scholarly journals Identification of RNA-binding domains of RNA-binding proteins in cultured cells on a system-wide scale with RBDmap

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2447-2464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Castello ◽  
Christian K. Frese ◽  
Bernd Fischer ◽  
Aino I Järvelin ◽  
Rastislav Horos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Wide Scale ◽  
Rna Binding Domains

scholarly journals Binding specificities of human RNA binding proteins towards structured and linear RNA sequences

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arttu Jolma ◽  
Jilin Zhang ◽  
Estefania Mondragón ◽  
Ekaterina Morgunova ◽  
Teemu Kivioja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Sites ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Metabolism ◽  
Rna Sequences ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Rna Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Motif

ABSTRACTSequence specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) control many important processes affecting gene expression. They regulate RNA metabolism at multiple levels, by affecting splicing of nascent transcripts, RNA folding, base modification, transport, localization, translation and stability. Despite their central role in most aspects of RNA metabolism and function, most RBP binding specificities remain unknown or incompletely defined. To address this, we have assembled a genome-scale collection of RBPs and their RNA binding domains (RBDs), and assessed their specificities using high throughput RNA-SELEX (HTR-SELEX). Approximately 70% of RBPs for which we obtained a motif bound to short linear sequences, whereas ~30% preferred structured motifs folding into stem-loops. We also found that many RBPs can bind to multiple distinctly different motifs. Analysis of the matches of the motifs in human genomic sequences suggested novel roles for many RBPs. We found that three cytoplasmic proteins, ZC3H12A, ZC3H12B and ZC3H12C bound to motifs resembling the splice donor sequence, suggesting that these proteins are involved in degradation of cytoplasmic viral and/or unspliced transcripts. Surprisingly, structural analysis revealed that the RNA motif was not bound by the conventional C3H1 RNA-binding domain of ZC3H12B. Instead, the RNA motif was bound by the ZC3H12B’s PilT N-terminus (PIN) RNase domain, revealing a potential mechanism by which unconventional RNA binding domains containing active sites or molecule-binding pockets could interact with short, structured RNA molecules. Our collection containing 145 high resolution binding specificity models for 86 RBPs is the largest systematic resource for the analysis of human RBPs, and will greatly facilitate future analysis of the various biological roles of this important class of proteins.

scholarly journals Validation and classification of RNA binding proteins identified by mRNA interactome capture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali ◽  
Lyudmila Dimitrova-Paternoga ◽  
Kevin Haubrich ◽  
Mai Sun ◽  
Anne Ephrussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Modular Organization ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Mammalian Cell Lines ◽  
Rna Immunoprecipitation ◽  
Rna Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Binders

AbstractRNA binding proteins (RBPs) take part in all steps of the RNA life cycle and are often essential for cell viability. Most RBPs have a modular organization and comprise a set of canonical RNA binding domains. However, in recent years a number of high-throughput mRNA interactome studies on yeast, mammalian cell lines and whole organisms have uncovered a multitude of novel mRNA interacting proteins that lack classical RNA binding domains. Whereas a few have been confirmed to be direct and functionally relevant RNA binders, biochemical and functional validation of RNA binding of most others is lacking. In this study, we employed a combination of NMR spectroscopy and biochemical studies to test the RNA binding properties of six putative RNA binding proteins. Half of the analysed proteins showed no interaction, whereas the other half displayed weak chemical shift perturbations upon titration with RNA. One of the candidates we found to interact weakly with RNA in vitro is Drosophila melanogaster End binding protein 1 (EB1), a master regulator of microtubule plus-end dynamics. Further analysis showed that EB1’s RNA binding occurs on the same surface as that with which EB1 interacts with microtubules. RNA immunoprecipitation and colocalization experiments suggest that EB1 is a rather non-specific, opportunistic RNA binder. Our data suggest that care should be taken when embarking on an RNA binding study involving these unconventional, novel RBPs, and we recommend initial and simple in vitro RNA binding experiments.

scholarly journals RNA interactome capture in Brachypodium reveals a flowering plant core RBPome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meixia Li ◽  
Zhicheng Zhang ◽  
Sam Balzarini ◽  
Bhavesh Parmar ◽  
Boonen Kurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Carbon Fixation ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Brachypodium Distachyon ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Flowering Plant ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Binding Domains

