scholarly journals A study of SeqA subcellular localization in Escherichia coli using photo-activated localization microscopy

2015 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 425-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek T. Mika ◽  
Aster Vanhecke ◽  
Peter Dedecker ◽  
Toon Swings ◽  
Jeroen Vangindertael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Bacterial Genome ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Localization Microscopy ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Copy Numbers

Escherichia coli (E. coli) cells replicate their genome once per cell cycle to pass on genetic information to the daughter cells. The SeqA protein binds the origin of replication, oriC, after DNA replication initiation and sequesters it from new initiations in order to prevent overinitiation. Conventional fluorescence microscopy studies of SeqA localization in bacterial cells have shown that the protein is localized to discrete foci. In this study we have used photo-activated localization microscopy (PALM) to determine the localization of SeqA molecules, tagged with fluorescent proteins, with a localization precision of 20–30 nm with the aim to visualize the SeqA subcellular structures in more detail than previously possible. SeqA–PAmCherry was imaged in wild type E. coli, expressed from plasmid or genetically engineered into the bacterial genome, replacing the native seqA gene. Unsynchronized cells as well as cells with a synchronized cell cycle were imaged at various time points, in order to investigate the evolution of SeqA localization during the cell cycle. We found that SeqA indeed localized into discrete foci but these were not the only subcellular localizations of the protein. A significant amount of SeqA–PAmCherry molecules was localized outside the foci and in a fraction of cells we saw patterns indicating localization at the membrane. Using quantitative PALM, we counted protein copy numbers per cell, protein copy numbers per focus, the numbers of foci per cell and the sizes of the SeqA clusters. The data showed broad cell-to-cell variation and we did not observe a correlation between SeqA–PAmCherry protein numbers and the cell cycle under the experimental conditions of this study. The numbers of SeqA–PAmCherry molecules per focus as well as the foci sizes also showed broad distributions indicating that the foci are likely not characterized by a fixed number of molecules. We also imaged an E. coli strain devoid of the dam methylase (Δdam) and observed that SeqA–PAmCherry no longer formed foci, and was dispersed throughout the cell and localized to the plasma membrane more readily. We discuss our results in the context of the limitations of the technique.

scholarly journals Blocking, Bending, and Binding: Regulation of Initiation of Chromosome Replication During the Escherichia coli Cell Cycle by Transcriptional Modulators That Interact With Origin DNA

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia E. Grimwade ◽  
Alan C. Leonard
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
Integration Host Factor ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Critical Event ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Chromosome Duplication ◽  
Recognition Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Modulators

Genome duplication is a critical event in the reproduction cycle of every cell. Because all daughter cells must inherit a complete genome, chromosome replication is tightly regulated, with multiple mechanisms focused on controlling when chromosome replication begins during the cell cycle. In bacteria, chromosome duplication starts when nucleoprotein complexes, termed orisomes, unwind replication origin (oriC) DNA and recruit proteins needed to build new replication forks. Functional orisomes comprise the conserved initiator protein, DnaA, bound to a set of high and low affinity recognition sites in oriC. Orisomes must be assembled each cell cycle. In Escherichia coli, the organism in which orisome assembly has been most thoroughly examined, the process starts with DnaA binding to high affinity sites after chromosome duplication is initiated, and orisome assembly is completed immediately before the next initiation event, when DnaA interacts with oriC’s lower affinity sites, coincident with origin unwinding. A host of regulators, including several transcriptional modulators, targets low affinity DnaA-oriC interactions, exerting their effects by DNA bending, blocking access to recognition sites, and/or facilitating binding of DnaA to both DNA and itself. In this review, we focus on orisome assembly in E. coli. We identify three known transcriptional modulators, SeqA, Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), and IHF (integration host factor), that are not essential for initiation, but which interact directly with E. coli oriC to regulate orisome assembly and replication initiation timing. These regulators function by blocking sites (SeqA) and bending oriC DNA (Fis and IHF) to inhibit or facilitate cooperative low affinity DnaA binding. We also examine how the growth rate regulation of Fis levels might modulate IHF and DnaA binding to oriC under a variety of nutritional conditions. Combined, the regulatory mechanisms mediated by transcriptional modulators help ensure that at all growth rates, bacterial chromosome replication begins once, and only once, per cell cycle.

scholarly journals Single-cell data and correlation analysis support the independent double adder model in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Le Treut ◽  
Fangwei Si ◽  
Dongyang Li ◽  
Suckjoon Jun
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Biological Models ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
E Coli

