scholarly journals Stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after lenalidomide induction therapy

Leukemia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1627-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Cavallo ◽  
S Bringhen ◽  
G Milone ◽  
D Ben-Yehuda ◽  
A Nagler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Prognostic Value of Bone Marrow Angiogenesis in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3321-3321
Author(s):  
Olga Pokrovskaya ◽  
Larisa Mendeleeva ◽  
Irina Kaplanskaya ◽  
Elena Parovichnikova ◽  
Sergei Kulikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract BACKGROUND. Angiogenesis is a constant hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) progression. It has also been reported that bone marrow angiogenesis is a predictive factor of poor survival in newly diagnosed myeloma. The aim of the current study was to investigate the dynamics of bone marrow (BM) microvessel density (MVD) in patients undergoing high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS. 36 patients with newly diagnosed MM (22 in stage II and 14 in stage III according to Salmon and Durie) were included in the study – 21 male and 15 female, median age – 51 ys (range 31–67). All patients underwent HDT that included 3–4 cycles of induction therapy (VAD), stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2 and G-CSF 5 mcg/kg, EDAP and single or tandem ASCT with melphalan 200 mg/ m2. The BM biopsies for histological and immunohistochemical analysis were performed at the time of diagnosis, after induction, after stem cell mobilization before the 1st ASCT and after the end of therapy (5 times during the treatment). The Control group consisted of normal BM donors (7 male and 3 female, median age 29, (17–59)) who underwent BM biopsy during BM harvesting for alloBMT. Blood vessels were highlighted by immunostaining of endothelial cells with a monoclonal antibody to CD34 (Novocastra Lab Ltd). The MVD was calculated in 10 fields using an 40x objective and 16x ocular lens. RESULTS. At diagnosis in all MM pts, MVD was extremely high compared to normal donors (152±8 vs 74±4). A significant decrease of BM MVD was observed after each phase of therapy: after the induction therapy the MVD was 124±6; before the 1st ASCT – 109±5 and at the end of treatment – 97±3. There was a statistically significant increase of MVD after stem cell mobilization due to G-CSF (143±4). Although there was a marked decrease of BM MVD in MM pts with CR or VGPR, it nevertheless stayed significantly higher compared with control group (p<0,001). The analysis of probability of CR or VGPR duration after ASCT according to MVD at different phases of therapy showed that MVD at diagnosis and before the 1-st ASCT are important prognostic factors. Probability of duration of CR or VGPR was 63% in group with low MVD before the 1st ASCT compared with 15% in group with high MVD (p<0,02). MVD was revealed to be more powerful prognostic factor for progression free survival (PFS) then CR or VGPR achievement. CONCLUSION. BM angiogenesis is increased in patients with MM. BM MVD is decreased during and after treatment however even after the completion of HDT and ASCT, the MVD is higher then in the normal control group. There is a statistically significant increase of MVD after stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. MVD at the time of diagnosis and before the 1-st ASCT are important prognostic factors for overall-survival and PFS after ASCT. MVD before the 1-st ASCT appears to be a more powerful prognostic factor for PFS then remission rate.

