Recent advances in flow injection analysis

The Analyst ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
pp. 2085-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Trojanowicz ◽  
Kamila Kołacińska

A dynamic development of methodologies of analytical flow injection measurements during four decades since their invention has reinforced the solid position of flow analysis in the arsenal of techniques and instrumentation of contemporary chemical analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana V. Mayo ◽  
Thomas N. Loegel ◽  
Stacey Lowery Bretz ◽  
Neil D. Danielson

1982 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Rocks ◽  
C Riley

Abstract Flow-injection analysis, founded on an approach that is entirely different from continuous-flow analysis, involves use of three principles: sample "injection," controlled dispersion of sample (rather than a dispersion retarded with gas bubbles), and reproducible timing. The conditions governing the dispersion of the sample in the flowing carrier stream are considered, and we illustrate how the dispersion can be manipulated to suit particular analytical requirements. Instrumentation and practical aspects of flow-injection analyses are discussed, especially with regard to clinical chemistry applications, and the technique is compared with the more conventional gas-segmented-flow analysis system. We conclude that, because of its speed, economy, and simplicity, flow-injection analysis will eventually replace the gas-segmented approach for many clinical chemistry analyses.


1989 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1330-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
George H. Vickers ◽  
Barbara S. Ross ◽  
Gary M. Hieftje

The use of flow-injection analysis to reduce mass-dependent interferences in inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry has been assessed. Results are presented which demonstrate nearly complete elimination of analyte-signal suppression under operating conditions where dispersion ( D) is approximately 25. Furthermore, results obtained with flow-injection analysis exhibit greater precision, take less time, and suffer only a 40% reduction in sensitivity, compared to continuous-flow analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document