isolation and incubation of the nuclei, and some desorption occurs during incubation. However, these effects introduce errors of less than 10% into the measurements of efflux rates. (3) Exogenous acidic polymers, including polyribonucleotides, disrupt nuclei and increase the apparent RNA efflux rate by causing leakage of nuclear contents. However, this effect can largely be overcome by including the nuclear stabilizers spermidine, Ca2+ and Mn2+ in the medium. In terms of this assessment, it appears that RNA efflux from isolated nuclei in media containing nuclear stabilizers serves as a reasonable model for transport in vivo.

scholarly journals Transcription boundaries of U1 small nuclear RNA.

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2332-2340 ◽  
Author(s):  
G R Kunkel ◽  
T Pederson
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Sm Proteins ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Rna Biosynthesis ◽  
Labeled Rna ◽  
Alpha Amanitin

Transcription-proximal stages of U1 small nuclear RNA biosynthesis were studied by 32P labeling of nascent chains in isolated HeLa cell nuclei. Labeled RNA was hybridized to nitrocellulose-immobilized, single-stranded M13 DNA clones corresponding to regions within or flanking a human U1 RNA gene. Transcription of U1 RNA was inhibited by greater than 95% by alpha-amanitin at 1 microgram/ml, consistent with previous evidence that it is synthesized by RNA polymerase II. No hybridization to DNA immediately adjacent to the 5' end of mature U1 RNA (-6 to -105 nucleotides) was detected, indicating that, like all studied polymerase II initiation, transcription of U1 RNA starts at or very near the cap site. However, in contrast to previously described transcription units for mRNA, in which equimolar transcription occurs for hundreds or thousands of nucleotides beyond the mature 3' end of the mRNA, labeled U1 RNA hybridization dropped off sharply within a very short region (approximately 60 nucleotides) immediately downstream from the 3' end of mature U1 RNA. Also in contrast to pre-mRNA, which is assembled into ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles while still nascent RNA chains, the U1 RNA transcribed in isolated nuclei did not form RNP complexes by the criterion of reaction with a monoclonal antibody for the small nuclear RNP Sm proteins. This suggests that, unlike pre-mRNA-RNP particle formation, U1 small nuclear RNP assembly does not occur until after the completion of transcription. These results show that, despite their common synthesis by RNA polymerase II, mRNA and U1 small nuclear RNA differ markedly both in their extents of 3' processing and their temporal patterns of RNP assembly.

scholarly journals STUDIES ON ISOLATED NUCLEI

1963 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachele Maggio ◽  
Philip Siekevitz ◽  
George E. Palade
Keyword(s):  
Nucleotide Composition ◽  
Gradient System ◽  
Variable Amount ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Pig Liver ◽  
Isolated Nuclei ◽  
Guinea Pig Liver ◽  
Rna And Dna ◽  
Degree Of Fragmentation

This paper describes the subfractionation of nuclei isolated from guinea pig liver by the procedure presented in the first article of the series (8). Centrifugation in a density gradient system of nuclear fractions disrupted by sonication permits the isolation of the following subfractions: (a) a nucleolar subfraction which consists mainly of nucleoli surrounded by a variable amount of nucleolus-associated chromatin and contaminated by chromatin blocks derived primarily from von Kupffer cell nuclei; (b) and (c), two nucleoplasmic subfractions (I and II) which consist mainly of chromatin threads in a coarser (I) or finer (II) degree of fragmentation. The protein, RNA, and DNA content of these subfractions was determined, and their RNA's characterized in terms of NaCl-solubility, nucleotide composition, and in vivo nucleotide turnover, using inorganic 32P as a marker. The results indicate that there are at least three types of RNA in the nucleus (one in the nucleolus and two in the nucleoplasm or chromatin), which differ from one another in NaCl-solubility, nucleotide composition, turnover, and possibly sequence. Possible relations among these RNA's and those of the cytoplasm are discussed.

scholarly journals Intranuclear localization and receptor proteins for 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol in chick intestine

1974 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E M Lawson ◽  
P W Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Calcium Binding ◽  
Association Constant ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Equilibrium Mixture ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Cell Nuclei ◽  
Nuclear Membranes

1. The intranuclear distribution of cholecalciferol and its metabolites was studied in the intestine of rachitic chicks. 2. At high doses of cholecalciferol the nuclei contain the vitamin and its 25-hydroxy metabolite, but over 80% of this is localized on the nuclear membranes. The hormone, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, is found within the cell nuclei irrespective of the intake of cholecalciferol, but significant amounts could not be found with chromatin isolated free of nuclear membranes. 3. 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol is associated in the nucleus with an acidic protein. Since one of the actions of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol is to control the synthesis of mRNA for calcium-binding protein it was to be expected that the hormone would be bound to chromatin, as with the other steroid hormones. It is suggested that the hormone–receptor complex exists as part of an equilibrium mixture of the complex bound to the DNA and in a free form. 4. A protein extract of nuclei was obtained, which when incubated at 4°C for 1h took up the 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. The nature of this binding was studied. 5. There appear to be two nuclear proteins able to bind the hormone one of which is the intestinal nuclear receptor. The binding sites on this protein are saturable with the hormone, have an association constant of 2×109m-1and show a high chemical specificity for the 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. The number of nuclear binding sites for the hormone provided by this receptor is similar to the maximum intestinal hormone concentration so far observed. Its sedimentation coefficient is 3.5S, and is very close to that observed for the nuclear protein to which is attached the 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol formed in vivo from vitamin D. 6. The cytoplasmic protein has an association constant of 1×109m-1and a sedimentation coefficient of 3.0S, but its relation with the nuclear receptor is not yet clear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document