High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 977-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S Henry ◽  
Matthew DeJongh ◽  
Aaron A Best ◽  
Paul M Frybarger ◽  
Ben Linsay ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Hartleb ◽  
C. Jonathan Fritzemeier ◽  
Martin J. Lercher

AbstractWhile new genomes are sequenced at ever increasing rates, their phenotypic analysis remains a major bottleneck of biomedical research. The generation of genome-scale metabolic models capable of accurate phenotypic predictions is a labor-intensive endeavor; accordingly, such models are available for only a small percentage of sequenced species. The standard metabolic reconstruction process starts from a (semi-)automatically generated draft model, which is then refined through extensive manual curation. Here, we present a novel strategy suitable for full automation, which exploits high-throughput gene knockout or nutritional growth data. We test this strategy by reconstructing accurate genome-scale metabolic models for three strains ofStreptococcus, a major human pathogen. The resulting models contain a lower proportion of reactions unsupported by genomic evidence than the most widely usedE. colimodel, but reach the same accuracy in terms of knockout prediction. We confirm the models’ predictive power by analyzing experimental data for auxotrophy, additional nutritional environments, and double gene knockouts, and we generate a list of potential drug targets. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of reconstructing high-quality genome-scale metabolic models from high-throughput data, a strategy that promises to massively accelerate the exploration of metabolic phenotypes.Significance statementReading bacterial genomes has become a cheap, standard laboratory procedure. A genome by itself, however, is of little information value – we need a way to translate its abstract letter sequence into a model that describes the capabilities of its carrier. Until now, this endeavor required months of manual work by experts. Here, we show how this process can be automated by utilizing high-throughput experimental data. We use our novel strategy to generate highly accurate metabolic models for three strains ofStreptococcus, a major threat to human health.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Zamani ◽  
Sayed-Amir Marashi ◽  
Tahmineh Lohrasebi ◽  
Mohammad-Ali Malboobi ◽  
Esmail Foroozan

Genome-scale metabolic models (GSMMs) have enabled researchers to perform systems-level studies of living organisms. As a constraint-based technique, flux balance analysis (FBA) aids computation of reaction fluxes and prediction of...


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 830-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxing Jian ◽  
Ningchuan Li ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Qiang Hua

Reconstruction and application of genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have facilitated metabolic engineering by providing a platform on which systematic computational analysis of metabolic networks can be performed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Riemer ◽  
René Rex ◽  
Dietmar Schomburg

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhung Pham ◽  
Ruben Van Heck ◽  
Jesse van Dam ◽  
Peter Schaap ◽  
Edoardo Saccenti ◽  
...  

Genome scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in eleven biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping.


Microbiome ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kees C. H. van der Ark ◽  
Ruben G. A. van Heck ◽  
Vitor A. P. Martins Dos Santos ◽  
Clara Belzer ◽  
Willem M. de Vos

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Yong Kim ◽  
Seung Bum Sohn ◽  
Yu Bin Kim ◽  
Won Jun Kim ◽  
Sang Yup Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document