Ethics and professionalism education during neonatal–perinatal fellowship training in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 875-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Cummings ◽  
G M Geis ◽  
J C Kesselheim ◽  
S Sayeed
2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Patwardhan ◽  
Michael Henrickson ◽  
Laura Laskosz ◽  
Sandy DuyenHong ◽  
Charles H Spencer

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 609-616.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindy H. Landzaat ◽  
Michael D. Barnett ◽  
Gary T. Buckholz ◽  
Jillian L. Gustin ◽  
Jennifer M. Hwang ◽  
...  

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Greenbaum ◽  
Robert S. Dobrin ◽  
Eric Rackow ◽  
Henning Pontoppidan ◽  
Robert F. Wilson

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Hamidian Jahromi ◽  
Alisa Arnautovic ◽  
Petros Konofaos

UNSTRUCTURED The current COVID-19 pandemic has vastly impacted the health care system in the United States, and it is continuing to dictate its unprecedented influence on the education systems, especially the residency and fellowship training programs. The impact of COVID-19 on these training programs has not been uniform across the board, with plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs among the hardest hit specialties. Implementation of social distancing regulations has affected departmental educational activities, including preoperative, morbidity and mortality conferences and journal clubs; operating room educational activities; as well as the overall education of plastic surgery trainees in the United States. Almost all elective and semielective surgeries across the United States were suspended for a few months during the COVID-19 pandemic; this constitutes a significant portion of plastic surgery cases. Considering the current staged reopening policies, it may be a long time, if ever, before restrictions are completely lifted. In this paper, we review the multidimensional impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic on the training programs of plastic surgery residents and fellows in the United States and worldwide, along with some potential solutions on how to address existing challenges.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194589242110547
Author(s):  
David C. Moffatt ◽  
Andrew M. Ferry ◽  
Jared M. Stuart ◽  
Jesse D. Supernaw ◽  
Alex E. Wright ◽  
...  

Background Scholarly productivity and research output vary among different subspecialties. The h-index was developed as a more wholesome metric that measures an author's contribution to literature. Objective Through a web-based cross-sectional analysis, we investigated the differences in scholarly impact and influence of both fellowship and nonfellowship-trained academic otolaryngologists in the United States. A secondary objective was to further understand the output among the larger fellowship fields. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was performed for active faculty otolaryngologists. A total of 1704 otolaryngologists were identified as faculty in residency training programs across the United States. Their h-index and publication data were gathered using the Scopus database. The data were obtained in August 2019 and analysis occurred in January 2020. Results Head and neck surgical faculty (25.5%) had the highest representation with fellowship experience. Among all faculty, there was no statistical difference in the overall average h-index scores when comparing faculty that had fellowship training with those who did not (12.6 and 12.1, respectively, P = .498). Rhinologists had the highest publication output per year at 3.90. Among fellowship-trained faculty, the highest average h-index and total publications were seen in head & neck surgery, while facial plastics had the lowest averages ( P < .001). Conclusions In this study, fellowship-trained faculty had a greater but not significant scholarly impact than nonfellowship faculty. Furthermore, there were significant variations in output among the various subspecialties of otolaryngology. Growing fields, as academic rhinology, are continuing to flourish in robust research productivity and output. This study further demonstrates the potential, growing influence of fellowship training on research involvement and academic advancement within the otolaryngology subspecialties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document