scholarly journals Zwint-1 is required for spindle assembly checkpoint function and kinetochore-microtubule attachment during oocyte meiosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Woo Seo ◽  
Seung Yeop You ◽  
Woo-Jae Chung ◽  
Dong-Hyung Cho ◽  
Jae-Sung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis

scholarly journals OLA1 is responsible for normal spindle assembly and SAC activation in mouse oocytes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Xie ◽  
Juan Zhang ◽  
JinLi Ding ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Yan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Polar Body ◽  
Germinal Vesicle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mouse Oocyte ◽  
Immunofluorescent Staining ◽  
Germinal Vesicle Breakdown ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis ◽  
Polar Body Extrusion ◽  
Spread Analysis

Background. OLA1 is a member of the GTPase protein family, unlike other members, it can bind and hydrolyze ATP more efficiently than GTP. OLA1 participates in cell proliferation, oxidative response and tumorigenesis. However, whether OLA1 is also required for oocyte meiosis is still unknown. Methods. In this study, the localization, expression, and functions of OLA1 in the mouse oocyte meiosis were examined. Immunofluorescent and confocal microscopy were used to explore the location pattern of OLA1 in the mouse oocyte. Moreover, nocodazole treatment was used to confirm the spindle-like location of OLA1 during mouse meiosis. Western blot was used to explore the expression pattern of OLA1 in the mouse oocyte. Microinjection of siRNA was used to explore the OLA1 functions in the mouse oocyte meiosis. In addition, chromosome spreading was used to investigate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activity. Results. Immunofluorescent staining showed that OLA1 evenly distributed in the cytoplasm at germinal vesicle (GV) stage. After meiosis resumption (GVBD), OLA1 co-localized with spindles, which was further identified by nocodazole treatment experiments. Knockdown of OLA1 impaired the germinal vesicle breakdown progression and finally resulted in a lower polar body extrusion rate. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated that knockdown of OLA1 led to abnormal spindle assembly, which was evidenced by multipolar spindles in OLA1-RNAi-oocytes. After 6 h post-GVBD in culture, an increased proportion of oocyte which has precociously entered into anaphase/telephase I (A/TI) was observed in OLA1-knockdown oocytes, suggesting that loss of OLA1 resulted in the premature segregation of homologous chromosomes. In addition, the chromosome spread analysis suggested that OLA1 knockdown induced premature anaphase onset was due to the precocious inactivation of SAC. Taken together, we concluded that OLA1 plays important role in GVBD, spindle assembly and SAC activation maintenance in oocyte meiosis.

scholarly journals Interactions between N-Terminal Modules in MPS1 Enable Spindle Checkpoint Silencing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon T. Pachis ◽  
Yoshitaka Hiruma ◽  
Anastassis Perrakis ◽  
Geert J.P.L. Kops
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Intramolecular Interactions ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Regulatory Input ◽  
Tpr Domain

ABSTRACTFaithful chromosome segregation relies on the ability of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to delay anaphase onset until all chromosomes are attached to the mitotic spindle via their kinetochores. MPS1 kinase is recruited to unattached kinetochores to initiate SAC signaling, and is removed from kinetochores once stable microtubule attachments have been formed to allow normal mitotic progression. Here we show that a helical fragment within the kinetochore-targeting NTE module of MPS1 is required for interactions with kinetochores, and also forms intramolecular interactions with its adjacent TPR domain. Bypassing this NTE-TPR interaction results in high MPS1 levels at kinetochores due to loss of regulatory input into MPS1 localization, ineffecient MPS1 delocalization from kinetochores upon microtubule attachment, and SAC silencing defects. These results show that SAC responsiveness to attachments relies on regulated intramolecular interactions in MPS1 and highlight the sensitivity of mitosis to perturbations in the dynamics of the MSP1-NDC80-C interactions.

scholarly journals Spindle assembly checkpoint satisfaction occurs through end-on but not lateral kinetochore-microtubule interactions under tension

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Kuhn ◽  
Sophie Dumont
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Normal Mitosis

