scholarly journals Phase transition of fibrillarin LC domain regulates localization and protein interaction of fibrillarin

2021 ◽  
Vol 478 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-810
Author(s):  
Eunji Kim ◽  
Ilmin Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Fibrillar Component

A key nucleolar protein, fibrillarin, has emerged as an important pharmacological target as its aberrant expression and localization are related to tumorigenesis, chemoresistance and poor survival in breast cancer patients. Fibrillarin contains a N-terminal low complexity sequence (LC) domain with a skewed amino acid distribution, which is known to undergo a phase transition to liquid-like droplets. However, the underlying mechanism of the phase transition of the fibrillarin LC domain and its physiological function are still elusive. In this study, we show that the localization of fibrillarin and its association with RNA binding proteins is regulated by this phase transition. Phenylalanine-to-serine substitutions of the phenylalanine:glycine repeats in the fibrillarin LC domain impede its phase transition into liquid-like droplets, as well as the hydrogel-like state composed of polymers, and also its incorporation into hydrogel or liquid-like droplets composed of wild-type LC domains. When expressed in cultured cells, fibrillarin containing the mutant LC domain fails to localize to the dense fibrillar component of nucleoli in the same way as intact fibrillarin. Moreover, the phase transition of the fibrillarin LC domain is required for the interaction of fibrillarin with other RNA binding proteins, such as FUS, TAF15, DDX5 and DHX9. Taken together, the results suggest that the phenylalanine residues in the LC domain are critical for the phase transition of fibrillarin, which in turn regulates the sub-nucleolar localization of fibrillarin and its interaction with RNA binding proteins, providing a useful framework for regulating the function of fibrillarin.

scholarly journals RNA Binding Proteins and the Pathogenesis of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 469-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Hofmann ◽  
William W. Seeley ◽  
Eric J. Huang
Keyword(s):  
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Compelling Evidence ◽  
Abnormal Protein ◽  
Early Onset Dementia ◽  
Cellular Pathways ◽  
Liquid Liquid Phase Separation

Frontotemporal dementia is a group of early onset dementia syndromes linked to underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) pathology that can be classified based on the formation of abnormal protein aggregates involving tau and two RNA binding proteins, TDP-43 and FUS. Although elucidation of the mechanisms leading to FTLD pathology is in progress, recent advances in genetics and neuropathology indicate that a majority of FTLD cases with proteinopathy involving RNA binding proteins show highly congruent genotype–phenotype correlations. Specifically, recent studies have uncovered the unique properties of the low-complexity domains in RNA binding proteins that can facilitate liquid–liquid phase separation in the formation of membraneless organelles. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence that mutations in FTLD genes lead to dysfunction in diverse cellular pathways that converge on the endolysosomal pathway, autophagy, and neuroinflammation. Together, these results provide key mechanistic insights into the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets of FTLD.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA-binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

scholarly journals RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in health and disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 474 (8) ◽  
pp. 1417-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Ford Harrison ◽  
James Shorter
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Fused In Sarcoma ◽  
Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Approximately 70 human RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) contain a prion-like domain (PrLD). PrLDs are low-complexity domains that possess a similar amino acid composition to prion domains in yeast, which enable several proteins, including Sup35 and Rnq1, to form infectious conformers, termed prions. In humans, PrLDs contribute to RBP function and enable RBPs to undergo liquid–liquid phase transitions that underlie the biogenesis of various membraneless organelles. However, this activity appears to render RBPs prone to misfolding and aggregation connected to neurodegenerative disease. Indeed, numerous RBPs with PrLDs, including TDP-43 (transactivation response element DNA-binding protein 43), FUS (fused in sarcoma), TAF15 (TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15), EWSR1 (Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1), and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A1 and A2 (hnRNPA1 and hnRNPA2), have now been connected via pathology and genetics to the etiology of several neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, and multisystem proteinopathy. Here, we review the physiological and pathological roles of the most prominent RBPs with PrLDs. We also highlight the potential of protein disaggregases, including Hsp104, as a therapeutic strategy to combat the aberrant phase transitions of RBPs with PrLDs that likely underpin neurodegeneration.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

AbstractThe Igf2 mRNA binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine SELEX and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

scholarly journals Prion-like domains in RNA binding proteins are essential for building subnuclear paraspeckles

2015 ◽  
Vol 210 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Hennig ◽  
Geraldine Kong ◽  
Taro Mannen ◽  
Agata Sadowska ◽  
Simon Kobelke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Nuclear Body ◽  
Interactome Network

