scholarly journals Hydrogen production from natural gas and biomethane with carbon capture and storage – A techno-environmental analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2967-2986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Antonini ◽  
Karin Treyer ◽  
Anne Streb ◽  
Mijndert van der Spek ◽  
Christian Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Environmental Analysis ◽  
Process Simulation ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
And Storage

We quantify the technical and environmental performance of clean hydrogen production (with CCS) by linking detailed process simulation with LCA.

scholarly journals Correction: Hydrogen production from natural gas and biomethane with carbon capture and storage – A techno-environmental analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-916
Author(s):  
Cristina Antonini ◽  
Karin Treyer ◽  
Anne Streb ◽  
Mijndert van der Spek ◽  
Christian Bauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Environmental Analysis ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Sustainable Energy ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
And Storage

Correction for ‘Hydrogen production from natural gas and biomethane with carbon capture and storage – A techno-environmental analysis’ by Cristina Antonini et al., Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2020, 4, 2967–2986, DOI: 10.1039/D0SE00222D.

scholarly journals On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Bauer ◽  
Karin Treyer ◽  
cristina antonini ◽  
Joule Bergerson ◽  
Matteo Gazzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Natural Gas Reforming

Natural gas based hydrogen production with carbon capture and storage is referred to as blue hydrogen. If substantial amounts of CO2 from natural gas reforming are captured and permanently stored,...

scholarly journals Valorization of OFMSW Digestate-Derived Syngas toward Methanol, Hydrogen, or Electricity: Process Simulation and Carbon Footprint Calculation

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aristide Giuliano ◽  
Enrico Catizzone ◽  
Cesare Freda ◽  
Giacinto Cornacchia
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Production ◽  
Process Simulation ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Combustion Engine ◽  
Co2 Storage ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Simulation Software ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Methanol Production

This paper explores a possible waste-based economy transition strategy. Digestate from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is considered, as well as a low-added value product to be properly valorized. In this regard, air gasification may be used to produce syngas. In this work, the production of methanol, hydrogen, or electricity from digestate-derived syngas was assessed by ChemCAD process simulation software. The process scheme of methanol production comprises the following parts: water gas shift (WGS) with carbon capture and storage units (CCS), methanol synthesis, and methanol purification. In the case of hydrogen production, after WGS-CCS, hydrogen was purified from residual nitrogen by pressure swing absorption (PSA). Finally, for electricity production, the digestate-derived syngas was used as fuel in an internal combustion engine. The main objective of this work is to compare the proposed scenarios in terms of CO2 emission intensity and the effect of CO2 storage. In particular, CCS units were used for methanol or hydrogen production with the aim of obtaining high equilibrium yield toward these products. On the basis of 100 kt/year of digestate, results show that the global CO2 savings were 80, 71, and 69 ktCO2eq/year for electricity, methanol, and hydrogen production, respectively. If carbon storage was considered, savings of about 105 and 99 ktCO2eq/year were achieved with methanol and hydrogen production, respectively. The proposed scenarios may provide an attractive option for transitioning into methanol or hydrogen economy of the future.

Assessment of Future Sustainable Power Technologies with Carbon Capture and Storage

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Hadjipaschalis ◽  
Costas Christou ◽  
Andreas Poullikkas
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Unit Cost ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Major Power ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Avoidance Cost

In this work, a technical, economic and environmental analysis concerning the use of three major power generation plant types including pulverized coal, integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and natural gas combined cycle, with or without carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS) integration, is carried out. For the analysis, the IPP optimization software is used in which the electricity unit cost and the CO2 avoidance cost from the various candidate power generation technologies is calculated. The analysis indicates that the electricity unit cost of IGCC technology with CCS integration is the least cost option with the lowest CO2 avoidance cost of all candidate technologies with CCS integration. Further investigation concerning the effect of the loan interest rate on the economic performance of the candidate plants revealed that up to a value of loan interest of approximately 5.7%, the IGCC plant with CCS retains the lowest electricity unit cost. Above this level, the natural gas combined cycle plant with post-combustion CCS becomes more economically attractive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document