Elucidating DNA damage and repair processes by independently generating reactive and metastable intermediates

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc M. Greenberg
NAR Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoju Hu ◽  
Zhuxuan Xu ◽  
Subhajyoti De

Abstract Although not all somatic mutations are cancer drivers, their mutational signatures, i.e. the patterns of genomic alterations at a genome-wide scale, provide insights into past exposure to mutagens, DNA damage and repair processes. Computational deconvolution of somatic mutation patterns and expert curation pan-cancer studies have identified a number of mutational signatures associated with point mutations, dinucleotide substitutions, insertions and deletions, and rearrangements, and have established etiologies for a subset of these signatures. However, the mechanisms underlying nearly one-third of all mutational signatures are not yet understood. The signatures with established etiology and those with hitherto unknown origin appear to have some differences in strand bias, GC content and nucleotide context diversity. It is possible that some of the hitherto ‘unknown’ signatures predominantly occur outside gene regions. While nucleotide contexts might be adequate to establish etiologies of some mutational signatures, in other cases additional features, such as broader (epi)genomic contexts, including chromatin, replication timing, processivity and local mutational patterns, may help fully understand the underlying DNA damage and repair processes. Nonetheless, remarkable progress in characterization of mutational signatures has provided fundamental insights into the biology of cancer, informed disease etiology and opened up new opportunities for cancer prevention, risk management, and therapeutic decision making.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Wojtowicz ◽  
Jan Hoinka ◽  
Bayarbaatar Amgalan ◽  
Yoo-Ah Kim ◽  
Teresa M. Przytycka

AbstractMany mutagenic processes leave characteristic imprints on cancer genomes known as mutational signatures. These signatures have been of recent interest regarding their applicability in studying processes shaping the mutational landscape of cancer. In particular, pinpointing the presence of altered DNA repair pathways can have important therapeutic implications. However, mutational signatures of DNA repair deficiencies are often hard to infer. This challenge emerges as a result of deficient DNA repair processes acting by modifying the outcome of other mutagens. Thus, they exhibit non-additive effects that are not depicted by the current paradigm for modeling mutational processes as independent signatures. To close this gap, we present RepairSig, a method that accounts for interactions between DNA damage and repair and is able to uncover unbiased signatures of deficient DNA repair processes. In particular, RepairSig was able to replace three MMR deficiency signatures previously proposed to be active in breast cancer, with just one signature strikingly similar to the experimentally derived signature. As the first method to model interactions between mutagenic processes, RepairSig is an important step towards biologically more realistic modeling of mutational processes in cancer. The source code for RepairSig is publicly available at https://github.com/ncbi/RepairSig.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeonghwan Youk ◽  
Hyun Woo Kwon ◽  
Joonoh Lim ◽  
Eunji Kim ◽  
Ryul Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractWhole-genome sequencing (WGS) of human tumors and normal cells exposed to various carcinogens has revealed distinct mutational patterns that provide deep insights into the DNA damage and repair processes. Although ionizing radiation (IR) is conventionally known as a strong carcinogen, its genome-wide mutational impacts have not been comprehensively investigated at the single-nucleotide level. Here, we explored the mutational landscape of normal single-cells after exposure to the various levels of IR. On average, 1 Gy of IR exposure generated ∼16 mutational events with a spectrum consisting of predominantly small nucleotide deletions and a few characteristic structural variations. In ∼30% of the post-irradiated cells, complex genomic rearrangements, such as chromoplexy, chromothripsis, and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, were resulted, indicating the stochastic and chaotic nature of DNA repair in the presence of the massive number of concurrent DNA double-strand breaks. These mutational signatures were confirmed in the genomes of 22 IR-induced secondary malignancies. With high-resolution genomic snapshots of irradiated cells, our findings provide deep insights into how IR-induced DNA damage and subsequent repair processes operate in mammalian cells.


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1284
Author(s):  
Anzhela V. Pavlova ◽  
Elena A. Kubareva ◽  
Mayya V. Monakhova ◽  
Maria I. Zvereva ◽  
Nina G. Dolinnaya

DNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) are known to be an integral part of the complex regulatory systems in both normal and pathological cells. At the same time, the ability of G4s to impede DNA replication plays a critical role in genome integrity. This review summarizes the results of recent studies of G4-mediated genomic and epigenomic instability, together with associated DNA damage and repair processes. Although the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated, it is known that, among the proteins that recognize G4 structures, many are linked to DNA repair. We analyzed the possible role of G4s in promoting double-strand DNA breaks, one of the most deleterious DNA lesions, and their repair via error-prone mechanisms. The patterns of G4 damage, with a focus on the introduction of oxidative guanine lesions, as well as their removal from G4 structures by canonical repair pathways, were also discussed together with the effects of G4s on the repair machinery. According to recent findings, there must be a delicate balance between G4-induced genome instability and G4-promoted repair processes. A broad overview of the factors that modulate the stability of G4 structures in vitro and in vivo is also provided here.


2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 483-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bentham Science Publisher Philip K. Liu

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ding-fang Zhang ◽  
Zhi-chun Yang ◽  
Jian-qiang Chen ◽  
Xiang-xiang Jin ◽  
Yin-da Qiu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the leading cause of death among men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Piperlongumine (PL) is a novel potential anticancer agent that has been demonstrated to exhibit anticancer efficacy against prostate cancer cells. However, the effects of PL on DNA damage and repair against CRPC have remained unclear. The aim of this study was to further explore the anticancer activity and mechanisms of action of PL against CRPC in terms of DNA damage and repair processes. Methods The effect of PL on CRPC was evaluated by MTT assay, long-term cell proliferation, reactive oxygen species assay, western blot assay, flow cytometry assay (annexin V/PI staining), β-gal staining assay and DAPI staining assay. The capacity of PL to inhibit the invasion and migration of CRPC cells was assessed by scratch-wound assay, cell adhesion assay, transwell assay and immunofluorescence (IF) assay. The effect of PL on DNA damage and repair was determined via IF assay and comet assay. Results The results showed that PL exhibited stronger anticancer activity against CRPC compared to that of taxol, cisplatin (DDP), doxorubicin (Dox), or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), with fewer side effects in normal cells. Importantly, PL treatment significantly decreased cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix and inhibited the migration of CRPC cells through affecting the expression and distribution of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), leading to concentration-dependent inhibition of CRPC cell proliferation and concomitantly increased cell death. Moreover, PL treatment triggered persistent DNA damage and provoked strong DNA damage responses in CRPC cells. Conclusion Collectively, our findings demonstrate that PL potently inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of CRPC cells and that these potent anticancer effects were potentially achieved via triggering persistent DNA damage in CRPC cells.


1998 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
C. Bjørge ◽  
A.-K. Olsen ◽  
R. Wiger ◽  
G. Brunborg ◽  
K. Haug ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document