scholarly journals Signatures of new d-wave vortex physics in overdoped Tl2Ba2CuO6+x revealed by TF-µ+SR

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jess H. Brewer ◽  
Scott L. Stubbs ◽  
Ruixing Liang ◽  
D. A. Bonn ◽  
W. N. Hardy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vortex Physics ◽  
D Wave

scholarly journals D wave bottomonia production from Zb(′) decay

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Wu ◽  
Dian-Yong Chen ◽  
Takayuki Matsuki
Keyword(s):  
D Wave

scholarly journals Using Machine Learning for Quantum Annealing Accuracy Prediction

Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Aaron Barbosa ◽  
Elijah Pelofske ◽  
Georg Hahn ◽  
Hristo N. Djidjev
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Maximum Clique ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
Maximum Clique Problem ◽  
Problem Instance ◽  
Np Hard ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Hard Problems ◽  
Problem Instances ◽  
D Wave

Quantum annealers, such as the device built by D-Wave Systems, Inc., offer a way to compute solutions of NP-hard problems that can be expressed in Ising or quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) form. Although such solutions are typically of very high quality, problem instances are usually not solved to optimality due to imperfections of the current generations quantum annealers. In this contribution, we aim to understand some of the factors contributing to the hardness of a problem instance, and to use machine learning models to predict the accuracy of the D-Wave 2000Q annealer for solving specific problems. We focus on the maximum clique problem, a classic NP-hard problem with important applications in network analysis, bioinformatics, and computational chemistry. By training a machine learning classification model on basic problem characteristics such as the number of edges in the graph, or annealing parameters, such as the D-Wave’s chain strength, we are able to rank certain features in the order of their contribution to the solution hardness, and present a simple decision tree which allows to predict whether a problem will be solvable to optimality with the D-Wave 2000Q. We extend these results by training a machine learning regression model that predicts the clique size found by D-Wave.

d-wave superconductor as a model of high-Tcsuperconductors

1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 1397-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyekyung Won ◽  
Kazumi Maki
Keyword(s):  
D Wave

scholarly journals Adaptive hyperparameter updating for training restricted Boltzmann machines on quantum annealers

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanglei Xu ◽  
William S. Oates
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Image Reconstruction ◽  
Image Recognition ◽  
Shannon Entropy ◽  
Reconstruction Error ◽  
Likelihood Method ◽  
Restricted Boltzmann Machines ◽  
Boltzmann Machines ◽  
D Wave

AbstractRestricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) have been proposed for developing neural networks for a variety of unsupervised machine learning applications such as image recognition, drug discovery, and materials design. The Boltzmann probability distribution is used as a model to identify network parameters by optimizing the likelihood of predicting an output given hidden states trained on available data. Training such networks often requires sampling over a large probability space that must be approximated during gradient based optimization. Quantum annealing has been proposed as a means to search this space more efficiently which has been experimentally investigated on D-Wave hardware. D-Wave implementation requires selection of an effective inverse temperature or hyperparameter ($$\beta $$ β ) within the Boltzmann distribution which can strongly influence optimization. Here, we show how this parameter can be estimated as a hyperparameter applied to D-Wave hardware during neural network training by maximizing the likelihood or minimizing the Shannon entropy. We find both methods improve training RBMs based upon D-Wave hardware experimental validation on an image recognition problem. Neural network image reconstruction errors are evaluated using Bayesian uncertainty analysis which illustrate more than an order magnitude lower image reconstruction error using the maximum likelihood over manually optimizing the hyperparameter. The maximum likelihood method is also shown to out-perform minimizing the Shannon entropy for image reconstruction.

scholarly journals Benchmarking Quantum Annealing Against “Hard” Instances of the Bipartite Matching Problem

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Vert ◽  
Renaud Sirdey ◽  
Stéphane Louise
Keyword(s):  
Simulated Annealing ◽  
Polynomial Time ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Quantum Annealing ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Matching Problem ◽  
Bipartite Matching ◽  
Wave Device ◽  
D Wave

AbstractThis paper experimentally investigates the behavior of analog quantum computers as commercialized by D-Wave when confronted to instances of the maximum cardinality matching problem which is specifically designed to be hard to solve by means of simulated annealing. We benchmark a D-Wave “Washington” (2X) with 1098 operational qubits on various sizes of such instances and observe that for all but the most trivially small of these it fails to obtain an optimal solution. Thus, our results suggest that quantum annealing, at least as implemented in a D-Wave device, falls in the same pitfalls as simulated annealing and hence provides additional evidences suggesting that there exist polynomial-time problems that such a machine cannot solve efficiently to optimality. Additionally, we investigate the extent to which the qubits interconnection topologies explains these latter experimental results. In particular, we provide evidences that the sparsity of these topologies which, as such, lead to QUBO problems of artificially inflated sizes can partly explain the aforementioned disappointing observations. Therefore, this paper hints that denser interconnection topologies are necessary to unleash the potential of the quantum annealing approach.

scholarly journals Statistical Bias in D-Wave Qubits

2021 ◽  
Vol 1936 (1) ◽  
pp. 012010
Author(s):  
Thomas Krauss ◽  
Alexander Giffen ◽  
Phillip Truppelli ◽  
Alan J. Michaels
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Bias ◽  
D Wave

D-wave density waves in CeCoIn5and highTccuprates

2005 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 319-322
Author(s):  
B. Dóra ◽  
K. Maki ◽  
A. Virosztek
Keyword(s):  
Density Waves ◽  
D Wave
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document