19F nuclear magnetic resonance spin–lattice relaxation study of polycrystalline lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate, including comments on the influence of cross-correlation

1992 ◽  
Vol 88 (16) ◽  
pp. 2393-2396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mortimer ◽  
Elaine A. Moore ◽  
Martin A. K. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cross Correlation ◽  
Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Spin Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Spin Lattice ◽  
Relaxation Study ◽  
Lithium Trifluoromethanesulfonate ◽  
Resonance Spin ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic

Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation study of di-2-pyridyl dichalcogenides, Py2X2 (X = S, Se, Te)

1986 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe C. Pappalardo ◽  
Antonio Grassi ◽  
Marcello Baldo ◽  
Lajos Radics ◽  
Alain Forchioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Spin Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Spin Lattice ◽  
Relaxation Study ◽  
Resonance Spin ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic

scholarly journals Imaging of nuclear magnetic resonance spin–lattice relaxation activation energy in cartilage

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 180221 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Foster ◽  
R. A. Damion ◽  
M. E. Ries ◽  
S. W. Smye ◽  
D. G. McGonagle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Activation Energy ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Relaxation Time ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Spin Lattice Relaxation ◽  
Cartilage Tissue ◽  
Spin Lattice ◽  
Resonance Spin ◽  
Nuclear Magnetic

Samples of human and bovine cartilage have been examined using magnetic resonance imaging to determine the proton nuclear magnetic resonance spin–lattice relaxation time, T 1 , as a function of depth within through the cartilage tissue. T 1 was measured at five to seven temperatures between 8 and 38°C. From this, it is shown that the T 1 relaxation time is well described by Arrhenius-type behaviour and the activation energy of the relaxation process is quantified. The activation energy within the cartilage is approximately 11 ± 2 kJ mol −1 with this notably being less than that for both pure water (16.6 ± 0.4 kJ mol −1 ) and the phosphate-buffered solution in which the cartilage was immersed (14.7 ± 1.0 kJ mol −1 ). It is shown that this activation energy increases as a function of depth in the cartilage. It is known that cartilage composition varies with depth, and hence, these results have been interpreted in terms of the structure within the cartilage tissue and the association of the water with the macromolecular constituents of the cartilage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document