AbstractThe reference point for cell-size control in the cell cycle is a fundamental biological question. We previously reported that we were unable to reproduce the conclusions of Witz et al.’s eLife paper (Witz, van Nimwegen, and Julou 2019) entitled, “Initiation of chromosome replication controls both division and replication cycles in E. coli through a double-adder mechanism”, despite extensive efforts. In this ‘replication double adder’ (RDA) model, both replication and division cycles are determined via replication initiation as the sole implementation point of size control. Witz et al. justified the RDA model using a type of correlation analysis (the “I-value analysis”) that they developed. By contrast, we previously showed that, in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, replication initiation and cell division are determined by balanced biosynthesis of key cell cycle proteins (e.g., DnaA for initiation and FtsZ for cell division) and their accumulation to their respective threshold numbers, which Witz et al. coined the ‘independent double adder’ (IDA) model. The adder phenotype is a natural quantitative consequence of these mechanistic principles. In a recent bioRxiv response to our report, Witz and colleagues explicitly confirmed two important limitations of the I-value analysis: (1) it is only applicable to non-overlapping cell cycles, wherein E. coli is known to deviate from the adder principle, and (2) it is only applicable to select biological models and, for example, cannot evaluate the IDA model. These limitations of the I-value analysis were not explained in the original eLife paper and were overlooked during the review process. In this report, we show using data analysis, mathematical modeling, and experiments why the I-value analysis - in its current implementation - cannot compare different biological models. Furthermore, the RDA model is incompatible with the adder principle and is not broadly supported by experimental data. For completeness, we also provide a detailed point-by-point response to Witz et al.’s response (Witz, Julou, and van Nimwegen 2020) in the Supplemental Information.

Biodecomposition of Phenanthrene and Pyrene by a Genetically Engineered Escherichia coli

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Ahankoub ◽  
Gashtasb Mardani ◽  
Payam Ghasemi-Dehkordi ◽  
Ameneh Mehri-Ghahfarrokhi ◽  
Abbas Doosti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Hazardous Substances ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Spiked Soil ◽  
Engineered Escherichia Coli ◽  
Genetically Manipulated ◽  
Hplc Measurement

Background: Genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) can be used for bioremediation of the biological pollutants into nonhazardous or less-hazardous substances, at lower cost. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are one of these contaminants that associated with a risk of human cancer development. Genetically engineered E. coli that encoded catechol 2,3- dioxygenase (C230) was created and investigated its ability to biodecomposition of phenanthrene and pyrene in spiked soil using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurement. We revised patents documents relating to the use of GEMs for bioremediation. This approach have already been done in others studies although using other genes codifying for same catechol degradation approach. Objective: In this study, we investigated biodecomposition of phenanthrene and pyrene by a genetically engineered Escherichia coli. Methods: Briefly, following the cloning of C230 gene (nahH) into pUC18 vector and transformation into E. coli Top10F, the complementary tests, including catalase, oxidase and PCR were used as on isolated bacteria from spiked soil. Results: The results of HPLC measurement showed that in spiked soil containing engineered E. coli, biodegradation of phenanthrene and pyrene comparing to autoclaved soil that inoculated by wild type of E. coli and normal soil group with natural microbial flora, were statistically significant (p<0.05). Moreover, catalase test was positive while the oxidase tests were negative. Conclusion: These findings indicated that genetically manipulated E. coli can provide an effective clean-up process on PAH compounds and it is useful for bioremediation of environmental pollution with petrochemical products.

scholarly journals Escherichia coli as a genetic tool

1985 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-618
Author(s):  
Naomi Datta
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Cloning And Expression ◽  
Biological Research ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Genetic Tool ◽  
The Past ◽  
Made In

SUMMARYThe study of Escherichia coli and its plasmids and bacteriophages has provided a vast body of genetical information, much of it relevant to the whole of biology. This was true even before the development of the new techniques, for cloning and analysing DNA, that have revolutionized biological research during the past decade. Thousands of millions of dollars are now invested in industrial uses of these techniques, which all depend on discoveries made in the course of academic research on E. coli. Much of the background of knowledge necessary for the cloning and expression of genetically engineered information, as well as the techniques themselves, came from work with this organism.

