scholarly journals Epitope tagging of endogenous proteins for genome-wide ChIP-chip studies

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Chunguang Guo ◽  
Yueting Chen ◽  
Hennady P Shulha ◽  
Michael P Schnetz ◽  
...  
BMC Genomics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Lavoie ◽  
Adnane Sellam ◽  
Christopher Askew ◽  
André Nantel ◽  
Malcolm Whiteway

PLoS Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. e3000665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelmer Willems ◽  
Arthur P. H. de Jong ◽  
Nicky Scheefhals ◽  
Eline Mertens ◽  
Lisa A. E. Catsburg ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4184-4184
Author(s):  
Juliane Bock ◽  
Liliana H. Mochmann ◽  
Stefanie Göllner ◽  
Eckhard Thiel ◽  
Carsten Müller-Tidow ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4184 Introduction: The Ets related gene, ERG, encodes a transcription factor with a crucial role in hematopoiesis. ERG rearrangements are associated with subtypes of myeloid leukemia, Ewing sarcoma and prostate carcinoma. Overexpression of ERG predicted adverse outcome in patients with acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recently, it was shown that a single ERG missense mutation in mice produced severe defects in embryonic hematopoiesis and adult stem cell maintenance. The significance of ERG signaling contributing to this disadvantageous phenotype in mice as well as in patients with acute leukemia is unknown. Thus, a genome wide screen to identify targets involved in ERG signaling was conducted. Methods: Chromatin immunoprecipitation on chip (ChIP-chip) was carried out in 5 primary AML samples (new diagnosed AML A – E), one primary T-ALL sample and one normal bone marrow sample. ChIP-chip was performed on all samples using an ERG-specific antibody and unspecific IgG antibody. In addition, ChIP-chip was conducted in the HL60 cell line (that lack ERG product) as a negative control. Duplicate ChIP-chips were performed for each immunoprecipitation. Subsequently, the ERG enriched DNA was co-hybridized to total chromatin on a human promoter array. The array represents ∼35.000 human gene loci representing 11.000 independent promoters. Following normalization, a class comparison was carried out between the potential ERG targets against non-targets identified with IgG ChIP-chip. Results: Significantly enriched genes with a P-value ≤ 0.05 included 164 genes from AML A, 1053 genes from AML B, 829 genes from AML C, 4112 genes from AML D, 895 genes from AML E, 1266 genes from T-ALL, and 1941 genes from normal bone marrow ChIP-chips. Functional clustering by gene ontology (DAVID) of significantly ERG enriched gene sets revealed overrepresentation of pathways involved in oncogenesis, proliferation and cell signaling including: the MAPK signaling pathway (KEGG pathway analysis) was enriched in two AML ChIP-chips (AML B, P= 0.007; AML D, P= 0.003) and in the normal bone marrow ChIP-chip (P= 0.02). Moreover, the Ras GTPase protein domain (INTERPRO) was enriched in three of the five AML samples (AML B, P=0.04; AML C, P= 0.02; AML D, P= 0.04). Both, MAPK pathway and Ras GTPase protein domains were not enriched in the HL60 negative control. Furthermore, proliferation assays were performed in an ERG tet-on inducible leukemia cell line system to explore functional consequences of ERG overexpression. In stably transfected cells with potent ERG overexpression a significantly higher proliferation rate was observed compared to non-induced cells. Conclusion: By genome wide ChIP-chip in primary leukemic samples, potential ERG downstream signaling pathways were revealed. Furthermore these data suggest that the ERG induced proliferation induction may be mediated by cellular programs including the MAPK pathway. Further validation of these findings will define the role of ERG involvement in the cellular signaling cascades and provide insights for molecular based treatment approaches to improve outcome for high risk leukemia characterized by high ERG expression. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 2567-2574 ◽  
Author(s):  
XINJIANG ZHU ◽  
JIAN LIU ◽  
XIAOYANG XU ◽  
CHUNDONG ZHANG ◽  
DONGQIU DAI

2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (17) ◽  
pp. 6166-6174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Herring ◽  
Marni Raffaelle ◽  
Timothy E. Allen ◽  
Elenita I. Kanin ◽  
Robert Landick ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The genome-wide location of RNA polymerase binding sites was determined in Escherichia coli using chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarrays (chIP-chip). Cross-linked chromatin was isolated in triplicate from rifampin-treated cells, and DNA bound to RNA polymerase was precipitated with an antibody specific for the β′ subunit. The DNA was amplified and hybridized to “tiled” oligonucleotide microarrays representing the whole genome at 25-bp resolution. A total of 1,139 binding sites were detected and evaluated by comparison to gene expression data from identical conditions and to 961 promoters previously identified by established methods. Of the detected binding sites, 418 were located within 1,000 bp of a known promoter, leaving 721 previously unknown RNA polymerase binding sites. Within 200 bp, we were able to detect 51% (189/368) of the known σ70-specific promoters occurring upstream of an expressed open reading frame and 74% (273/368) within 1,000 bp. Conversely, many known promoters were not detected by chIP-chip, leading to an estimated 26% negative-detection rate. Most of the detected binding sites could be associated with expressed transcription units, but 299 binding sites occurred near inactive transcription units. This map of RNA polymerase binding sites represents a foundation for studies of transcription factors in E. coli and an important evaluation of the chIP-chip technique.


2009 ◽  
Vol 328 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl T. Smith ◽  
Priyankara Wickramasinghe ◽  
Andrew Olson ◽  
Dmitri Loukinov ◽  
Lan Lin ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 3290-3300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanhyo Lee ◽  
Xiaoyong Li ◽  
Aaron Hechmer ◽  
Michael Eisen ◽  
Mark D. Biggin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Recent analyses of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) revealed that Pol II is concentrated at the promoters of many active and inactive genes. NELF causes Pol II to pause in the promoter-proximal region of the hsp70 gene in Drosophila melanogaster. In this study, genome-wide location analysis (chromatin immunoprecipitation-microarray chip [ChIP-chip] analysis) revealed that NELF is concentrated at the 5′ ends of 2,111 genes in Drosophila cells. Permanganate genomic footprinting was used to determine if paused Pol II colocalized with NELF. Forty-six of 56 genes with NELF were found to have paused Pol II. Pol II pauses 30 to 50 nucleotides downstream from transcription start sites. Analysis of DNA sequences in the vicinity of paused Pol II identified a conserved DNA sequence that probably associates with TFIID but detected no evidence of RNA secondary structures or other conserved sequences that might directly control elongation. ChIP-chip experiments indicate that GAGA factor associates with 39% of the genes that have NELF. Surprisingly, NELF associates with almost one-half of the most highly expressed genes, indicating that NELF is not necessarily a repressor of gene expression. NELF-associated pausing of Pol II might be an obligatory but sometimes transient checkpoint during the transcription cycle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document