AbstractTo ensure accurate chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents anaphase until all kinetochores attach to the spindle. What signals the SAC monitors remains unclear. We do not know the contributions of different microtubule attachment features, or tension from biorientation, to SAC satisfaction in normal mitosis - or how these possible cues change during attachment. Here, we quantify concurrent Mad1 intensity, reporting on SAC silencing, and real-time attachment geometry, occupancy, and tension at individual mammalian kinetochores. We show that Mad1 loss from the kinetochore occurs in switch-like events with robust kinetics, and that metaphase-like tension across sister kinetochores is established just before Mad1 loss events at the first sister. We demonstrate that CenpE-mediated lateral attachment of the second sister can persistently generate this metaphase-like tension prior to biorientation, likely stabilizing sister end-on attachment, yet cannot induce Mad1 loss from that kinetochore. Instead, Mad1 loss begins after several end-on microtubules attach. Thus, end-on attachment provides geometry-specific molecular cues, or force on specific kinetochore linkages, that other attachment geometries cannot provide.SummaryThe spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays anaphase until kinetochores are properly attached to the spindle. The authors demonstrate that the SAC monitors geometry-specific molecular cues, or force on specific kinetochore linkages, that “end-on” but not “lateral” attachments generating persistent tension can provide.

scholarly journals DNA damage responses in mammalian oocytes

Reproduction ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. R15-R22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josie K Collins ◽  
Keith T Jones
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Germinal Vesicle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Stages Of Growth ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Dna Damage Responses ◽  
Chromosome Attachment ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Meiosis I

DNA damage acquired during meiosis can lead to infertility and miscarriage. Hence, it should be important for an oocyte to be able to detect and respond to such events in order to make a healthy egg. Here, the strategies taken by oocytes during their stages of growth to respond to DNA damaging events are reviewed. In particular, recent evidence of a novel pathway in fully grown oocytes helps prevent the formation of mature eggs with DNA damage. It has been found that fully grown germinal vesicle stage oocytes that have been DNA damaged do not arrest at this point in meiosis, but instead undergo meiotic resumption and stall during the first meiotic division. The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint, which is a well-known mitotic pathway employed by somatic cells to monitor chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules, appears to be utilised by oocytes also to respond to DNA damage. As such maturing oocytes are arrested at metaphase I due to an active Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. This is surprising given this checkpoint has been previously studied in oocytes and considered to be weak and ineffectual because of its poor ability to be activated in response to microtubule attachment errors. Therefore, the involvement of the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint in DNA damage responses of mature oocytes during meiosis I uncovers a novel second function for this ubiquitous cellular checkpoint.

scholarly journals Delineating the contribution of Spc105-bound PP1 to spindle checkpoint silencing and kinetochore microtubule attachment regulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (12) ◽  
pp. 3926-3942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babhrubahan Roy ◽  
Vikash Verma ◽  
Janice Sim ◽  
Adrienne Fontan ◽  
Ajit P. Joglekar
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Error Correction Mechanism

Accurate chromosome segregation during cell division requires the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which detects unattached kinetochores, and an error correction mechanism that destabilizes incorrect kinetochore–microtubule attachments. While the SAC and error correction are both regulated by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), which silences the SAC and stabilizes kinetochore–microtubule attachments, how these distinct PP1 functions are coordinated remains unclear. Here, we investigate the contribution of PP1, docked on its conserved kinetochore receptor Spc105/Knl1, to SAC silencing and attachment regulation. We find that Spc105-bound PP1 is critical for SAC silencing but dispensable for error correction; in fact, reduced PP1 docking on Spc105 improved chromosome segregation and viability of mutant/stressed states. We additionally show that artificially recruiting PP1 to Spc105/Knl1 before, but not after, chromosome biorientation interfered with error correction. These observations lead us to propose that recruitment of PP1 to Spc105/Knl1 is carefully regulated to ensure that chromosome biorientation precedes SAC silencing, thereby ensuring accurate chromosome segregation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document