Rapid sea-level rise and reef back-stepping at the close of the last interglacial highstand

Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 458 (7240) ◽  
pp. 881-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Blanchon ◽  
Anton Eisenhauer ◽  
Jan Fietzke ◽  
Volker Liebetrau
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Last Interglacial

scholarly journals Greenland ice sheet contribution to sea level rise during the last interglacial period: a modelling study driven and constrained by ice core data

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 353-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Quiquet ◽  
C. Ritz ◽  
H. J. Punge ◽  
D. Salas y Mélia
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Ice Core ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Interglacial Period ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Intergovernmental Panel ◽  
Orbital Configuration ◽  
Global Sea Level

Abstract. As pointed out by the forth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC-AR4 (Meehl et al., 2007), the contribution of the two major ice sheets, Antarctica and Greenland, to global sea level rise, is a subject of key importance for the scientific community. By the end of the next century, a 3–5 °C warming is expected in Greenland. Similar temperatures in this region were reached during the last interglacial (LIG) period, 130–115 ka BP, due to a change in orbital configuration rather than to an anthropogenic forcing. Ice core evidence suggests that the Greenland ice sheet (GIS) survived this warm period, but great uncertainties remain about the total Greenland ice reduction during the LIG. Here we perform long-term simulations of the GIS using an improved ice sheet model. Both the methodologies chosen to reconstruct palaeoclimate and to calibrate the model are strongly based on proxy data. We suggest a relatively low contribution to LIG sea level rise from Greenland melting, ranging from 0.7 to 1.5 m of sea level equivalent, contrasting with previous studies. Our results suggest an important contribution of the Antarctic ice sheet to the LIG highstand.

scholarly journals The role of ocean thermal expansion in Last Interglacial sea level rise

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. McKay ◽  
Jonathan T. Overpeck ◽  
Bette L. Otto-Bliesner
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Expansion ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Last Interglacial

scholarly journals Asynchronous Antarctic and Greenland ice-volume contributions to the last interglacial sea-level highstand

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eelco Rohling ◽  
Fiona Hibbert
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Ice Sheets ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Climate Forcing ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Ice Shelf

<p>Sea-level rise is among the greatest risks that arise from anthropogenic global climate change. It is receiving a lot of attention, among others in the IPCC reports, but major questions remain as to the potential contribution from the great continental ice sheets. In recent years, some modelling work has suggested that the ice-component of sea-level rise may be much faster than previously thought, but the rapidity of rise seen in these results depends on inclusion of scientifically debated mechanisms of ice-shelf decay and associated ice-sheet instability. The processes have not been active during historical times, so data are needed from previous warm periods to evaluate whether the suggested rates of sea-level rise are supported by observations or not. Also, we then need to assess which of the ice sheets was most sensitive, and why. The last interglacial (LIG; ~130,000 to ~118,000 years ago, ka) was the last time global sea level rose well above its present level, reaching a highstand of +6 to +9 m or more. Because Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) contributions were smaller than that, this implies substantial Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) contributions. However, this still leaves the timings, magnitudes, and drivers of GrIS and AIS reductions open to debate. I will discuss recently published sea-level reconstructions for the LIG highstand, which reveal that AIS and GrIS contributions were distinctly asynchronous, and that rates of rise to values above 0 m (present-day sea level) reached up to 3.5 m per century. Such high pre-anthropogenic rates of sea-level rise lend credibility to high rates inferred by ice modelling under certain ice-shelf instability parameterisations, for both the past and future. Climate forcing was distinctly asynchronous between the southern and northern hemispheres as well during the LIG, explaining the asynchronous sea-level contributions from AIS and GrIS. Today, climate forcing is synchronous between the two hemispheres, and also faster and greater than during the LIG. Therefore, LIG rates of sea-level rise should likely be considered minimum estimates for the future.</p>

scholarly journals Quantification of the Greenland ice sheet contribution to Last Interglacial sea level rise

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 621-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Stone ◽  
D. J. Lunt ◽  
J. D. Annan ◽  
J. C. Hargreaves
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Ice Cores ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Substantial Contribution ◽  
Interglacial Period ◽  
Last Interglacial

Abstract. During the Last Interglacial period (~ 130–115 thousand years ago) the Arctic climate was warmer than today, and global mean sea level was probably more than 6.6 m higher. However, there are large discrepancies in the estimated contributions to this sea level change from various sources (the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and smaller ice caps). Here, we determine probabilistically the likely contribution of Greenland ice sheet melt to Last Interglacial sea level rise, taking into account ice sheet model parametric uncertainty. We perform an ensemble of 500 Glimmer ice sheet model simulations forced with climatologies from the climate model HadCM3, and constrain the results with palaeodata from Greenland ice cores. Our results suggest a 90% probability that Greenland ice melt contributed at least 0.6 m, but less than 10% probability that it exceeded 3.5 m, a value which is lower than several recent estimates. Many of these previous estimates, however, did not include a full general circulation climate model that can capture atmospheric circulation and precipitation changes in response to changes in insolation forcing and orographic height. Our combined modelling and palaeodata approach suggests that the Greenland ice sheet is less sensitive to orbital forcing than previously thought, and it implicates Antarctic melt as providing a substantial contribution to Last Interglacial sea level rise. Future work should assess additional uncertainty due to inclusion of basal sliding and the direct effect of insolation on surface melt. In addition, the effect of uncertainty arising from climate model structural design should be taken into account by performing a multi-climate-model comparison.

