scholarly journals Stimulation of terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage by nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Yue ◽  
Yan Peng ◽  
Changhui Peng ◽  
Wanqin Yang ◽  
Xin Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Nitrogen Addition ◽  
Ecosystem Carbon ◽  
Stimulation Of

Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 234-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Lu ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Yiqi Luo ◽  
Yuanhe Yang ◽  
Changming Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Carbon ◽  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nitrogen Addition ◽  
Soil Carbon Storage ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals Spatial Simulation of Land Use based on Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Storage in Coastal Jiangsu, China

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Chuai ◽  
Xianjin Huang ◽  
Wanjing Wang ◽  
Changyan Wu ◽  
Rongqin Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Spatial Simulation ◽  
Ecosystem Carbon

scholarly journals The effects of carbon turnover time on terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaner Yan ◽  
Xuhui Zhou ◽  
Lifeng Jiang ◽  
Yiqi Luo
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Turnover Time ◽  
Carbon Turnover ◽  
C Storage ◽  
Ecosystem Carbon ◽  
Scale Temperature ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract. Carbon (C) turnover time is a key factor in determining C storage capacity in various plant and soil pools and the magnitude of terrestrial C sink in a changing climate. However, the effects of C turnover time on C storage have not been well quantified for previous researches. Here, we first analyzed the difference among different definition of mean turnover time (MTT) including ecosystem MTT(MTTEC) and soil MTT (MTTsoil) and its variability in MTT to climate changes, and then evaluated the changes of ecosystem C storage driven by MTT changes. Our results showed that total GPP-based ecosystem MTT (MTTEC_GPP : 25.0 ± 2.7 years) was shorter than soil MTT (35.5 ± 1.2 years) and NPP-based ecosystem MTT (MTTEC_NPP:50.8 ± 3 years) MTTEC_GPP = Cpool/GPP & MTTsoil = Csoil/NPP & MTTEC_NPP = Cpool/NPP, Cpool and Csoil referring as the ecosystem or soil carbon storage, respectively). At the biome scale, temperature is still the predictor for MTTEC (R2 = 0.77, p 

scholarly journals Responses of terrestrial ecosystem phosphorus cycling to nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Deng ◽  
Dafeng Hui ◽  
Sam Dennis ◽  
K. Chandra Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Nitrogen Addition ◽  
Phosphorus Cycling

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Storage in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Fu ◽  
Liangliang Xu ◽  
Hongyu Zheng ◽  
Jinhua Chen
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Land Use Changes ◽  
Terrestrial Ecosystem ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Ecosystem Carbon ◽  
Integrated Valuation ◽  
Urban Planning And Management

Terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage plays an important role in mitigating global warming. Understanding the characteristics and drivers of changes in carbon storage can provide a scientific basis for urban planning and management. The objective of this study was to reveal the ways in which urbanization influences the spatial and temporal variations in carbon storage. In this study, we investigated the changes in carbon storage from 1990–2000, 2000–2010, and 2010–2018 in the Su-Xi-Chang region, which is a typical fast-growing urban agglomeration in China, based on the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) model. Moreover, we analyzed the impacts of urbanization-induced land-use changes on carbon storage. The results showed that in terms of space and time, the greatest loss of carbon storage occurred in developing urban areas and during the rapidly urbanizing stage. Our study revealed that the reduction in cultivated land was the greatest contributor to carbon stock losses. In addition, we found that some types of land use conversion can enhance carbon storage. Based on the results, some suggestions are proposed aimed at promoting urban sustainable development. This study also provides insights into enhancing urban sustainability for other urban agglomerations throughout the world.

scholarly journals Carbon Dynamics in the Northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2030 Using Landsat Land Use/Cover Change Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingye Li ◽  
Jian Gong ◽  
Jean-Michel Guldmann ◽  
Shicheng Li ◽  
Jie Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Carbon Storage ◽  
Sharp Decrease ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Qinghai Lake ◽  
Lake Basin ◽  
Ecosystem Carbon ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
The Impact

Land use/cover change (LUCC) has an important impact on the terrestrial carbon cycle. The spatial distribution of regional carbon reserves can provide the scientific basis for the management of ecosystem carbon storage and the formulation of ecological and environmental policies. This paper proposes a method combining the CA-based FLUS model and the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model to assess the temporal and spatial changes in ecosystem carbon storage due to land-use changes over 1990–2015 in the Qinghai Lake Basin (QLB). Furthermore, future ecosystem carbon storage is simulated and evaluated over 2020–2030 under three scenarios of natural growth (NG), cropland protection (CP), and ecological protection (EP). The long-term spatial variations in carbon storage in the QLB are discussed. The results show that: (1) Carbon storage in the QLB decreased at first (1990–2000) and increased later (2000–2010), with total carbon storage increasing by 1.60 Tg C (Teragram: a unit of mass equal to 1012 g). From 2010 to 2015, carbon storage displayed a downward trend, with a sharp decrease in wetlands and croplands as the main cause; (2) Under the NG scenario, carbon reserves decrease by 0.69 Tg C over 2020–2030. These reserves increase significantly by 6.77 Tg C and 7.54 Tg C under the CP and EP scenarios, respectively, thus promoting the benign development of the regional ecological environment. This study improves our understanding on the impact of land-use change on carbon storage for the QLB in the northeastern Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document