The role of Brønsted base basicity in estimating carbon acidity at enzyme active sites: a caveat

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (30) ◽  
pp. 7161-7165
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Bearne
Keyword(s):  
Active Sites ◽  
Base Catalyst ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
A Value ◽  
Enzyme Active Sites ◽  
Brønsted Base

Using the pKE-BH+a value of the Brønsted base catalyst in the enzyme–substrate complex can overestimate the extent to which an enzyme lowers the substrate's pKC–Ha value.

The role of secondary alcoholic groups of D-galacturonan in its degradation with exo-D-galacturonanase

1980 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kveta Heinrichová ◽  
Rudolf Kohn
Keyword(s):  
Acetyl Derivative ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Hydroxyl Groups ◽  
Pectic Acid ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Degradation Degree ◽  
Derivatives Of

The effect of exo-D-galacturonanase from carrot on O-acetyl derivatives of pectic acid of variousacetylation degree was studied. Substitution of hydroxyl groups at C(2) and C(3) of D-galactopyranuronic acid units influences the initial rate of degradation, degree of degradation and its maximum rate, the differences being found also in the time of limit degradations of the individual O-acetyl derivatives. Value of the apparent Michaelis constant increases with increase of substitution and value of Vmax changes. O-Acetyl derivatives act as a competitive inhibitor of degradation of D-galacturonan. The extent of the inhibition effect depends on the degree of substitution. The only product of enzymic reaction is D-galactopyranuronic acid, what indicates that no degradation of the terminal substituted unit of O-acetyl derivative of pectic acid takes place. Substitution of hydroxyl groups influences the affinity of the enzyme towards the modified substrate. The results let us presume that hydroxyl groups at C(2) and C(3) of galacturonic unit of pectic acid are essential for formation of the enzyme-substrate complex.

Effect of Modifiers on the Hydrolysis of Basic and Neutral Peptides by Carboxypeptidase B

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 747-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Moore ◽  
N. Leo Benoiton
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
Active Sites ◽  
Kinetic Behavior ◽  
Carboxypeptidase A ◽  
Phenyllactic Acid ◽  
Carboxypeptidase B ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Basic Peptides ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

The initial rates of hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Lys and Bz-Gly-Phe by carboxypeptidase B (CPB) are increased in the presence of the modifiers β-phenylpropionic acid, cyclohexanol, Bz-Gly, and Bz-Gly-Gly. The hydrolysis of the tripeptide Bz-Gly-Gly-Phe is also activated by Bz-Gly and Bz-Gly-Gly, but none of these modifiers activate the hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Gly-Lys, Z-Leu-Ala-Phe, or Bz-Gly-phenyllactic acid by CPB. All modifiers except cyclohexanol display inhibitory modes of binding when present in high concentration.Examination of Lineweaver–Burk plots in the presence of fixed concentrations of Bz-Gly has shown that activation of the hydrolysis of neutral and basic peptides by CPB, as reflected in the values of the extrapolated parameters, Km(app) and keat, occurs by different mechanisms. For Bz-Gly-Gly-Phe, activation occurs because the enzyme–modifier complex has a higher affinity than the free enzyme for the substrate, whereas activation of the hydrolysis of Bz-Gly-Lys derives from an increase in the rate of breakdown of the enzyme–substrate complex to give products.Cyclohexanol differs from Bz-Gly and Bz-Gly-Gly in that it displays no inhibitory mode of binding with any of the substrates examined, activates only the hydrolysis of dipeptides by CPB, and has a greater effect on the hydrolysis of the basic dipeptide than on the neutral dipeptide. Moreover, when Bz-Gly-Lys is the substrate, cyclohexanol activates its hydrolysis by CPB by increasing both the enzyme–substrate binding affinity and the rate of the catalytic step, an effect different from that observed when Bz-Gly is the modifier.The anomalous kinetic behavior of CPB is remarkably similar to that of carboxypeptidase A, and is a good indication that both enzymes have very similar structures in and around their respective active sites. A binding site for activator molecules down the cleft of the active site is proposed for CPB to explain the observed kinetic behavior.

scholarly journals Role of Sulfated Tyrosines of Thyroglobulin in Thyroid Hormonosynthesis

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (11) ◽  
pp. 4834-4843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Christine Nlend ◽  
David M. Cauvi ◽  
Nicole Venot ◽  
Odile Chabaud
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Coupling Reaction ◽  
Short Life ◽  
Hormone Synthesis ◽  
Amino Acid Peptide ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Saturation Binding ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

