scholarly journals Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Hybrid Scanner Imaging of Cerebral Blood Flow Using 15O-Water Positron Emission Tomography and Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Newborn Piglets

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1703-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie B Andersen ◽  
William S Henning ◽  
Ulrich Lindberg ◽  
Claes N Ladefoged ◽  
Liselotte Højgaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Arterial Spin Labeling ◽  
Input Function ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Newborn Piglets ◽  
Positron Emission

Abnormality in cerebral blood flow (CBF) distribution can lead to hypoxic–ischemic cerebral damage in newborn infants. The aim of the study was to investigate minimally invasive approaches to measure CBF by comparing simultaneous 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and single TI pulsed arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MR) on a hybrid PET/MR in seven newborn piglets. Positron emission tomography was performed with IV injections of 20 MBq and 100 MBq 15O-water to confirm CBF reliability at low activity. Cerebral blood flow was quantified using a one-tissue-compartment-model using two input functions: an arterial input function (AIF) or an image-derived input function (IDIF). The mean global CBF (95% CI) PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL at baseline were 27 (23; 32), 34 (31; 37), and 27 (22; 32) mL/100 g per minute, respectively. At acetazolamide stimulus, PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 64 (55; 74), 76 (70; 83) and 79 (67; 92) mL/100 g per minute, respectively. At baseline, differences between PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 22% ( P < 0.0001) and −0.7% ( P = 0.9). At acetazolamide, differences between PET-AIF, PET-IDIF, and ASL were 19% ( P = 0.001) and 24% ( P = 0.0003). In conclusion, PET-IDIF overestimated CBF. Injected activity of 20 MBq 15O-water had acceptable concordance with 100 MBq, without compromising image quality. Single TI ASL was questionable for regional CBF measurements. Global ASL CBF and PET CBF were congruent during baseline but not during hyperperfusion.

scholarly journals Comparison of Cerebral Blood Flow Acquired by Simultaneous [15O]Water Positron Emission Tomography and Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1373-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke Zhang ◽  
Hans Herzog ◽  
Jörg Mauler ◽  
Christian Filss ◽  
Thomas W Okell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Arterial Spin Labeling ◽  
Spin Labeling ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission

Until recently, no direct comparison between [15O]water positron emission tomography (PET) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF) was possible. With the introduction of integrated, hybrid magnetic resonance (MR)-PET scanners, such a comparison becomes feasible. This study presents results of CBF measurements recorded simultaneously with [15O]water and ASL. A 3T MR-BrainPET scanner was used for the simultaneous acquisition of pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and [15O]water PET. Quantitative CBF values were compared in 10 young healthy male volunteers at baseline conditions. A statistically significant ( P<0.05) correlation was observed between the two modalities; the whole-brain CBF values determined with PET and pCASL were 43.3 ±6.1 mL and 51.9 ± 7.1 mL per 100 g per minute, respectively. The gray/white matter (GM/WM) ratio of CBF was 3.0 for PET and 3.4 for pCASL. A paired t-test revealed differences in regional CBF between ASL and PET with higher ASL-CBF than PET-CBF values in cortical areas. Using an integrated, hybrid MR-PET a direct simultaneous comparison between ASL and [15O]water PET became possible for the first time so that temporal, physiologic, and functional variations were avoided. Regional and individual differences were found despite the overall similarity between ASL and PET, requiring further detailed investigations.

scholarly journals Absolute Cerebral Blood Flow and Blood Volume Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bolus Tracking: Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography Values

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Østergaard ◽  
Donald F. Smith ◽  
Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen ◽  
SørenB. Hansen ◽  
Antony D. Gee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Blood Volume ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
O 15

The authors determined cerebral blood flow (CBF) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of contrast agent bolus passage and compared the results with those obtained by O-15 labeled water (H215O) and positron emission tomography (PET). Six pigs were examined by MRI and PET under normo- and hypercapnic conditions. After dose normalization and introduction of an empirical constant ΦGd, absolute regional CBF was calculated from MRI. The spatial resolution and the signal-to-noise ratio of CBF measurements by MRI were better than by the H215O-PET protocol. Magnetic resonance imaging cerebral blood volume (CBV) estimates obtained using this normalization constant correlated well with values obtained by O-15 labeled carbonmonooxide (C15O) PET. However, PET CBV values were approximately 2.5 times larger than absolute MRI CBV values, supporting the hypothesized sensitivity of MRI to small vessels.

scholarly journals Comparison of cerebral blood flow measurement with [15O]-water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 842-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey P Fan ◽  
Hesamoddin Jahanian ◽  
Samantha J Holdsworth ◽  
Greg Zaharchuk
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Arterial Spin Labeling ◽  
Brain Perfusion ◽  
Spin Labeling ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Positron Emission

Noninvasive imaging of cerebral blood flow provides critical information to understand normal brain physiology as well as to identify and manage patients with neurological disorders. To date, the reference standard for cerebral blood flow measurements is considered to be positron emission tomography using injection of the [15O]-water radiotracer. Although [15O]-water has been used to study brain perfusion under normal and pathological conditions, it is not widely used in clinical settings due to the need for an on-site cyclotron, the invasive nature of arterial blood sampling, and experimental complexity. As an alternative, arterial spin labeling is a promising magnetic resonance imaging technique that magnetically labels arterial blood as it flows into the brain to map cerebral blood flow. As arterial spin labeling becomes more widely adopted in research and clinical settings, efforts have sought to standardize the method and validate its cerebral blood flow values against positron emission tomography-based cerebral blood flow measurements. The purpose of this work is to critically review studies that performed both [15O]-water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling to measure brain perfusion, with the aim of better understanding the accuracy and reproducibility of arterial spin labeling relative to the positron emission tomography reference standard.

scholarly journals Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Bolus Tracking: Comparison with [15O]H2O Positron Emission Tomography in Humans

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Østergaard ◽  
Peter Johannsen ◽  
Peter Høst-Poulsen ◽  
Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen ◽  
Helle Asboe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Cerebral Blood Flow ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Flow Measurements ◽  
Bolus Tracking ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Blood Flow Measurements

In six young, healthy volunteers, a novel method to determine cerebral blood flow (CBF) using magnetic resonance (MR) bolus tracking was compared with [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET). The method yielded parametric CBF images with tissue contrast in good agreement with parametric PET CBF images. Introducing a common conversion factor, MR CBF values could be converted into absolute flow rates, allowing comparison of CBF values among normal subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document