scholarly journals Biological Sources of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Noise in cI Expression of Lysogenic Phage Lambda

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Lei ◽  
Wei Tian ◽  
Hongyuan Zhu ◽  
Tianqi Chen ◽  
Ping Ao
Keyword(s):  
Phage Lambda ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Biological Sources ◽  
Lysogenic Phage ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

scholarly journals Contribution of RNA Degradation to Intrinsic and Extrinsic Noise in Gene Expression

Cell Reports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 3752-3761.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Baudrimont ◽  
Vincent Jaquet ◽  
Sandrine Wallerich ◽  
Sylvia Voegeli ◽  
Attila Becskei
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Noise In Gene Expression ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

scholarly journals Optimal receptor-cluster size determined by intrinsic and extrinsic noise

2011 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Aquino ◽  
Diana Clausznitzer ◽  
Sylvain Tollis ◽  
Robert G. Endres
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Size ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Receptor Cluster ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

scholarly journals Intrinsic and extrinsic noise are distinguishable in a synthesis – export – degradation model of mRNA production

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennady Gorin ◽  
Lior Pachter
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Downstream Processing ◽  
Mrna Splicing ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Degradation Model ◽  
Degenerate Cases ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

AbstractIntrinsic and extrinsic noise sources in gene expression, originating respectively from transcriptional stochasticity and from differences between cells, complicate the determination of transcriptional models. In particularly degenerate cases, the two noise sources are altogether impossible to distinguish. However, the incorporation of downstream processing, such as the mRNA splicing and export implicated in gene expression buffering, recovers the ability to identify the relevant source of noise. We report analytical copy-number distributions, discuss the noise sources’ qualitative effects on lower moments, and provide simulation routines for both models.

Comparing the Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Noise on the Vicsek Model in Three Dimensions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Jahromi Shirazi ◽  
Nicole Abaid
Keyword(s):  
Collective Behavior ◽  
Intrinsic Noise ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Vicsek Model ◽  
Fish Schools ◽  
Natural Systems ◽  
Order And Disorder ◽  
Noise Models ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

A group of simple individuals may show ordered, complex behavior through local interactions. This phenomenon is called collective behavior, which has been observed in a vast variety of natural systems such as fish schools or bird flocks. The Vicsek model is a well-established mathematical model to study collective behavior through interaction of individuals with their neighbors in the presence of noise. How noise is modeled can impact the collective behavior of the group. Extrinsic noise captures uncertainty imposed on individuals, such as noise in measurements, while intrinsic noise models uncertainty inherent to individuals, akin to free will. In this paper, the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic noise on characteristics of the transition between order and disorder in the Vicsek model in three dimensions are studied through numerical simulation.

scholarly journals Inferring intrinsic and extrinsic noise from a dual fluorescent reporter

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik van Nimwegen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Bayesian Analysis ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Intrinsic Noise ◽  
Extrinsic Noise ◽  
Fluorescent Reporter ◽  
Gene Expression Noise ◽  
Total Gene Expression ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Intrinsic And Extrinsic Noise

AbstractDual fluorescent reporter constructs, which measure gene expression from two identical promoters within the same cell, allow total gene expression noise to be decomposed into an extrinsic component, roughly associated with cell-to-cell fluctuations in cellular component concentrations, and intrinsic noise, roughly associated with inherent stochasticity of the biochemical reactions involved in gene expression [1]. A recent paper by Fu and Pachter presented frequentist statistical estimators for intrinsic and extrinsic noise using data from dual reporters [2]. For comparison, I here present results of a Bayesian analysis of this problem. I show that the orthodox estimators suffer from pathologies such as predicting negative values for a manifestly non-negative quantity, i.e. variance, and show that the Bayesian estimators do not suffer from such pathologies. In addition, I show that the Bayesian analysis automatically identifies that optimal estimates of intrinsic and extrinsic noise depend on a subtle combination of two statistics of the data, allowing for accuracies that are up to twice the accuracy of the orthodox estimators in some parameter regimes.I hope up this little worked out example contrasting orthodox statistical analysis based on ad hoc estimators with estimators resulting from a Bayesian analysis, will be educational for others in the field. I distribute a Mathematica Notebook with this paper that allows users to easily reproduce all results and figures of the paper.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document