Primer: using decision analysis to improve clinical decision making in urology

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 439-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena B Elkin ◽  
Andrew J Vickers ◽  
Michael W Kattan
1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Shewchuk ◽  
Kennon T. Francis

1976 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Pliskin ◽  
C. H. Beck

The methodological framework of decision analysis is applied to a given physician’s decision making process with respect to a given, identified patient. The paper demonstrates how some of the subjective assessments and value judgments can be systematically incorporated and applied in a real-world setting. Direct subjective assessment of all probabilities was necessary because the specific characteristics of the given patient did not enable use of data in the literature. Explicit tradeoffs between longevity and quality of life were elicited from the decision maker and used in quantifying his relative preferences for the possible outcomes. The paper demonstrates the usefulness of decision analysis in structuring and analyzing a real-world problem, especially one where little or no data are available.


Author(s):  
Timothy E.A. Peto ◽  
Philippa Peto

Clinicians make decisions at every stage of the patient pathway. In routine practice complex decisions are often made rapidly using ‘intuition’ or common sense, but this can lead to suboptimal management plans. Clinical decision analysis is a way of formalizing the logical process behind decision-making, and when combined with evidence from medical research is described as the practice of evidence-based medicine. In practice, most clinicians do not have the time, intellectual energy, or training to perform a formal clinical decision analysis and they tend to use short cuts and go for the ‘safe’ decision which is suitable for the ‘average patient’ and often in keeping with guidelines for local practice. However, clinicians who follow the logical process of clinical decision analysis find it easier to live with the uncertainty of an inexact science and subjective wishes of the patient.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document