scholarly journals Long Term Surgical Outcome and Prognostic Factors of Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chi Wang ◽  
Chi-Cheng Chuang ◽  
Kuo-Chen Wei ◽  
Cheng-Nen Chang ◽  
Shih-Tseng Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Surgical Outcome

scholarly journals Examination of Prognostic Factors Affecting Long-Term Survival of Patients with Stage 3/4 Gallbladder Cancer without Distant Metastasis

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2073
Author(s):  
Ryota Higuchi ◽  
Takehisa Yazawa ◽  
Shuichirou Uemura ◽  
Yutaro Matsunaga ◽  
Takehiro Ota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Gallbladder Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Hepatoduodenal Ligament ◽  
Entire Area ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Left Margin

In advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) radical resection, if multiple prognostic factors are present, the outcome may be poor; however, the details remain unclear. To investigate the poor prognostic factors affecting long-term surgical outcome, we examined 157 cases of resected stage 3/4 GBC without distant metastasis between 1985 and 2017. Poor prognostic factors for overall survival and treatment outcomes of a number of predictable preoperative poor prognostic factors were evaluated. The surgical mortality was 4.5%. In multivariate analysis, blood loss, poor histology, liver invasion, and ≥4 regional lymph node metastases (LNMs) were independent prognostic factors for poor surgical outcomes; invasion of the left margin or the entire area of the hepatoduodenal ligament and a Clavien–Dindo classification ≥3 were marginal factors. The analysis identified outcomes of patients with factors that could be predicted preoperatively, such as liver invasion ≥5 mm, invasion of the left margin or the entire area of the hepatoduodenal ligament, and ≥4 regional LNMs. Thus, the five-year overall survival was 54% for zero factors, 34% for one factor, and 4% for two factors (p < 0.05). A poor surgical outcome was likely when two or more factors were predicted preoperatively; therefore, new treatment strategies are required for such patients.

Skull base atypical meningioma: Long term surgical outcome and prognostic factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chi Wang ◽  
Chi-Cheng Chuang ◽  
Kuo-Chen Wei ◽  
Yung-Hsin Hsu ◽  
Peng-Wei Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Atypical Meningioma

Surgical Outcome in Paediatric Patients with Ebstein's Anomaly: A Multicenter, Long-Term Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Geerdink ◽  
G. du Marchie Sarvaas ◽  
I. Kuipers ◽  
W. Helbing ◽  
T. Delhaas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Ebstein’S Anomaly ◽  
Term Study ◽  
Ebstein's Anomaly ◽  
Long Term Study ◽  
Paediatric Patients

Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Non-Benign Meningiomas

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Schichor ◽  
Anna-Maria Biczok ◽  
Kraus Theo ◽  
Niklas Thon ◽  
Jörg-Christian Tonn
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Prognostic factors that mandate long term follow up following surgery for appendix neuroendocrine tumours (aNETs)

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Alabraba ◽  
Heman Joshi ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Hassan Malik ◽  
Melissa Banks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Nasal and paranasal sinus mucosal melanoma: Long-term survival outcomes and prognostic factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 103070
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Abt ◽  
Lauren E. Miller ◽  
Tara E. Mokhtari ◽  
Derrick T. Lin ◽  
Jeremy D. Richmon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Paranasal Sinus ◽  
Mucosal Melanoma ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival

scholarly journals Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1141
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Marte ◽  
Andrea Tufo ◽  
Francesca Steccanella ◽  
Ester Marra ◽  
Piera Federico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
The Impact

Background: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. Methods: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. Results: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1–2 and pN0–1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. Conclusion: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document