Accurate elemental boiling points from first principles

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (41) ◽  
pp. 24041-24050
Author(s):  
Jan-Michael Mewes ◽  
Odile R. Smits

Thermodynamic integration with a DFT Hamiltonian has been used to obtain accurate absolute Gibbs energies of atomic liquids and normal boiling points in excellent agreement with experimental references (MAD < 2%).

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Michael Mewes ◽  
Odile Smits

<div>The normal boiling point (NBP) is a fundamental property of liquids and marks the intersection of the Gibbs energies of the liquid and the gas phase at ambient pressure.</div><div>This work provides the first comprehensive demonstration of the calculation of boiling points of atomic liquids through first-principles molecular-dynamics simulations.</div><div>To this end, thermodynamic integration (TDI) and perturbation theory (TPT) are combined with a density-functional theory (DFT) Hamiltonian, which provides absolute Gibbs energies, internal energies, and entropies of atomic liquids with an accuracy of a few meV/atom. </div><div>Linear extrapolation to the intersection with the Gibbs energy of a non-interacting gas phase eventually pins-down the NBPs. While these direct results can already be quite accurate, they are susceptible to a systematic over- or underbinding of the employed density functional. We show how the resulting errors can be strongly reduced by increasing the robustness of the method through a simple linear correction based on a high-level theoretical or experimental cohesive energy termed $\lambda$-scaling.</div><div>By carefully tuning the technical parameters, the walltime per element could be reduced from weeks to about a day (10-20k core-hours), which enabled extensive testing for B, Al, Na, K, Ca, Sr, Ba, Mn, Cu, Xe and Hg. </div><div>This comprehensive benchmark demonstrates the excellent performance and robustness of the approach with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of less than 2% from experimental NBPs and very similar accuracy for liquid entropies (MAD 2.3 J/(mol*K), 2% relative). In some cases, the uncertainty in the predictions are several times smaller than the variation between literature values, allowing us to clear out ambiguities in the NBPs of B and Ba.</div>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Michael Mewes ◽  
Odile Smits

<div>The normal boiling point (NBP) is a fundamental property of liquids and marks the intersection of the Gibbs energies of the liquid and the gas phase at ambient pressure.</div><div>This work provides the first comprehensive demonstration of the calculation of boiling points of atomic liquids through first-principles molecular-dynamics simulations.</div><div>To this end, thermodynamic integration (TDI) and perturbation theory (TPT) are combined with a density-functional theory (DFT) Hamiltonian, which provides absolute Gibbs energies, internal energies, and entropies of atomic liquids with an accuracy of a few meV/atom. </div><div>Linear extrapolation to the intersection with the Gibbs energy of a non-interacting gas phase eventually pins-down the NBPs. While these direct results can already be quite accurate, they are susceptible to a systematic over- or underbinding of the employed density functional. We show how the resulting errors can be strongly reduced by increasing the robustness of the method through a simple linear correction based on a high-level theoretical or experimental cohesive energy termed $\lambda$-scaling.</div><div>By carefully tuning the technical parameters, the walltime per element could be reduced from weeks to about a day (10-20k core-hours), which enabled extensive testing for B, Al, Na, K, Ca, Sr, Ba, Mn, Cu, Xe and Hg. </div><div>This comprehensive benchmark demonstrates the excellent performance and robustness of the approach with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of less than 2% from experimental NBPs and very similar accuracy for liquid entropies (MAD 2.3 J/(mol*K), 2% relative). In some cases, the uncertainty in the predictions are several times smaller than the variation between literature values, allowing us to clear out ambiguities in the NBPs of B and Ba.</div>


2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shogo Fukushima ◽  
Eisaku Ushijima ◽  
Hiroyuki Kumazoe ◽  
Akihide Koura ◽  
Fuyuki Shimojo ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. ADAM ◽  
S.J. CLARK ◽  
M.R. WILSON ◽  
G.J. ACKLAND ◽  
J. CRAIN

1998 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1063-1075
Author(s):  
W. C. Mackrodt, E.-A. Williamson, D. W

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-174
Author(s):  
Terri Gullickson
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 42 (C6) ◽  
pp. C6-625-C6-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Van Camp ◽  
V. E. Van Doren ◽  
J. T. Devreese

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document