scholarly journals Late assembly of the Vibrio cholerae cell division machinery postpones septation to the last 10% of the cell cycle

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Galli ◽  
Evelyne Paly ◽  
François-Xavier Barre
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Cholerae Cell

scholarly journals Insensitivity of Chromosome I and the Cell Cycle to Blockage of Replication and Segregation of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome II

mBio ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Kadoya ◽  
Dhruba K. Chattoraj
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Evolutionary Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sequence Of Events ◽  
Orderly Fashion ◽  
Origin Region ◽  
Chromosome Ii ◽  
Chromosome I

ABSTRACT Vibrio cholerae has two chromosomes (chrI and chrII) whose replication and segregation are under different genetic controls. The region covering the replication origin of chrI resembles that of the Escherichia coli chromosome, and both origins are under control of the highly conserved initiator, DnaA. The origin region of chrII resembles that of plasmids that have iterated initiator-binding sites (iterons) and is under control of the chrII-specific initiator, RctB. Both chrI and chrII encode chromosome-specific orthologs of plasmid partitioning proteins, ParA and ParB. Here, we have interfered with chrII replication, segregation, or both, using extra copies of sites that titrate RctB or ParB. Under these conditions, replication and segregation of chrI remain unaffected for at least 1 cell cycle. In this respect, chrI behaves similarly to the E. coli chromosome when plasmid maintenance is disturbed in the same cell. Apparently, no checkpoint exists to block cell division before the crippled chromosome is lost by a failure to replicate or to segregate. Whether blocking chrI replication can affect chrII replication remains to be tested. IMPORTANCE Chromosome replication, chromosome segregation, and cell division are the three main events of the cell cycle. They occur in an orderly fashion once per cell cycle. How the sequence of events is controlled is only beginning to be answered in bacteria. The finding of bacteria that possess more than one chromosome raises the important question: how are different chromosomes coordinated in their replication and segregation? It appears that in the evolution of the two-chromosome genome of V. cholerae, either the secondary chromosome adapted to the main chromosome to ensure its maintenance or it is maintained independently, as are bacterial plasmids. An understanding of chromosome coordination is expected to bear on the evolutionary process of chromosome acquisition and on the efficacy of possible strategies for selective elimination of a pathogen by targeting a specific chromosome.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Anticancer potential of nitric oxide (NO) in neuroblastoma treatment

RSC Advances ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 9112-9120
Author(s):  
Jenna L. Gordon ◽  
Kristin J. Hinsen ◽  
Melissa M. Reynolds ◽  
Tyler A. Smith ◽  
Haley O. Tucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Neuroblastoma Cells ◽  
Cycle Arrest

S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) reduces cell viability, inhibits cell division, and induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document