scholarly journals Social inequalities in early childhood health and development: a European-wide systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 418-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demetris Pillas ◽  
Michael Marmot ◽  
Kiyuri Naicker ◽  
Peter Goldblatt ◽  
Joana Morrison ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 381-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gretchen J. Domek ◽  
Maureen Cunningham ◽  
Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano ◽  
Dena Dunn ◽  
Madiha Abdel-Maksoud ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A3.1-A3
Author(s):  
Marilyn Metzler ◽  
Malia Richmond-Crum ◽  
Kate Taft ◽  
Kate Hess Pace ◽  
Calondra Tibbs ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kayla Marra ◽  
Isabel Espinosa

Objectives. To identify bottlenecks and barriers to effective coverage by Early Childhood Health and Development (ECHD) interventions in Guatemala. Methods. A scoping review of more than 100 peer-reviewed articles, grey literature, and other academic publications was conducted. Articles published from 2005-2019 were considered. Results were analyzed using the Tanahashi model of effective coverage that categorizes coverage by five domains: availability, accessibility, acceptability, contact, and effective coverage. Results. A total of 103 articles were identified, addressing 337 bottlenecks and barriers to effective coverage by ECHD interventions in Guatemala. Most occurred along the acceptability dimension (35.9%). The findings revealed four opportunity spaces: (i) strong political interest and commitment (opportunity for leadership); (ii) vibrant community health networks (opportunity for leverage); (iii) availability of promising evidence-based projects and interventions (opportunity for scale-up); and (iv) strong agency presence (opportunity for collaboration). Conclusions. Most bottlenecks and barriers to ECHD interventions in Guatemala occur around acceptability, followed by accessibility and availability. There is considerable potential for national leadership, leverage, scale-up, and collaboration of ongoing efforts in the country. These results may be used to inform future research and policymaking. The Tanahashi approach is an effective lens of analysis that can be applied to other countries, geographic areas, and contexts in future studies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Keys ◽  
Jill M. Norris ◽  
Emily E. Cameron ◽  
Katherine S. Bright ◽  
Lianne M. Tomfohr-Madsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Fathers are under-represented in research and programs addressing early childhood health and development. Recruiting fathers into these interventions can be hampered for multiple reasons, including recruitment and retention strategies that are not tailored for fathers. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the effectiveness of recruitment and retention strategies used to include fathers of children (from conception to age 36 months) in intervention studies. The secondary aim is to investigate study-level factors that may influence recruitment and retention. Methods We will conduct searches for scholarly peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and pre-post studies that recruited fathers using the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), and CINAHL. English-language articles will be eligible if they recruited self-identified fathers of children from conception to age 36 months for health-promoting interventions that target healthy parents and children. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts for inclusion, as well as grading methodological quality. Recruitment and retention proportions will be calculated for each study. Where possible, we will calculate pooled proportional effects with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models and conduct a meta-regression to examine the impact of potential modifiers of recruitment and retention. Discussion Findings from this review will help inform future intervention research with fathers to optimally recruit and retain participants. Identifying key factors should enable health researchers and program managers design and adapt interventions to increase the likelihood of increasing father engagement in early childhood health interventions. Researchers will be able to use this review to inform future research that addresses current evidence gaps for the recruitment and retention of fathers. This review will make recommendations for addressing key target areas to improve recruitment and retention of fathers in early childhood health research, ultimately leading to a body of evidence that captures the full potential of fathers for maximizing the health and wellbeing of their children. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018081332.


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
G.J. Domek ◽  
M. Cunningham ◽  
C. Luna-Asturias ◽  
M. Abdel-Maksoud ◽  
D. Dunn ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. e20200375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Y.P. Foo ◽  
Mohinder Sarna ◽  
Gavin Pereira ◽  
Hannah C. Moore ◽  
Deshayne B. Fell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document