scholarly journals Correction: A shock tube study of the branching ratios of propene + OH reaction

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (37) ◽  
pp. 24477-24477
Author(s):  
Jihad Badra ◽  
Fethi Khaled ◽  
Binod Raj Giri ◽  
Aamir Farooq

Correction for ‘A shock tube study of the branching ratios of propene + OH reaction’ by Jihad Badra et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 2421–2431.

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 2421-2431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihad Badra ◽  
Fethi Khaled ◽  
Binod Raj Giri ◽  
Aamir Farooq

Branching ratios of the propene + OH reaction are determined by measuring the rate coefficients of the reaction of OH with propene and five deuterated isotopes of propene.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 10283-10284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly G. Kiselev

The approach proposed in the original paper yields spurious contributions to both enthalpy and entropy of activation of barrierless reactions. This renders reaction branching ratios intrinsically biased towards radical decomposition of nitro species.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Gould

The GMTKN55 benchmarking protocol introduced by [Goerigk et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 32184] allows comprehensive analysis and ranking of density functional approximations with diverse chemical behaviours. But this comprehensiveness comes at a cost: GMTKN55's 1500 benchmarking values require energies for around 2500 systems to be calculated, making it a costly exercise. This manuscript introduces three subsets of GMTKN55, consisting of 30, 100 and 150 systems, as `diet' substitutes for the full database. The subsets are chosen via a stochastic genetic approach, and consequently can reproduce key results of the full GMTKN55 database, including ranking of approximations.


Author(s):  
Manoj Prasad ◽  
Filip Strubbe ◽  
Filip Beunis ◽  
Kristiaan Neyts

Correction for ‘Space charge limited release of charged inverse micelles in non-polar liquids’ by Manoj Prasad et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 19289–19298, DOI: 10.1039/C6CP03544B.


Author(s):  
Shyamal Mondal ◽  
Debasree Chowdhury ◽  
Pabitra Das ◽  
Biswarup Satpati ◽  
Debabrata Ghose ◽  
...  

Correction for ‘Observation of ordered arrays of endotaxially grown nanostructures from size-selected Cu-nanoclusters deposited on patterned substrates of Si’ by Shyamal Mondal et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 6009–6016 DOI: 10.1039/D0CP06089E.


Author(s):  
Aditya G. Rao ◽  
Christian Wiebeler ◽  
Saumik Sen ◽  
David S. Cerutti ◽  
Igor Schapiro

Correction for ‘Histidine protonation controls structural heterogeneity in the cyanobacteriochrome AnPixJg2’ by Aditya G. Rao et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp05314g.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 4454-4454
Author(s):  
Kunran Yang ◽  
Jeremie Zaffran ◽  
Bo Yang

Correction for ‘Fast prediction of oxygen reduction reaction activity on carbon nanotubes with a localized geometric descriptor’ by Kunran Yang et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 890–895, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP04885E.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 10130-10131
Author(s):  
Ryo Sakamoto ◽  
Maho Yamashita ◽  
Kosuke Nakamoto ◽  
Yongquan Zhou ◽  
Nobuko Yoshimoto ◽  
...  

Correction for ‘Local structure of a highly concentrated NaClO4 aqueous solution-type electrolyte for sodium ion batteries’ by Ryo Sakamoto et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 26452–26458, DOI: 10.1039/D0CP04376A.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (47) ◽  
pp. 27912-27912
Author(s):  
Ignacio Melián-Cabrera

Correction for ‘Temperature control in DRIFT cells used for in situ and operando studies: where do we stand today?’ by Ignacio Melián-Cabrera, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp04352d.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 11101-11104
Author(s):  
S. Pelloni ◽  
P. Lazzeretti

Correction for ‘Anisotropy of the vorticity tensor as a magnetic indicator of aromaticity’ by S. Pelloni et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 1299–1305, DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05563K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document