scholarly journals Effect of pharmaceutical treatment on vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1443-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Etminan ◽  
Mervyn DI Vergouwen ◽  
Don Ilodigwe ◽  
R Loch Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Methodological Problems

As it is often assumed that delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is caused by vasospasm, clinical trials often focus on prevention of vasospasm with the aim to improve clinical outcome. However, the role of vasospasm in the pathogenesis of DCI and clinical outcome is possibly smaller than previously assumed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on all randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that studied the effect of pharmaceutical preventive strategies on vasospasm, DCI, and clinical outcome in SAH patients to further investigate the relationship between vasospasm and clinical outcome. Effect sizes were expressed in pooled risk ratio (RR) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 14 studies randomizing 4,235 patients were included. Despite a reduction of vasospasm (RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.92)), no statistically significant effect on poor outcome was observed (RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.03)). The variety of DCI definitions did not justify pooling the DCI data. We conclude that pharmaceutical treatments have significantly decreased the incidence of vasospasm, but not of poor clinical outcome. This dissociation between vasospasm and clinical outcome could result from methodological problems, sample size, insensitivity of clinical outcome measures, or from mechanisms other than vasospasm that also contribute to poor outcome.

scholarly journals Vasospasm on transcranial Doppler is predictive of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 1257-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyanendra Kumar ◽  
Reza Bavarsad Shahripour ◽  
Mark R. Harrigan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
The Impact

OBJECT The impact of transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography evidence of vasospasm on patient-centered clinical outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is unknown. Vasospasm is known to lead to delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the predictive value of vasospasm on DCI, as diagnosed on TCD. METHODS MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane trial register, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched through September 2014 using key words and the terms “subarachnoid hemorrhage,” “aneurysm,” “aneurysmal,” “cerebral vasospasm,” “vasospasm,” “transcranial Doppler,” and “TCD.” Sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were pooled by a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. RESULTS Seventeen studies (n = 2870 patients) met inclusion criteria. The amount of variance attributable to heterogeneity was significant (I2 > 50%) for all syntheses. No studies reported the impact of TCD evidence of vasospasm on functional outcome or mortality. TCD evidence of vasospasm was found to be highly predictive of DCI. Pooled estimates for TCD diagnosis of vasospasm (for DCI) were sensitivity 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77%–96%), specificity 71% (95% CI 51%–84%), positive predictive value 57% (95% CI 38%–71%), and negative predictive value 92% (95% CI 83%–96%). CONCLUSIONS TCD evidence of vasospasm is predictive of DCI with high accuracy. Although high sensitivity and negative predictive value make TCD an ideal monitoring device, it is not a mandated standard of care in aSAH due to the paucity of evidence on clinically relevant outcomes, despite recommendation by national guidelines. High-quality randomized trials evaluating the impact of TCD monitoring on patient-centered and physician-relevant outcomes are needed.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Shi ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Qing-wen Tang ◽  
Ling-fei Xiao ◽  
Zu-han Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Poor Outcome

The neutrophil–to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as an essential systemic inflammation factor, has been widely used as a prognostic indicator in various diseases, such as malignant tumors, cardiovascular disease, and intracranial hemorrhage. An increasing number of studies have believed that NLR is a valuable predictor of prognosis for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, these results remain controversial. In the current study, we planned to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between NLR and poor outcome, and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). We carried out a comprehensive search for published literatures on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 1, 2021. We conducted an assessment of all included studies based on the principles proposed in the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Poor outcome and the occurrence of DCI were considered as the main outcome measure. We calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) to examine the strength of the association of NLR with poor outcome or the occurrence of DCI. We strictly selected a total of 10 studies comprising 4,989 patients. Nine studies reported the association between NLR and poor outcome, and five studies reported the association between NLR and the occurrence of DCI. The pooled results indicated higher NLR was significantly associated with both poorer outcomes (OR = 1.32, 95%CI 1.11–1.57; P = 0.002, I2 = 87%), and the occurrence of DCI (OR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.22–2.41; P = 0.002, I2 = 82%) in aSAH patients. The NLR is a valuable indicator of inflammation to independently predict poor outcome and occurrence of DCI after aSAH, where a higher NLR is significantly associated with poor outcomes and occurrence of DCI. These findings suggest that the NLR can help clinicians evaluate the prognosis and identify potentially severe patients early, which may contribute to better management and improve poor prognosis of aSAH patients.

Antiplatelet therapy and delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
M. Harrison Snyder ◽  
Natasha Ironside ◽  
Jeyan S. Kumar ◽  
Kevin T. Doan ◽  
Ryan T. Kellogg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Symptomatic Vasospasm ◽  
Increased Risk

OBJECTIVE Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a potentially preventable cause of morbidity and mortality after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The authors performed a meta-analysis to assess the effect of antiplatelet therapy (APT) on DCI in patients with aSAH. METHODS A systematic review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed. Study inclusion criteria were 1) ≥ 5 aSAH patients; 2) direct comparison between aSAH management with APT and without APT; and 3) reporting of DCI, angiographic, or symptomatic vasospasm rates for patients treated with versus without APT. The primary efficacy outcome was DCI. The outcomes of the APT versus no-APT cohorts were compared. Bias was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS The overall cohort comprised 2039 patients from 15 studies. DCI occurred less commonly in the APT compared with the no-APT cohort (pooled = 15.9% vs 28.6%; OR 0.47, p < 0.01). Angiographic (pooled = 51.6% vs 68.7%; OR 0.46, p < 0.01) and symptomatic (pooled = 23.6% vs 37.7%; OR 0.51, p = 0.01) vasospasm rates were lower in the APT cohort. In-hospital mortality (pooled = 1.7% vs 4.1%; OR 0.53, p = 0.01) and functional dependence (pooled = 21.0% vs 35.7%; OR 0.53, p < 0.01) rates were also lower in the APT cohort. Bleeding event rates were comparable between the two cohorts. Subgroup analysis of cilostazol monotherapy compared with no APT demonstrated a lower DCI rate in the cilostazol cohort (pooled = 10.6% vs 28.1%; OR 0.31, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis of surgically treated aneurysms demonstrated a lower DCI rate for the APT cohort (pooled = 18.4% vs 33.9%; OR 0.43, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS APT is associated with improved outcomes in aSAH without an increased risk of bleeding events, particularly in patients who underwent surgical aneurysm repair and those treated with cilostazol. Although study heterogeneity is the most significant limitation of the analysis, the findings suggest that APT is worth exploring in patients with aSAH, particularly in a randomized controlled trial setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document