Prion-like domains (PLDs) are low complexity sequences found in RNA binding proteins associated with the neurodegenerative disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Recently, PLDs have been implicated in mediating gene regulation via liquid-phase transitions that drive ribonucleoprotein granule assembly. In this paper, we report many PLDs in proteins associated with paraspeckles, subnuclear bodies that form around long noncoding RNA. We mapped the interactome network of paraspeckle proteins, finding enrichment of PLDs. We show that one protein, RBM14, connects key paraspeckle subcomplexes via interactions mediated by its PLD. We further show that the RBM14 PLD, as well as the PLD of another essential paraspeckle protein, FUS, is required to rescue paraspeckle formation in cells in which their endogenous counterpart has been knocked down. Similar to FUS, the RBM14 PLD also forms hydrogels with amyloid-like properties. These results suggest a role for PLD-mediated liquid-phase transitions in paraspeckle formation, highlighting this nuclear body as an excellent model system for understanding the perturbation of such processes in neurodegeneration.

scholarly journals Essential PBP1-associated proteins of Trypanosoma brucei

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Nascimento ◽  
M. Terrao ◽  
KK. Marucha ◽  
B. Liu ◽  
F. Egler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
A Minor

AbstractControl of gene expression in kinetoplastids depends heavily on RNA-binding proteins that influence mRNA decay and translation. We previously showed that MKT1 interacts with PBP1, which in turn recruits LSM12 and poly(A) binding protein. MKT1 is recruited to mRNA by sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, resulting in stabilisation of mRNA. We here show that PBP1, LSM12 and an additional 117-residue protein, XAC1 (Tb927.7.2780), are present in complexes that contain either MKT1 or MKT1L (Tb927.10.1490). All five proteins are present predominantly in the complexes, and there was evidence for a minor subset of complexes that contained both MKT1 and MKT1L. MKT1 appeared to be associated with many mRNAs, with the exception of those encoding ribosomal proteins. XAC1-containing complexes reproducibly contained RNA-binding proteins that were previously found associated with MKT1. In addition, however, XAC1- or MKT1-containing complexes specifically recruit one of the six translation initiation complexes, EIF4E6-EIF4G5; and yeast 2-hybrid assay results indicated that MKT1 interacts with EIF4G5. The C-terminus of MKT1L resembles MKT1: it contains MKT1 domains and a PIN domain that is probably not active as an endonuclease. MKT1L, however, also has an N-terminal extension with regions of low-complexity. Although MKT1L depletion inhibited cell proliferation, we found no evidence for specific interactions with RNA-binding proteins or mRNA. Deletion of the N-terminal extension, however, enabled MKT1L to interact with EIF4E6. We speculate that MKT1L may either enhance or inhibit the functions of MKT1-containing complexes.

scholarly journals Distinct roles of hnRNPH1 low-complexity domains in splicing and transcription

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (50) ◽  
pp. e2109668118
Author(s):  
Ga Hye Kim ◽  
Ilmin Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Phase Separation ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Rna Splicing ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Reversible Polymers

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) represent a large family of RNA-binding proteins that control key events in RNA biogenesis under both normal and diseased cellular conditions. The low-complexity (LC) domain of hnRNPs can become liquid-like droplets or reversible amyloid-like polymers by phase separation. Yet, whether phase separation of the LC domains contributes to physiological functions of hnRNPs remains unclear. hnRNPH1 contains two LC domains, LC1 and LC2. Here, we show that reversible phase separation of the LC1 domain is critical for both interaction with different kinds of RNA-binding proteins and control of the alternative-splicing activity of hnRNPH1. Interestingly, although not required for phase separation, the LC2 domain contributes to the robust transcriptional activation of hnRNPH1 when fused to the DNA-binding domain, as found recently in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our data suggest that the ability of the LC1 domain to phase-separate into reversible polymers or liquid-like droplets is essential for function of hnRNPH1 as an alternative RNA-splicing regulator, whereas the LC2 domain may contribute to the aberrant transcriptional activity responsible for cancer transformation.

scholarly journals Periphilin self-association underpins epigenetic silencing by the HUSH complex

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniil M. Prigozhin ◽  
Anna Albecka ◽  
Christopher H. Douse ◽  
Iva A. Tchasovnikarova ◽  
Richard T. Timms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Core Complex ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Repressive Mark ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Nascent Transcripts