Cytopenia at Diagnosis Impairs Stem Cell Mobilization Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5828-5828
Author(s):  
Selami Kocak Toprak ◽  
Atilla Uslu ◽  
Erden Atilla ◽  
Pervin Topcuoglu ◽  
Gunhan Gurman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: The GIMEMA group has recently developed a risk score predicting mobilization failure (Musto et al, EHA 2014). The risk score included age, cytopenia at diagnosis, induction therapy and their toxicity. In this study we aimed to evaluate the impact of these factors on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization among patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and methods: 125 newly diagnosed patients with MM (M: 76, F: 49) planned for autologous stem cell transplantation; median age 58 years (range, 30-67) were included in the analysis. This retrospective study examined the impact of age (> 60 years), gender of the patients, cytopenia (Hb<10 gr/dL, absolute neutrophil count < 1x109/L, thrombocyte count < 100x109/L) at diagnosis, and severe hematological toxicity during induction therapy, the type of induction and mobilization methods, the presence of neuropathy, comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension and renal failure (creatinine > 2 mg/dL), and the use of beta blocker drugs. Patients with CD34+ levels of <20/μL in peripheral blood at maximum stimulation were considered to be Poor Mobilizers. The total amount of PBSC <5x106/kg after a single mobilization procedure was defined as sub-optimal collection. Poor mobilization was observed in only two patients (<2x106/kg). Statistics: Comparison of categorical variables was evaluated by chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Nominal variables were compared with non-parametrical test, Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal Wallis test. P value below as 0.05 was accepted as significance. Results: Optimal mobilization with median two apheresis (1-4) sessions for PBSC was obtained in 85.6% of the patients (n=107). Median CD34+ cells in this group were 8.33x106/kg (5-27x106/kg). The presence of cytopenia at diagnosis was the only significantly detrimental factor on mobilization (90% vs 77.1%, p=0.04). When the patients was scored in four groups as having single or combined variables (age, cytopenia at the diagnosis or during induction therapy), we were not able to develop a risk score. Conclusions: In our experience, 14.4% of the myeloma patients showed suboptimal or poor mobilization. Use of bortezomib, age, presence of neurotoxicity or hematological toxicity at mobilization did not significantly impair mobilization. We were able to confirm only cytopenia at diagnosis, from the four factors reported by Musto et al, as a detrimental factor impairing the stem cell mobilization. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib Plus Melphalan and Prednisone as Induction Prior to Transplant or as Frontline Therapy for Non-Transplant Candidates in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3325-3325
Author(s):  
Cristina Gasparetto ◽  
Jon P Gockerman ◽  
Louis F Diehl ◽  
Carlos de Castro ◽  
Joseph O Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Frontline Therapy ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract High-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) aged ≤65 years. Melphalan–prednisone (MP)-based therapy is the standard for non-ASCT candidates but is not typically used for transplant-eligible patients as prolonged therapy with melphalan can adversely affect stem cell collection. The phase 3 VISTA study demonstrated the superior efficacy of bortezomib plus MP (VMP) versus MP in previously untreated MM patients ineligible for ASCT. In this phase 2 study, we evaluated the efficacy of a shorter course of VMP on a different treatment schedule as induction therapy prior to ASCT or as frontline therapy in non- ASCT candidates. Patients aged ≥18 years with previously untreated MM received up to six 28-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV, days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus oral melphalan 6 mg/m2 and oral prednisone 60 mg/m2, days 1–7. After 2–6 cycles, ASCT-eligible patients could proceed to stem cell mobilization (G-CSF 10 mg/kg/day ± GM-CSF 250 mg/m2/ day or cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 + GM-CSF) and conditioning with melphalan 200 mg/ m2 (140 mg/m2 if aged >65 years). Response was assessed every two cycles and post- ASCT by International Uniform Response Criteria. The primary end point was complete response (CR) rate to VMP. A total of 45 patients were enrolled; 27 were male. Median age was 63 years (range 33–75). MM subtype was 67% IgG, 16% IgA, and 9% each κ- and λ- light-chain; 37% of patients had ISS Stage III MM, 22% had ECOG performance status >1, and 70% had ≥40% plasma cells in bone marrow. In total, 20 patients proceeded to ASCT. Median duration of VMP was 4 cycles in both non-ASCT (range 1–6) and ASCT (range 2–6) patients. Response rate (best response) to VMP was 95% (42 of 44 evaluable patients), including 9% stringent CR (sCR), 9% CR (18% ≥CR [95% CI: 7%, 30%]), 27% very good partial response (VGPR), and 50% partial response (PR). Best response was achieved after cycle 2 in 10 patients, cycle 4 in 25 patients, and cycle 6 in 7 patients. All 20 ASCT patients had successful stem cell mobilization; median yield of CD34+ cells/ kg was 5.6 x 106 (range 2.3–12.2 x 106), in a median of 2 collection days. Post-transplant responses were 10% sCR, 20% CR, 55% VGPR, and 5% PR; the remaining 2 patients need further follow-up for response assessment. Response improved post-VMP to post-ASCT in 10 patients (6 PR to VGPR, 2 PR to CR, 2 VGPR to CR). After median follow-up of 14.0 months (range 7.4–47.7) and 14.6 months (range 8.2–42.9) in non-ASCT and ASCT patients, respectively, both median time to progression and progression-free survival were 19.8 months (95% CI: 14.3 months, not estimable [NE]) in non-ASCT patients and 27.9 months (95% CI: 14.6 months, NE) in ASCT patients. A total of 7 patients (5 non- ASCT, 2 ASCT) have died; 1-year survival rate was 82% (95% CI: 59%, 93%) in non- ASCT patients and 95% (95% CI: 69%, 99%) in ASCT patients. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events in all 45 patients during VMP therapy included peripheral neuropathy (24%), thrombocytopenia (20%), neutropenia (18%), and infection (9%). Only 1 patient had deep-vein thrombosis. In conclusion, VMP represents a highly effective therapy for previously untreated MM, with 45% of patients achieving VGPR or better, including 18% sCR/CR. Toxicities were predictable and generally manageable. Short-course VMP therapy did not negatively impact stem cell mobilization, supporting its use as induction therapy prior to ASCT. Very high post-transplant response rates were seen, with 85% of patients achieving ≥VGPR, including 30% sCR/CR. Since achievement of CR/VGPR is associated with improved long-term outcomes in MM, the preliminary outcome data presented here appear promising; however, longer follow-up is required.