Optimizing a production strategy for a nonspecific nuclease from Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. palearctica in genetically engineered Escherichia coli

2019 ◽  
Vol 366 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ge ◽  
Senlin Guo ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Duanhua Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Yersinia Enterocolitica ◽  
Inclusion Bodies ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Biological Research ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Protein Renaturation ◽  
Engineered Escherichia Coli ◽  
Pharmaceutical Production

ABSTRACT A nuclease from Yersinia enterocolitica subsp. palearctica (Nucyep) is a newly found thermostable nonspecific nuclease. The heat-resisting ability of this nuclease would be extremely useful in biological research or pharmaceutical production. However, the application of this nuclease is limited because of its poor yield. This research aimed to improve Nucyep productivity by producing a novel genetically engineered Escherichia coli and optimizing the production procedures. After 4 h of induction by lactose, the new genetically engineered E. coli can express a substantial amount of Nucyep in the form of inclusion bodies. The yield was approximately 0.3 g of inclusion bodies in 1 g of bacterial pellets. The inclusion bodies were extracted by sonication and solubilized in an 8 M urea buffer. Protein renaturation was successfully achieved by dilution method. Pure enzyme was obtained after subjecting the protein solution to anion exchange. The Nucyep showed its nonspecific and heat resistant properties as previously reported (Boissinot et  al. 2016). Through a quantification method, its activity was determined to be 1.3 × 10 6 Kunitz units (K.U.)/mg. These results can serve as a reference for increasing Nucyep production.

scholarly journals The Role of Metabolites in the Link between DNA Replication and Central Carbon Metabolism in Escherichia coli

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 447
Author(s):  
Klaudyna Krause ◽  
Monika Maciąg-Dorszyńska ◽  
Anna Wosinski ◽  
Lidia Gaffke ◽  
Joanna Morcinek-Orłowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Carbon Metabolism ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Central Carbon Metabolism ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Cell Physiology ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Central Carbon

A direct link between DNA replication regulation and central carbon metabolism (CCM) has been previously demonstrated in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli, as effects of certain mutations in genes coding for replication proteins could be specifically suppressed by particular mutations in genes encoding CCM enzymes. However, specific molecular mechanism(s) of this link remained unknown. In this report, we demonstrate that various CCM metabolites can suppress the effects of mutations in different replication genes of E. coli on bacterial growth, cell morphology, and nucleoid localization. This provides evidence that the CCM-replication link is mediated by metabolites rather than direct protein-protein interactions. On the other hand, action of metabolites on DNA replication appears indirect rather than based on direct influence on the replication machinery, as rate of DNA synthesis could not be corrected by metabolites in short-term experiments. This corroborates the recent discovery that in B. subtilis, there are multiple links connecting CCM to DNA replication initiation and elongation. Therefore, one may suggest that although different in detail, the molecular mechanisms of CCM-dependent regulation of DNA replication are similar in E. coli and B. subtilis, making this regulation an important and common constituent of the control of cell physiology in bacteria.

Extended-spectrum resistance to β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (ESRI) evolved from low-level resistant Escherichia coli

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ángel Rodríguez-Villodres ◽  
María Luisa Gil-Marqués ◽  
Rocío Álvarez-Marín ◽  
Rémy A Bonnin ◽  
María Eugenia Pachón-Ibáñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Copy Numbers ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanic Acid

Abstract Objectives Escherichia coli is characterized by three resistance patterns to β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLs/BLIs): (i) resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam and susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (RSS); (ii) resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam (RRS); and (iii) resistance to ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and piperacillin/tazobactam (RRR). These resistance patterns are acquired consecutively, indicating a potential risk of developing resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, but the precise mechanism of this process is not completely understood. Methods Clinical isolates incrementally pressured by piperacillin/tazobactam selection in vitro and in vivo were used. We determined the MIC of piperacillin/tazobactam in the presence and absence of piperacillin/tazobactam pressure. We deciphered the role of the blaTEM genes in the new concept of extended-spectrum resistance to BLs/BLIs (ESRI) using genomic analysis. The activity of β-lactamase was quantified in these isolates. Results We show that piperacillin/tazobactam resistance is induced in E. coli carrying blaTEM genes. This resistance is due to the increase in copy numbers and transcription levels of the blaTEM gene, thus increasing β-lactamase activity and consequently increasing piperacillin/tazobactam MICs. Genome sequencing of two blaTEM-carrying representative isolates showed that piperacillin/tazobactam treatment produced two types of duplications of blaTEM (8 and 60 copies, respectively). In the clinical setting, piperacillin/tazobactam treatment of patients infected by E. coli carrying blaTEM is associated with a risk of therapeutic failure. Conclusions This study describes for the first time the ESRI in E. coli. This new concept is very important in the understanding of the mechanism involved in the acquisition of resistance to BLs/BLIs.