AbstractTranscription of integrated DNA from viruses or transposable elements is tightly regulated to prevent pathogenesis. The Human Silencing Hub (HUSH), composed of Periphilin, TASOR and MPP8, silences transcriptionally active viral and endogenous transgenes. HUSH recruits effectors that alter the epigenetic landscape and chromatin structure, but how HUSH recognizes target loci and represses their expression remains unclear. We identify the physicochemical properties of Periphilin necessary for HUSH assembly and silencing. A disordered N-terminal domain (NTD) and structured C-terminal domain are essential for silencing. A crystal structure of the Periphilin-TASOR core complex shows Periphilin forms α-helical homodimers, which each bind a single TASOR molecule. The NTD binds RNA non-specifically and forms insoluble aggregates through an arginine/tyrosine-rich sequence reminiscent of low-complexity regions from self-associating RNA-binding proteins. Residues required for TASOR binding and aggregation were required for HUSH-dependent silencing and genome-wide deposition of repressive mark H3K9me3. The NTD was functionally complemented by low-complexity regions from certain RNA-binding proteins and proteins that form condensates or fibrils. Our work suggests the associative properties of Periphilin promote HUSH aggregation on nascent transcripts.

scholarly journals TriPepSVM - de novo prediction of RNA-binding proteins based on short amino acid motifs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annkatrin Bressin ◽  
Roman Schulte-Sasse ◽  
Davide Figini ◽  
Erika C Urdaneta ◽  
Benedikt M Beckmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
String Kernels ◽  
Rna Binders

In recent years hundreds of novel RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have been identified leading to the discovery of novel RNA-binding domains (RBDs). Furthermore, unstructured or disordered low-complexity regions of RBPs have been identified to play an important role in interactions with nucleic acids. However, these advances in understanding RBPs are limited mainly to eukaryotic species and we only have limited tools to faithfully predict RNA-binders from bacteria. Here, we describe a support vector machine (SVM)-based method, called TriPepSVM, for the classification of RNA-binding proteins and non-RBPs. TriPepSVM applies string kernels to directly handle protein sequences using tri-peptide frequencies. Testing the method in human and bacteria, we find that several RBP-enriched tripeptides occur more often in structurally disordered regions of RBPs. TriPepSVM outperforms existing applications, which consider classical structural features of RNA-binding or homology, in the task of RBP prediction in both human and bacteria. Finally, we predict 66 novel RBPs in Salmonella Typhimurium and validate the bacterial proteins ClpX, DnaJ and UbiG to associate with RNA in vivo.

scholarly journals The RNA-associated proteins MKT1 and MKT1L form alternative PBP1-containing complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (32) ◽  
pp. 10940-10955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Melo do Nascimento ◽  
Monica Terrao ◽  
Kevin Kamanyi Marucha ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Franziska Egler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Two Hybrid

Control of gene expression in kinetoplastids such as trypanosomes depends heavily on RNA-binding proteins that influence mRNA decay and translation. We previously showed that the trypanosome protein MKT1 forms a multicomponent protein complex: MKT1 interacts with PBP1, which in turn recruits LSM12 and poly(A)-binding protein. MKT1 is recruited to mRNAs by sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, resulting in stabilization of the bound mRNA. We here show that PBP1, LSM12, and a 117-residue protein, XAC1 (Tb927.7.2780), are present in complexes that contain either MKT1 or an MKT1-like protein, MKT1L (Tb927.10.1490). All five proteins are present predominantly in the complexes, and we found evidence for a minor subset of complexes containing both MKT1 and MKT1L. XAC1-containing complexes reproducibly contained RNA-binding proteins that were previously found associated with MKT1. Moreover, XAC1- or MKT1-containing complexes specifically recruited one of the two poly(A)-binding proteins, PABP2, and one of the six cap-binding translation initiation complexes, EIF4E6–EIF4G5. Yeast two-hybrid assay results indicated that MKT1 directly interacts with EIF4G5. MKT1–PBP1 complexes can therefore interact with mRNAs via their poly(A) tails and caps, as well as through sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins. Correspondingly, MKT1 is associated with many mRNAs, although not with those encoding ribosomal proteins. Meanwhile, MKT1L resembles MKT1 at the C terminus but additionally features an N-terminal extension with low-complexity regions. Although MKT1L depletion inhibited cell proliferation, we found no evidence that it specifically interacts with RNA-binding proteins or mRNA. We speculate that MKT1L may compete with MKT1 for PBP1 binding and thereby modulate the function of MKT1-containing complexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document