scholarly journals High throughput gene expression profiling of yeast colonies with microgel-culture Drop-seq

Lab on a Chip ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1838-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leqian Liu ◽  
Chiraj K. Dalal ◽  
Benjamin M. Heineike ◽  
Adam R. Abate
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Massively Parallel ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
High Throughput Gene Expression ◽  
Parallel Strategy

We describe isogenic colony sequencing (ICO-seq), a massively-parallel strategy to assess the gene expression profiles of large numbers of genetically distinct yeast colonies.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling for Response Prediction of Rectal Adenocarcinomas to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1826-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Michael Ghadimi ◽  
Marian Grade ◽  
Michael J. Difilippantonio ◽  
Sudhir Varma ◽  
Richard Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Response Prediction ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Correct Prediction

Purpose There is a wide spectrum of tumor responsiveness of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy ranging from complete response to complete resistance. This study aimed to investigate whether parallel gene expression profiling of the primary tumor can contribute to stratification of patients into groups of responders or nonresponders. Patients and Methods Pretherapeutic biopsies from 30 locally advanced rectal carcinomas were analyzed for gene expression signatures using microarrays. All patients were participants of a phase III clinical trial (CAO/ARO/AIO-94, German Rectal Cancer Trial) and were randomized to receive a preoperative combined-modality therapy including fluorouracil and radiation. Class comparison was used to identify a set of genes that were differentially expressed between responders and nonresponders as measured by T level downsizing and histopathologic tumor regression grading. Results In an initial set of 23 patients, responders and nonresponders showed significantly different expression levels for 54 genes (P < .001). The ability to predict response to therapy using gene expression profiles was rigorously evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Tumor behavior was correctly predicted in 83% of patients (P = .02). Sensitivity (correct prediction of response) was 78%, and specificity (correct prediction of nonresponse) was 86%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 78% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion Our results suggest that pretherapeutic gene expression profiling may assist in response prediction of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The implementation of gene expression profiles for treatment stratification and clinical management of cancer patients requires validation in large, independent studies, which are now warranted.

scholarly journals High-Throughput Gene Expression Profiles to Define Drug Similarity and Predict Compound Activity

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans De Wolf ◽  
Laure Cougnaud ◽  
Kirsten Van Hoorde ◽  
An De Bondt ◽  
Joerg K. Wegner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
High Throughput Gene Expression ◽  
Drug Similarity

Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Fundamental Differences between Leukemic Stem Cells (Lin-CD34+CD38−) and Mature Blasts (Lin−CD34+CD38+) of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1377-1377
Author(s):  
Kazem Zibara ◽  
Daniel Pearce ◽  
David Taussig ◽  
Spyros Skoulakis ◽  
Simon Tomlinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Leukemic Stem Cells ◽  
Significant Differential Expression ◽  
New Genes

Abstract The identification of LSC has important implications for future research as well as for the development of novel therapies. The phenotypic description of LSC now enables their purification and should facilitate the identification of genes that are preferentially expressed in these cells compared to normal HSC. However, gene-expression profiling is usually conducted on mononuclear cells of AML patients from either peripheral blood and/or bone marrow. These samples contain a mixture of blasts cells, normal hematopoietic cells and limited number of leukemic stem cells. Thus, this results in a composite profile that obscure differences between LSC and blasts cells with low proliferative potential. The aim of this study was to compare the gene expression profile of highly purified LSC versus leukemic blasts in order to identify genes that might have important roles in driving the leukemia. For this purpose, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of highly purified LSCs (Lin−CD34+CD38−) and more mature blast cells (Lin−CD34+CD38+) isolated from 7 adult AML patients. All samples were previously tested for the ability of the Lin−CD34+CD38− cells but not the Lin−CD34+CD38+ fraction to engraft using the non-obese diabetic/severe combined immuno-deficiency (NOD-SCID) repopulation assay. Affymetrix microarrays (U133A chip), containing 22,283 genes, were used for the analysis. Comparison of Lin-CD34+CD38- cell population to the Lin−CD34+CD38+ cell fraction showed 5421 genes to be expressed in both fractions. Comparative analysis of gene-expression profiles showed statistically significant differential expression of 133 genes between the 2 cell populations. Most of the genes were downregulated in the LSC-enriched fraction, compared to the more differentiated fraction. Gene ontology was used to determine the categories of the up-regulated transcripts. These transcripts, which are selectively expressed, include a number of known genes (e.g., receptors, signalling genes, proliferation and cell cycle genes and transcription factors). These genes play important roles in differentiation, self-renewal, migration and adhesion of HSCs. Among the genes showing the highest differences in expression levels were the following: ribonucleotide reductase M2 polypeptide, thymidylate synthetase, ZW10 interactor, cathepsin G, azurocidin 1, topoisomerase II, CDC20, nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1, Rac GTPase activating protein 1, leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, myeloperoxidase, cyclin A1 (RRM2, TYMS, ZWINT, CTSG, AZU1, TOP2A, CDC20, NUSAP1, RACGAP1, LILRB2, PCNA, MPO, CCNA1). Some transcripts detected have not been implicated in HSC functions, and others have unknown function so far. This work identifies new genes that might play a role in leukemogenesis and cancer stem cells. It also leads to a better description and understanding of the molecular phenotypes of these 2 cell populations. Hence, in addition to being a more efficient way to further understand the biology of LSC, this should also provide a more efficient way of identifying new therapeutics and diagnostic targets.

scholarly journals Gene expression profiling of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis at homeostasis and in response to tissue injury

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Weidenbusch ◽  
Severin Rodler ◽  
Shangqing Song ◽  
Simone Romoli ◽  
Julian A. Marschner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Profiling ◽  
Expression Profiling ◽  
Tissue Injury ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Notch Pathway ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Sterile Inflammation ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

Notch and interleukin-22 (IL-22) signaling are known to regulate tissue homeostasis and respond to injury in humans and mice, and the induction of endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) ligands through Notch links the two pathways in a hierarchical fashion. However in adults, the species-, organ- and injury-specific gene expression of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis components is unknown. We therefore performed gene expression profiling of DLL1, DLL3, DLL4, DLK1, DLK2, JAG1, JAG2, Notch1, Notch2, Notch3, Notch4, ADAM17/TNF-α ADAM metalloprotease converting enzyme (TACE), PSEN1, basigin (BSG)/CD147, RBP-J, HES1, HES5, HEY1, HEYL, AHR, ARNT, ARNT2, CYP1A1, CYP24A1, IL-22, IL22RA1, IL22RA2, IL10RB, and STAT3 under homeostatic conditions in ten mature murine and human organs. Additionally, the expression of these genes was assessed in murine models of acute sterile inflammation and progressive fibrosis. We show that there are organ-specific gene expression profiles of the Notch-AhR-IL22 axis in humans and mice. Although there is an overall interspecies congruency, specific differences between human and murine expression signatures do exist. In murine tissues with AHR/ARNT expression CYP1A1 and IL-22 were correlated with HES5 and HEYL expression, while in human tissues no such correlation was found. Notch and AhR signaling are involved in renal inflammation and fibrosis with specific gene expression changes in each model. Despite the presence of all Notch pathway molecules in the kidney and a model-specific induction of Notch ligands, IL-22 was only up-regulated in acute inflammation, but rapidly down-regulated during regeneration. This implies that for targeting injury responses, e.g. via IL-22, species-specific differences, injury type and time points have to be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document