scholarly journals Replication of plasmids derived from Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages in starved Escherichia coli

Microbiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bożena Nejman ◽  
Beata Nadratowska-Wesołowska ◽  
Agnieszka Szalewska-Pałasz ◽  
Alicja Węgrzyn ◽  
Grzegorz Węgrzyn
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Shiga Toxin ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Stringent Response ◽  
Toxin Production ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation

The pathogenicity of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) depends on the expression of stx genes that are located on lambdoid prophages. Effective toxin production occurs only after prophage induction, and one may presume that replication of the phage genome is important for an increase in the dosage of stx genes, positively influencing their expression. We investigated the replication of plasmids derived from Shiga toxin (Stx)-converting bacteriophages in starved E. coli cells, as starvation conditions may be common in the intestine of infected humans. We found that, unlike plasmids derived from bacteriophage λ, the Shiga toxin phage-derived replicons did not replicate in amino acid-starved relA + and relA − cells (showing the stringent and relaxed responses to starvation, respectively). The presence of the stable fraction of the replication initiator O protein was detected in all tested replicons. However, while ppGpp, the stringent response effector, inhibited the activities of the λ P R promoter and its homologues from Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages, these promoters, except for λ P R, were only weakly stimulated by the DksA protein. We suggest that this less efficient (relative to λ) positive regulation of transcription responsible for transcriptional activation of the origin contributes to the inhibition of DNA replication initiation of Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophages in starved host cells, even in the absence of ppGpp (as in starved relA − hosts). Possible clinical implications of these results are discussed.

scholarly journals P1 Trisaccharide (Galα1,4Galβ1,4GlcNAc) Synthesis by Enzyme Glycosylation Reactions Using Recombinant Escherichia coli

2003 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 2110-2115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziye Liu ◽  
Yuquan Lu ◽  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
Keith Pardee ◽  
Peng George Wang
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Sucrose Synthase ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Enzymatic Reaction ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Reaction Volume ◽  
Recombinant Bacteria ◽  
Preparative Scale ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Oligosaccharide Moiety

ABSTRACT The frequency of Escherichia coli infection has lead to concerns over pathogenic bacteria in our food supply and a demand for therapeutics. Glycolipids on gut cells serve as receptors for the Shiga-like toxin produced by E. coli. Oligosaccharide moiety analogues of these glycolipids can compete with receptors for the toxin, thus acting as antibacterials. An enzymatic synthesis of the P1 trisaccharide (Galα1,4Galβ1,4GlcNAc), one of the oligosaccharide analogues, was assessed in this study. In the proposed synthetic pathway, UDP-glucose was generated from sucrose with an Anabaena sp. sucrose synthase and then converted with an E. coli UDP-glucose 4-epimerase to UDP-galactose. Two molecules of galactose were linked to N-acetylglucosamine subsequently with a Helicobacter pylori β-l,4-galactosyltransferase and a Neisseria meningitidis α-1,4-galactosyltransferase to produce one molecule of P1 trisaccharide. The four enzymes were coexpressed in a single genetically engineered E. coli strain that was then permeabilized and used to catalyze the enzymatic reaction. P1 trisaccharide was accumulated up to 50 mM (5.4 g in a 200-ml reaction volume), with a 67% yield based on the consumption of N-acetylglucosamine. This study provides an efficient approach for the preparative-scale synthesis of P1 trisaccharide with recombinant bacteria.

scholarly journals Complete Genome Sequence of the Engineered Escherichia coli SHuffle Strains and Their Wild-Type Parents

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Anton ◽  
Alexey Fomenkov ◽  
Elisabeth A. Raleigh ◽  
Mehmet Berkmen
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Complete Genome ◽  
Disulfide Bonds ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Biotech Industry ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
K 12

SHuffle strains are genetically engineered Escherichia coli strains that are capable of oxidizing cysteines within proteins to form disulfide bonds. Here we present the complete genome of both the K-12 and B versions of SHuffle strains along with their parental ancestors. These strains have been of significant use to both the general scientific community and the biotech industry, interested in producing novel disulfide-bonded proteins that were hitherto unable to be expressed in standard E. coli expression strains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document