Our previous studies showed that sulfated tyrosines (Tyr-S) are involved in thyroid hormone synthesis and that Tyr5, the main hormonogenic site of thyroglobulin (Tg), is sulfated. In the present paper, we studied the role of Tyr-S in the formation and activity of the peroxidase-Tg complex. Results show that noniodinated 35SO3-Tg specifically binds (Kd = 1.758 μm) to immobilized lactoperoxidase (LPO) via Tyr-S linkage by using saturation binding and competition experiments. We found that NIFEY-S, a 15-amino acid peptide corresponding to the NH2-end sequence of Tg and containing the hormonogenic acceptor Tyr5-S, was a better competitor than cholecystokinin and Tyr-S. 35SO3-Tg, iodinated without peroxidase, bound to LPO with a Kd (1.668 μm) similar to that of noniodinated Tg, suggesting that 1) its binding occurs via Tyr-S linkage and 2) Tyr-S requires peroxidase to be iodinated, whereas nonsulfated Tyr does not. Iodination of NIFEY-S with [125I]iodide showed that Tyr5-S iodination increased with LPO concentration, whereas iodination of a nonsulfated peptide containing the donor Tyr130 was barely dependent on LPO concentration. Enzymatic hydrolysis of iodinated Tg or NIFEY-S showed that the amounts of sulfated iodotyrosines also depended on LPO amount. Sulfated iodotyrosines were detectable in the enzyme-substrate complex, suggesting they have a short life before the coupling reaction occurs. Our data suggest that after Tyr-S binding to peroxidase where it is iodinated, the sulfate group is removed, releasing an iodophenoxy anion available for coupling with an iodotyrosine donor.

scholarly journals KPC-2 β-lactamase Enables Carbapenem Antibiotic Resistance Through Fast Deacylation of the Covalent Intermediate

2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.015050
Author(s):  
Shrenik C Mehta ◽  
Ian M Furey ◽  
Orville A Pemberton ◽  
David M Boragine ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
The Common ◽  
Covalent Intermediate ◽  
Hydrolysis Of ◽  
Carbapenem Antibiotic ◽  
Enzyme Intermediate

Serine active-site β-lactamases hydrolyze β-lactam antibiotics through formation of a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate followed by deacylation via an activated water molecule. Carbapenem antibiotics are poorly hydrolyzed by most β-lactamases due to slow hydrolysis of the acyl-enzyme intermediate. However, the emergence of the KPC-2 carbapenemase has resulted in widespread resistance to these drugs, suggesting it operates more efficiently. Here, we investigated the unusual features of KPC-2 that enable this resistance. We show that KPC-2 has a 20,000-fold increased deacylation rate compared to the common TEM-1 β-lactamase. Further, kinetic analysis of active site alanine mutants indicates that carbapenem hydrolysis is a concerted effort involving multiple residues. Substitution of Asn170 greatly decreases the deacylation rate, but this residue is conserved in both KPC-2 and non-carbapenemase β-lactamases, suggesting it promotes carbapenem hydrolysis only in the context of KPC-2. X-ray structure determination of the N170A enzyme in complex with hydrolyzed imipenem suggests Asn170 may prevent the inactivation of the deacylating water by the 6α-hydroxyethyl substituent of carbapenems. In addition, the Thr235 residue, which interacts with the C3 carboxylate of carbapenems, also contributes strongly to the deacylation reaction. In contrast, mutation of the Arg220 and Thr237 residues decreases the acylation rate and, paradoxically, improves binding affinity for carbapenems. Thus, the role of these residues may be ground state destabilization of the enzyme-substrate complex or, alternatively, to ensure proper alignment of the substrate with key catalytic residues to facilitate acylation. These findings suggest modifications of the carbapenem scaffold to avoid hydrolysis by KPC-2 β-lactamase.

scholarly journals The Role of Evolving Interfacial Substrate Properties on Heterogeneous Cellulose Hydrolysis Kinetics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Nill ◽  
Tina Jeoh
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Cellulose Hydrolysis ◽  
Reaction Rates ◽  
Hydrolysis Kinetics ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Substrate Properties ◽  
Hydrolysis Of

AbstractInterfacial enzyme reactions require formation of an enzyme-substrate complex at the surface of a heterogeneous substrate, but often multiple modes of enzyme binding and types of binding sites complicate analysis of their kinetics. Excess of heterogeneous substrate is often used as a justification to model the substrate as unchanging; but using the study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose as an example, we argue that reaction rates are dependent on evolving substrate interfacial properties. We hypothesize that the relative abundance of binding sites on cellulose where hydrolysis can occur (productive binding sites) and binding sites where hydrolysis cannot be initiated or is inhibited (non-productive binding sites) contribute to rate limitations. We show that the initial total number of productive binding sites (the productive binding capacity) determines the magnitude of the initial burst phase of cellulose hydrolysis, while productive binding site depletion explains overall hydrolysis kinetics. Furthermore, we show that irreversibly bound surface enzymes contribute to the depletion of productive binding sites. Our model shows that increasing the ratio of productive- to non-productive binding sites promotes hydrolysis, while maintaining an elevated productive binding capacity throughout conversion is key to preventing hydrolysis slowdown.