Can the Last Interglacial Constrain Projections of Future Antarctic Ice Mass Loss and Sea-level Rise?

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gilford ◽  
Erica Ashe ◽  
Robert Kopp ◽  
Robert DeConto ◽  
David Pollard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
And Sea Level

scholarly journals Could the Last Interglacial Constrain Projections of Future Antarctic Ice Mass Loss and Sea-level Rise?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gilford ◽  
Erica Ashe ◽  
Robert Kopp ◽  
Robert DeConto ◽  
David Pollard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Loss ◽  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
And Sea Level

Hazard and rates of sea level rise: What can we learn from the last interglacial?

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 072007
Author(s):  
Robert E Kopp ◽  
F J Simons ◽  
A C Maloof ◽  
D Kroon ◽  
S Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Last Interglacial

scholarly journals Melting of Northern Greenland during the last interglacial

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 3517-3539 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Born ◽  
K. H. Nisancioglu
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
Ice Sheet ◽  
Greenland Ice Sheet ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
The South ◽  
High Accumulation ◽  
Positive Feedbacks ◽  
Geological Past

Abstract. The Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) is losing mass at an increasing rate, making it the primary contributor to global eustatic sea level rise. Large melting areas and rapid thinning at its margins has raised concerns about its stability. However, it is conceivable that these observations represent the transient adjustment of the fastest reacting parts of the ice sheet, masking slower processes that dominate the long term fate of the GrIS and its contribution to sea level rise. Studies of the geological past provide valuable information on the long term response of the GrIS to warm periods. We simulate the GrIS during the Eemian interglacial, a period 126 000 yr before present (126 ka) with Arctic temperatures comparable to projections for the end of this century. The northeastern part of the GrIS is unstable and retreats significantly, despite moderate melt rates. Unlike the south and west, strong melting in the northeast is not compensated by high accumulation, or fast ice flow. The analogy with the present warming suggests that in coming decades, positive feedbacks could increase the rate of mass loss of the northeastern GrIS, exceeding the currently observed melting in the south.

The southern North Sea as a natural palaeo-laboratory to reconstruct the coastal response to Last Interglacial sea-level rise

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Barlow ◽  
Victor Cartelle ◽  
Oliver Pollard ◽  
Lauren Gregoire ◽  
Natalya Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level Rise ◽  
Sea Level ◽  
North Sea ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Recent Observation ◽  
Sea Level Change ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Level Change ◽  
Southern North Sea

<p>Current models that project sea-level rise beyond 2100 have large uncertainties because recent observation encompass a too limited range of climate variability to provide robust tests against which to simulate future changes. It is crucial to turn to the geological record where there are large-scale changes in climate, but the current interglacial provides limited evidence for how the Earth-system responds to increased temperatures, and therefore it is necessary to study previous climatically-warm periods. Global temperatures during the Last Interglacial were ~1<sup>o</sup>C warmer than pre-industrial values and 3-5<sup>o</sup>C warmer at polar latitudes, during which time global mean sea level was likely 6-9 m above present. Though the drivers of warming during the Last Interglacial are different to those of today, it is the amplified warming at polar latitudes, the primary locations of the terrestrial ice masses likely to contribute to long term sea-level rise, which makes the Last Interglacial an ideal palaeo-laboratory to understand coastal response to sea-level rise.  However, our understanding of Last Interglacial sea level change is primarily limited to tropical and sub-tropical latitudes and it is important to understand the response of temperate estuarine settings to rising sea level.</p><p>The ERC-funded RISeR project (Rates of Interglacial Sea-level Change, and Responses) focuses on specifically targeting palaeo shorelines buried within the southern North Sea, preserved beyond the limit of the Last Glacial Maximum ice sheets. Buried Last Interglacial sequences in this area provide a valuable record of marine transgression and are being unveiled in new geophysical and geotechnical datasets acquired to support the offshore renewable energy development. This offshore sedimentary archives offer significant advantages over the geomorphologically restricted onshore records allowing us to trace the transgression over a much large area, and should capture the earliest flooding of the Last Interglacial North Sea basin, when the far-field data suggests ice sheet melt was at it maximum. By integrating the already available datasets with newly acquired samples as part of the project, we aim to develop new palaeoenvironmental reconstructions of the Last Interglacial sea-level change from northwest Europe, providing the first chronological constraints on timing, and therefore rates. This has the potential to allow us to ‘fingerprint’ the source of melt (Greenland and/or Antarctica) during the interglacial sea-level highstand.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document