Cyclophosphamide Overcomes the Suppressive Effect of LenalidomideTherapy on Stem Cell Collection in Preparation for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3024-3024
Author(s):  
Tomer Mark ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
Roger N. Pearse ◽  
Jessica Stern ◽  
Jessica Furst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Multiple Myeloma (MM) therapy has evolved over recent years to include powerful new therapeutic agents. The goal for most patients with MM, however, still remains high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantations as this procedure has been proven to have a therapeutic benefit. Therefore, the selection of an induction therapy must take into consideration the potential impact on the ability to collect enough stem cells for future transplantation. Recent studies have discussed difficulty in collecting stem cells in patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction therapy using filgastrim (G-CSF) in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in MM. It also has been recommended that the duration of lenalidomide induction therapy be limited to 4–6 cycles, since longer treatment time can hinder collection yields. We sought to determine if the addition of cyclophosphamide (CTX) to G-CSF as a mobilization regimen could rescue the ability to collect adequate stem cells for at least two autologous stem cell transplants for patients who had induction therapy with the BiRD (Biaxin® [clarithromycin]/Revlimid® [lenalidomide]/dexamethasone) regimen. BiRD therapy is as follows for each 28-day cycle: Clarithromycin 500mg po BID for days 1–28, Lenalidomide 25mg po daily for days 1–21, and Dexamethasone 40mg po weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 21. All patients had either Stage II or III MM by Salmon-Durie criteria and were treatment naïve. Patients were advised to undergo stem cell collection after either maximum disease response or disease plateau had been achieved. Prior to stem cell mobilization, BiRD therapy was held for a minimum of 14 days. Stem cell collection was performed after either G-CSF alone at a dose 10 mcg/kg/day for 5–10 consecutive days until a total of 10 × 106/kg CD34+ stem cells had been collected or with the addition of cyclophosphamide (CTX) at a dose of 3g/m2 once prior to the initiation of G-CSF therapy. A total of 28 patients underwent stem cell collection. Stem cell mobilization was attempted with G-CSF alone in 9 instances and with CTX+G-CSF in 20 instances (1 patient underwent mobilization with both G-CSF alone and CTX+G-CSF). In comparison to the G-CSF monotherapy, CTX+G-CSF yielded a significantly greater stem cell collection (mean CD34+ cells collected: 3.78 × 106/kg vs. 32.33 × 106/kg, P < 0.0001). Only 33% of patients who attempted stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone obtained sufficient CD34+ cell yield vs. 100% of the patients mobilized with CTX+G-CSF (P < 0.0001). The extent of BiRD therapy prior to stem cell mobilization ranged from 2–27 cycles. The number of cycles of BiRD did not significantly impact the success rate of stem cell collection (P = 0.14). In conclusion, the patients mobilized with CTX+G-CSF had a higher number of CD34+ cells collected and were all able collect enough stem cells for two autologous transplants. There was no association with the duration of BiRD therapy and successful CD34+ cell collection. We therefore recommend continuing lenalidomide-based induction therapy until desired tumor reduction goal is achieved and using the CTX in addition to G-CSF to ensure successful stem cell harvest prior to autologous transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document