Abstract BackgroundRNA binding proteins regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by controlling the fate of RNA, in processes such as mRNA localization, translation, splicing and stability. The annotation of RNA binding proteins is mainly based on the well-known RNA binding domains and motifs. However, novel RNA binding proteins without such conventional domains have been identified in different species using in vivo RNA interactome capture. To find support for novel conserved RNA binding proteins in plants, we applied an optimized RNA interactome capture to the monocot model Brachypodium distachyon.ResultsWe provide experimental evidence for 203 RNA binding proteins isolated from Brachypodium shoot tissue and leaf mesophyll protoplasts, and grouped these into classic RNA binding proteins with recognizable RNA binding domains and motifs, and candidate RNA binding proteins without such domains. Compared to RNA binding proteins captured in Arabidopsis thaliana, candidate RNA binding proteins involved in carbon fixation and carbon metabolic pathways are highly conserved. We tried to validate the RNA binding proteins captured in this research through a silica-based method, but this method appears not efficient for plants. This may indicate that optimized methods to validate high throughout RNA binding proteome are required for plants.ConclusionsOur results provide classic and candidate RNA binding proteins in Brachypodium distachyon and conserved RNA binding proteins in flowering plants. Future functional characterization should point out what the significance of RNA binding is for the function of these proteins.

scholarly journals Cooperativity boosts affinity and specificity of proteins with multiple RNA-binding domains

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon H. Stitzinger ◽  
Salma Sohrabi-Jahromi ◽  
Johannes Söding
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Rna Binding Domains

AbstractNumerous cellular processes rely on the binding of proteins with high affinity to specific sets of RNAs. Yet most RNA binding domains display low specificity and affinity, to the extent that for most RNA-binding domains, the enrichment of the best binding motif measured by high-throughput RNA SELEX or RNA bind-n-seq is usually below 10-fold, dramatically lower than that of DNA-binding domains. Here, we develop a thermodynamic model to predict the binding affinity for proteins with any number of RNA-binding domains given the affinities of their isolated domains. For the four proteins in which affinities for individual domains have been measured the model predictions are in good agreement with experimental values. The model gives insight into how proteins with multiple RNA-binding domains can reach affinities and specificities orders of magnitude higher than their individual domains. Our results contribute towards resolving the conundrum of missing specificity and affinity of RNA binding proteins and underscore the need for bioinformatic methods that can learn models for multi-domain RNA binding proteins from high-throughput in-vitro and in-vivo experiments.

scholarly journals The Role of RNA-Binding Proteins in Vertebrate Neural Crest and Craniofacial Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Forman ◽  
Brenna J. C. Dennison ◽  
Katherine A. Fantauzzo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Gene Expression Regulation ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Craniofacial Development ◽  
Specific Sequence ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Binding Domains

Cranial neural crest (NC) cells delaminate from the neural folds in the forebrain to the hindbrain during mammalian embryogenesis and migrate into the frontonasal prominence and pharyngeal arches. These cells generate the bone and cartilage of the frontonasal skeleton, among other diverse derivatives. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as critical regulators of NC and craniofacial development in mammals. Conventional RBPs bind to specific sequence and/or structural motifs in a target RNA via one or more RNA-binding domains to regulate multiple aspects of RNA metabolism and ultimately affect gene expression. In this review, we discuss the roles of RBPs other than core spliceosome components during human and mouse NC and craniofacial development. Where applicable, we review data on these same RBPs from additional vertebrate species, including chicken, Xenopus and zebrafish models. Knockdown or ablation of several RBPs discussed here results in altered expression of transcripts encoding components of developmental signaling pathways, as well as reduced cell proliferation and/or increased cell death, indicating that these are common mechanisms contributing to the observed phenotypes. The study of these proteins offers a relatively untapped opportunity to provide significant insight into the mechanisms underlying gene expression regulation during craniofacial morphogenesis.

PUB1: a major yeast poly(A)+ RNA-binding protein

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 6114-6123
Author(s):  
M J Matunis ◽  
E L Matunis ◽  
G Dreyfuss
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Gene Replacement ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Development And Differentiation

The expression of RNA polymerase II transcripts can be regulated at the posttranscriptional level by RNA-binding proteins. Although extensively characterized in metazoans, relatively few RNA-binding proteins have been characterized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Three major proteins are cross-linked by UV light to poly(A)+ RNA in living S. cerevisiae cells. These are the 72-kDa poly(A)-binding protein and proteins of 60 and 50 kDa (S.A. Adam, T.Y. Nakagawa, M.S. Swanson, T. Woodruff, and G. Dreyfuss, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:2932-2943, 1986). Here, we describe the 60-kDa protein, one of the major poly(A)+ RNA-binding proteins in S. cerevisiae. This protein, PUB1 [for poly(U)-binding protein 1], was purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized poly(rU), and specific monoclonal antibodies to it were produced. UV cross-linking demonstrated that PUB1 is bound to poly(A)+ RNA (mRNA or pre-mRNA) in living cells, and it was detected primarily in the cytoplasm by indirect immunofluorescence. The gene for PUB1 was cloned and sequenced, and the sequence was found to predict a 51-kDa protein with three ribonucleoprotein consensus RNA-binding domains and three glutamine- and asparagine-rich auxiliary domains. This overall structure is remarkably similar to the structures of the Drosophila melanogaster elav gene product, the human neuronal antigen HuD, and the cytolytic lymphocyte protein TIA-1. Each of these proteins has an important role in development and differentiation, potentially by affecting RNA processing. PUB1 was found to be nonessential in S. cerevisiae by gene replacement; however, further genetic analysis should reveal important features of this class of RNA-binding proteins.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA-binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA-binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

