scholarly journals The mitotic checkpoint kinase NEK2A regulates kinetochore microtubule attachment stability

Oncogene ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (29) ◽  
pp. 4107-4114 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Du ◽  
X Cai ◽  
J Yao ◽  
X Ding ◽  
Q Wu ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (13) ◽  
pp. 8675-8685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandar R. Bhonde ◽  
Marie-Luise Hanski ◽  
Jan Budczies ◽  
Minh Cao ◽  
Bernd Gillissen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S Harris ◽  
Sujatha Venkataraman ◽  
Irina Alimova ◽  
Diane K Birks ◽  
Ilango Balakrishnan ◽  
...  

Oncogene ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (48) ◽  
pp. 7593-7599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Gupta ◽  
Satoru Inaba ◽  
Oi Kwan Wong ◽  
Guowei Fang ◽  
Jingwen Liu

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (24) ◽  
pp. 4385-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Taylor ◽  
Deema Hussein ◽  
Yunmei Wang ◽  
Sarah Elderkin ◽  
Christopher J. Morrow

BUB1 is a budding yeast gene required to ensure that progression through mitosis is coupled to correct spindle assembly. Two related human protein kinases, Bub1 and BubR1, both localise to kinetochores during mitosis, suggesting that they play a role in delaying anaphase until all chromosomes achieve correct, bipolar attachment to the spindle. However, how the activities of Bub1 and BubR1 are regulated by spindle events and how their activities regulate downstream cell cycle events is not known.To investigate how spindle events regulate Bub1 and BubR1, we characterised their relative localisations during mitosis in the presence and absence of microtubule toxins. In prometaphase cells, both kinases colocalise to the same domain of the kinetochore. However, whereas the localisation of BubR1 at sister kinetochores is symmetrical, localisation of Bub1 is often asymmetrical. This asymmetry is dependent on microtubule attachment, and the kinetochore exhibiting weaker Bub1 staining is typically closer to the nearest spindle pole. In addition, a 30 minute nocodazole treatment dramatically increases the amount of Bub1 localising to kinetochores but has little effect on BubR1. Furthermore, Bub1 levels increase at metaphase kinetochores following loss of tension caused by taxol treatment. Thus, these observations suggest that Bub1 localisation is sensitive to changes in both tension and microtubule attachment.Consistent with this, we also show that Bub1 is rapidly phosphorylated following brief treatments with nocodazole or taxol. In contrast, BubR1 is phosphorylated in the absence of microtubule toxins, and spindle damage has little additional effect. Although these observations indicate that Bub1 and BubR1 respond differently to spindle dynamics, they are part of a common complex during mitosis. We suggest therefore that Bub1 and BubR1 may integrate different ‘spindle assembly signals’ into a single signal which can then be interpreted by downstream cell cycle regulators.


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1968-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marin Barisic ◽  
Bénédicte Sohm ◽  
Petra Mikolcevic ◽  
Cornelia Wandke ◽  
Veronika Rauch ◽  
...  

Spindly recruits a fraction of cytoplasmic dynein to kinetochores for poleward movement of chromosomes and control of mitotic checkpoint signaling. Here we show that human Spindly is a cell cycle–regulated mitotic phosphoprotein that interacts with the Rod/ZW10/Zwilch (RZZ) complex. The kinetochore levels of Spindly are regulated by microtubule attachment and biorientation induced tension. Deletion mutants lacking the N-terminal half of the protein (NΔ253), or the conserved Spindly box (ΔSB), strongly localized to kinetochores and failed to respond to attachment or tension. In addition, these mutants prevented the removal of the RZZ complex and that of MAD2 from bioriented chromosomes and caused cells to arrest at metaphase, showing that RZZ-Spindly has to be removed from kinetochores to terminate mitotic checkpoint signaling. Depletion of Spindly by RNAi, however, caused cells to arrest in prometaphase because of a delay in microtubule attachment. Surprisingly, this defect was alleviated by codepletion of ZW10. Thus, Spindly is not only required for kinetochore localization of dynein but is a functional component of a mechanism that couples dynein-dependent poleward movement of chromosomes to their efficient attachment to microtubules.


eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhejian Ji ◽  
Haishan Gao ◽  
Luying Jia ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Hongtao Yu

The master spindle checkpoint kinase Mps1 senses kinetochore-microtubule attachment and promotes checkpoint signaling to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. The kinetochore scaffold Knl1, when phosphorylated by Mps1, recruits checkpoint complexes Bub1–Bub3 and BubR1–Bub3 to unattached kinetochores. Active checkpoint signaling ultimately enhances the assembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consisting of BubR1–Bub3, Mad2, and Cdc20, which inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome bound to Cdc20 (APC/CCdc20) to delay anaphase onset. Using in vitro reconstitution, we show that Mps1 promotes APC/C inhibition by MCC components through phosphorylating Bub1 and Mad1. Phosphorylated Bub1 binds to Mad1–Mad2. Phosphorylated Mad1 directly interacts with Cdc20. Mutations of Mps1 phosphorylation sites in Bub1 or Mad1 abrogate the spindle checkpoint in human cells. Therefore, Mps1 promotes checkpoint activation through sequentially phosphorylating Knl1, Bub1, and Mad1. This sequential multi-target phosphorylation cascade makes the checkpoint highly responsive to Mps1 and to kinetochore-microtubule attachment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weijie Lan ◽  
Don W. Cleveland

In this issue, three groups (Hewitt et al. 2010. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.201002133; Maciejowski et al. 2010. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001050; Santaguida et al. 2010. J. Cell Biol. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001036) use chemical inhibitors to analyze the function of the mitotic checkpoint kinase Mps1. These studies demonstrate that Mps1 kinase activity ensures accurate chromosome segregation through its recruitment to kinetochores of mitotic checkpoint proteins, formation of interphase and mitotic inhibitors of Cdc20, and correction of faulty microtubule attachments.


2010 ◽  
Vol 285 (43) ◽  
pp. 32988-32998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongping Cui ◽  
Xiaolong Cheng ◽  
Ce Zhang ◽  
Yanyan Zhang ◽  
Shujing Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document