scholarly journals Peptide substrates for chymosin (rennin). Interaction sites in κ-casein-related sequences located outside the (103-108)-hexapeptide region that fits into the enzyme's active-site cleft

1987 ◽  
Vol 244 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Visser ◽  
C J Slangen ◽  
P J van Rooijen
Keyword(s):  
Active Site ◽  
Peptide Bond ◽  
Milk Clotting ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Interaction Sites ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Ability To Act ◽  
Milk Clotting Enzyme ◽  
Active Site Cleft

The role of individual amino acid residues in the 98-102 and 111-112 regions of bovine kappa-casein in its interaction with the milk-clotting enzyme chymosin (rennin) was investigated. to this end the tryptic 98-112 fragment of kappa-casein was modified in its N- and/or C-terminal part by chemical (guanidation, ethoxyformylation, repeated Edman degradation) and enzymic (carboxypeptidase) treatments. Further, use was made of short synthetic kappa-casein analogues in which His-102 had been replaced by Pro or Lys. All peptides and their derivatives were tested comparatively at various pH values for their ability to act as chymosin substrates via specific cleavage of the peptide bond at position 105-106. The results indicate that in the alternating 98-102 sequence (His-Pro-His-Pro-His) the His as well as the Pro residues contribute to the substrate activity with no predominant role of any one of these groups. Another interaction site is formed by the Lys residue at position 111 of the substrate. A model of the enzyme-substrate complex is proposed. Herein the 103-108 fragment of the substrate, to be accommodated within the enzyme's active-site cleft, is brought into position by electrostatic binding (via His-98, His-100, His-102 and Lys-111) near the entrance of the cleft. These interactions are strongly supported by Pro residues at positions 99, 101, 109 and 110 of the substrate, which act as stabilizers of the proper conformation of the substrate in the enzyme-substrate complex.

Bioorganic Reactions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary W. Morrow
Keyword(s):  
Ground State ◽  
Enzyme Catalysis ◽  
Active Sites ◽  
Intermolecular Forces ◽  
Organic Reactions ◽  
Specific Substrate ◽  
Processes And Reactions ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Ground State Energies

It is not essential to have a background in enzymology or biochemistry to gain at least an introductory-level understanding of many biosynthetic processes, so this book does not deal with enzymology or enzyme structure or function in any significant way, even though much of the chemistry we will be examining depends almost entirely on enzyme catalysis. Nevertheless, we will refer to enzyme catalysis and the names of specific enzymes throughout the text as we examine biosynthetic processes and reactions in significant detail. So what exactly are enzymes? Simply put, enzymes are naturally occurring proteins that catalyze various biochemical reactions in living systems. As we will see, many of the reactions they catalyze are familiar organic reactions, but have specific purposes and target structures. Generally speaking, enzymes catalyze organic reactions by lowering transition state energies or raising ground state energies of reactants in much the same way as nonenzymatic catalysts in laboratory chemical reactions, though in the case of enzyme catalysis, rate enhancements of as much as 1023 have been reported, far exceeding rate enhancements currently achievable by conventional chemical means. Understanding the interaction of enzymes and substrates (reactants) to form an enzyme–substrate complex (E–S complex) is fundamental to having some appreciation for how enzymes carry out their work. While overly simplistic, the “lock-and-key” model of enzyme–substrate interaction provides an intuitive context for understanding the remarkable substrate specificity of enzyme-mediated reactions. Thus, so-called enzyme active sites or binding sites (the “lock”) will only accept certain specific substrate structures (the “key”), with shape, conformation, intermolecular forces, and other factors determining the lock-and-key fit. Enzymes not only catalyze specific kinds of reactions, they can act specifically on certain compounds or classes of compounds or functional groups, often showing remarkable selectivity and stereospecificity, especially in the recognition and/or introduction of chirality centers in organic molecules. In terms of nomenclature, enzyme names always end with an ase suffix and are typically named in accordance with the substrate they act upon and/or the kind of reaction process they catalyze.

scholarly journals Structural Features of the Interaction between Human 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase hOGG1 and DNA

Acta Naturae ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Koval ◽  
D. G. Knorre ◽  
O. S. Fedorova
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Dna Bases ◽  
Dna Glycosylase ◽  
Repair Enzyme ◽  
Enzyme Active Site ◽  
Substrate Complex ◽  
Enzyme Substrate ◽  
Amino Acid Mutations

The purpose of the present review is to summarize the data related with the structural features of interaction between the human repair enzyme 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) and DNA. The review covers the questions concerning the role of individual amino acids of hOGG1 in the specific recognition of the oxidized DNA bases, formation of the enzyme-substrate complex, and excision of the lesion bases from DNA. Attention is also focused upon conformational changes in the enzyme active site and disruption of enzyme activity as a result of amino acid mutations. The mechanism of damaged bases release from DNA induced by hOGG1 is discussed in the context of structural dynamics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document