Surface-phase heterogeneity in the benzene–silicalite system

1992 ◽  
pp. 512-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Portsmouth ◽  
Lynn F. Gladden
Keyword(s):  
Surface Phase ◽  
Phase Heterogeneity

Surface heterogeneity in Li0.5CoO2 within a porous composite electrode

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (60) ◽  
pp. 8320-8323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Lu ◽  
Yongzhi Mao ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Yongfeng Hu ◽  
Jigang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Composite Electrode ◽  
Surface Heterogeneity ◽  
Surface Phase ◽  
Porous Composite ◽  
Phase Heterogeneity

Surface phase heterogeneity mapping of the same LCO particles in a charged composite electrode deciphers the interactions among the electrode components.

Intra-phase heterogeneity of stresses in micro-macro models: link with X-ray diffraction measurements

2003 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. 1173-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Brenner ◽  
N. Letouzé ◽  
J. L. Béchade ◽  
O. Castelnau
Keyword(s):  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Phase Heterogeneity

Comparison of a Non Electrostatic Surface Complexation Model and Surface Phase Theories for Prediction of Future Sorption Properties.

2004 ◽  
Vol 824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan T. Emrén ◽  
Anna-Maria Jacobsson
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solution ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Surface Complexation ◽  
Sorption Properties ◽  
Phase Method ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Surface Phase ◽  
Surface Complexation Model ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
The One

AbstractIn performance assessments, sorption of radionuclides dissolved in groundwater is mostly handled by the use of fixed Kd values. It has been well known that this approach is unsatisfying. Only during the last few years, however, tools have become available that make it possible to predict the actual Kd value in an aqueous solution that differs from the one in which the sorption properties were measured.One such approach is surface complexation (SC) that gives a detailed knowledge of the sorption properties. In SC, one tries to find what kinds of sorbed species are available on the surface and the thermodynamics for their formation from species in the bulk aqueous solution. Recently, a different approach, surface phase method (SP), has been developed. In SP, a thin layer including the surface is treated as a separate phase. In the bulk aqueous solution, the surface phase is treated as a virtual component, and from the chemical potential of this component, the sorption properties can be found.In the paper, we compare advantages and disadvantages of the two kinds of models. We also investigate the differences in predicted sorption properties of a number of radionuclides (Co, Np, Th and U). Furthermore, we discuss under which circumstances, one approach or the other is preferable.

Sb adsorption on Si(1 1 1)–In(4 × 1) surface phase

2001 ◽  
Vol 175-176 ◽  
pp. 187-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.V Rao ◽  
D Gruznev ◽  
T Tambo ◽  
C Tatsuyama
Keyword(s):  
Surface Phase

Photoelectron diffraction and photoelectron holography study of a Ge(111) high-temperature surface phase transition

1993 ◽  
Vol 281 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-179
Author(s):  
T.T. Tran ◽  
S. Thevuthasan ◽  
Y.J. Kim ◽  
D.J. Friedman ◽  
A.P. Kaduwela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Surface Phase ◽  
Surface Phase Transition ◽  
Photoelectron Diffraction ◽  
Temperature Surface

The structure of the surface phase: a new normal-incidence X-ray standing wave study

2000 ◽  
Vol 453 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Jackson ◽  
S.M. Driver ◽  
D.P. Woodruff ◽  
B.C.C. Cowie ◽  
R.G. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Standing Wave ◽  
Normal Incidence ◽  
Surface Phase ◽  
New Normal ◽  
X Ray
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document