scholarly journals A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser

Eye ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A Vernon ◽  
Harry A Quigley
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Field Screening ◽  
Field Analyser

scholarly journals Visual Defects Associated with Vigabatrin: A Study of Epileptic Argentine Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Cecilia Moreno ◽  
Brenda Giagante ◽  
Patricia Saidon ◽  
Silvia Kochen ◽  
Jorge Benozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Antiepileptic Drug ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Screening Strategy ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Automated Perimetry ◽  
Field Screening ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Visual Defects ◽  
Field Defects

ABSTRACT:Objective:The aim of the present study was to assess visual alterations in a population of Argentine patients treated with the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin.Methods:Twenty patients receiving vigabatrin and 15 patients receiving carbamazepine were examined with automated perimetry using a Humphrey 120-point full screening strategy. In addition, scotopic flash electroretinograms were performed.Results:Of 20 patients treated with vigabatrin, two were unable to cooperate with testing. Of the remaining 18 patients, all but two showed at least one non-detected point inside the central 40° of the visual field of each eye. Of the 15 carbamazepine-treated patients, three were unable to perform the study. None of the remaining 12 patients showed visual field defects. Both a- and b-wave amplitudes of the scotopic electroretinogram were significantly reduced in 12 patients receiving vigabatrin.Conclusions:Visual field defects among patients on vigabatrin therapy may occur with a higher frequency than previously recognized. The Humphrey 120-points full field screening test and electroretinography are useful tools to assess the visual dysfunction associated with vigabatrin.

Fastpac visual field screening

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan M. Young ◽  
Julian L. Rait ◽  
Cathy A. Carson ◽  
Hugh R. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Screening

Comparing the usefulness of a new algorithm to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression in glaucoma patients, in comparison to the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm

2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-318304
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Murata ◽  
Ryo Asaoka ◽  
Yuri Fujino ◽  
Masato Matsuura ◽  
Kazunori Hirasawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Variational Bayes ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Test Duration ◽  
Field Analyser ◽  
Measurement Duration ◽  
Measurement Algorithm ◽  
Thresholding Algorithm

Background/aimsWe previously reported that the visual field (VF) prediction model using the variational Bayes linear regression (VBLR) is useful for accurately predicting VF progression in glaucoma (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014, 2018). We constructed a VF measurement algorithm using VBLR, and the purpose of this study was to investigate its usefulness.Method122 eyes of 73 patients with open-angle glaucoma were included in the current study. VF measurement was performed using the currently proposed VBLR programme with AP-7700 perimetry (KOWA). VF measurements were also conducted using the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) standard programme with Humphrey field analyser. VF measurements were performed using the 24–2 test grid. Visual sensitivities, test–retest reproducibility and measurement duration were compared between the two algorithms.ResultMean mean deviation (MD) values with SITA standard were −7.9 and −8.7 dB (first and second measurements), whereas those with VBLR-VF were −8.2 and −8.0 dB, respectively. There were no significant differences across these values. The correlation coefficient of MD values between the 2 algorithms was 0.97 or 0.98. Test–retest reproducibility did not differ between the two algorithms. Mean measurement duration with SITA standard was 6 min and 02 s or 6 min and 00 s (first or second measurement), whereas a significantly shorter duration was associated with VBLR-VF (5 min and 23 s or 5 min and 30 s).ConclusionVBLR-VF reduced test duration while maintaining the same accuracy as the SITA-standard.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document