Comment on “Pressure enhancement in carbon nanopores: a major confinement effect” by Y. Long, J. C. Palmer, B. Coasne, M. Śliwinska-Bartkowiak and K. E. Gubbins, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 17163

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 9824-9825
Author(s):  
David van Dijk

A standard thermodynamic interpretation unambiguously explains the observed properties of fluids confined in pores, while a “pressure enhancement” effect emerges only from calculations in which particular choices are selected from an arbitrary set.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 9826-9830
Author(s):  
Yun Long ◽  
Jeremy C. Palmer ◽  
Benoit Coasne ◽  
Kaihang Shi ◽  
Małgorzata Śliwińska-Bartkowiak ◽  
...  

By calculating the unique effective tangential pressure and discussing recent evidence from experiment and simulations, we show that the high pressure and strong compression in adsorbed layers for wetting systems on carbon are significant.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Gould

The GMTKN55 benchmarking protocol introduced by [Goerigk et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 32184] allows comprehensive analysis and ranking of density functional approximations with diverse chemical behaviours. But this comprehensiveness comes at a cost: GMTKN55's 1500 benchmarking values require energies for around 2500 systems to be calculated, making it a costly exercise. This manuscript introduces three subsets of GMTKN55, consisting of 30, 100 and 150 systems, as `diet' substitutes for the full database. The subsets are chosen via a stochastic genetic approach, and consequently can reproduce key results of the full GMTKN55 database, including ranking of approximations.


Author(s):  
Manoj Prasad ◽  
Filip Strubbe ◽  
Filip Beunis ◽  
Kristiaan Neyts

Correction for ‘Space charge limited release of charged inverse micelles in non-polar liquids’ by Manoj Prasad et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 19289–19298, DOI: 10.1039/C6CP03544B.


Author(s):  
Shyamal Mondal ◽  
Debasree Chowdhury ◽  
Pabitra Das ◽  
Biswarup Satpati ◽  
Debabrata Ghose ◽  
...  

Correction for ‘Observation of ordered arrays of endotaxially grown nanostructures from size-selected Cu-nanoclusters deposited on patterned substrates of Si’ by Shyamal Mondal et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 6009–6016 DOI: 10.1039/D0CP06089E.


Author(s):  
Aditya G. Rao ◽  
Christian Wiebeler ◽  
Saumik Sen ◽  
David S. Cerutti ◽  
Igor Schapiro

Correction for ‘Histidine protonation controls structural heterogeneity in the cyanobacteriochrome AnPixJg2’ by Aditya G. Rao et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05314g.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 4454-4454
Author(s):  
Kunran Yang ◽  
Jeremie Zaffran ◽  
Bo Yang

Correction for ‘Fast prediction of oxygen reduction reaction activity on carbon nanotubes with a localized geometric descriptor’ by Kunran Yang et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 890–895, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04885E.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 10130-10131
Author(s):  
Ryo Sakamoto ◽  
Maho Yamashita ◽  
Kosuke Nakamoto ◽  
Yongquan Zhou ◽  
Nobuko Yoshimoto ◽  
...  

Correction for ‘Local structure of a highly concentrated NaClO4 aqueous solution-type electrolyte for sodium ion batteries’ by Ryo Sakamoto et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 26452–26458, DOI: 10.1039/D0CP04376A.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (47) ◽  
pp. 27912-27912
Author(s):  
Ignacio Melián-Cabrera

Correction for ‘Temperature control in DRIFT cells used for in situ and operando studies: where do we stand today?’ by Ignacio Melián-Cabrera, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp04352d.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 11101-11104
Author(s):  
S. Pelloni ◽  
P. Lazzeretti

Correction for ‘Anisotropy of the vorticity tensor as a magnetic indicator of aromaticity’ by S. Pelloni et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 1299–1305, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05563K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document