scholarly journals KH domain containing RNA-binding proteins coordinate with microRNAs to regulate Caenorhabditis elegans development

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin Haskell ◽  
Anna Zinovyeva
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulate Gene Expression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Kh Domain ◽  
Regulate Gene

Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, but the extent to which these key regulators of gene expression coordinate their activities and the precise mechanisms of this coordination are not well understood. RBPs often have recognizable RNA binding domains that correlate with specific protein function. Recently, several RBPs containing K homology (KH) RNA binding domains were shown to work with miRNAs to regulate gene expression, raising the possibility that KH domains may be important for coordinating with miRNA pathways in gene expression regulation. To ascertain whether additional KH domain proteins functionally interact with miRNAs during Caenorhabditis elegans development, we knocked down twenty-four genes encoding KH-domain proteins in several miRNA sensitized genetic backgrounds. Here, we report that a majority of the KH domain-containing genes genetically interact with multiple miRNAs and Argonaute alg-1. Interestingly, two KH domain genes, predicted splicing factors sfa-1 and asd-2, genetically interacted with all of the miRNA mutants tested, whereas other KH domain genes showed genetic interactions only with specific miRNAs. Our domain architecture and phylogenetic relationship analyses of the C. elegans KH domain-containing proteins revealed potential groups that may share both structure and function. Collectively, we show that many C. elegans KH domain RBPs functionally interact with miRNAs, suggesting direct or indirect coordination between these two classes of post-transcriptional gene expression regulators.

scholarly journals A nuclear localization domain in the hnRNP A1 protein.

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Siomi ◽  
G Dreyfuss
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Hnrnp A1 ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Rich Domain ◽  
Localization Domain ◽  
Hnrnp Proteins

The heterogeneous nuclear RNP (hnRNP) A1 protein is one of the major pre-mRNA/mRNA binding proteins in eukaryotic cells and one of the most abundant proteins in the nucleus. It is localized to the nucleoplasm and it also shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. The amino acid sequence of A1 contains two RNP motif RNA-binding domains (RBDs) at the amino terminus and a glycine-rich domain at the carboxyl terminus. This configuration, designated 2x RBD-Gly, is representative of perhaps the largest family of hnRNP proteins. Unlike most nuclear proteins characterized so far, A1 (and most 2x RBD-Gly proteins) does not contain a recognizable nuclear localization signal (NLS). We have found that a segment of ca. 40 amino acids near the carboxyl end of the protein (designated M9) is necessary and sufficient for nuclear localization; attaching this segment to the bacterial protein beta-galactosidase or to pyruvate kinase completely localized these otherwise cytoplasmic proteins to the nucleus. The RBDs and another RNA binding motif found in the glycine-rich domain, the RGG box, are not required for A1 nuclear localization. M9 is a novel type of nuclear localization domain as it does not contain sequences similar to classical basic-type NLS. Interestingly, sequences similar to M9 are found in other nuclear RNA-binding proteins including hnRNP A2.

scholarly journals The structural basis for RNA selectivity by the IMP family of RNA binding proteins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeetayu Biswas ◽  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Varun Bhaskar ◽  
Jeffrey A. Chao ◽  
Robert H. Singer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Stability ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Variable Loops

AbstractThe Igf2 mRNA binding proteins (ZBP1/IMP1, IMP2, IMP3) are highly conserved post-transcriptional regulators of RNA stability, localization and translation. They play important roles in cell migration, neural development, metabolism and cancer cell survival. The knockout phenotypes of individual IMP proteins suggest that each family member regulates a unique pool of RNAs, yet evidence and an underlying mechanism for this is lacking. Here, we combine SELEX and NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that the major RNA binding domains of the two most distantly related IMPs (ZBP1 and IMP2) bind to different consensus sequences and regulate targets consistent with their knockout phenotypes and roles in disease. We find that the targeting specificity of each IMP is determined by few amino acids in their variable loops. As variable loops often differ amongst KH domain paralogs, we hypothesize that this is a general mechanism for evolving specificity and regulation of the transcriptome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document